Patient assessment within the context of healthcare delivery packages: A comparative analysis

BackgroundDue to an increased focus on productivity and cost-effectiveness, many countries across the world have implemented a variety of tools for standardizing diagnostics and treatment. In Denmark, healthcare delivery packages are increasingly used for assessment of patients. A package is a tool for creating coordination, continuity and efficient pathways; each step is pre-booked, and the package has a well-defined content within a predefined category of diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate how assessment processes took place within the context of healthcare delivery packages.MethodsThe study used a constructivist Grounded Theory approach. Ethnographic fieldwork was carried out in three specialized units: a mental health unit and two multiple sclerosis clinics in Southern Denmark, which all used assessment packages. Several types of data were sampled through theoretical sampling. Participant observation was conducted for a total of 126 h. Formal and informal interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals and 13 patients. Furthermore, audio recordings were made of 9 final consultations between physicians and patients; 193 min of recorded consultations all in all. Lastly, the medical records of 13 patients and written information about packages were collected. The comparative, abductive analysis focused on the process of assessment and the work made by all the actors involved. In this paper, we emphasized the work of healthcare professionals.ResultsWe constructed five interrelated categories: 1. “Standardized assessing”, 2. “Flexibility”, which has two sub-categories, 2.1. “Diagnostic options” and 2.2. “Time and organization”, and, finally, 3. “Resisting the frames”. The process of assessment required all participants to perform the predefined work in the specified way at the specified time. Multidisciplinary teamwork was essential for the success of the process. The local organization of the packages influenced the assessment process, most notably the pre-defined scope of relevant diseases targeted by the package. The inflexible frames of the assessment package could cause resistance among clinicians. Moreover, expert knowledge was an important factor for the efficiency of the process. Some types of organizational work processes resulted in many patients being assessed, but without being diagnosed with at package-relevant disease.ConclusionLimiting the grounds for using specialist knowledge in structured health care delivery may affect specialists’ sense of professional autonomy and can result in professionals employing strategies to resist the frames of the packages. Finally, when organizing healthcare delivery packages, it seems important to consider how to make the optimal use of specialist knowledge.     

The Montana Adaptive Equipment Project:

A statewide service delivery project which provides specialized adaptive equipment to multi-handicapped persons living in rural communities is described. In addition to client consultation regarding motor programs, the adaptive equipment project provided specialized equipment such as adaptive chairs, standing and walking aids, feeding utensils, bathing aids, etc. to handicapped client of all ages. Services were delivered via an itinerant approach and relied on parents and others in the community as primary intervention agents. The project is viewed as an important activity in maintaining recently deinstitutionalized clients in community settings.     

A comparison of function after limb salvage with non-invasive expandable or modular prostheses in children

BackgroundModular and non-invasive expandable prostheses have been developed to provide a functional knee joint that allows future expansion as growth occurs in the contralateral extremity in children with bone sarcomas that require removal of the growth plate. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of paediatric patients who received either a non-invasive expandable or modular prosthesis for bone sarcomas arising around the knee.MethodsWe evaluated clinician-reported, patient-reported and measured function in 42 paediatric patients at least one year (median age at assessment 19.1 years) after limb salvage surgery, and compared patients who received modular system prostheses (N = 29, median age 15.5), who did not require lengthening procedures to those who received non-invasive expandable prostheses (N = 13, median age 11.1) requiring lengthening procedures (median 5).ResultsThe number of revisions and time to first revision did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups in total scores on the Enneking Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scale, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Scale, and the Functional Mobility Assessment. Children with non-invasive expandable prostheses climbed stairs (11.93 ± 4.83 versus 16.73 ± 7.24 s, p = 0.02) in less time than those with modular prostheses.ConclusionOur results suggest that the non-invasive expandable prosthesis produces similar functional results to the more traditional modular prosthesis.     

以症状为主线的教学模式在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科规范化培训教学中的应用

耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师规范化培训教学对临床思维的要求日益提高,传统以理论授课为主的教学模式难以使学生对耳鼻咽喉头颈外科形成系统的临床思维,本文探讨了“以症状为主线,充分培养临床思维”的教学模式在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科基地住院医师规范化培训培养中的应用及心得体会.     

Recognition of the critically ill patient and escalation of therapy

Critical illness often involves multiple organ failures and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the vast majority of patients, there is a recognizable period of physiological deterioration which heralds the development of organ failure and critical illness. Despite efforts to improve the detection and management of critical illness, signs of deterioration are often missed and decisions to move patients to critical care units are delayed. Standardized approaches which implement an effective ‘chain of response’ are now utilized worldwide. They focus on attempting to reduce the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) such as in-hospital cardiac arrest and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission using preventative measures. These systems should include: accurate recording and documentation of vital signs, recognition and interpretation of abnormal values, rapid bedside patient assessment by trained teams and appropriate interventions. Early warning systems (EWS) are an important part of this and can help identify patients at risk of deterioration and SAEs. Assessment of the critically ill patient should be undertaken by an appropriately trained clinician and follow a structured ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure) format. This facilitates correction of life-threatening problems by priority and provides a standardized communication framework between professionals. Lastly, timely support and input from members of the critical care team are vital to ensure optimal outcomes for critically ill patients.     

Nutrition assessment in patients undergoing liver transplant

Liver transplantation (LT) is a major surgery performed on patients with end stage liver disease. Nutrition is an integral part of patient care, and protein-energy malnutrition is almost universally present in patients suffering from liver disease undergoing LT. Nutrition assessment of preliver transplant phase helps to make a good nutrition care plan for the patients. Nutrition status has been associated with various factors which are related to the success of liver transplant such as morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. To assess the nutritional status of preliver transplant patients, combinations of nutrition assessment methods should be used like subjective global assessment, Anthropometry mid arm-muscle circumference, Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and handgrip strength.     

The effect of oral appliances that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

Oral appliances (OAs) have demonstrated efficacy in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but many different OA devices are available. The Japanese Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine supported the use of OAs that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening and suggested an evaluation of their effects in comparison with untreated or CPAP. A systematic search was undertaken in 16 April 2012. The outcome measures of interest were as follows: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest SpO₂, arousal index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the SF‐36 Health Survey. We performed this meta‐analysis using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Five studies remained eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Comparing OA and control appliance, OA significantly reduced the weighted mean difference (WMD) in both AHI and the arousal index (favouring OA, AHI: ?7·05 events h^?1; 95% CI, ?12·07 to ?2·03; P = 0·006, arousal index: ?6·95 events h^?1; 95% CI, ?11·75 to ?2·15; P = 0·005). OAs were significantly less effective at reducing the WMD in AHI and improving lowest SpO₂ and SF‐36 than CPAP, (favouring OA, AHI: 6·11 events h^?1; 95% CI, 3·24 to 8·98; P = 0·0001, lowest SpO₂: ?2·52%; 95% CI, ?4·81 to ?0·23; P = 0·03, SF‐36: ?1·80; 95% CI, ?3·17 to ?042; P = 0·01). Apnea Hypopnea Index and arousal index were significantly improved by OA relative to the untreated disease. Apnea Hypopnea Index, lowest SpO₂ and SF‐36 were significantly better with CPAP than with OA. The results of this study suggested that OAs improve OSA compared with untreated. CPAP appears to be more effective in improving OSA than OAs.