Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support Used Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock From ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundOptimal timing to initiate mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear with studies showing conflicting results on whether to start before or after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aims to examine the association between mortality and MCS initiated before vs after PPCI in patients with STEMI complicated by CS.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for abstracts and full-text articles from inception to October 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated the association of mortality in patients who initiated MCS (specifically intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)) before PPCI versus after PPCI, specifically in patients with STEMI complicated by CS. Data were integrated using the random-effects models.ResultsTen studies involving 1,352 patients (956, 203, and 193 patients underwent IABP, Impella, and VA-ECMO respectively) with STEMI complicated by CS were included. There was no difference in mortality using IABP before or after PPCI ([OR] 1.77, 95% CI 0.77–1.61, I2 = 27%, p = 0.57). Nevertheless, Impella and VA-ECMO started before PPCI were significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared to that started after PPCI ([OR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.92, I2 = 0%, p = 0.03 and [OR] 0.29, 95% CI 0.14–0.62, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI complicated by CS undergoing PPCI, the use of IMPELLA or VA-ECMO prior to PPCI significantly decreased mortality, in contrast to IABP, in which no difference in mortality was found between using it before or after PPCI. More rigorous studies are needed to clarify this association.     

The reality of cholangiocarcinoma in India– real world data from a tertiary referral centre

BackgroundCholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are rare tumours originating from bile duct. Due to their asymptomatic nature they are usually diagnosed when the disease is advanced. Little data exists with respect to their incidence and treatment outcomes in low and middle income countries.MethodA retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients with perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic (iCCA) CCA registered between January 2012 and December 2018 was performed.ResultsA total of 760 patients, 427 (56.2%) diagnosed with pCCA and 333 (43.8%) of iCCA were included. Patients with localised, locally advanced and metastatic disease in pCCA were 45.5%, 25.9%, 8.5% and that in iCCA were 22.1%, 10.1% and 67.7% respectively. Only 141 (43.9%, 57 - iCCA, 84 -pCCA) of the total 321 patients started on some definitive cancer directed therapy could complete the intended treatment. The overall curative resection rate for all patients of iCCA was 14.5% whereas for patients of pCCA it was only 10.5%.ConclusionMore than half of CCA patients are not able to complete their intended treatment, being worse for pCCA as compared to iCCA. Early referral and centralisation of treatment for this complex disease might be the way forward to achieve optimal outcomes.