骨碎补化学成分和生物活性研究进展＊

骨碎补是历代临床常用中药，具有疗伤止痛、补肾强骨、消风祛斑等功效。其主要含黄酮、苯丙素、三萜、酚酸及其苷等类化学成分，现代研究表明骨碎补具有抗骨质疏松、促进骨折愈合、促软骨再生、护牙健齿、保护肾功能、抗炎、防治中毒性耳聋、降血脂等多种生物活性，开发前景广阔。本文对近年来骨碎补的化学成分、药理作用及临床应用研究进行综述，以期为骨碎补的进一步深入系统的研究和开发利用提供依据。     

生物型与骨水泥型假体全髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效分析

目的 比较生物型与骨水泥型假体全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折(DFNF)的临床疗效.方法 前瞻性纳入2015年7月—2018年6月佳木斯大学附属第一医院骨科收治的老年DFNF患者128例,男性71例,女性57例;年龄61～84岁,平均72.7岁.骨折原因:跌伤75例,撞伤32例,高处坠落伤21例.依据随机数字表法分为生物型假体THA组(BPTHA组,n=64)与骨水泥型假体THA组(CPTHA组,n=64).BPTHA组行生物型假体髋关节置换,CPTHA组行骨水泥型假体髋关节置换.观察两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量等围术期指标及住院时间.比较术前及术后6、12个月髋关节功能(Harris),血清前列腺素缓激肽(BK)、5-羟色胺(5-HT)等疼痛因子水平及视觉模拟评分(VAS),血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)等炎性反应指标水平;分析术后并发症发生情况.结果 两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);BPTHA组住院时间长于CPTHA组[(19.76±2.24)d vs.(15.37±1.71)d,P<0.05].术后6个月,BPTHA组Harris评分低于CPTHA组[(81.72±8.37)分vs.(86.68±8.85)分,P<0.05];术后12个月,BPTHA组Harris评分高于CPTHA组[(95.54±9.67)分vs.(90.72±9.12)分,P<0.05].术后6个月,BPTHA组血清BK、5-HT、SAA、CRP、ESR水平及VAS均高于CPTHA组(P<0.05);术后12个月,BPTHA组血清BK、5-HT、SAA、CRP、ESR水平及VAS均低于CPTHA组(P<0.05).BPTHA组并发症发生率为3.13％,CPTHA组并发症发生率为4.69％,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 BPTHA、CPTHA均可应用于老年DFNF的临床治疗,但CPTHA近期疗效优于BPTHA,而BPTHA远期疗效优于CPTHA.     

经自然腔道取标本手术在结直肠外科手术中的应用进展

随着腔镜技术的进一步发展以及微创理念应用于结直肠外科疾病的诊治中,结直肠相关疾病的诊治发生了翻天覆地的变化。由传统的经腹手术到腹腔镜手术、经自然腔道手术,再到经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES),结直肠疾病的外科诊治在微创领域取得了巨大成果。NOSES技术是目前结直肠外科在微创领域前沿的手术方式之一,它通过经直肠、阴道取标本来避免了腹壁的辅助取标本切口,从而将结直肠外科手术进一步微创化。NOSES技术集传统腹腔镜手术的优势与现代微创外科的理念于一体,它在确保手术效果的基础上集中体现了微创、加速康复外科、功能外科、"无疤"等理念的特点。本文主要就国内外各中心开展NOSES技术在结直肠外科诊治开展中的相关经验、心得和体会进行综述。     

Biomechanical behavior of brain injury caused by sticks using finite element model and Hybrid-III testing

Objective: To study the biomechanical mechanism of head injuries beaten with sticks, which is common in the battery or assaultive cases. Methods: In this study, the Hybrid-III anthropomorphic test device and finite element model (FEM) of the total human model for safety (THUMS) head were used to determine the biomechanical response of head while being beaten with different sticks. Total eight Hybrid-III tests and four finite element simulations were conducted. The contact force, resultant acceleration of head center of gravity, intracranial pressure and von Mises stress were calculated to determine the different biomechanical behavior of head with beaten by different sticks. Results: In Hybrid-III tests, the stick in each group demonstrated the similar kinematic behavior under the same loading condition. The peak values of the resultant acceleration for thick iron stick group, thin iron stick group, thick wooden stick group and thin wooden stick group were 203.4 g, 221.1 g, 170.5 g and 122.2 g respectively. In finite element simulations, positive intracranial pressure was initially observed in the frontal comparing with negative intracranial pressure in the contra-coup site. Subsequently the intracranial pressure in the coup site was decreasing toward negative value while the contra-coup intracranial pressure increasing toward positive values. Conclusions: The results illustrated that the stiffer and larger the stick was, the higher the von Mises stress, contact force and intracranial pressure were. We believed that the results in the Hybrid-III tests and THUMS head simulations for brain injury beaten with sticks could be reliable and useful for better understanding the injury mechanism.     

A comparison of double single suture-button fixation,suture-button fixation,and screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injury: A retrospective cohort study

Different methods have been used throughout the years for syndesmotic injury but there is no consensus on the ideal treatment. Some methods are expensive and some have more complications. The aim of this study is to compare single suture endobutton with double suture endobutton and screw fixation for syndesmotic injury.Sixty nine patients with syndesmotic injury with fibular fractures whom were treated with a single interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTight^TM, Zimmer Biomet), a double interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTight^TM, Zimmer Biomet) and 1 syndesmotic screw (TST, Istanbul, Turkey) were included in this study. Functional and radiological results from patient records between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.Twenty patients were treated with the double interosseous suture endobutton, 23 were treated with the single interosseous suture endobutton, and 26 were treated with traditional AO screw fixation. Three patients from the screw fixation group (11.5%) required revision surgery (P < .05). All the radiologic and clinical outcomes were statistical similar in all 3 groups.Our findings showed that the interosseous suture endobutton system is at least as safe as the screw fixation technique for treatment of syndesmosis joint injuries and can be used as an alternative to the screw method. The interosseous suture endobutton system eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove the hardware, which minimizes the probability of re-diastasis. Since our results showed no statistical difference between single and double interosseous suture endobutton systems, the less costly single endobutton system may be the better alternative.