Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands

Summary In 1981 generalized anaphylaxis was registered on 166 occasions in Dutch general and academic hospitals. Clinical details of 120 of those patients revealed that in 107 anaphylaxis was either probable (n=90) or possible (n=17), whereas in 13 cases some other reaction than anaphylaxis had occurred. The series of confirmed cases contained 46 men and 61 women, with mean ages of 47 y and 48 y, respectively.There was a complete recovery in 102 patients and two patients died. Hypotension was present in 79 cases (74%), dyspnoea in 34 cases (32%) and a skin reaction, mainly urticaria, erythema or angioedema, was mentioned in 62 cases (58%). Most cases of anaphylaxis were drug-induced (76%), the main causes being the analgesic glafenine and contrast media. Glafenine was mentioned as the cause in 36% of all admissions for drug-induced anaphylaxis. Only 3.7% of cases had been reported to the voluntary reporting scheme of the Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs.On the basis of reimbursement data, the risk of developing severe anaphylaxis to glafenine was estimated at 11.7–19.3-fold relative to indomethacin, and 13.4–20.2-fold relative to oral penicillins.     

Ca^＋＋对链霉素抗原—抗体反应的抑制作用

为探讨临床中使用钙制剂抢救链霉素过敏休克病人有良好效果的原因,由被动血凝试验、被动皮肤过敏试验和ELISA法证实,Ca~( )可以抑制链霉素抗原-抗体的反应。这种抑制作用是通过Ca~( )链霉素抗原结合,封闭链霉素抗原决定簇来加以实现的。     

Analysis of sensitization to carboxymethylcellulose: Identification of high risk group using ELISA and histamine release experiment

Objective and Design: Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) has been considered to be inert and is commonly used as an additive in medicines, foods and cosmetics. However, we experienced a patient who developed an anaphylactic reaction to CMC after an upper gastrointestinal examination using a barium meal containing CMC. Therefore, we examined the incidence of sensitization by CMC in healthy subjects, and categorized the high risk group prone to developing anaphylactic response to CMC.Methods: An ELISA for detecting CMC-specific IgE antibody was developed using serum from the patient as a positive control. In the ten subjects exhibiting high anti-CMC IgE among 387 normal populations, histamine release from isolated leukocytes was performed.Results: Five of ten subjects with a high IgE titer showed a significant CMC-induced histamine release from leukocyte preparations in vitro as observed in the patient, and were classified as high risk group. There was a correlation between sensitization by CMC and that by Japanese cedar pollen. The incidence of sensitization in females was 2.4 fold higher than that in males.Conclusions: The combination of ELISA and histamine release experiment made it possible to identify the high risk group for developing anaphylactic response. The administration of high dose CMC as a suspending agent in barium sulfate or injectable corticosteroids to this group should be avoided to prevent anaphylactic reactions in the clinic.Received 18 August 2003; returned for revision 29 September 2003; accepted by M. J. Parnham 10 December 2003     

The radioimmunoassay of histamine release from circulating basophils in an in vitro study as support for the in vivo active systemic anaphylaxis test in the guinea pig

An in vitro anaphylaxis test is described which explores the ability of compound re-challenge to induce histamine release from polynuclear basophils in whole blood of guinea pigs that had previously been sensitised. This test is used in drug safety, in support of the in vivo active systemic anaphylaxis test, which is sometimes required by regulatory authorities, when the observed clinical signs are not conclusive. This sensitive and discriminative test is inexpensive and reduces animal utilisation.     

Efficacy of a rational algorithm to assess allergy risk in patients receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine

Among 6146 hospital employees, 118 subjects with severe allergic background were identified through a screening questionnaire and stratified into 3 groups (Low-risk (LR), Intermediate (IR) and High-risk (HR) group), based on their allergic anamnesis.Data reports on hypersensitivity reactions (HypR) have been collected in both allergic and non-allergic subjects. Seventeen patients (14%) in the allergic population had a HypR after the first, the second or both doses. Skin manifestations were the most frequent ones. Allergic events were more frequent in HR (35%) than IR (10%; p = 0.005) or LR (0%; p = 0.074) subjects. No patient had anaphylaxis. All patients completed the vaccination schedule.13 HypR occurred in patients without severe allergic background (13/6028, 0,2%) including one (1/6148, 0.016% of total population) WAO grade-4 anaphylaxis.Our data suggest that BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine is relatively safe also in patients with severe allergic background; however, some precautions are required for high-risk patients.     

Acute unsolicited adverse events following BNT162b2 vaccine in Saudi Arabia,a real-world data

BackgroundAcute adverse events and anaphylaxis were reported after the administration of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines. We aim to explore the nature and outcome of adverse events following BNT162B2 vaccine in a community vaccination center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.MethodWithin 30 min post vaccination, all acute adverse events (AAEs) that occurred before March 31st, 2021, and in people older than 16 years were reviewed (AAE group). We used the case definition of Brighton collaboration on vaccine safety to define anaphylaxis. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, allergy history, and outcome at disposition were collected. Observation duration after vaccination was short (<15 min) or extended (<3 h). Statistical analysis was performed to study AAEs association with the study variables and outcomes.ResultsOut of 71,221 vaccine recipients, 144 (0.002%) had developed 345 AAEs, at a rate of 48.4 events per 10,000 dose administered. The majority of cases in AAE group were first dose recipients (93.8%) and previously healthy (59%), while the minority had a previous history of allergy (6.3%) or a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (4.2%). We found a significant association between female gender and the occurrence of any AAE (p-value = 0.002). Per every 10,000 doses administered, non-anaphylactic AAEs were dizziness (17.8), headache (9.7), nausea (7.1), or syncope (3.2). Only one in every ten AAEs was considered serious and resulted in an extended observation (4.8 per 10,000 doses), but only 1/144 required hospitalization for non-anaphylaxis reasons (0.1 per 10,000 doses). According to the Brighton collaboration definition of anaphylaxis, no single case of high certainty anaphylaxis was recorded. No death was documented in this cohort.ConclusionAcute adverse events due to BNT162b2 vaccine were rare and mostly non-serious with a tendency to occur more in women. Further prospective studies on larger vaccine recipients to evaluate the incidence of anaphylaxis in the Saudi population are warranted.     

《严重过敏反应急救指南》临床问题与结局指标的收集和确定

目的: 确定纳入《严重过敏反应急救指南》的临床问题与结局指标。方法: 由指南指导委员会7位临床医学、药学及护理学专家参考国际指南指导项目组起草、修订拟纳入指南的临床问题与结局指标初稿。临床问题分为背景问题与前景问题,其中背景问题在专家共识组共22位临床专家修订后直接纳入指南范围,前景问题与结局指标将通过三轮德尔菲法对共识组临床专家咨询形成终稿。研究在方法学家全程监督下完成,并通过分析积极系数、变异系数与分值频率等指标进行质量控制。结果: 问题征集初拟共纳入34个前景问题、6个背景问题及6个结局指标,背景问题经专家组修订后直接纳入指南。使用德尔菲法(Delphi method)对前景问题与结局指标的重要程度进行分级后,最终确定28个关键前景问题及6个结局指标纳入指南范围。其中,4个结局指标为关键性结局,其余2个为重要结局,纳入的28个关键前景问题分为严重过敏反应的诊断、救治准备、救治措施及救治后的管理四个部分,另有5个重要问题和1个次要问题此次未纳入指南,供指南修订或更新时参考或讨论。研究中专家响应的积极程度高,积极系数为100%;前景问题的共识程度高,4分及以上的问卷频率均≥0.75;结局指标中,病死率及疾病严重程度的共识程度高,变异系数≤15%。结论: 在全面严谨的信息收集基础上,以德尔菲法的方式确定了需要纳入《严重过敏反应急救指南》的临床问题与结局指标为该指南的后续制定工作奠定了基础。