椎管镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症并侧隐窝狭窄

目的 :探讨椎管镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症并侧隐窝狭窄的临床效果。方法 :采用显微内窥镜椎间盘切除系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症并侧隐窝狭窄 860例。结果 :临床疗效参照NaKai分级 ,70 9例获得随访 ,平均 2年 7个月 ,优 ,5 5 9例 ;良 ,12 7例 ;可 ,2 3例。结论 :椎管镜技术是治疗腰椎间盘疾病安全有效的方法 ,住院时间短 ,恢复快 ,但操作技术有待进一步提高。     

超声刀在MED治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用

目的 探讨超声刀应用于后路脊柱显微内窥镜椎间盘摘除术(Microendoscopic Discectomy MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的优势与疗效.方法 我院自2005年1月～11月将根据患者症状、体征、体查、CT和或MRI确诊的腰椎间盘突出症患者97例随机分为两组,超声刀 MED组45例,采用超声刀处理椎板下缘等骨性结构;而常规MED手术组52例采用枪钳或电动磨钻处理.结果 超声刀 MED组与常规MED组平均手术时间分别为42 min和75 min,平均术中失血量分别为29 ml和61 ml,平均术后引流量分别为13 ml和29 ml,差异均有显著性(P＜0.05);两组所有病例获得13月(6～17月)随访,按Macnnab标准,优良率分别为95.6%和92.3%,差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论 超声刀切割骨骼的同时不损伤软组织,且有同步止血功能,操作安全方便,能缩短MED手术时间,不失为脊柱手术一种理想的辅助工具.     

经椎板间隙入路显微内窥镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症

目的：探讨经椎板间隙入路显微内窥镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的手术适应证，手术存在问题及解决方法。方法：用METRX治疗腰椎间盘突出症l16例，详细介绍手术过程、操作技巧、手术适应证和术中注意问题。结果；平均随访15．1个月，按Nakal疗效评定分级属优90例，良22例，可2例，差2例，优良率96．6％。结论：严格掌握手术适应证、准确定位、娴熟操作技巧、彻底止血、术后有计划的康复训练是手术成功的关键。     

腰椎间盘巨大突出手术治疗的回顾性分析

目的探讨腰椎间盘巨大突出的临床特点及治疗方法。方法回顾性分析本院1999～2002年住院手术并有随访资料的77例。结果随访6～36个月,平均17.2个月,按Nakal疗效评价,优61例,良10例,可6例。优良率92.2%。结论手术治疗腰椎间盘巨大突出疗效确切,明确诊断后,应尽早手术治疗。     

Thoracic vertebra interbody fusion surgery with robotic assisted system in a swine model

Minimally invasive procedures have been increasing in spine surgery, and interest in robotic systems has inclined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate feasibility of a robotic-assisted thoracic spine interbody fusion in a swine model. Neurosurgeons performed the surgical procedures with robotic surgery certificates on the Da Vinci Xi Surgical System. Surgical approaches were applied using four ports while the swine was in the left lateral position. The surgical procedure was accomplished in 70 min including positioning and preparation of robotic system (20 min), placement of ports and thoracic dissection and confirmation of level with the C-arm system (10 min), discectomy and cage insertion (15 min), control of cage position via the C-arm system and closure (10 min). This study showed the anterior thoracic approach with robotic surgery is safe and feasible with providing a wide working area and high image quality.     

椎间盘摘除联合后外侧融合术治疗再发性腰椎间盘突出的疗效观察

目的观察椎间盘摘除联合外侧融合术治疗再发性腰椎间盘突出的临床疗效。方法 200例腰椎间盘突出患者根据腰椎有无失稳分为研究组和对照组各100例。对照组患者100例术前无腰椎失稳、退变性滑脱,研究组患者100例合并腰椎失稳、退变性滑脱或椎管狭窄,对照组给予患者椎间盘摘除术治疗,研究组患者给予椎间盘摘除联合外侧融合术治疗,应用JOA、ODI、LBOS、VAS评分表进行评分并记录手术优良率。结果 2组患者治疗后JOA、ODI、LBOS、VAS评分均显著优于治疗前(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组手术优良率为88%高于对照组的85%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腰椎间盘突出症复发根据病情不同给予针对性治疗,椎间盘摘除联合外侧融合术可改善椎间盘功能,提高手术成功率。     

Preoperative and postoperative assessment of temporal and masseter muscle size with magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing unilateral temporomandibular joint surgery

The aim of this study was to assess any change between the preoperative and postoperative sizes of temporal and masseter muscles with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients undergoing unilateral temporomandibular joint surgery.This study was designed and implemented retrospectively. For clinical evaluation, a visual analog scale (VAS) and maximum mouth opening (MMO) were used. In order to make a preoperative diagnosis and perform a 6-month control, muscle size was measured in millimeters (mm) on T1 axial sections in MRI. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 23.0 software package. Numeric variables were compared between two dependent groups using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Twelve patients who underwent unilateral discectomy plus dermis-fat grafting, with classical preauricular inverse L incision, were included in the study, and data for eleven female patients were evaluated. The difference in size between the operated and non-operated sides was found to be statistically insignificant at the preoperative stage for both masseter muscle (operated side m^M: 13.264 ± 1.822 mm; non-operated side m^M: 13.264 ± 2.315 mm; p^M = 0.929) and temporal muscle (operated side m^T: 20.345 ± 2.609 mm; non-operated side m^T: 20.582 ± 2.366 mm; p^T = 0.594). There was a significant size reduction in the masseter muscle on the operated side in the postoperative period (preop m^M: 13.264 ± 1.822 mm; postop m^M: 12.036 ± 1.728 mm; p^M = 0.018). Although there was also a size reduction in the operated side of the temporal muscle in the postoperative period, that difference did not reach statistical significance (preop m^T: 20.345 ± 2.609 mm; postop m^T: 19.445 ± 1.603 mm; p^T = 0.182). On the non-operated side, there were no significant postoperative changes in the sizes of either the masseter muscle (preop m^M: 13.264 ± 2.315 mm; postop m^M: 12.682 ± 2.059 mm; p^M = 0.248) or the temporal muscle (preop m^T: 20.582 ± 2.366; postop m^T: 19.891 ± 3.487 mm; p^T = 0.625).Considering the study findings as a whole, a size reduction was observed in the operated side of the masseter muscle after TMJ surgery. The etiology of this change may be surgical trauma to the temporal and masseter muscles, skeletal alteration resulting from condylar change secondary to discectomy, and patients restraining themselves from application of maximum bite force as a result of a self-protection mechanism due to postoperative pain.