High factor VIII levels contribute to the thrombotic risk in families with factor V Leiden

Factor V Leiden (FVL)-carrying relatives of selected patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have much higher venous thrombotic risks than FVL-carrying relatives of unselected consecutive patients with VTE. To find an explanation for this, we explored other risk factors of VTE, in particular the presence of high factor VIII levels, in a retrospective follow-up study. We assessed levels of factor VIII, factor IX, fibrinogen, protein C, protein S, antithrombin, the presence of prothrombin 20210A, and the occurrence of VTE in 61 first-degree relatives of 12 selected thrombophilic families harbouring FVL, and 183 first-degree relatives of 47 unselected families of FVL carriers with a first VTE. In all families, FVL appeared to be an independent risk factor for VTE. Higher thrombosis incidence rates were found in carriers of both FVL and high factor VIII levels (> or = 150 IU/dl), while high levels of factor VIII appeared to be an independent thrombotic risk factor only in selected thrombophilic families. The fraction of individuals with more than one prothrombotic coagulation disorder was 10% higher in selected families. These results and the higher thrombotic risks we found in the thrombophilic families favour the hypothesis that other unknown co-existing genetic defects contribute to thrombophilia.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. A systematic review of prospective studies

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PTM) are the two most common genetic polymorphisms known to predispose to a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, whether these thrombophilic abnormalities are also risk factors for recurrent VTE is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of prospective studies to assess the risk of recurrent VTE associated with heterozygous carriage of each of these mutations. All randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies that reported the incidence of recurrent VTE in patients with and without FVL and PTM after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment were collected and analyzed. The risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrent VTE were calculated in heterozygous carriers of FVL or PTM and compared to those of non-carriers. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Recurrent VTE occurred in 114 out of 557 heterozygous carriers of FVL (20.5%) as compared to 382 out of 2,646 non-carriers (14.4%); and in 38 out of 212 heterozygous carriers of PTM (17.9%) compared to 428 of 2,996 non-carriers (14.3%). The RR of VTE recurrence conferred by the heterozygous carriage of FVL and PTM was 1.39 (95% CI, range 1.15 to 1.67) and 1.20 (range 0.89 to 1.61), respectively, using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model; 1.45 (1.13 to 1.85) and 1.36 (1.02 to 1.82), respectively, using the Der Simonian and Laird random effects method. In symptomatic patients with VTE, heterozygous carriage of FVL is clearly associated with a definitely increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism. The risk is lower with PTM and is difficult to interpret since it varies according to the assessment method used.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

Risk of thrombosis associated with oral contraceptives of women from 97 families with inherited thrombophilia: high risk of thrombosis in carriers of the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral contraceptives (OC) and inherited thrombophilia are well-known risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there are only few studies on the risk of VTE in women with inherited thrombophilia who use oral contraceptives. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective family cohort study of 325 women belonging to 97 families with inherited thrombophilia, including antithrombin, protein S and C deficiencies, the factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) and the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene (PT20210A) to determine the risk of VTE associated with OC intake. RESULTS: For carriers of the PT20210A mutation, the risk of VTE in OC users was 3-fold higher (95% CI 1.3-6.8) than that in non-carriers. Carriers of FVL mutation taking OC showed an OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.6-3.3), indicating a tendency to increase the risk of VTE. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high prevalence of the PT20210A (6.5%) and FVL (2%) mutations in the general Spanish population and the increased risk of VTE associated with OC intake, genetic screening for these mutations should be considered in potential OC users belonging to families with thrombophilia.     

A prospective study of asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: The factor V Leiden mutation is a common genetic defect associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The clinical implications for asymptomatic carriers of this mutation and, consequently, the usefulness of screening families in which a proband has both the mutation and venous thromboembolism are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 470 asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (234 men, 236 women; mean age, 43 years [range, 15 to 88 years]), 12 of whom were homozygous. Carriers were identified by screening the first-degree relatives (>15 years of age) of 247 symptomatic probands. MEASUREMENTS: Objectively diagnosed episodes of venous thromboembolism and the relationship between incidence and exposure to high-risk situations. RESULTS: Nine venous thromboembolic events were observed in 1564 observation-years, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.26% to 1.10%). The incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism was 0.26% (CI, 0.07% to 0.65%) per year; 3.5% (CI, 0.1% to 17.8%) per episode of surgery, trauma, or immobilization; 0.0% (CI, 0.0% to 19.5%) per pregnancy; 1.8% (CI, 0.4% to 5.2%) per year of oral contraceptive use; and 2.9% (CI, 0.8% to 15.3%) per year of use of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation is low and does not justify routine screening of the families of symptomatic patients.     

Different risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in carriers with factor V Leiden compared with non-carriers, but not in other thrombophilic defects. Results from a large retrospective family cohort study

The term factor V Leiden (FVL) paradox is used to describe the different risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism that has been found in carriers of FVL. In a thrombophilic family-cohort, we estimated differences in absolute risks of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism for various thrombophilic defects. Of 2,054 relatives, 1,131 were female, 41 had pulmonary embolism and 126 deep vein thrombosis. Annual incidence for deep vein thrombosis in non-carriers of FVL was 0.19% (95%CI, 0.16–0.23), and 0.41% (95%CI, 0.28–0.58) in carriers; relative risk (RR) 2.1 (95%CI, 1.4–3.2). For pulmonary embolism these incidences were similar in carriers and non-carriers 0.07%, respectively; RR 1.0 (95% CI, 0.4–2.5). When co-inheritance of other thrombophilic defects was excluded the RR for deep vein thrombosis in FVL carriers was 7.0 (95%CI, 2.3–21.7) compared to non-carriers and 2.8 (95%CI, 0.5–14.4) for pulmonary embolism. For other thrombophilic defects no such effect was observed. Thus the FVL paradox was confirmed in our study. However, a similar paradox in carriers of other thrombophilic defects was not observed.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and the risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective, single center, cohort study we assessed the risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women belonging to a large number of families identified because of a symptomatic proband with single identified factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Female family members who had experienced at least one full-term pregnancy were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and seventy pregnancies occurred in 105 carriers and 215 pregnancies in 81 non-carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. RESULTS: The frequency of VTE was 6.4% for heterozygous, 16.7% for homozygous, 20% for double heterozygous carriers of thrombophilic defects, and 1.2% for non-carriers. The majority of VTE events related to pregnancy occurred in the post-partum period. The relative risks of developing pregnancy-related VTE in women who were carriers of heterozygous and homozygous (or combined heterozygous) factor V Leiden mutation as compared to non-carriers were 5.3 (95% CI, 0.6 to 43.9) and 15.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 164), respectively. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Factor V Leiden mutation is a risk factor for pregnancy-related VTE, especially in its homozygous form and in combination with other thrombophilic abnormalities. Screening of families with this mutation might be useful for women of fertile age, as they may take advantage from thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the post-partum period.     

Factor XIII Val34Leu and the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers

A mutation in factor XIII (Val34Leu) was reported to protect against venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the effect of Val34Leu on thrombotic risk in 352 factor V Leiden carriers who were first-degree relatives of 132 thrombotic propositi carrying factor V Leiden. The total observation period was 2,594 years in 92 Val34Leu carriers and 7,444 years in 260 non-carriers. The annual incidence of a first episode of venous thromboembolism was 0.31% in Val34Leu carriers and 0.44% in non-carriers [relative risk (RR) for venous thromboembolism: 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.5]. Age-specific RR for venous thromboembolism were (for Val34Leu carriers and non-carriers respectively): 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-3.2) in the age group of 15-30 years, 0.4 (95%, CI 0.05-3.0) in the age group of 30-45 years, 0.6 (95% CI 0.1-2.9) in the group aged 45-60 years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.06-4.5) in relatives older than 60 years. In conclusion, the impact of FXIII Val34Leu on the venous thromboembolic risk is modest, suggesting that screening for this mutation in factor V Leiden carriers is not justified.     

Pseudohomozygosity for activated protein C resistance is a risk factor for venous thrombosis

Pseudohomozygosity for activated protein C resistance (APC-r) is a rare condition due to the association of heterozygous FV Leiden mutation and partial type I FV deficiency. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in these subjects, seven families including 11 pseudohomozygotes and 45 relatives were examined. Among the relatives, 16 were heterozygous FV Leiden carriers, nine showed partial FV deficiency and 20 no abnormalities. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 4/11 (36.3%) pseudohomozygous patients versus 6/16 (37. 4%) FV Leiden carriers and 1/20 (5%) normal relatives. Pseudohomozygotes and FV Leiden carriers had a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis in comparison to normal relatives (RR 8.8 and 5.7, respectively). There was no difference between the thrombotic risk of pseudohomozygous subjects and of FV Leiden carriers (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.43-5.7). Furthermore, there was no difference in thrombosis-free survival between pseudohomozygotes and 45 consecutive FV Leiden heterozygous outpatients, suggesting that a referral bias may explain the apparent younger age of thrombosis in the pseudohomozygotes in comparison to relatives with FV Leiden heterozygosity (27 years v 54 years; P = 0.01). Pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance carries a significantly higher risk for venous thromboembolism in comparison to normal subjects, but probably not in comparison to heterozygous FV Leiden carriers.