An underestimated combination of opposites resulting in enhanced thrombotic tendency

Heterozygous carriers of factor V (FV) Leiden who also carry FV deficiency often develop venous thromboembolism, but the thrombosis risk associated with this rare condition (pseudohomozygous activated protein C resistance) is still unclear. The thrombosis risk of genetically characterized pseudohomozygotes (n = 6) was compared with that of FV Leiden heterozygotes (n = 683) and homozygotes (n = 50) recruited within a large cohort study on familial thrombophilia. Both thrombin generation and Kaplan-Meier thrombosis-free survival analyses were performed in different FV genotype groups. FV Leiden pseudohomozygotes showed significantly higher thrombosis risk than heterozygotes. The thrombin generation test in pseudohomozygotes showed a pattern similar to homozygotes. Accordingly, early thrombotic manifestations occurred in pseudohomozygotes at a similar rate as in homozygotes. Thus, failure to recognize FV deficiency in FV Leiden heterozygotes may result in an underestimate of the thrombosis risk and inadequate management of affected patients.     

The A20210 allele in the prothrombin gene enhances the risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of inherited protein S deficiency.

Sixteen families with inherited protein S deficiency and venous thromboembolism (VT) were screened for the presence of factor V (FV) Leiden mutation and for the G20210A allele in the prothrombin gene. While FV Leiden was not detected in any of the families, protein S deficiency and prothrombin mutation were present in five families. To assess the risk of VT in carriers of the combined defects, a total of 92 members of the 16 families, including propositi, were examined. Thirty subjects were normal, 40 showed protein S deficiency, 10 the prothrombin mutation and 12 showed both abnormalities. When index cases were excluded, thrombosis history were present in 40.7% of protein S-deficient patients, 75% of patients with combined abnormality, one out of the 10 (10%) with prothrombin mutation and only one (3.3%) of the normal subjects. Relatives with combined defects showed the highest incidence rate of VT in comparison with normal relatives (rate ratio = 32.4), those with protein S deficiency an intermediate degree (rate ratio = 15.7), and G20210A relatives the lowest (rate ratio = 3.4). Relatives with combined defects had an increased risk of VT in comparison with relatives with protein S deficiency (incidence rate ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-5.41; P = 0.1). In conclusion, the presence of the prothrombin mutation seems to increase the risk of VT carriers of protein S deficiency, although additional families are required to fully estimate the magnitude of risk.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders

The duration of anticoagulant treatment after a first episode of venous thromboembolism primarily depends on the risk of recurrence. Variability of recurrence rates in factor (F) V Leiden carriers may be due to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. A retrospective study was performed in 329 FV Leiden carriers with a history of venous thromboembolism (262 probands, 67 relatives). The annual rate of first recurrence was estimated in relatives. The contribution of concomitant thrombophilic disorders to the recurrence rate was evaluated in probands and relatives by a nested case--control analysis in 105 matched pairs of carriers either with or without recurrence. The overall annual recurrence rate was 2.3 per 100 patient-years. The adjusted risk of recurrence for concomitant thrombophilic disorders was: 9.1 (1.3-62.8) for the FII mutation; 1.0 (0.2-4.9) for homozygosity for FV Leiden; 1.5 (0.2-9.5) for inherited deficiencies of protein C or S; 1.8 (0.7-4.9) for FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels >122%; 5.4 (1.6-18.6) for fasting homocysteine levels >15.2 micromol/l; and 4.4 (1.0-18.7) for loading homocysteine levels >45.8 micromol/l. Of these disorders, only the FII mutation and hyperhomocysteinaemia significantly increased the risk of recurrence in FV Leiden carriers. The estimated recurrence rate ranged from 0.45 per 100 patient--years after a secondary first event in the absence of concomitant disorders to 4.8 per 100 patient-years when a spontaneous first event was combined with concomitant disorders. Our study provides supportive evidence that the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous FV Leiden carriers depends on the concomitance of other thrombophilic disorders, in addition to whether the first thrombotic event occurred spontaneously.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation

The G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene is associated with an increased risk of a first venous thromboembolic episode; few data are available about the long-term risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism and it is not known whether or not carriers of the mutation should be recommended lifelong anticoagulant treatment after the first thrombosis. We investigated 624 patients, referred for previous objectively documented deep venous thrombosis of the legs or pulmonary embolism, to determine the risk of recurrent thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene after the first episode of venous thromboembolism. After exclusion of other inherited (anti-thrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency and factor V Leiden) or acquired (anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome) causes of thrombophilia, 52 heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin mutation were compared with 283 patients with normal genotype. The relative risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism was calculated between groups using a Cox's proportional hazard model. The patients with the prothrombin mutation had a risk for spontaneous recurrent venous thromboembolism similar to that of patients with normal genotype (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.3). The circumstances of the first event (spontaneous or secondary) did not produce any substantial variation in the risk for recurrence. In conclusion, the carriers of the prothrombin mutation should be treated with oral anticoagulants after a first deep venous thrombosis for a similar length of time as patients with a normal genotype.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: Factor V (FV) Leiden is a risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT). Data on its influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial owing to different study designs and patient cohorts. METHODS: We reevaluated the risk of recurrence among heterozygous carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden with a first spontaneous proximal VT of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous FV Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, or long-term anticoagulation were excluded. The study end point was objectively documented, symptomatic, recurrent VTE. RESULTS: After discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy for a first VTE, we prospectively observed 287 patients, 83 (29%) of whom were heterozygous for FV Leiden. Recurrent VTE was seen in 17 (20%) of 83 patients with and 44 (21.6%) of 204 without FV Leiden. The probability of recurrence among heterozygotes was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-16%), 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%), and 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) after 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, and was not higher than that among patients without the mutation (16%, 23%, and 34%, respectively). The relative risk of recurrence in heterozygotes was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P =.60) after adjustment for confounding variables. The risk of recurrence among patients with and without FV Leiden was not different when sex distribution or duration of anticoagulation therapy was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is similar among carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden. Heterozygous patients should receive secondary thromboprophylaxis for a similar length of time as patients without FV Leiden.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden with a concomitant inherited thrombophilic defect: a retrospective analysis.

Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic defect associated with venous thromboembolism. Its clinical expression is limited and shows a wide intrafamilial and interfamilial variation, which might be explained by the influence of other genetic risk factors. We retrospectively studied 226 patients with factor V Leiden and documented venous thromboembolism (probands) and 400 first-degree carrier relatives to assess the contribution of concomitant genetic risk factors to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 8.3%, homozygosity of factor V Leiden in 7.2%, and inherited deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S in 4.7% of symptomatic carriers (probands and relatives), as compared with 6.0, 3.4 and 0.9% of asymptomatic carriers, respectively. The total follow-up time in relatives was 11 049 years. Prevalences of venous thromboembolism were 10.8% in single heterozygous factor V Leiden carrier relatives, 16.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation, 36.8% in homozygotes for factor V Leiden, and 40.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and an inherited deficiency of protein C or protein S. Annual incidences in these groups were 0.39, 0.57, 1.41, and 4.76%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a small, non-significant additional effect of the prothrombin mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism in heterozygotes for factor V Leiden [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-3.8]. This effect was more pronounced for homozygosity of factor V Leiden (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0) and inherited protein C or protein S deficiencies (adjusted hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% CI, 3.8-81.2). Our data provide evidence of clustering of the evaluated genetic thrombophilic defects in symptomatic factor V Leiden carriers and support the assumption that the clinical expression of factor V Leiden depends on clustering in a part of carriers.     

Factor V Leiden: the venous thrombotic risk in thrombophilic families

Factor V Leiden (FVL) leads to a sevenfold increased risk of venous thrombosis and is present in 50% of individuals from families referred because of unexplained familial thrombophilia. We assessed the association of FVL with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 12 thrombophilic families of symptomatic probands with FVL in a retrospective follow-up study. We screened 182 first- and second-degree relatives of the 12 unrelated propositi for the FVL mutation and the occurrence of VTE. The incidence rate of VTE in carriers of FVL (0.56%/year) was about six times the incidence for the Dutch population (0.1%/year). The incidence rate in non-carriers also appeared to be higher (0.15% per year). At the age of 50 years, the probability of not being affected by VTE was reduced to 75% for carriers and to 93% for non-carriers (P = 0.009). Identification of carriers of FV Leiden may be worthwhile in young symptomatic individuals and their relatives with a strong positive family history of venous thromboembolism or a history of recurrent venous thrombosis who may be at risk (e.g. pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives). After adjustment for prothrombin G20210A (present in two families), even higher thrombotic incidence rates were found in carriers and non-carriers of FVL. This makes the presence of other unknown prothrombotic risk factors more probable in these families.     

Phenotypic homozygous activated protein C resistance associated with compound heterozygosity for Arg506Gln (factor V Leiden) and His1299Arg substitutions in factor V

Two patients from two unrelated families with a history of thrombosis showed severe plasma activated protein C (APC) resistance. However, genotypic analysis demonstrated that the patients were heterozygous for factor V (FV) Leiden mutation. Coagulation studies revealed that FV clotting activity and antigen were similarly reduced at about 50% of normal in the patients. One brother of propositus A also showed the same abnormalities. Genetic analysis showed that, in addition to FV Leiden mutation in exon 10 of the FV gene (G1691A), these patients had a transition in exon 13 of the FV gene (A4070G; R2 allele) predicting His1299Arg substitution in the mature FV. Study by RT-PCR of platelet FV mRNA indicated that the mRNA produced by the FV gene, marked by the R2 allele, was reduced in amount in both pseudohomozygous patients of family A. The R2 allele has previously been demonstrated to be significantly associated with plasma FV deficiency in the Italian population. The presence of FV deficiency did not protect the propositi from thrombosis. These data confirm that genotypic analysis is mandatory in patients with phenotypic severe APC resistance before these patients are definitely classified as homozygotes for FV Leiden and that further genotypic analysis is advisable.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

Genetic polymorphisms associated with acute pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis.

Frequently an inherited predisposition to thrombosis remains clinically silent until an additional environmental factor intervenes. The present study aimed to assess distribution of inherited risk factors of venous thrombosis in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The prevalences of factor V Leiden (FV Leiden), prothrombin factor II G20210A (FII G20210A), C677T and A1298C of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations were studied in 149 VTE patients and 100 controls. The following key risks were established: previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (23.5%), bed rest (34.2%), immobilisation of lower limb (10.1%), hospitalisation (30.9%) and obesity (28.9%). In 29 (19%) patients and in three (3%) controls FV Leiden was found. A significant association between VTE and FV Leiden was established. There were six (4%) carriers of the FII G20210A among VTE patients and one in the controls. No associations between VTE and MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) were found. In three of 149 patients both FV Leiden and FII G20210A polymorphisms were observed. The mean protein C activity was slightly, though nonsignificantly, smaller in VTE patients. In conclusion, there was a positive association between venous thromboembolism and factor V Leiden. Only a weak trend favouring a relationship between prothrombin factor II G20210A and venous thrombolism was present. No associations between common polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and venous thromboembolism were found.     

Symptomatic Combined Homozygous Factor XII Deficiency and Heterozygous Factor V Leiden

A family with a combined deficiency of factor XII and factor V Leiden is presented. The proposita is a 72-year-old who showed a mild to moderate thrombotic tendency characterized by two episodes of deep venous thrombosis and superficial phlebitis between the age of 50 and 71. She was shown to be carrier of homozygous factor XII deficiency and heterozygous FV Leiden mutation. A sister of the proposita showed the same pattern but remained asymptomatic. Other family members showed either isolated heterozygous factor XII deficiency or combined heterozygous factor XII deficiency and heterozygous FV Leiden mutation but were all asymptomatic. These data lend support to those who maintain that FV Leiden is a mild genetic determinant for thrombosis. The role of FXII deficiency as an additional risk factor remains questionable.     

Difference in absolute risk of venous and arterial thrombosis between familial protein S deficiency type I and type III. Results from a family cohort study to assess the clinical impact of a laboratory test-based classification

Hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency type I is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Contradictionary data on type III deficiency suggests a difference in risk between both types. We studied 156 first degree relatives (90% of eligible relatives) from type I deficient probands (cohort 1) and 268 (88%) from type III deficient probands (cohort 2) to determine the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 1.47 and 0.17 per 100 person-years in deficient and non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 [relative risk (RR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-30.0], and 0.27 vs. 0.24 in cohort 2 (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.2). Type III deficiency was demonstrated in 20% of non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 and the annual incidence in this subgroup was 0.70 (RR 4.3;0.95-19.0). The cut-off level of free PS to identify subjects at risk was 30%, the lower limit of its normal range (65%). PS deficiency was not a risk factor for arterial thromboembolism. In conclusion, type I deficiency was found to be a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism, in contrast with type III deficiency. This was because of lower free PS levels in type I deficient subjects and a free PS cut-off level far below the lower limit of its normal range.     

The reduced sensitivity of the ProC Global test in protein S deficient subjects reflects a reduction in the associated thrombotic risk.

To investigate simultaneously a defect affecting the protein C/protein S (PC/PS) anticoagulant pathway is possible thanks to a methodological approach (ProC(R) Global; Dade Behring) based on the activation of endogenous plasma PC by a snake venom extract. Factor V (FV) Leiden, the most frequent cause of hereditary thrombosis, is well detected by the test with sensitivity of 100% irrespective of the presence/absence of thrombosis in the subjects investigated. The test is also suited to detect PC or PS defect, but in this case the in vitro impairment of the PC/PS pathway is less pronounced particularly for PS defects (sensitivity for PC and PS defect, 85-100 and 30-90%, respectively). In this study, we hypothesized that the lower sensitivity described for PS defect, compared with those of PC and FV Leiden defects, could also be related to the clinical condition of the subject investigated (symptomatic/asymptomatic) rather than solely to the PS plasma activity/level. Therefore, we analyzed 126 subjects with single congenital defects in the PC/PS pathway: 46 subjects with PS deficiency (26 thrombotic cases and 20 asymptomatic relatives), 40 subjects with PC deficiency (25 thrombotic cases and 15 asymptomatic relatives), and 40 heterozygous FV Leiden subjects (25 thrombotic cases and 15 asymptomatic relatives). By a cut-off of normalized Agkistrodon contortix snake venom ratio of 0.84, the sensitivity in the whole group of cases (sensitivity a) was 76.1, 95.0 and 100%, respectively, for PS, PC and FV Leiden defects. The test failed to detect 11 (23.9%) among the 46 PS-deficient subjects, and all these cases except two belonged to the asymptomatic subgroup (9/20; 45%). Excluding the 20 asymptomatic relatives, the new sensitivity (sensitivity b) for the PS defect was 92.3%. The comparison of the sensitivity in the symptomatic PS cases and in the asymptomatic ones was significantly different (P = 0.010). Among the 40 PC-deficient subjects, only two (5.0%) were not detected by the test and they belonged indifferently to the two subgroups. Finally, none of the 40 FV Leiden heterozygotes were misdiagnosed by the test. These results suggest that in symptomatic PS-deficient cases the test could reflect a post-thrombotic effect and/or reveal potential unidentified prothrombotic influences assessing a prothrombotic risk condition.     

Factor XIII Val34Leu and the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers

A mutation in factor XIII (Val34Leu) was reported to protect against venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the effect of Val34Leu on thrombotic risk in 352 factor V Leiden carriers who were first-degree relatives of 132 thrombotic propositi carrying factor V Leiden. The total observation period was 2,594 years in 92 Val34Leu carriers and 7,444 years in 260 non-carriers. The annual incidence of a first episode of venous thromboembolism was 0.31% in Val34Leu carriers and 0.44% in non-carriers [relative risk (RR) for venous thromboembolism: 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.5]. Age-specific RR for venous thromboembolism were (for Val34Leu carriers and non-carriers respectively): 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-3.2) in the age group of 15-30 years, 0.4 (95%, CI 0.05-3.0) in the age group of 30-45 years, 0.6 (95% CI 0.1-2.9) in the group aged 45-60 years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.06-4.5) in relatives older than 60 years. In conclusion, the impact of FXIII Val34Leu on the venous thromboembolic risk is modest, suggesting that screening for this mutation in factor V Leiden carriers is not justified.     

Additional genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolismin carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation

Only a minority of subjects with factor V (FV) Leiden mutation develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), suggesting that additional genetic risk factors may be present in symptomatic carriers. We screened 157 unrelated carriers of the FV Leiden mutation with a first episode of VTE and 291 unrelated asymptomatic FV carriers for the presence of two frequent mutations, i.e. G20210A of the prothrombin gene and C677T of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. Carriers with other inherited or acquired thrombophilia-associated abnormalities were excluded from analysis. Heterozygotes for the G20210A mutation were more prevalent among symptomatic carriers than in asymptomatic carriers (10.8% v 2.7%, P  < 0.0001); homozygotes for the C677T mutation were also more prevalent in symptomatic carriers (21.6% v 14.4%, P  = 0.05). Factor V Leiden carriers who had had a VTE episode during oral contraceptive intake were more frequently carriers of the G20210A mutation (14.3%, P  = 0.03). These results further support the idea that VTE in carriers of FV Leiden results from interaction with additional genetic or circumstantial risk factors, and that an accurate search for such factors is required to identify carriers at risk.     

Protein S type III deficiency is no risk factor for venous and arterial thromboembolism in 168 thrombophilic families: a retrospective study.

Free protein S rather than total protein S levels are currently measured to detect inherited protein S deficiency. Because type III (free protein S) deficiency is still not established as risk factor for thrombosis, we assessed the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism in a family cohort study. Annual incidences in first-degree relatives with and without protein S deficiency type III were compared. Probands had experienced thrombosis and had either the prothrombin G20210A mutation, increased factor VIII:C levels or hyperhomocysteinemia. Relatives were tested for these thrombophilic disorders and factor V Leiden. Levels of antithrombin, protein C, total and free protein S, and factor XI:C were additionally measured. Of 500 relatives enrolled, 105 were excluded from analysis because they could not be classified, due to acquired conditions. Protein S deficiency type III was demonstrated in 60/395 remaining relatives (15%). Other thrombophilic defects were equally distributed among deficient and non-deficient relatives. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 0.28 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09-0.66] in deficient relatives versus 0.20 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.12-0.30) in non-deficient relatives [hazard ratio, 1.4 (95% CI, 0.4-4.0)]. For arterial thromboembolism these values were 0.16 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.03-0.46) versus 0.10 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.05-0.19) [hazard ratio, 1.5 (95% CI, 0.3-6.0)]. These results suggest that protein S deficiency type III is not associated with an increased risk of either venous or arterial thromboembolism.     

Clinical and laboratory expression of associated thrombophilic conditions (homozygous/heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation and heterozygous prothrombin variant 20210A) in an Italian family.

Prothrombin variant 20210A is maintained to be a mild risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The association of this defect with other inherited thrombophilic conditions may result in an increased risk of developing VTE. In this article, a family is described in which prothrombin variant was associated with either homozygous or heterozygous factor V Leiden (FV Leiden) mutation. All family members except the proband were asymptomatic despite the presence and the severity of the underlying genetic defect(s). The proband, who carried homozygous FV Leiden mutation and heterozygous prothrombin variant, experienced recurrent VTE during pregnancies, whereas one brother, with the same defect, was asymptomatic. Mean prothrombin antigen and activity levels were higher in carriers of the prothrombin variant as compared with noncarriers. Thrombin generation was assessed in family members, in carriers of prothrombin variant or homozygous FV Leiden mutation and in a control group. Most of the family members presented with increased prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels possibly because of the presence of the FV Leiden mutation. Although it is conceivable that the co-inheritance of prothrombin variant and FV Leiden mutation may increase the risk of VTE, patients with these combined defects may remain asymptomatic. It is likely that acquired triggering conditions play a major role in determining VTE in carriers of a mild genetic predisposition. This has to be taken into account when recommendation for thromboprophylaxis is given.     

Prospective evaluation of the risk conferred by factor V Leiden and thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms in pregnancy

Factor V (FV) Leiden and thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) are 2 common polymorphisms that have been implicated in vascular thrombosis. We determined whether these mutations predicted an adverse outcome in pregnancy. Second, we looked for an interaction between these 2 mutations in patients with recurrent fetal loss or thrombosis in pregnancy. Primigravid subjects at their booking visit to the National Maternity Hospital (Holles Street, Dublin, Ireland) were screened for the polymorphisms. Thermolabile MTHFR and FV Leiden genotypes were detected by either restriction fragment length polymorphism or heteroduplex capillary chromatography. The carrier frequency of FV Leiden in the screened primigravid population was 2.7% (allele frequency 1.36%), all being heterozygous for the mutation. This value was lower than expected from previous studies in European populations. Forty-nine percent of the screened population (289 of 584) were heterozygous for thermolabile MTHFR, and 10.6% were homozygous (62 of 584). The frequency of the 2 polymorphisms was no higher in those who subsequently developed preeclampsia (n=12) or intrauterine growth retardation (n=9), and none of the screened population developed thrombosis. However, the frequency of FV Leiden was higher in patients who subsequently miscarried after the first trimester of pregnancy (allele frequency of 5.5%, P=0.0356). Among those positive for FV Leiden, 3 of 27 miscarried, compared with 24 of 572 of FV Leiden-negative patients (11% versus 4.2%). No interaction was found between the 2 mutations in the control or patient populations. In patients with a prior history of venous thrombosis, the carrier rate of FV Leiden was increased (4 of 33, allele frequency of 7.6%, P=0. 0115). In contrast, the carrier frequency for thermolabile MTHFR was no higher, and there was no interaction between the 2 mutations. Neither mutation occurred at a significantly higher frequency in patients with a prior history of recurrent fetal loss. In conclusion, FV Leiden is a risk factor for thrombosis in pregnancy and possibly for second-trimester miscarriage independent of thermolabile MTHFR. However, prospective analysis suggests that the risk conferred by FV Leiden is low in a primigravid population. The thermolabile MTHFR genotype was not implicated in any adverse outcome.     

Intraindividual consistency of the activated protein C resistance phenotype

Resistance to activated protein C (APC) has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, but it is not known whether this phenotype is consistent over time. We reinvestigated 2580 subjects from the Vicenza Thrombophilia and Atherosclerosis (VITA) Project to evaluate the prevalence of a consistent APC resistance phenotype in the population. Among the 433 subjects with an APC resistance at first visit, the phenotype was confirmed in all the 74 factor V (FV) Leiden carriers and in 124 of 359 FV Leiden negative subjects (34%). The prevalence of a confirmed phenotype, not associated with FV Leiden, was 4.8% in our population. In a subgroup of subjects previously investigated for heritability of the APC resistance, we confirmed the APC resistance phenotype in seven of 39 (17.9%) subjects with an APC resistant sibling but only in 20 of 408 (4.9%) subjects without a sibling with the same phenotype (P = 0.005). Among the 124 FV Leiden negative subjects with a persistent APC resistance phenotype, 40 (32%) had a plasma factor VIII coagulant activity level above 150 IU/dl and eight (6.4%) were carriers of the G20210A prothrombin allele. APC resistance not due to FV Leiden is a frequent and consistent phenotype in the general population, with a possibly strong genetic influence.