正念减压疗法对新冠疫情期间老年胃食管反流病患者心理状态和睡眠质量的影响分析

背景老年胃食管反流病患者发生率随着年龄的增加症状将逐渐加重,患者对该病认识不足、心理压力大等因素,容易增加负面情绪,进而影响睡眠质量.目的探讨正念减压疗法对新冠疫情期间老年胃食管反流病患者心理状态和睡眠质量的影响分析.方法选取2020-05/2020-10在我院收治的老年胃食管反流病患者120例,按照随机原则分为对照组和观察组各60例.对照组给予内科常规护理,如饮食护理、健康宣教、用药护理、运动护理及心理护理等,同时解答患者对疾病相关知识的咨询.观察组在对照组基础上给予进行正念减压疗法干预5次,每次干预时长为30min,为保证在完成实验,每2d干预一次,每个被试的干预都在10 d内完成,均接受了8次干预.干预前后分别采用抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS-21)、心境状态量表(POMS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量量表(PSQI)进行评分.结果与干预前比较, 2组抑郁、焦虑、压力维度及DASS-21量表总分均下降,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);干预后观察组DASS-21总分及抑郁、焦虑、压力下降明显于对照组(P0.05).与干预前比较, 2组紧张、抑郁分量表均下降,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),干预后观察组变化明显于对照组(P0.05);但自我、疲劳、精力、愤怒、慌乱分量表差异无统计学意义(P0.05).与干预前比较,2组睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、催眠药物、日间功能障碍及PSQI总分均下降,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),干预后观察组下降明显于对照组(P0.05).结论正念减压疗法能有效降低新冠疫情期间老年胃食管反流病患者焦虑、抑郁负面心理情绪,并积极改善患者睡眠质量.     

八周简易正念减压训练对老年功能性消化不良患者焦虑抑郁和睡眠质量的改善作用

背景功能性消化不良(functional dyspepsia,FD)容易使患者出现焦虑、抑郁负面心理,影响患者睡眠质量.精神、心理因素在FD疾病中占重要地位,加强了解FD患者的心理状况,以更好的实施针对性的干预措施,降低负面情绪和改善睡眠质量.目的观察八周简易正念减压训练对老年FD患者焦虑抑郁和睡眠质量的改善.方法选取2017-03/2019-06在浙江省金华市第二医院就诊的老年FD患者90例为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组各45例.对照组给予常规护理.观察组在对照组基础上给予八周简易正念减压训练干预.观察2组患者干预前后焦虑、抑郁评分变化,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分变化、入睡时间、睡眠时间变化情况.结果与干预前比较,2组焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表评分均降低(P<0.05),且观察组降低明显于对照组(P<0.05).与干预前比较,2组干预后睡眠质量明显改善(P<0.05),入睡时间明显缩短(P<0.05),睡眠时间明显延长(P<0.05),且观察组明显于对照组(P<0.05).结论八周简易正念减压训练能够有效减轻老年FD患者焦虑、抑郁等负性情绪,改善患者睡眠质量,值得临床推广.     

多阶段心理干预对行再血管化治疗的冠心病患者远期预后的影响

目的:探究多阶段心理干预对行再血管化治疗的冠心病患者远期预后的影响。方法:选择于本院进行再血管化治疗后抑郁的冠心病患者160例,按随机数字表法均分为常规心理护理组和多阶段心理护理组,随访2年。比较两组患者入组时和入组2年后患者焦虑自评量表评分(SAS)、抑郁自评量表评分(SDS)、Gensini评分及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。结果:入组2年后,两组患者各项评分均显著下降(P均=0.001),且与常规心理护理组比较,多阶段心理护理组SAS[(65.74±3.95)分比(61.13±3.87)分]、SDS[(70.14±5.69)分比(65.59±5.70)分]和Gensini评分[(40.33±4.30)分比(35.14±3.61)分]下降更显著(P均=0.001);多阶段心理护理组患者MACE发生率明显低于常规心理护理组(13.75%比31.25%,P=0.008)。结论:在再血管化治疗后给予冠心病患者多阶段心理干预可明显缓解患者焦虑、抑郁状态,降低不良心血管事件发生率。     

护理心理干预对冠心病择期介入患者焦虑抑郁的影响

目的探讨护理心理干预对择期经皮冠脉介入(PCI)患者焦虑抑郁水平的影响。方法连续调查2013年2~3月在北京军区总医院心内科行择期PCI治疗的住院患者80例,随机分为护理心理干预组和对照组,每组40例。分别于入院时、护理心理干预后、PCI术后填写贝克-抑郁量表、状态-焦虑量表;分析比较心理干预组与对照组焦虑抑郁水平变化。结果干预组与对照组患者基线时均处于焦虑状态,焦虑评分分别为:(44.4±9.4)分、(44.8±10.6)分;经护理心理干预后及PCI术后患者焦虑评分为:(40.4±9.4)分、(38.6±10.4)分,均明显低于对照组患者[(44.2±8.6)分、(41.5±9.4)分];两组患者基线时焦虑评分无统计学差异(P0.05),护理心理干预后及PCI术后焦虑评分均有统计学差异(P0.05)。两组患者抑郁水平在心理干预前后无明显变化。结论择期行PCI患者术前存在明显焦虑情绪,护理心理干预可明显降低PCI患者的焦虑情绪。     

综合性心理干预对脑出血后忧郁状态患者负性情绪和生活质量的影响

目的:探讨综合心理干预对脑出血后忧郁状态患者负性情绪及生活质量的影响。方法:77例脑出血后有忧郁患者随机分为干预组(41例)和常规护理组(36例)。干预组在常规护理的基础上,进行综合心理干预。采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和明尼苏达心衰生活质量调查表(MLHFQ)分别于入院时和干预1个月后对两组患者进行评分。结果:两组患者入院时SDS、SAS评分比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);1个月后,与干预前和常规护理组同期比较,干预组SDS[(58.15±8.57)分、(60.15±9.38)分比(51.20±7.81)分]、SAS评分[(58.55±6.86)分、(54.75±8.03)分比(45.85±7.14)分]显著降低,MLHFQ量表中所有分值均显著减少[总分:(64.75±6.08)分、(60.18±5.72)分比(42.45±4.71)分],P均<0.01。结论:综合性心理干预能够改善脑出血后忧郁患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪,并明显提高其生活质量。     

以患者为中心的心理护理改善冠心病患者睡眠质量的作用

目的:探讨基于患者为中心的心理护理改善冠心病患者睡眠质量的作用。方法:选择本院心内科冠心病患者118例,参照住院号奇偶数匹配原则患者被分为常规护理组(58例)与心理护理组(60例,在常规护理基础上采用基于患者为中心的心理护理干预)。比较两组患者护理前后匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI),Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS),抑郁自评量表(SDS)、健康调查简易量表(SF-36)评分情况。结果:与护理前比较,护理后两组患者失眠症发生率、SAS评分和SDS评分明显降低,入睡潜伏期明显缩短;睡眠效率、实际睡眠时间明显增加(P均=0.001);且与常规护理组比较,护理后心理护理组失眠症发生率(48.28%比20.00%)、SAS评分[(42.31±7.06)分比(35.62±6.14)分]和SDS评分[(45.01±6.23)分比(37.12±5.14)分]降低更显著,睡眠效率[(66.48±6.59)%比(73.26±8.15)%]、实际睡眠时间[(5.14±0.84)h比(5.89±0.92)h]明显增加,入睡潜伏期[(39.24±6.48)min比(28.51±6.23)min]明显缩短(P均=0.001),SF-36量表各项评分均明显提高(P均=0.001)。结论:基于患者为中心的心理护理干预在改善冠心病睡眠质量中的作用显著,可改善睡眠质量,降低负面情绪的不良影响,最终改善生活质量。     

心理干预对围绝经期妇女睡眠质量和心理健康的影响

目的探讨心理干预对围绝经期妇女睡眠质量和心理健康的作用。方法围绝经期妇女220例采用随机数字表法分为对照组110例,实施常规指导和观察组110例,实施心理干预;护理前后进行焦虑量表(SAS)、抑郁量表(SDS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)评定,比较两组干预效果。结果护理后,两组SAS、SDS、PSQI评分(睡眠质量、时间、潜伏期、睡眠障碍、睡眠效率、药物使用、日间功能、总分)、SCL-90评分(躯体化、焦虑、抑郁、强迫症状、敌对、恐惧、人际关系敏感、偏执、精神病性)降低(P0.05)。观察组上述SAS、SDS、PSQI评分、SCL-90评分低于对照组(P0.05)。结论心理干预可明显改善围绝经期妇女的睡眠质量和心理健康状况,疗效显著。     

术前心理疏导对于冠心病首次与多次PCI患者睡眠质量、心理的作用

目的:研究术前心理疏导对于多次与首次行PCI的冠心病(CHD)心绞痛患者的睡眠质量、心理的作用。方法:选择本院2016年6月至2017年6月收治的首次接受PCI的49例CHD患者为首次PCI组,以同期收治的≥2次PCI治疗的49例CHD患者为多次PCI组。两组均于术前接受有针对性的专业心理疏导。观察比较两组术前后心理、睡眠质量、血浆N末端B型利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)等临床指标。结果:与首次PCI组比较,多次PCI组术前焦虑自评量表[SAS,(50.18±8.79)分比(54.21±8.92)分]、抑郁自评量表[(55.78±9.36)分比(59.98±9.41)分]、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数问卷评分[PSQI,(12.74±2.73)分比(15.96±2.81)分]、冠脉Gensini积分[(89.16±6.12)分比(96.73±6.36)分]、左室舒张末内径[(58.71±5.12)mm比(64.38±5.19)mm]、左室收缩末内径[(45.87±3.25)mm比(49.92±3.29)mm]、血浆NT-proBNP水平[(612.15±11.28)ng/ml比(639.87±11.34)ng/ml]、心绞痛发作程度评分[(5.18±0.56)分比(5.92±0.58)分]均显著升高,P0.05或0.01。与术前比较,术后两组上述指标、心绞痛发作次数和发作时间均显著降低,P0.05或0.01。术后除了多次PCI组SAS和PSQI评分仍显著高于首次组外,两组其余指标差异均无显著性,P均0.05。结论:多次PCI患者术前上述临床指标均较首次PCI患者严重。术前心理疏导能够有效缓解心理压力,提高睡眠质量;且术前心理疏导和PCI能够使得多次PCI患者获得与首次PCI者相似的疗效。     

心理疏导和药物干预对心肌桥患者焦虑抑郁的影响

目的:探讨心理疏导和药物干预对心肌桥患者焦虑抑郁的影响。方法:126例行冠脉造影确定为心肌桥的患者被分为:常规治疗组(62例)和心理干预组[64例,在常规治疗基础上给予心理疏导和氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片(黛力新)和舍曲林治疗]。另选择40位冠脉造影正常者作为正常对照组,干预前后采用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)对三组进行焦虑抑郁评估,并进行统计学比较。结果:干预前常规治疗组和心理干预组之间SAS和SDS标准分无显著差异(P0.05),但均明显高于正常对照组[SAS:(50.38±7.10)分、(49.78±7.42)分比(25.70±3.80)分,SDS:(48.5±7.43)分、(47.67±8.12)分比(26.47±4.10)分,P均0.01]。干预后心理干预组患者的SAS和SDS标准分均比干预前明显降低(P0.01),且明显低于常规治疗组标准分[SAS:(40.84±6.23)分比(50.88±8.63)分,SDS:(39.82±5.84)分比(50.69±8.48)分](P均0.01)。结论:心理疏导加上药物干预可明显减轻或缓解心肌桥患者焦虑和抑郁情绪。     

个性化心理疗法在鼻咽癌首次住院患者中的应用效果评价

目的评价个性化心理疗法对鼻咽癌患者焦虑及抑郁状态的影响。方法采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS),对首次住院治疗且SAS评分≥50分和(或)SDS评分≥53分的57例鼻咽癌患者,在入院一周内进行个性化心理疗法,比较患者在接受个性化心理疗法干预前后焦虑和抑郁发生率以及SAS值、SDS值的变化。结果干预后焦虑和抑郁发生率分别为52.63%、56.14%,显著低于干预前的478.95%、84.21%,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01);SAS值、SDS值分别为(46.43±7.40)分、(49.21±7.82)分,显著低于干预前的(52.46±6.12)分、(57.23±8.46)分,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论个性化心理疗法可有效减轻鼻咽癌患者的焦虑和抑郁状况,提高患者的生活质量,值得在临床推广应用。     

心脏起搏患者术前心理状况及其心理干预的作用

为了解心脏起搏患者术前的心理状态及心理干预的作用 ,采用症状自评量表 (SCL 90 )调查 86例心脏起搏患者 ,总分 >16 0分或单个因子分 >2分示有心理问题。用焦虑自评量表 (SAS) ,抑郁自评量表 (SDS)分别评价 86例心脏起搏患者心理干预前后的焦虑、抑郁得分变化及其与 39例对照组的差别。结果 :SCL 90调查显示 :86例心脏起搏患者存在以焦虑 (4 3人 )、躯体化 (36人 )、恐怖 (34人 )、抑郁 (2 5人 )、人际关系 (2 2人 )为主要表现的心理问题 ,其得分均高于国内常模 (分别为 2 .0 9± 0 .5 9vs1.39± 0 .4 3,2 .19± 0 .5 4vs 1.37± 0 .4 8,2 .2 0± 0 .6 1vs1.2 3± 0 .4 1,2 .0 2± 0 .6 2vs 1.5 0± 0 .5 9,P均 <0 .0 1;2 .12± 0 .4 8vs 1.6 5± 0 .5 1,P <0 .0 5 )。心理干预后患者焦虑、抑郁得分明显下降 ,与干预前相比有统计学显著性差异 (分别为 4 1.2 4± 7.2 6vs 4 6 .78± 9.2 5 ,38.6 9± 6 .14vs4 4 .5 6± 7.82 ,P均 <0 .0 1) ;而对照组焦虑、抑郁两次评分比较无统计学显著性差异。结论 :心脏起搏患者存在焦虑、躯体化、恐怖、抑郁、人际关系等明显心理问题 ,心理干预能明显缓解患者的焦虑、抑郁状况。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下中老年人的心理健康状况

目的研究中老年人在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情下心理健康状况及其影响因素。方法采用在线问卷方法调查全国范围内50~65岁的中老年人心理健康状态,问卷内容包括心理健康自评问卷(SRQ-20)、健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和失眠严重程度指数量表(ISI),分别用以评估应激反应、抑郁情绪、焦虑情绪、睡眠障碍状态。采用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计分析。多重线性回归分析相关因素对疫情下中老年人心理健康状态的影响。结果有效回收问卷1501份(nSRQ-20=1377,nPHQ-9=1241,nGAD-7=1204,nISI=1209),经分析发现24.5%出现了心理应激,18.5%表现出中重度抑郁状态,10.7%表现出中重度焦虑状态,10.8%表现出中重度失眠。多重线性回归分析显示,身体健康状况、对疫情的担忧、教育程度和年龄对疫情下中老年人心理健康状态的影响较大,4个因素在PHQ-9、GAD-7、SRQ-20及ISI模型中的决定系数R2分别为0.190、0.176、0.232和0.137,其中以身体健康状况最为显著,标准化β值依次为0.374、0.368、0.406、0.322(均P<0.01)。进一步分析不同健康状况(良好、一般及欠佳3组)间心理状态的差异,发现3组在应激反应、抑郁、焦虑、睡眠4个维度上的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论中老年人在此次COVID-19疫情下较平时更易出现心理健康问题,身体健康情况差者心理健康问题更明显。     

Mental Health,resilience, and religiosity in the elderly under COVID-19 quarantine in Qatar

Introduction: Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) quarantine has been associated with depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. We hypothesize these symptoms might even be more pronounced in the elderly, who may be particularly sensitive to social isolation. However, certain individuals might be more resilient than others due to their coping mechanisms, including religious coping.Objectives: We aimed to examine the levels of perceived stress, depressive, and anxiety symptoms in older adults under COVID-19 quarantine in Qatar; and to identify the sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical factors associated with mental health outcomes, with a focus on the role of resilience, and religiosity.Methods: A cross-sectional study assessing depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms as well as resilience, and religiosity through a phone survey in adults aged 60 years or more under COVID-19 quarantine in the State of Qatar, in comparison to age and gender-matched controls.Results: The prevalence of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms in elderly subjects under COVID-19 quarantine in Qatar was not significantly different from the prevalence in gender and age-matched controls. In the quarantined group, higher depressive, anxiety, and stress scores were associated with the female gender and with lower resilience scores but were not linked to age, psychiatric history, medical history, duration of quarantine, or religiosity.Conclusion: The elderly population does not seem to develop significant COVID-19 quarantine-related psychological distress, possibly thanks to high resilience and effective coping strategies developed through the years.     

Prevalence of psychological disorders,sleep disturbance and stressful life events and their relationships with disease parameters in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of psychological disorders, sleep disturbance, and stressful life events in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and healthy controls, to assess the correlation between psychological and disease-related variables, and finally to detect powerful factors in predicting anxiety and depression. AS patients diagnosed with the modified New York criteria and healthy controls were enrolled from China. Participants completed a set of questionnaires, including demographic and disease parameters, Zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire (PSQI), and the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS). The relationship between psychological and other variables was explored. Stepwise multiple regression was used to determine the contributors to each disorder. Of all the 2772 AS patients, 79.1% were male. Mean age was 28.99 ± 8.87 years. Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance was 31.6% (95% CI, 29.9, to 33.4), 59.3% (95% CI, 57.5, to 61.2), and 31.0% (95% CI, 29.3, to 36.7), respectively. 35.3% had stimulus of psychological and social elements (SPSE). Compared with healthy controls, AS patients had more severe psychological disorders, sleep disturbance, and stressful life events (P < 0.01). SDS, overall pain, BASFI, and sleep disturbance were significant contributors of the SAS scores (P < 0.03). SAS, less years of education, and sleep duration were significant contributors of SDS (P < 0.01). AS patients had more anxiety, depression, stressful life events, and sleep disturbance than healthy controls. Pain, functional limitation, sleep disturbance, and education were major contributors to psychological disorders.     

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对慢性心力衰竭患者认知功能障碍的改善作用

目的探讨血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)伴认知功能障碍患者认知功能的改善作用。方法选取2017年9月年至2019年2月江苏省荣军医院住院治疗及无锡市山北街道合并认知功能障碍的CHF患者60例,采用随机数表法将患者分为治疗组和对照组,各30例。对照组患者的治疗包括病因治疗、去除诱因、改善心力衰竭等传统疗法,治疗组在对照组基础上给予ACEI治疗。分别采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)分别评估患者的认知功能、焦虑和抑郁状况。采用SPSS 21.0统计软件分析数据。结果干预前,2组患者MoCA各项评分及总分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。干预后,与对照组相比,治疗组患者MoCA各项评分均有所增加,其中视空间及执行能力[(4.27±0.52)vs(2.70±0.54)分]和总分值[(24.70±1.09)vs(22.23±1.43)分]差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。与干预前比较,治疗组干预后各项MoCA评分均增加,其中总分[(24.70±1.09)vs(22.60±1.54)分]和视空间及执行能力[(4.27±0.52)vs(2.77±0.68)分]差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预前及干预后,2组患者间心功能、左室射血分数、焦虑、抑郁评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);各组干预前后上述指标比较差异亦无统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗期间2组患者心功能始终处于稳定状态,均未诱发急性心功能衰竭,药物治疗种类及方案也未调整。2组患者均未出现严重不良反应,亦未出现新的合并症。结论 ACEI类药物能够改善CHF患者的认知功能,提高患者的执行能力。     

心理支持干预疗法对心脏病患者介入治疗的影响

目的 探讨心理支持干预疗法对心脏病介入治疗患者的影响.方法 将86例行心脏介入治疗的患者按随机数字表法随机分为对照组（40例）和干预组（46例）.对照组接受一般治疗,干预组实施心理干预,干预前后分别填写汉密顿焦虑量表（HAMA）对患者进行心理状态调查.结果 与对照组比较,干预组焦虑评分显著降低,差异有统计学意义[男：（8.23±0.218）分vs.（14.02±2.874）分,P＜0.05;女：（9.02±1.070）分vs.（16.87±3.412）分,P＜0.05].结论 心理支持干预治疗可以有效缓解心脏介入治疗患者术前焦虑心理,保障介入治疗的顺利进行.     

体位疗法对心力衰竭患者陈-施呼吸的疗效观察

目的 探讨体位疗法对心力衰竭患者陈-施呼吸的疗效.方法 50例合并中-重度陈-施呼吸的心力衰竭患者,连续行2晚多导睡眠监测,分别为基础状态和体位干预治疗法.体位疗法是指让患者保持侧卧位,避免平卧位.随后将2晚的睡眠参数进行比较.结果 体位疗法降低了呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)[(43.51±10.24)次/hvs (25.32±10.97)次/h,P＜0.05],同时减少了觉醒指数[(29.04±9.18)次/h vs (16.85±7.87)次/h,P＜0.05],增加了平均血氧饱和度[(93.56±2.54)％ vs (94.74±2.37)％,P＜0.05].体位疗法增加了深睡眠期的比例[(10.29±6.34)％ vs(17.99±7.12)％,P＜0.05],对总睡眠时间无明显影响[(3.34±0.36)h vs (3.36±0.30)h,P＞0.05].结论 体位疗法能有效减轻中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停-陈施呼吸的严重性,且对睡眠结构无不利影响.     

焦虑抑郁状态对老年高血压患者动态血压影响的研究

目的探讨老年高血压伴发抑郁焦虑情绪患者的24h动态血压变化规律。方法选择老年高血压患者120例,进行抑郁自评量表和焦虑自评量表的心理问卷调查及汉密尔顿抑郁量表和汉密尔顿焦虑量表的评定,根据评分结果分为抑郁焦虑组75例和无抑郁焦虑组45例,对所有研究对象进行24h动态血压监测,并对结果进行比较分析。结果抑郁焦虑组24h收缩压、昼间收缩压、夜间收缩压明显高于无抑郁焦虑组[(136.0±14.6)mm Hg(1mm Hg=0.133kPa)vs(126.0±13.4)mm Hg,(139.0±15.2)mm Hg vs(130.0±13.6)mm Hg,(132.0±13.6)mm Hg vs(123.0±12.5)mm Hg,P<0.01]。抑郁焦虑组24h收缩压标准差、昼间收缩压标准差及24h收缩压加权标准差显著高于无抑郁焦虑组[(14.78±1.62)mm Hg vs(14.07±1.80)mm Hg,(13.25±2.94)mm Hg vs(12.28±3.05)mm Hg,(14.07±1.37)mm Hg vs(10.81±1.91)mm Hg,P<0.05,P<0.01]。结论有抑郁焦虑情绪的老年高血压患者血压变异性显著高于无抑郁焦虑高血压患者。     

Anxiety,health-related quality of life,and symptoms of burnout in frontline physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic caused increased workload and stress for health professionals involved in the care of such patients. We aimed to describe the health-related quality of life, and burnout in frontline physicians diagnosed with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted during the first-wave phase of COVID-19, from September to October 2020. Questionnaires were sent electronically to 450 physicians from State of Bahia, assessing symptoms of anxiety, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and burnout syndrome. For the categorical variables, the Pearson's chi-square test was used and difference between means was compare using the Mann-Whitney test. was Groups with and without anxiety symptoms were compared using prevalence ratios (PR). Pearson's correlation measured the correlation between WHOQOL-BREF and MBI (Maslach Burnout Inventory) domains. The Fisher r-to-z transformation was used to assess the significance of the difference between two correlation coefficients. The significance level was <0.05.ResultsOut of the 450 physicians, 223 (49,6%) completely answered the questionnaire and 38 (17%) showed symptoms of anxiety. Physicians with anxiety had higher scores in emotional exhaustion (EE) (38.31 ± 8.59 vs 25.31±0.87; p = 0.0001) and depersonalization (DP) (9.0 ± 5.6 vs 5.9 ± 5.3; p = 0.001) domains, and lower scores in personal accomplishment (PA) (32.1 ± 8.2 vs 36.3 ± 7.6; p = 0.004), than those without anxiety. All correlations between WHOQOL-BREF domains and MBI in physicians without anxiety were significant (p = 0.01).ConclusionPhysicians with anxiety showed more emotional exhaustion, less personal accomplishment, and lower quality of life. All domains of WHOQOL BREF were correlated with all MBI domains among physicians without anxiety. Differences in correlation according to anxiety were remarkable in psychological HOQOL BREF domain and emotional exhaustion and depersonalization MBI domains. The effect of anxiety leading to poorer levels of perceived health needs to be further investigated.     

Analysis of psychological status and effect of psychological intervention in quarantined population during the epidemic of SARS-CoV-2

During outbreaks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many countries adopted quarantine to slow the spread of the virus of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Quarantine will cause isolation from families, friends, and the public, which consequently leads to serious psychological pressure with potentially long-lasting effects on the quarantined population. Experience of specific practices to improve the psychological status of the mandatory quarantined population was limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychological impact of mandatory quarantine, and evaluate the effect of psychological intervention on the quarantined population.We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess and manage the psychological status of a mandatory quarantined population in Beijing, China. A total of 638 individuals completed 2 questionnaires and were enrolled in this study, of which 372 participants accepted designed psychological intervention while other 266 participants refused it. The SCL-90 questionnaire was used to evaluate the psychological status and its change before and after the intervention. The differences of SCL-90 factor scores between participants and the national norm group were assessed by 2 samples t test. While the SCL-90 factor scores before and after intervention were compared with 2 paired samples t test.Compared with the Chinese norms of SCL-90, the participants had higher SCL-90 factor scores in most items of the SCL-90 inventory. The SCL-90 factor scores of participants with psychological intervention significantly decreased in somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. In contrast, most factor scores of the SCL-90 inventory changed little without statistical significance in participants without psychological intervention.Psychological problems should be emphasized in the quarantined individuals and professional psychological intervention was a feasible approach to improve the psychological status of the mandatory quarantined population in the epidemic of SARS-CoV-2.