PD‐L1 expression associated with worse survival outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma

1 Aim

There is currently a need to identify prognostic biomarkers to assist in a risk adopted approach in treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) has been studied as a prognostic biomarker in a number of tumors given its central role in antitumoral immune response evasion. Four previously published analyses found PD‐L1 positivity to be an adverse survival prognostic factor in MPM. This study aims to further investigate the relationship between PD‐L1 expression in mesothelioma tissues and survival outcome.

2 Methods

Clinical data of MPM patients from a single institution between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Patient's archived tissues were stained with PD‐L1 (Clone Ventana SP263). PD‐L1 positivity was defined as > 1% membranous staining regardless of intensity.

3 Results

Data from fifty eight patients were analyzed. Median age was 73, majority was male (49, 84%) and had ECOG between 0 and 2 (46, 79%). Most common histopathological subtype was epithelioid (42, 72%), 9 (16%) biphasic subtype and 7 (12%) sarcomatoid. Thirty one patients (53%) received best supportive care and twenty seven patients (47%) received chemotherapy or combination treatment. Forty‐two patients had positive PD‐L1 expression (72.4%). The median survival time for PD‐L1 negative group is 15.5 months and 6 months for the positive group. Positive PD‐L1 expression is independently correlated with worse prognosis (HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.005–4.057; P‐value = 0.0484).

4 Conclusions

Our analysis found a higher percentage of MPM patients with positive PD‐L1 (> 1%) compared to other studies. Highly positive PD‐L1 expression was associated with statistically significantly lower median survival time.     

The PD‐1/PD‐L1 axis and human papilloma virus in patients with head and neck cancer after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A multicentre study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK‐ROG)

We examined the prognostic role of PD‐1+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and PD‐L1+ cells in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). FFPE samples from 161 patients were immunohistochemically stained for PD‐1, CD8 and PD‐L1. The immune marker expression was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival (OS), local progression‐free survival (LPFS) and distant metastases free‐survival (DMFS), also in the context of HPV16 DNA/p16 status. The median follow‐up was 48 months (range: 4–100). The 2‐year‐OS was 84.1% for the entire cohort. High PD‐1 and PD‐L1 expression were more common in patients with positive HPV16 DNA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and high infiltration by CD8+ TILs (p < 0.001 for both markers). High PD‐L1 expression correlated with superior OS (p = 0.025), LPFS (p = 0.047) and DMFS (p = 0.048) in multivariable analysis, whereas no significance could be demonstrated for PD‐1. Patients with CD8^high/PD‐L1^high expression had favorable outcome (p < 0.001 for all endpoints) compared to other groups. We validated the superior OS data on CD8^high/PD‐L1^high using the Cancer Genome Atlas TCGA dataset (n = 518; p = 0.032). High PD‐L1 expression was a favorable prognostic marker in HPV16‐negative but not HPV16‐positive patients. In conclusion, HPV‐positive tumors showed higher expression of immune markers. PD‐L1 expression constitutes an independent prognostic marker in SCCHN patients post‐adjuvant CRT. In conjunction with CD8 status, these data provide an important insight on the immune contexture of SCCHN and are directly relevant for future treatment stratification with PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors to complement CRT.     

Clinical significance of programmed cell death‐ligand 1 expression and the immune microenvironment at the invasive front of colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability

Immunotherapy is reportedly effective in colorectal cancers (CRCs) with high microsatellite instability (MSI‐H); however, the specific cell types that respond to immune checkpoint therapy are unclear. Herein, we aimed to examine the expression of programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) and related proteins in MSI‐H and microsatellite‐stable (MSS) CRCs to investigate the immune microenvironment at the tumor's invasive front. The MSI status was retrospectively assessed in 499 patients undergoing surgical resection of primary CRC; of these, 48 were classified as MSI‐H. Propensity score matching was performed, and tissues from 36 and 37 patients with MSI‐H and MSS CRCs, respectively, were immunohistochemically evaluated for PD‐L1, PD‐1, CD8 and CD68. PD‐L1 expression was evaluated separately for tumor cells (PD‐L1 [T]) and tumor‐infiltrating myeloid cells in the stroma (PD‐L1 [I]). PD‐L1 (T) was positive in only 5.4% and 36.1% of MSS and MSI‐H CRCs, while PD‐L1 (I) was positive in 27% and 72.2% of these CRCs, respectively. The PD‐L1 (T) and PD‐L1 (I) expression levels in MSI‐H CRCs significantly correlated with poor differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (p < 0.05), and with early‐stage adenocarcinoma and high budding grade (p < 0.05), respectively. Significantly more PD‐L1 (I), CD8‐positive cells and CD68‐positive macrophages were present at the invasive front than in the central tumor in MSI‐H CRCs (p < 0.005). PD‐L1 was expressed on both tumor cells and CD68/CD163‐positive (M2) macrophages at the invasive front of MSI‐H CRCs. In conclusion, PD‐L1‐positive tumor cells and M2‐type tumor‐associated macrophages may contribute to tumor invasion and immune escape at the invasive front.     

PD‐L1 expression of the residual tumor serves as a prognostic marker in local advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

This study sought to investigate the prevalence of programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) and its prognostic value in patients with residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for locally advanced breast cancer. A total of 309 patients considered as non‐pathological complete responders (non‐pCR) after NCT followed by mastectomy were selected. The expression of PD‐L1 and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in residual breast cancer cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry in surgical specimens. The median density was used to classify PD‐L1 expression from low to high. The prognostic value of various clinicopathological factors was evaluated. The expression of PD‐L1 was more commonly observed in patients with low levels of total TILs (p < 0.001), high levels of FOXP3+ TILs (p < 0.001) and low levels of CD8+ TILs (p < 0.001). This served as an independent prognostic factor for both relapse‐free survival (Hazard ratio = 1.824, p = 0.013) and overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio = 2.585, p = 0.001). High expression of PD‐L1 was correlated to worse survival, which is most significantly observed in triple‐negative patients. Patients classified as PD‐L1‐high/CD8‐low exhibited relatively unfavorable survival, whereas patients with either low expression of PD‐L1 or high expression of CD8 had similar outcomes. PD‐L1 expression in residual tumor can be used as a prognostic marker in non‐pCR patients after receiving NCT for breast cancer, which highlights the importance of immune evasion in the therapeutic vulnerability of chemoresistant cancer cells as well as the potential of anti‐PD‐L1 treatments in non‐pCR responders.     

Independent association of PD‐L1 expression with noninactivated VHL clear cell renal cell carcinoma—A finding with therapeutic potential

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an aggressive tumor that is characterized in most cases by inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene VHL. The VHL/HIF/VEGF pathway thus plays a major role in angiogenesis and is currently targeted by anti‐angiogenic therapy. The emergence of resistance is leading to the use of targeted immunotherapy against immune checkpoint PD1/PDL1 that restores antitumor immune response. The correlation between VHL status and PD‐L1 expression has been little investigated. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive cases of ccRCC and correlated PD‐L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with clinical data (up to 10‐year follow‐up), pathological criteria, VEGF, PAR‐3, CAIX and PD‐1 expressions by IHC and complete VHL status (deletion, mutation and promoter hypermethylation). PD‐L1 expression was observed in 69 ccRCC (70.4%) and the corresponding patients had a worse prognosis, with a median specific survival of 52 months (p = 0.03). PD‐L1 expression was significantly associated with poor prognostic factors such as a higher ISUP nucleolar grade (p = 0.01), metastases at diagnosis (p = 0.01), a sarcomatoid component (p = 0.04), overexpression of VEGF (p = 0.006), and cytoplasmic PAR‐3 expression (p = 0.01). PD‐L1 expression was also associated with dense PD‐1 expression (p = 0.007) and with ccRCC with 0 or 1 alteration(s) (non‐inactivated VHL tumors; p = 0.007) that remained significant after multivariate analysis (p = 0.004 and p = 0.024, respectively). Interestingly, all wild‐type VHL tumors (no VHL gene alteration, 11.2%) expressed PD‐L1. In this study, we found PD‐L1 expression to be associated with noninactivated VHL tumors and in particular wild‐type VHL ccRCC, which may benefit from therapies inhibiting PD‐L1/PD‐1.     

Persistent restoration to the immunosupportive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma by bevacizumab

Although vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes the immunosuppressive microenvironment, the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) on tumor immunity has not been fully investigated. The present study used 47 glioblastoma tissues obtained at 3 different settings: tumors of initial resection (naïve Bev group), tumors resected following Bev therapy (effective Bev group), and recurrent tumors after Bev therapy (refractory Bev group). The paired samples of the initial and post‐Bev recurrent tumors from 9 patients were included. The expression of programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)/PD ligand‐1 (PD‐L1), CD3, CD8, Foxp3, and CD163 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The PD‐L1+ tumor cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (P < .01 for each). The PD‐1+ cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (P < .01 for each). The amount of CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration increased in the refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (CD3, P < .01; CD8, P = .06). Both Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and CD163+ tumor‐associated macrophages significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (Foxp3, P < .01 for each; CD163, P < .01 for each). These findings were largely confirmed by comparing paired initial and post‐Bev recurrent tumors. Bevacizumab restores the immunosupportive tumor microenvironment in glioblastomas, and this effect persists during long‐term Bev therapy.     

Expression of programmed death ligand 1 is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid sarcoma patients

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a rare condition and is an extramedullary tumour of immature myeloid cells. It is now known that the programmed death 1 (PD‐1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) pathway suppresses the host antitumor responses and that these products are expressed on both tumour cells and tumour‐infiltrating cells in various malignancies. However, little is known about the significance of PD‐1/PD‐L1 expression on tumour cells and tumour microenvironmental cells in MS. To investigate the clinicopathological significance of PD‐1/PD‐L1 expression in MS, we analyzed 98 patients by immunohistochemistry. Of these, 10.2% of cases had neoplastic tumour cells positive for PD‐L1 (nPD‐L1⁺). However, the rate of nPD‐L1⁺ was <5% (range: 0.27 to 2.97%). On the other hand, PD‐L1 expression on 1 or more of stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment (miPD‐L1⁺) was observed in 37.8% of cases. Because all nPD‐L1⁺ cases expressed PD‐1 on less than 5% of tumour cells, we compared the miPD‐L1⁺ and miPD‐L1^? groups. There was a correlation between miPD‐L1⁺ status and the number of PD‐1‐expressing tumour ‐infiltrating lymphocytes (PD‐1⁺ TILs; P = .0229). miPD‐L1⁺ was found to be associated with poorer overall survival and progression‐free survival (P = .00392, P = .00261, respectively). Multivariate analysis also confirmed miPD‐L1⁺ to be an independent poor prognostic factor. In conclusion, our study indicated that the immunotherapy blocking the PD‐1/PD‐L1 pathway may improve the clinical outcome of MS.     

Negative influence of programmed death‐1‐ligands on the survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy

The programmed death‐1/programmed death‐1 ligands (PD‐1/PD‐L) pathway plays an important role in immunological tumor evasion. However, the clinical significance of the PD‐L (L1 and L2) expression in esophageal cancer treated with chemotherapy has not been fully investigated. We examined the expression of PD‐L of the primary tumors obtained from 180 esophageal cancer patients who underwent radical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using immunohistochemical staining. The relationship between the expression patterns and clinico‐pathological characteristics was examined. In the present study, 53 patients (29.4%) and 88 patients (48.3%) were classified into positive for PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 expression, respectively. In all the patients examined, overall survival rates of the patients with tumors positive for PD‐L1 or PD‐L2 were significantly worse than those with tumors negative for PD‐L1 or PD‐L2 (P = 0.0010 and P = 0.0237, respectively). However, subgroup analysis showed that these tendencies are only found in the patients treated with NAC, and not in those without NAC. The patients with positive PD‐L1 expression had a significantly higher rate of NAC history (P = 0.0139), but those with positive PD‐L2 expression did not have a significantly high rate of NAC history (P = 0.6127). There is no significant relationship between PD‐L1 expression and response to chemotherapy (P = 0.3118), but patients with positive PD‐L2 expression had significantly inferior responses to chemotherapy (P = 0.0034). The PD‐1/PD‐L pathway might be an immunological mechanism associated with the long‐term effectiveness of chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. Further investigation into the roles of PD‐1 pathway in chemotherapy could lead to the development of better treatment options for this disease.     

Upregulation of programmed cell death ligand 1 promotes resistance response in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients treated with neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy

To assess the association of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) with cisplatin‐based neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response, we investigated the level of PD‐L1 and found increased PD‐L1 expression in chemo‐resistant tumors compared with chemo‐sensitive tumors according to RNA‐Seq analysis. In a cohort of 92 patients with NAC, the positive staining of PD‐L1 was correlated with TNM stage, lower sensitive‐response rates and shorter overall survival rates. In another 30 paired tumor specimens pre‐ and post‐chemotherapy, the patients with high PD‐L1 expression post‐chemotherapy had a worse outcome and higher stable disease rate. CD8⁺ tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes were found to be related to chemosensitive response and better prognosis and negative PD‐L1 expression. Furthermore, in two patient‐derived xenograft models and cell lines A549 and PC‐9, cisplatin upregulated PD‐L1 expression, and the enhancement of PD‐L1 in cancer cell lines was in a drug dose‐dependent manner. Moreover, the depletion of PD‐L1 significantly reduced cisplatin resistance. When phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/protein kinase B signaling was inhibited by corresponding inhibitors, PD‐L1 expression was downregulated and apoptosis was upregulated in the cisplatin‐treated cancer cells. These results suggest that the upregulation of PD‐L1 promotes a resistance response in lung cancer cells that might be through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/protein kinase B pathway and suppression of tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes. The high expression of PD‐L1 after NAC could be an indication of therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer.     

Uptake of positron emission tomography tracers reflects the tumor immune status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The relationship between the local immune status and cancer metabolism regarding ¹⁸F‐FDG and ¹⁸F‐FAMT uptake in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unknown. The present study examined the correlations between tumor immune status, clinicopathological factors, and positron emission tomography (PET) tracer uptake in ESCC. Forty‐one ESCC patients who underwent ¹⁸F‐FDG PET and ¹⁸F‐FAMT PET before surgery were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemistry was conducted for programmed death 1 (PD‐1), CD8, Ki‐67, CD34, GLUT1 (¹⁸F‐FDG transporter) and LAT1 (¹⁸F‐FAMT transporter). ESCC specimens with high tumoral PD‐L1 and high CD8‐positive lymphocytes were considered to have “hot tumor immune status.” High PD‐L1 expression (53.7%) was significantly associated with tumor/lymphatic/venous invasion (P = 0.028, 0.032 and 0.018), stage (P = 0.041), CD8‐positive lymphocytes (P < 0.001), GLUT1 (P < 0.001), LAT1 expression (P = 0.006), Ki‐67 labelling index (P = 0.009) and CD34‐positive vessel counts (P < 0.001). SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FDG was significantly higher in high PD‐L1 cases than in low PD‐L1 cases (P = 0.009). SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FAMT was significantly higher in high PD‐L1 (P < 0.001), high CD8 (P = 0.012) and hot tumor groups (P = 0.028) than in other groups. High SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FAMT (≥4.15) was identified as the only predictor of hot tumor immune status. High PET tracer uptake was significantly associated with cancer aggressiveness and hot tumor immune status in ESCC. PET imaging may be an effective tool to predict tumor immune status in ESCC with respect to immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity.     

PD‐L1 expression enhancement by infiltrating macrophage‐derived tumor necrosis factor‐α leads to poor pancreatic cancer prognosis

Immunotherapy using anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies for several types of cancer has received considerable attention in recent decades. However, the molecular mechanism underlying PD‐L1 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells has not been clearly elucidated. We investigated the clinical significance and regulatory mechanism of PD‐L1 expression in PDAC cells. Among the various cytokines tested, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α upregulated PD‐L1 expression in PDAC cells through NF‐κB signaling. The induction of PD‐L1 expression was also caused by co‐culture with activated macrophages, and the upregulation was inhibited by neutralization with anti‐TNF‐α antibody after co‐culture with activated macrophages. PD‐L1 expression in PDAC cells was positively correlated with macrophage infiltration in tumor stroma of human PDAC tissues. In addition, survival analysis revealed that high PD‐L1 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in 235 PDAC patients and especially in patients harboring high CD8‐positive T‐cell infiltration. These findings indicate that tumor‐infiltrating macrophage‐derived TNF‐α could be a potential therapeutic target for PDAC.     

Infiltration of tumor‐associated macrophages is involved in tumor programmed death‐ligand 1 expression in early lung adenocarcinoma

Programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) is an immune modulator that promotes immunosuppression by binding to programmed death‐1 of T‐lymphocytes. Although tumor cell PD‐L1 expression has been shown to be associated with the clinical response to anti–PD‐L1 antibodies, its concise regulatory mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we evaluated the associations of tumor PD‐L1 expression and immune cell infiltrating patterns in 146 cases of early lung adenocarcinoma (AC) to investigate the possible extrinsic regulation of tumor PD‐L1 by immune cells. Using immunohistochemistry, cell surface PD‐L1 expression in tumor cells was observed in 18.5% of stage 0‐IA lung AC patients. Tumor PD‐L1 positivity was significantly associated with stromal invasion, which was accompanied by increased tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM), CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells and FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells. Among these immune cells, TAM and CD8⁺ T cells significantly accumulated in PD‐L1‐positive carcinoma cell areas, which showed a tumor cell nest‐infiltrating pattern. Although CD8⁺ T cells are known to induce tumor PD‐L1 expression via interferon‐? production, the increased TAM within tumors were also associated with tumor cell PD‐L1 positivity, independently of CD8⁺ T cell infiltration. Our in vitro experiments revealed that PD‐L1 expression in lung cancer cell lines was significantly upregulated by co–culture with M2‐differentiated macrophages; expression of PD‐L1 was reduced to baseline levels following treatment with a transforming growth factor‐β inhibitor. These results demonstrated that tumor‐infiltrating TAM are extrinsic regulators of tumor PD‐L1 expression, indicating that combination therapy targeting both tumor PD‐L1 and stromal TAM might be a possible strategy for effective treatment of lung cancer.     

Prognostic value of programmed death‐ligand 1 expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer

The programmed death‐1/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) pathway is a negative feedback pathway that suppresses the activity of T cells. Previous studies reported that high PD‐L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) was associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer; however, the prognostic evaluation of these studies was limited because they included patients at various disease stages. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between PD‐L1 status in the immune microenvironment and the clinicopathological features of stage III colorectal cancer. Two hundred and thirty‐five patients were included in the analysis. PD‐L1 expression on TC and tumor‐infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The median follow‐up of thisi study was 52.9 months. A total of 8.1% of stage III colorectal cancer showed high PD‐L1 expression on TC and 15.3% showed high PD‐L1 expression on TIMC. Patients with high PD‐L1 expression on TC had significantly shorter disease‐free survival (DFS) than patients with low expression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–4.62; P = 0.012). In addition, patients with high PD‐L1 expression on TIMC were associated with longer DFS than patients with low expression (HR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16–0.98; P = 0.046). These findings suggest that PD‐L1 expression status may be a new predictor of recurrence for stage III colorectal cancer patients and highlight the necessity of evaluating PD‐L1 expression on TC and TIMC separately in the tumor microenvironment.     

Variable indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase expression in acral/mucosal melanoma and its possible link to immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma. Although anti–programmed death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) is a well‐studied biomarker for response to anti–programmed death‐1 PD‐1 therapy in melanoma, its clinical relevance remains unclear. It has been established that the high expression of indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO) is correlated to a response to anti–CTLA‐4 treatment in melanoma. However, it is still unknown whether the IDO expression is associated with response to anti–PD‐1 therapy in advanced melanoma. In addition, acral and mucosal melanomas, which comprise a great proportion of all melanomas in Asians, are genetically different subtypes from cutaneous melanomas; however, they have not been independently analyzed due to their low frequency in Western countries. To evaluate the association of IDO and PD‐L1 expression with response to anti–PD‐1 antibody in acral and mucosal melanoma patients, we analyzed 32 Japanese patients with acral and mucosal melanomas treated with anti–PD‐1 antibody from the perspective of IDO and PD‐L1 expression levels by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Multivariate Cox regression models showed that the low expression of IDO in tumors was associated with poor progression‐free survival (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13‐0.81, P = 0.016), whereas PD‐L1 expression on tumors was not associated with progression‐free survival. Significantly lower expression of IDO in tumors was found in non–responders compared to responders. Assessment of the IDO expression could be useful for the identification of suitable candidates for anti–PD‐1 therapy among acral and mucosal melanomas patients. Further validation study is needed to estimate the clinical utility of our findings.     

Predictive factors of the tumor immunological microenvironment for long‐term follow‐up in early stage breast cancer

The aim of this research was to investigate the correlation of immunologic factors in the tumor environment of breast cancer, using immunohistological staining to evaluate the expression of programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐1/PD‐L1), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and macrophages, and to analyze the association between the immunologic factors and clinical outcome for patients with early stage breast cancer (EBC). A total of 97 EBC patients who underwent standard surgery were investigated. Expression of PD‐1/PD‐L1 and PTEN and the density of CD3⁺ TILs, CD8⁺ TILs, and CD163⁺ macrophages were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. The association between the immunologic factors and clinical outcome was statistically analyzed. The density of CD3⁺ TILs, CD8⁺ TILs, and CD163⁺ macrophages and non‐expression of PTEN was significantly higher in cases of triple negative breast cancer. CD8⁺ TIL density and CD8⁺/PD‐L1⁺ expression were predictive factors for disease‐free survival and overall survival (OS). Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)‐positive patients with PTEN expression and luminal/HER2‐negative patients without PD‐L1 expression had significantly longer OS compared to patients without PTEN expression (P = 0.049) and with PD‐L1 expression (P = 0.036), respectively. Furthermore, patients with PD‐L1⁺/CD8⁺ expression had worse median progression‐free survival (P = 0.022) and median OS (P = 0.037) compared with patients without PD‐L1⁺/CD8⁺ expression. The CD3⁺ TILs, CD8⁺ TILs, and CD163⁺ macrophages were shown to infiltrate the tumor area of EBC. In particular, triple negative breast cancer had a higher rate of TIL infiltration within the tumor environment. Expression of PTEN and lack of PD‐L1 expression were associated with favorable survival in HER2‐positive and luminal/HER2‐negative EBC patients, respectively. The PD‐L1 expression combined with CD8⁺ density was significantly associated with an aggressive clinical outcome.     

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor‐CD74 interaction regulates the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 in melanoma cells

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) on tumor cells contributes to cancer immune evasion by interacting with programmed cell death 1 on immune cells. γ‐Interferon (IFN‐γ) has been reported as a key extrinsic stimulator of PD‐L1 expression, yet its mechanism of expression is poorly understood. This study analyzed the role of CD74 and its ligand macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) on PD‐L1 expression, by immunohistochemical analysis of melanoma tissue samples and in vitro analyses of melanoma cell lines treated with IFN‐γ and inhibitors of the MIF‐CD74 interaction. Immunohistochemical analyses of 97 melanoma tissue samples showed significant correlations between CD74 and the expression status of PD‐L1 (P < .01). In vitro analysis of 2 melanoma cell lines, which are known to secrete MIF constitutively and express cell surface CD74 following IFN‐γ stimulation, showed upregulation of PD‐L1 levels by IFN‐γ stimulation. This was suppressed by further treatment with the MIF‐CD74 interaction inhibitor, 4‐iodo‐6‐phenylpyrimidine. In the analysis of melanoma cell line WM1361A, which constitutively expresses PD‐L1, CD74, and MIF in its non‐treated state, treatment with 4‐iodo‐6‐phenylpyrimidine and transfection of siRNAs targeting MIF and CD74 significantly suppressed the expression of PD‐L1. Together, the results indicated that MIF‐CD74 interaction directly regulated the expression of PD‐L1 and helps tumor cells escape from antitumorigenic immune responses. In conclusion, the MIF‐CD74 interaction could be a therapeutic target in the treatment of melanoma patients.     

Anti‐PD‐L1 treatment enhances antitumor effect of everolimus in a mouse model of renal cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy based on blockade of the programmed death‐1 (PD‐1)/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) axis has shown promising clinical activity for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients; however, the most effective use of these agents in combination with conventional targeted therapy remains to be resolved. Here we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (EVE) and anti‐PD‐L1 using an immunocompetent mouse model of RCC. We first assessed the in vitro effect of EVE on PD‐L1 expression in the human 786‐O and mouse RENCA RCC cell lines and found that EVE upregulated PD‐L1 expression in these RCC cell lines. We then treated RENCA tumor‐bearing mice with EVE and found that PD‐L1 expression was also increased in tumor cells after EVE treatment. To determine the antitumor effects of EVE alone, anti‐PD‐L1 alone, and EVE in combination with anti‐PD‐L1, we evaluated their antitumor effects on RENCA tumor‐bearing mice. A significant decrease in the tumor burden was observed in the EVE alone but not in the anti‐PD‐L1 alone treatment group compared with the control group. Importantly, the combination of EVE with anti‐PD‐L1 significantly reduced tumor burden compared with the EVE alone treatment, increasing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the ratio of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells to TILs. The results of the present study demonstrated that anti‐PD‐L1 treatment enhanced the antitumor effect of EVE in a mouse model, supporting a direct translation of this combination strategy to the clinic for the treatment of RCC.