老年人急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术治疗

目的:探讨老年人急性胆囊炎的临床特点,更好地把握腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)术的时机和方法。方法:回顾分析32例老年人急性胆囊炎LC的临床资料,比较早期(急性发作48h内)LC及延期(急性发作48h后)LC的治疗结果。结果:早期及延期LC均获成功,患者全部治愈,未发生严重并发症;但延期LC的平均手术时间及术后平均住院日期较长。结论:老年人急性胆囊炎病情进展快,手术难度大、风险高;只要高度重视围手术期的处理,把握手术时机及技巧,早期LC是安全、可行的;除病情危重不能耐受手术者外,多数患者均应尽早施行LC。     

急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的体会(附275例报告)

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的手术时机和手术技巧。方法:回顾分析2004年8月至2009年12月为275例急性胆囊炎患者施行LC的临床资料,总结成功为急性胆囊炎患者行LC的经验。结果:本组242例成功完成LC,33例中转开腹,全组无死亡病例及大出血等严重并发症发生,仅1例胆管损伤。结论:急性胆囊炎在发病早期(72h内)应用适当的手术技巧,多数急性胆囊炎患者行LC是安全可靠的。     

急性结石性胆囊炎经腹腔镜胆囊切除的手术时机选择及并发症的预防

目的探讨急性胆囊炎经腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)的手术时机选择及并发症的预防。方法分析急性结石性胆囊炎经腹腔镜胆囊切除术82例患者的临床资料。结果82例患者中除3例中转开腹手术外,其余均手术成功。全组无手术并发症状发生。结论急性胆囊炎LC手术时机原则上越早越好,手术成功与否同手术者的经验及手术的技巧有直接关系。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎46例体会

目的:总结急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的临床经验及适应证和手术技巧。方法:回顾性分析我院2003年1月至2008年6月为46例急性胆囊炎患者行LC的临床资料。结果:45例成功完成LC,其中3例行胆囊大部切除术。因Calot三角致密粘连,解剖不清,中转开腹1例。手术时间30~120min,平均50min。术后住院4~10d,平均6.7d。术后无严重并发症发生。结论:只要把握手术时机,掌握好手术技巧,急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的。     

急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术127例报告

目的:探讨急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)手术时机的选择及术中并发症的预防.方法:回顾分析2008年1月至2011年6月为127例急性结石性胆囊炎患者施行LC的临床资料.结果:125例顺利完成LC,2例中转开腹.术后继发胆管结石3例,均于术后3～5d行...     

老年人急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜治疗

目的总结急性胆囊炎老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的适应证及手术经验。方法回顾分析2004年1月～2006年1月89例老年患者急性胆囊炎(AC)的LC治疗经过。结果本组手术均获成功,未发生严重并发症。结论掌握恰当的适应证与手术时机,应用合理手术方案和操作技巧,对于老年患者AC的腹腔镜手术是安全可行的。     

急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床分析

目的探讨急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的效果及安全性。方法对64例急性胆囊炎患者行LC治疗,回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果 58例顺利完成LC手术,6例中转开腹完成手术。未发生胆管损伤、腹腔出血、胆漏及膈下脓肿等并发症。结论严格掌握手术适应证、充分术前准备、规范进行操作,恰当把握中转开腹的时机,对急性胆囊炎患者实施LC是安全可行。     

胆囊结石伴急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术时机

目的 :探讨胆囊结石伴急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术时机。方法 :回顾分析 12 2例患者的临床资料。结果 :115例顺利完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC) ,7例中转开腹。全组并发胆漏 1例 ,粘连性肠梗阻 1例。结论 :只要掌握正确的手术时机 ,及时中转开腹 ,急性胆囊炎行LC是安全可行的。     

急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床探讨

目的 探讨急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的手术时机、适应证及注意事项.方法 对159例急性结石性胆囊炎患者行LC的资料作回顾性分析.结果 148例LC手术成功,手术时间30～125 min,平均65 min.11例中转开腹,中转率为6.9%.均恢复良好,无严重并发症发生.结论 结石性胆囊炎急性发作的患者,治...     

老年急性结石性胆囊炎不分离离断胆囊动脉主干左侧入路LC术的临床效果观察

目的探讨不分离离断胆囊动脉主干左侧入路LC术在治疗老年人急性结石性胆囊炎的安全性及疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2011.1~2015.9老年人急性结石性胆囊炎急诊行LC术共38例。其中采用不分离离断胆囊动脉主干左侧入路LC治疗17例老年人急性结石性胆囊炎记为实验组,21例行常规行LC术老年人急性结石性胆囊炎记为对照组。结果所有38例患者均顺利完成手术,未中转开腹。两组的手术时间,术后住院时间等方面无明显统计学差异(P0.05),术中出血量实验组明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论采用不分离离断胆囊动脉主干左侧入路LC术治疗老年人急性结石性胆囊炎安全可靠,值得临床采用。     

急性胆囊炎320例腹腔镜手术时机的评价与操作体会

目的　对急性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术时机进行评价 ,并总结手术操作体会。方法　将 32 0例急性胆囊炎患者分 3组施行LC。结果　早期手术组 16 4例 ,中转手术 8例 (0 .5 % ) ;限期手术组 5 1例 ,中转手术 7例 (13.7% ) ;择期手术组 10 5例 ,中转手术 5例 (0 .5 % )。平均手术时间分别为早期组4 6min、限期组 89min及择期组 35min ,平均住院时间分别为 5 .4d、13.6d及 8.7d。本组患者均痊愈出院。结论　急性胆囊炎在发病早期是行LC的理想时机 ;Calot三角的良好显露、正确处理胆囊管和胆囊动脉是LC成功的关键 ;正确对待中转手术和掌握中转手术的指征是LC的安全保证措施     

老年人急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术治疗

目的探讨老年人急性胆囊炎采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床效果与应用价值。方法回顾性分析105例因急性胆囊炎实施胆囊切除术的老年患者的临床资料,按手术方式分为腹腔镜组(LC组)和剖腹胆囊切除术组(OC组)。结果两组患者手术时间、肠功能恢复时间及住院天数差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),LC组优于OC组;术中出血、腹腔引流量和术后并发症两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论老年急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜治疗是安全可行的。     

急性结石性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜手术的可行性及手术方法探讨

目的:探讨急性结石性胆囊炎患者症状发作72h内行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的可行性及合理的手术方法。方法:回顾分析136例急性结石性胆囊炎患者的临床资料,并与同期行LC治疗1 165例非急性发作期胆囊结石患者在手术时间、并发症发生率及中转开腹率等方面比较。结果:136例早期行LC的急性结石性胆囊炎患者平均手术时间、并发症发生率及中转开腹率与同期行LC治疗的1 165例非急性发作期胆囊结石患者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:急性结石性胆囊炎在症状发作72h内行LC是安全可行的。手术成功的关键是Calot三角的正确处理,减少并合理处理术中出血是降低肝外胆管损伤和中转开腹率的重点。     

Early minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND: Recently, techniques using fine-caliber instruments (2 or 3 mm in diameter) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, called minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC), were reported to be superior to conventional LC (CLC, using 5 mm instruments) in postoperative course and cosmetic outcome. However, the use of MLC to date has been largely restricted to uncomplicated situations. Since CLC has been proved to be a safe and efficient technique for acute cholecystitis especially if conducted early, this study tests the feasibility and safety of MLC for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis were prospectively randomized to minilaparoscopic (n = 38) or conventional laparoscopic (n = 31) cholecystectomy, and the operations were conducted within 2 days of admission whenever possible. Despite different operative techniques, both groups of patients received identical preoperative preparation, evaluation and postoperative care. The two groups were compared for patient characteristics, results of laboratory tests, predictive score for LC difficulties, operative time, operative complications, hospitalization days and need for meperidine injection for wound pain. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 7.9% (3 of 38) for the MLC group and 6.5% (2 of 31) for the CLC group. Nine patients in the MLC group and 7 in the CLC group had concomitant choledocholithiasis and underwent endoscopic stone retrieval before operation. The age, sex, predictive score for LC difficulties, preoperative leukocyte count, length of hospital stay and requirement of intramuscular meperidine injections were similar for both groups of patients, while, the operative times were marginally longer in the MLC group (113.8 +/- 30.8 versus 98.2 +/- 33.2 minutes, P = 0.056). No major complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis by MLC are as good as those of CLC if the operation is performed early, with obvious smaller incisions and minimal complications. MLC is a safe and effective procedure for patients with acute cholecystitis, and has an acceptable low conversion rate.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的手术时机

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（｜aparoscopiccholecystectomy,LC）治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的手术时机。方法对南京明基医院2008年5月～2011年5月75例急性结石性胆囊炎行LC的临床资料进行回顾性分析,比较早期组（胆囊炎发作≤72h）与延期组（胆囊炎发作〉72h）手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间和近期并发症发生率。结果早期组手术时间（92．4±23．1）min,明显短于延期组（122．0±31．8）rain（t=-4．564,P=0．000）;术中出血量中位数20ml（10-100m1）,明显少于延期组中位出血量40ml（10～200m1）（Z=-2．557,P=0．011）;术后住院时间（4．5±1．5）d,明显短于延期组（5．6±2．8）d（t=-2．122,P=0．037）;早期组近期并发症发生率2．6％（1／38）,与延期组12．1％（4／33）无统计学差异（,=1．264,P：0．261）。结论急性结石性胆囊炎病人急诊行Lc最好在发病72h内进行,并把握好中转开腹手术的指征。     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with acute cholecystitis versus those with chronic cholecystitis and to determine the optimal timing for LC in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: From January 1991 to July 1998, 796 patients (542 women and 254 men) underwent LC. In 132 patients (67 women and 65 men), acute cholecystitis was confirmed via histopathological examination. These patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 85) had an LC prior to 3 days after the onset of the symptoms of acute cholecystitis, and group 2 (n = 47) had an LC after 3 days. RESULTS: There were no mortalities. The conversion rates were 38.6% in acute cholecystitis and 9.6% in chronic cholecystitis (p<10(-8)). Length of surgery (150.3 min vs. 107.8 min; p<10(-9)), postoperative morbidity (15% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.001), and postoperative length of stay (7.9 days vs. 5 days; p< 10(-9)) were significantly different between LC for acute cholecystitis and elective LC. For acute cholecystitis, we found a statistical difference between the successful group and the conversion group in terms of length of surgery and postoperative stay. The conversion rates in patients operated on before and after 3 days following the onset of symptoms were 27% and 59.5%, respectively (p = 0.0002). There was no statistical difference between early and delayed surgery in terms of operative time and postoperative complications. However, total hospital stay was significantly shorter for group 1. CONCLUSIONS: LC for acute cholecystitis is a safe procedure with a shorter postoperative stay, lower morbidity, and less mortality than open surgery. LC should be carried out as soon as the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is established and preferably before 3 days following the onset of symptoms. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce both the conversion rate and the total hospital stay as medical and economic benefits.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe approach for management of acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is increasingly being used as an appropriate early treatment in patients with cholecystitis. This study evaluated the safety, effectiveness, and complications of LC in all cases of acute cholecystitis. METHODS: A retrospective study involved the patients who underwent LC for acute cholecystitis within 72 hours of admission. The preoperative diagnosis was based on clinical, laboratory, and echographic examinations, while the final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination of the excised gallbladder. RESULTS: We identified 184 patients with acute cholecystitis. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was not performed. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 62 patients (33.7%), and postoperative ERCP in 13 patients (7.1%). Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in 19 patients (10.3%); 16 patients for severe inflammation and adhesions and 3 patients because of uncontrolled bleeding. The mean operative time was 68 minutes. No deaths occurred. The overall complication rate was 6% with 3 postoperative bile leakages and 2 nonbilious subhepatic collections. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: LC is a safe, effective procedure for the early management of patients with acute cholecystitis. LC can be safely performed without routine IOC when ERCP is performed preoperatively on the basis of specific indications. Meticulous dissection and good exposure of Calot's triangle may prevent bile duct injuries.