重度开放性Pilon骨折的治疗

目的 探讨重度开放性Pilon骨折的手术时机、手术方法选择及其对治疗效果的影响.方法 2003年4月至2008年7月收治开放性Pilon骨折患者21例,骨折按AO/OTA分类,均为C型,C2型17例,C3型4例;软组织损伤程度按照Gustilo标准,Ⅱ度18例,Ⅲ A度2例,Ⅲ B度1例.根据骨折类型、软组织损伤程度及受伤时间的不同采用两种不同的治疗方法,GustiloⅡ度C2型16例,GustiloⅡ度C3型2例,Gustilo ⅢA度C2型l例,采用创面清创胫骨有限内固定结合支架外固定术;GustiloⅢA度C3型1例,Gustilo ⅢB度C3型1例,采用创面清创跟骨牵引、延期手术.结果 所有患者术后获得6～48个月的随访,平均24个月.骨折复位情况影像学评估结果(Burwell-Charnley标准):解剖复位6例,复位一般14例,复位差1例.骨折全部愈合,愈合时间2.5～11个月,平均4.7个月,其中骨折延迟愈合2例,延迟愈合率9.5%.创面皮肤浅表坏死2例,浅表感染2例,深部感染1例,感染率14.3%.早期出现踝关节创伤性关节炎8例,发生率38.1%.按美国骨科协会足踝外科分会(American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society,AOFAS)评分标准:评分为66～94分,平均85.2分.主要并发症包括皮肤、软组织坏死、感染,骨折延迟愈合,创伤性关节炎等.结论 治疗开放性Pilon骨折要根据骨折类型、软组织损伤程度及受伤时间的不同选择适当的手术时机和手术方式,正确评估软组织损伤情况、骨与软组织血运的保护是治疗关键.严格的清创、合理应用抗生素、酌情植骨、适时的功能锻炼可以减少并发症的发生.     

胫骨pilon骨折治疗中踝关节外侧结构损伤恢复的重要性

目的 探讨踝关节外侧结构稳定性在胫骨pilon骨折治疗中的意义.方法 从2005年7月至2008年1月共收治18例胫骨pilon骨折伴踝关节外侧结构损伤患者,其中男13例,女5例,平均年龄41.3岁.闭合性骨折16例,开放性骨折2例.AO分型:B1型3例,B2型5例;C1型3例,C2型7例.对于12例闭合性胫骨pilon骨折患者,首先采用后外侧切口进行腓骨复位和内固定,接着采用改良前内侧切口进行胫骨Chaput结节的复位和固定,中间关节面以及内侧骨块参照Chaput结节进行复位.对于2例开放性骨折和4例伴有严重软组织损伤或多发伤的闭合性胫骨pilon骨折患者,采用分期手术治疗,一期腓骨切开复位钢板内固定结合内侧胫骨跨踝关节外固定支架固定,对内侧结构只做克氏针或螺钉临时复位固定,二期(平均14 d后)拆除胫骨外固定支架或行胫骨切开复位钢板内固定. 结果 14例患者术后获8～30个月(平均18.4个月)随访,4例失访.14例骨折均获骨性愈合,平均愈合时间为5.4个月.关节面复位评价:解剖复位9例,一般4例,差1例.临床功能评价:优6例,良3例,可4例,差1例.1例开放性胫骨pilon骨折外固定后出现感染,在抗感染治疗后7周更换内固定,同时放置庆大霉素珠链,术后30周骨折愈合. 结论踝关节外侧结构稳定性的恢复在胫骨pilon骨折治疗中极其重要.     

有限内固定联合支架外固定术治疗复杂性Pilon骨折的疗效观察

目的：探讨有限内固定联合支架外固定术治疗复杂性Pilon骨折的临床疗效以及安全性。方法选取2010年2月至2014年2月我院收治的复杂性胫骨Pilon骨折患者80例,随机分为两组,联合固定组（40例）采用有限内固定联合支架外固定治疗,单纯内固定组（40例）采用切开复位内固定治疗。采用Burwell?Charnley骨折复位放射学评分评价复位情况,Tornetta等Pilon骨折临床治疗结果评价标准评价治疗结果,并比较两组并发症的发生情况。结果两组患者均随访时间3~6个月,平均随访时间为4.2个月。术后1周时,联合固定组22例达解剖复位,12例复位可,6例复位差;单纯内固定组19例达解剖复位,16例复位可,5例复位差,两组关节面复位情况比较,差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.882,P=0.643）。术后3个月,联合固定组临床治疗优良率为92.5%,显著优于单纯内固定组的80.0%（χ2=4.114,P=0.043）;两组并发症发生率分别为7.5%和5.0%,差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.213,P=0.644）。结论有限内固定联合支架外固定是治疗复杂性Pilon骨折的有效方法,可使损伤关节面达到解剖复位,有效恢复患者的踝关节功能。     

超踝关节可动外固定架治疗严重粉碎和开放性Pilon骨折初步报告

目的应用自行设计的超踝关节可动外固定架治疗严重粉碎和开放性Pilon骨折。方法2000年1月～2002年5月采用自制超躁关节可动外国定架治疗踝关节粉碎和开放性Pilon骨折15例．必要时结合有限切开克氏针内固定。结果全部病例均得到随访．随访时间6～22个月．平均10个月，外固定架术后使用时间平均为3个月．骨折愈台时间平均为4.5个月，所有骨折均愈合。2例延迟愈合者行骨移植术．其中1例同时行钢板内固定。9倒开放骨折者无一例发生感染：其余6例闭合骨折者无伤口感染、皮肤坏死，仅2例发生钉道感染，终末随访时踝关节活动度为优5例，良7例．可2例．差1例。1例因发生创伤性关节炎而行踝关节融合术。结论应用超踝关节可动外固定架治疗复杂的Pilon骨折．既能维持骨折对位．又不妨碍踝关节活动，手术创伤小，愈合率高，并发症少．疗效较满意．     

严重Pilon骨折的手术治疗

目的探讨严重Pilon骨折的手术治疗的方法及其临床效果。方法自2006年8月至2011年8月共收治严重Pilon骨折患者189例,获得随访的76例患者中,骨折按AO／OTA分类,均为C型,其中C1型19例,C2型35例,C3型22例。合并腓骨骨折75例。开放性骨折9例,软组织损伤程度按Gustilo分型,9例均I型。开放性骨折急诊行清创缝合及跟骨牵引后等待延期手术。闭合性骨折人院后均行跟骨牵引后延期手术。延期手术均在踝部肿胀消退后进行,伤后至手术时间5～14d,平均7．2d。65例行骨折切开复位内侧钢板螺钉内固定术,其中11例加用前或后侧小钢板固定,21例加用螺钉固定。11例采用骨折有限切开固定加超关节外固定架固定。有腓骨骨折者先行腓骨内固定术。61例取自体髂骨植骨。结果76例患者获得随访,随访时间10～54个月,平均27个月,术后骨折复位情况影像学评估结果（Burwell—Chamley标准）：解剖复位33例,复位一般41例,复位差2例。骨折全部愈合,愈合时间12周-73周,平均17．6周,其中骨折延迟愈合9例。皮肤创面浅表坏死7例,浅表感染6例,深部感染2例。发生踝关节创伤性关节炎18例,按美国骨科协会足踝外科分会（AOFAS）评分标准：评分为47～95分,平均82．7分。结论根据骨折类型和软组织损伤程度,对严重Pilon骨折采用手术治疗,通过合理的固定及早期功能锻炼,能取得满意的疗效,有效减少并发症的发生。     

腓侧锁定接骨板桥接治疗胫骨下段骨折

目的探讨腓侧锁定接骨板桥接治疗胫骨下段骨折的临床疗效。方法对48例胫骨下段骨折患者采用腓侧锁定接骨板内固定。结果 48例均获得随访,时间8~25个月。患者骨折均愈合,其中骨折延迟愈合4例,未发生内固定断裂。创面皮肤浅表坏死2例,深部感染1例。骨折复位情况影像学评估：解剖复位38例,复位一般10例。按Mazur踝关节功能系统评分标准：优40例,良6例,可2例。结论合理评估软组织条件,掌握手术时机,关节面解剖复位,腓侧锁定接骨板治疗胫骨下段骨折可获得良好的疗效。     

Results of operative fixation of unstable ankle fractures in geriatric patients.

It is widely accepted that operative fixation of unstable ankle fractures yields predictably good outcomes in the general population. The current literature, however reports less acceptable results in the geriatric population age 65 years and older. The current study analyzes the outcome of the surgical treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients at least 65 years old. Twenty three patient over 65 years old were surgically treated after sustaining 21 (91%) closed and 2 (9%) open grade II unstable ankle fractures. Fractures were classified according to the Danis-Weber and Lauge-Hansen schemes. Fracture type was predominantly Weber B (21/23, 91%), or supination external rotation stage IV (21/23, 91%). Fracture union rate was 100%. There were three significant complications including a lateral wound dehiscence with delayed fibular union in an open fracture dislocation, and two below knee amputations, neither of which was directly related to the fracture treatment. There were three minor complications; one superficial wound infection and two cases of prolonged incision drainage, all of which resolved without further surgical intervention. Complications were associated with open fractures and preexisting systemic disease. These results indicate that open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures in geriatric patients is an efficacious treatment regime that with results that are comparable to the general population.     

四肢长骨开放性骨折早期内固定治疗的探讨

目的探讨早期内固定系统治疗四肢长骨开放性骨折的临床效果。方法86例四肢长骨开放性骨折患者，采用早期彻底清创，切开复位内固定治疗，其中采用钢板螺钉57例，髓内钉加钢丝14例，克氏针加钢丝10例，钢丝加外固定支架5例。Ⅰ期缝合65例，延迟缝合10例，皮瓣转移11例。结果随访77例，平均10.5（3-22）个月，骨正常愈合73例，延迟愈合或骨不连4例。结论早期内固定治疗四肢长骨开放性骨折能尽量把开放性骨折转变为闭合性骨折，从而提高其愈合能力。     

动力型外固定支架结合有限内固定术治疗Pilon骨折

目的评价复位手法、动力型外固定支架结合有限内固定治疗复杂Pilon骨折的疗效。方法 2007年1月～2009年6月,采用手法复位、动力型外固定支架结合有限内固定治疗23例复杂Pilon骨折。根据Ruedi-Allgower分类标准,Ⅱ型14例,Ⅲ型9例。结果所有患者术程顺利,手术用时平均57min,术中出血量平均75ml,术中无神经、血管损伤。随访23例,随访时间6～24个月,平均17个月。未发生螺钉松动及切口深部感染。3例出现钉道浅部感染,均通过换药等局部处理后治愈;轻度踝内翻1例;创伤性关节炎1例。骨折均愈合,平均愈合时间4.2个月。按Mazur踝关节临床症状及功能评分系统进行评分,优15例,良5例,可2例,差1例,优良率87.0%。结论复位手法、动力型外固定支架结合有限内固定能够减少切开复位带来的软组织损伤,避免对骨折端血供的破坏,具有出血量少、创伤小、手术时间短、骨不连发生率低等优点,是治疗复杂Pilon骨折的较好选择。     

Long-term results of pilon fractures

INTRODUCTION: The long-term results of pilon fractures are rarely documented. The present study evaluated the long-term results related to each fracture pattern of a pilon fracture treated with open reduction and plating. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty-eight pilon fractures with a mean 10-year follow-up were divided into three groups, based on the Ruedi-Allgower classification. Group A was composed of 39 patients with Ruedi-Allgower type I fractures; group B comprised 62 patients with type II fractures; and group C included 27 patients with type III fractures. The radiographs were reviewed for adequacy of fracture reduction and posttraumatic arthrosis. At the end of follow-up, the clinical results were evaluated using a rating scale. RESULTS: Group C had significantly lower excellent and good reduction rates than group A or B (P < 0.05). Groups B and C had progressively increased ankle arthrosis with time (P = 0.043, P = 0.049, respectively). Group C had more unsatisfactory clinical outcomes than group A or B (P < 0.05). Operative concurrent fixation of the fractured fibula resulted in a better outcome than non-operative treatment (P < 0.05). Open fractures had significantly lower satisfactory outcomes than closed fractures (60.5% versus 78.9%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction with plating was a reasonably effective procedure for the treatment of Ruedi type I pilon fractures. The long-term outcome of pilon fractures was affected by fracture patterns, fibular length restoration, quality of reduction, and severity of soft tissue injury. Posttraumatic arthrosis affecting the ankle after a severe pilon fracture (Ruedi type II or III) was a progressive disease, and required long-term follow-up.     

The management of tibial fractures in acute spinal cord injury patients

Of 34 tibia fractures in 28 acute spinal cord injuries, 13 patients had complete and 15 had incomplete neurologic lesions. Tibia fractures were divided into three groups: Group I, nonoperative treatment; Group II, early open reduction and internal fixation; and Group III, Type III open injuries. Group I included 17 fractures, of which nine (53%) had delayed union, malunion, or nonunion. The average time to union was 6.5 months. Seven patients had pressure sores and pulmonary emboli. Eleven fractures were noted in Group II. One delayed union (9%), one superficial wound infection that healed uneventfully, and one deep vein thrombosis were noted. The average time to union was 12 weeks. All six Group III tibias had delayed and nonunions, regardless of treatment. Nonoperative fractures healed at a prolonged rate, while open reduction and internal fixation enhanced the rate and time to union. Fractures treated with early open reduction and internal fixation, excluding Group III patients, had the least orthopedic and medical complications. Open reduction and internal fixation is a justifiable alternative to nonoperative treatment in the uncomplicated tibia fracture regardless of neurologic lesion for improved medical and fracture care.     

Is delayed reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi free flap a worthy option in the management of open IIIB tibial fractures?

Early reconstruction of severe open fractures, performed within 7 days of the injury, has a better outcome than closure after 7 days. However, the uncertain demarcation of damaged tissue often results in delayed reconstruction. In this article, we report our surgical outcomes of delayed reconstruction using latissimus dorsi free flap with internal fixation. Twenty‐three patients with Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures Between March 2009 and May 2012 were included in this study. There were 16 cases of distal 1/3 fracture of the tibia, 4 of midshaft fracture, 1 of proximal 1/3 fracture, and 2 of segmental fracture. Serial debridement with application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was performed before the final operation. All patients underwent internal fixation of the bone and reconstruction of soft tissue defect using latissimus dorsi free flap. The number of serial debridements, excluding those performed during emergency and finial operation, ranged from 1 to 5 (mean 2.69) times. Mean time from injury to final operation was 10.65 (range, 7–22) days. All flaps survived without complications. Three cases (13%) were infected, and three cases required further bone graft surgery to facilitate bone union (13%). Bone union was achieved after a mean 6.3 (range, 3–12) months. Mean follow‐up period was 16.34 (range, 12–26) months. During follow‐up, all patients were able to ambulate without use of an aid. In cases of severe open fracture, treatment should emphasize soft tissue coverage rather than rushing to achieve definitive fixation in the setting of poor surrounding tissues. When delayed reconstruction is inevitable, radical debridement is performed first, then NPWT is used as bridging therapy, and free flap could be considered for definite soft tissues coverage. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:453–459, 2016.     

胫骨远端骨折:经皮钢板内固定优于切开复位内固定吗?

目的 对闭合复位经皮钢板固定及切开复位内固定两种方法治疗胫骨远端骨折进行回顾性比较研究,明确两种方法的不同指征和疗效. 方法 2006年10月至2007年6月,对采用钢板内固定治疗闭合胫骨远端骨折(不累及关节面)的94例患者进行回顾性研究.研究对象分为切开组和闭合组,其中切开组42例,闭合组52例.研究内容为骨折愈合时间、有无畸形愈合及并发症发生率.结果 平均随访时间14.5个月(8～24个月).切开组中骨折愈合35例,延迟愈合3例,骨不连4例.平均愈合时间3.83个月(3～8个月),无畸形愈合患者,切口感染2例.闭合组中骨折愈合47例,延迟愈合5例,无骨不连患者.平均愈合时间3.66个月(2～8个月).两组的总愈合时间,A1型、A2型、B型愈合时间之间差异无统计学意义;A3型愈合时间闭合组长于切开组;C型愈合时间闭合组短于切开组.闭合组中出现5例畸形愈合患者(其中2例外旋畸形,3例向后成角畸形),8例出现踝关节异物不适感,钢板取出后症状好转. 结论胫骨远端骨折总体上切开组与闭合组的愈合时间差异无统计学意义.但A3型骨折中切开组要优于闭合组,而C型骨折中闭合组要优于切开组.如闭合复位经皮固定的患者术后存在前后成角畸形,则其存在较高的骨延迟愈合率.     

Stabilisation of the fractured fibula plays an important role in the treatment of pilon fractures: a retrospective comparison of fibular fixation methods

Ninety-eight pilon fractures associated with ipsilateral distal fibular fracture were included in this study. The pilon fractures were treated by open reduction and plating. The 98 fractures were divided into three groups based on the treatment method of fractured fibula. Group A was composed of 50 fibular fractures treated by open reduction and plate fixation. Group B was composed of 23 fibular fractures treated by open reduction and pin fixation. Group C was composed of 25 fibular fractures treated conservatively by closed reduction. The radiographs were reviewed for adequacy of fracture reduction and posttraumatic arthrosis. At the end of follow-up, the clinical outcomes were evaluated using a rating scale. The three groups were similar in respect to Ruedi type, open fracture grade, and demographics (all p values >0.25). Group A showed a decreasing trend of malunion and ankle arthrosis compared to group C (p = 0.091 and p = 0.099, respectively). Group A had a better clinical outcome than group C (p = 0.008). In addition, group A showed an increasing trend of satisfactory outcome compared to group B (p = 0.096). In conclusion, for pilon fractures associated with ipsilateral fibular fractures, stabilisation of the fractured fibula plays an important role in the decrease of distal tibial malunion and post-traumatic ankle arthrosis as well as improvement of clinical outcomes.     

胫骨远端骨折:经皮钢板内固定优于切开复位内固定吗?

目的 对闭合复位经皮钢板固定及切开复位内固定两种方法治疗胫骨远端骨折进行回顾性比较研究,明确两种方法的不同指征和疗效. 方法 2006年10月至2007年6月,对采用钢板内固定治疗闭合胫骨远端骨折(不累及关节面)的94例患者进行回顾性研究.研究对象分为切开组和闭合组,其中切开组42例,闭合组52例.研究内容为骨折愈合时间、有无畸形愈合及并发症发生率.结果 平均随访时间14.5个月(8～24个月).切开组中骨折愈合35例,延迟愈合3例,骨不连4例.平均愈合时间3.83个月(3～8个月),无畸形愈合患者,切口感染2例.闭合组中骨折愈合47例,延迟愈合5例,无骨不连患者.平均愈合时间3.66个月(2～8个月).两组的总愈合时间,A1型、A2型、B型愈合时间之间差异无统计学意义;A3型愈合时间闭合组长于切开组;C型愈合时间闭合组短于切开组.闭合组中出现5例畸形愈合患者(其中2例外旋畸形,3例向后成角畸形),8例出现踝关节异物不适感,钢板取出后症状好转. 结论胫骨远端骨折总体上切开组与闭合组的愈合时间差异无统计学意义.但A3型骨折中切开组要优于闭合组,而C型骨折中闭合组要优于切开组.如闭合复位经皮固定的患者术后存在前后成角畸形,则其存在较高的骨延迟愈合率.     

经皮微创内固定技术（MIPO）治疗踝关节骨折的疗效分析

目的比较经皮微创内固定技术（MIPO）与切开复位内固定术（ORIF）治疗踝关节骨折的疗效。方法自2009—01—2012—12对收治的88例成人踝关节骨折根据内固定方法不同分为闭合复位经皮微创空心钉及钢板内固定（MIPO组,38例）和传统切开复位内固定（ORIF组,50例）,比较2组手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、局部并发症发生情况及术后1年AOFAS评分。结果MIPO组在住院时间、切口感染发生率及骨折愈合时间方面明显优于ORIF组,差异有统计学意义（P〈O．05）。88例均获得随访6～36个月,平均18个月。结论与传统切开复位内固定相比,闭合复位经皮微创空心钉及钢板固定技术治疗踝关节骨折具有创伤小、切口美观、固定牢靠、骨折愈合率高、踝关节功能恢复满意的优点。     

Two-staged delayed open reduction and internal fixation of severe pilon fractures

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a two-staged technique for the treatment of C3 pilon fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with twenty-two C3 pilon fractures. Patients with C1 or C2 fractures and patients with open growth plates were excluded. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent immediate fibular fixation and placement of a medial spanning external fixator. After, on average, twenty-four days, patients underwent removal of the external fixator and formal open reduction and internal fixation of the pilon fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: At average follow-up of twenty-two months, all patients were evaluated by using subjective, objective, and radiographic measurements as described by Burwell and Chamley (J Bone Joint Surg 1965;47B:634-659). Range of motion and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the twenty-two fractures healed within an average of 4.2 months. Average range of motion was 7 degrees of dorsiflexion, 33 degrees of plantar flexion, 17 degrees of eversion, and 11 degrees of inversion. Subjective and objective measurements showed 77 percent good results, 14 percent fair results, and 9 percent poor results. Radiographic reduction showed 73 percent anatomic and 27 percent fair reductions. There were no infections or soft tissue complications. The arthrodesis rate was 9 percent. CONCLUSIONS: A two-staged approach offers acceptable results for the treatment of severe pilon fractures. These results compare favorably with those of primary open reduction and of internal fixation and external fixation techniques. The major advantages include limited soft tissue complications and improved articular reconstruction.     

脊柱附件局部取骨植骨在青少年脊柱侧凸矫形中的应用

目的探讨青少年脊柱侧凸术中脊柱附件局部取骨植骨融合的可行性。方法选择12例经脊柱附件局部取骨植骨融合的青少年脊柱侧凸,12例均采取一期后路矫形,中华长城内固定系统或GSS椎弓根内固定系统矫形内固定,矫形后切取需要融合区域棘突、关节突及胸椎横突处外侧骨皮质,滑移错位植于关节突关节处。定期复查X线片观察脊柱侧凸Cobb角变化和内固定情况。结果术中出血300~600 ml,输血300~400 ml。术前Cobb角为45°~120°（87°±21°）,术后为15°~50°（27°±13°）,矫正率为69%。经12~19个月随访,X线提示11例达到骨性融合,未出现侧凸角度加大及断钉、断棒等并发症,疗效满意。1例术后5个月出现2枚下位椎弓根钉断钉,行二次手术。结论脊柱附件局部取骨、植骨融合可满足青少年脊柱侧凸矫形植骨要求,临床疗效满意。     

2种内固定方法治疗98例踝关节骨折的疗效比较

目的比较闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定与传统切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折的疗效。方法 2004年3月～2009年8月收治的98例非粉碎型内外踝双骨折根据内固定方法不同分为闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定(闭合复位组)和传统切开复位内固定(切开复位组),比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合后外踝有无疼痛及术后1年AOFAS足踝评分。结果闭合复位组术中出血量、术后切口感染发生率及骨折愈合后外踝出现疼痛发生率明显优于切开复位组(P<0.05)。闭合复位组51例术后随访16～81个月,平均29.7月,骨折全部愈合;切开复位组42例随访17～80个月,平均28.3月,4例出现切口红肿、皮缘坏死,经换药后切口愈合,无深部感染发生,1例出现骨折不愈合。结论与传统切开复位内固定比较,闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗踝关节骨折具有出血少、术后切口并发症发生率低、骨折愈合后外踝疼痛发生率低的优点,并能获得与切开复位内固定等同的踝关节功能。     

组合式四肢骨折通用型外固定器治疗胫腓骨骨折

目的：探讨组合式四肢骨折通用型外固定器对胫腓骨骨折的临床治疗效果。方法：37例胫腓骨骨折患者均采用组合式四肢骨折通用型外固定器治疗,其中男28例,女9例;年龄22～76岁,平均47.8岁。横形骨折7例,粉碎性骨折18例,螺旋形骨折8例,斜形骨折4例。闭合性骨折29例,开放性骨折8例。结果：37例患者获得随访,随访时间6～13个月,平均9个月,骨折全部愈合。结论：组合式四肢骨折通用型外固定器治疗胫腓骨骨折具有创伤小、操作难度低、安装拆卸方便、固定稳固、骨折愈合率高等优点,膝踝关节运动不受影响,甚至可戴外固定器行走,无须长期卧床。