食管破裂诊断及外科手术方式的选择——附36例临床分析

目的探讨食管破裂的诊断与手术方式。方法 1980-01—2012-06间共收治36例食管破裂与穿孔患者。保守治疗2例,手术治疗34例。单纯食管破裂修补术、食管破裂修补加肋间肌瓣、膈肌瓣、带蒂大网膜覆盖破裂口8例;破裂食管切除、Ⅰ期食管胃胸内或颈部吻合术3例;纵膈引流、胸腔引流或食管"T"管引流加空肠造瘘6例;食管旷置或颈部食管造瘘,加纵膈、胸腔引流及空肠造瘘,Ⅱ期消化道重建2例,其中1例为经胸骨后管状胃与颈部食管吻合;颈部食管旁切开引流术及食管支架置入术各1例。贲门失弛缓症、食管癌、食管癌术后吻合口狭窄扩张或支架置入时破裂5例:姑息性食管癌切除、吻合口狭窄部切除再游离胃行颈部吻合术4例,食管破裂修补术加破裂食管对侧Heller手术1例。合并多发性肋骨骨折肺深部裂伤、脾破裂胃破裂、车祸胸部贯通伤伴胸壁皮肤Ⅱ度烧伤各1例:行肺裂伤修补,胸腹联合切口行脾切除胃破裂修补术加胃空肠造瘘,1例伤后6d,确诊食管破裂,行食管破裂修补及肋间肌瓣加固。1例食管异物40 d,致食管-主动脉瘘(AEF),左心转流下阻断主动脉,修补主动脉破口,切除胸段食管行颈部食管胃吻合,获成功。食管胸中段化学性烧伤致穿孔1例,I期行胸段食管切除食管胃颈部吻合术。食管破裂修补术后再瘘3例:行胸腔廓清、上下胸腔引流及空肠造瘘。结果治愈27例,其中3例并吻合口狭窄,经扩张后好转。死亡9例。结论选择合理方式治疗食管破裂至关重要。要综合考虑食管破裂的原因、部位、时间、大小、原发疾病、并发症、纵隔及胸腔感染情况。     

食管穿孔的诊断及治疗

目的总结食管穿孔的临床特征、诊断及治疗经验方法。方法 回顾分析2000-01～2010-06 23例食管穿孔临床资料及诊治情况结果。结果本组均经钡剂造影、胸部X线平片、CT、胸腔穿刺等检查,并经手术及食管镜证实。23例中,颈段食管穿孔5例,胸段18例。8例为食管自发性破裂,3例为医源性,11例为食管异物致穿孔,1例为外伤性穿孔。治疗颈段3例手术修补、引流,2例保守治疗;胸段15例经开胸手术,其中2例行食管切除、胃食管吻合术,修补13例;2例行可回收带膜食管支架置入封堵术、胸腔闭式引流、空肠造瘘营养支持治疗,1例放弃治疗。全组1例死于严重胸腔、纵膈感染。结论根据发病史及临床特征要及时、准确的诊断是降低食管穿孔病死率的关键。结合穿孔时间、部位、感染程度选择治疗方案,颈段可保守治疗,胸段食管穿孔应以手术治疗为主。     

食管穿孔83例分析

８３例不同原因引起的食管穿孔，保守治疗５７例；手术２６例，行单纯食管修补术２０例、开胸行纵隔和／或胸腔引流２例、切除贲门肿物行胃食管吻合１例、颈部食管外置２例（其中１例并行二期结肠代食管手术）、１例开胸取异物形成食管瘘后，行二期修补瘘术。全组死亡８例，其中死于纵隔胸腔感染和主动脉破裂出血各４例。总治愈率８５％。并指出异物假牙造成食管穿孔的重要性，对严重的腐蚀性食管灼伤应早期行食管镜检，并针对食管穿孔部位、种类、间隔期、纵隔与胸腔的感染程度及病人具体情况采取相应的治疗措施。     

食管破裂与穿孔15例的临床诊治分析

目的探讨食管破裂与穿孔的诊断与治疗,提高对该疾病的诊治水平。方法总结分析我科15例食管破裂与穿孔的临床病例资料。颈段食管穿孔3例,2例为异物所致,1例为外伤所致,均手术治疗,胸段食管破裂穿孔12例,其中自发性食管破裂穿孔4例,食管异物损伤5例,外伤性食管穿孔2例,医源性损伤1例,根据食管的损伤程度及感染累及范围分别采取食管切开异物取出食管修补,食管部分切除,纵隔引流,瘘口修补等手术治疗12例。结果15例食管破裂与穿孔治愈13例;1例死于合并糖尿病因胸腔和纵隔感染严重,中毒性休克,呼吸衰竭,肾功能衰竭;1例死于食管癌引发食管破裂穿孔致感染性休克,多器官衰竭。结论根据食管破裂与穿孔的大小、时间、部位、纵膈和胸腔污染程度,早期明确诊断,及时采取合适的手术方式是治疗的关键。     

倒置三腔管治疗食管自发性破裂术后瘘

病人　男 ,2 7岁。因饮酒剧烈呕吐后引发食管破裂 ,行胸腔穿刺抽气、抽液和胸腔闭式引流后症状无缓解。 1999年11月剖胸探查 ,见奇静脉弓下食管右壁有 6ｃｍ纵行裂伤 ,给予修补裂口、清洁胸腔。但修补失败 ,病人出现大量脓胸 ,稽留高热 ,稀碘造影检查瘘口较大。术后第 7ｄ我们采用倒置三腔管、瘘口旷置、胃造瘘和胸腔引流治疗 ,取得满意疗效 ,现报告如下。将Ｆ10胃管常规置入胃内 ,作上腹正中切口 ,通过胃造口倒置Ｆ18三腔管且与胃管妥善缝合固定 ,在Ｘ线透视下 ,牵引胃管调整三腔管的 2个气囊使之在瘘口上下各一 ,旷置瘘口。胸腔冲洗后于最…     

胸段食管骨性异物穿孔的分类与外科治疗

目的 探讨骨性异物所致胸段食管破裂穿孔的分类及其治疗方法.方法 对57例胸段食管骨性异物破裂穿孔患者根据食管损伤性质和继发感染程度进行分类,分别采取不同手术方式并总结其疗效.结果 Ⅰ类为食管破裂、纵隔无脓肿形成,共计17例;其中直接食管破口连续缝合修补7例,直接缝合修补后,外穿孔部位用肋间肌加强6例,心包和带蒂大网膜加强各2例.Ⅱ类为纵膈脓肿期,共计13例;其中食管穿孔切除、胃代食管10例,纵隔脓肿清除胸腔引流3例.Ⅲ类为脓胸期,即骨性异物穿破食管后感染波及胸腔而形成脓胸,共计21例;其中食管穿孔切除、一期胃带食管12例,食管穿孔切除、二期胃或结肠带食管9例.Ⅳ类为脓肿侵犯周围器官并形成主动脉-食管瘘或气管食管瘘,共计6例;气管瘘修补、大网膜填塞、二期胃或结肠代食管术4例,病变段血管切除、人工血管置换、二期胃或结肠代食管2例.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类的51例患者50例获治愈,1例死于脓毒症引起的多脏器功能衰竭综合征.Ⅳ类的6例患者术前准备时麻醉诱导过程死亡1例,手术死亡1例,死因皆为食管-主动脉瘘导致的大出血,其余4例治愈.结论 对骨性异物所致胸段食管损伤病变进行分类,并采取相应方法治疗有助于提高疗效;一旦确诊均应采取积极的手术方式.     

空肠双腔造瘘加纵隔胸腔引流治疗食管穿孔18例

食管破裂穿孔病情凶险、并发症多、疗效差、病死率高，外科医生一直在探讨其治疗手段。我科采用空肠双腔造瘘（经十二指肠、逆行胃减压引流和空肠肠内营养）加纵隔胸腔引流治疗食管穿孔18例，疗效满意，现将体会总结如下。     

大网膜移植治疗食管感染、穿孔

目的　探讨食管感染、穿孔的手术治疗方法 ,以提高其成功率 ,降低死亡率。　方法　 1970～ 1999年收治食管感染、穿孔患者 32例 ,其中食管异物 2 2例 ,外伤 5例 ,食管溃疡穿孔 3例 ,医源性损伤 2例。所有患者共施行手术5 6例次。手术方式包括除去异物、胸腔引流、食管破口修补、邻近组织覆盖、带蒂大网膜包绕、病变食管切除、重建食管、胃造口和空肠造口。　结果　治愈 2 6例 ,好转 2例 ,死亡 4例。随访 1～ 5年 ,2 2例能进普通饮食。　结论　食管感染、穿孔治疗的关键为去除病因、清除病灶内失活组织、控制感染、胃造口减压、空肠造口供给营养和带蒂大网膜包绕食管     

8例医源性食管穿孔的诊断和治疗

目的探讨医源性食管穿孔的诊断和治疗。方法回顾性分析8例医源性食管穿孔的临床资料。结果8例手术过程顺利,其中1例发现较晚者经加强抗炎支持治疗痊愈。结论食管造影为确诊医源性食管穿孔的主要手段,纤维胃镜检查可弥补食管造影的不足。一旦确诊应及早手术治疗,手术以食管修补为主,所有患者均应行胃造瘘术。     

非恶性食管-气管/支气管瘘的外科治疗

目的探讨非恶性食管-气管/支气管瘘的临床特点和处理方法。方法回顾性分析2002年1月至2011年10月北京协和医院收治12例非恶性食管-气管/支气管瘘患者的临床资料,其中男6例,女6例;平均年龄49.8(32～72)岁。食管气管瘘7例,食管支气管瘘1例,食管癌术后胸胃支气管瘘2例,食管憩室支气管瘘2例。右侧开胸入路9例,左侧开胸3例。行食管瘘、气管瘘修补7例;食管瘘、支气管瘘修补1例;胸胃瘘、支气管瘘修补术2例;食管下段、左肺下叶切除,食管胃弓下吻合术1例;左肺下叶切除,食管憩室瘘修补术1例。结果全部患者均顺利恢复,无手术合并症或死亡,7～10 d恢复经口进食。术后3个月～1年内复查纤维支气管镜及上消化道造影,无气管支气管狭窄,无食管狭窄,不必采用支架或扩张治疗。术后随诊3个月～10年,均恢复良好。结论食管-气管/支气管瘘排除恶性病因,明确瘘口位置,术前给予充分营养支持,手术Ⅰ期修补瘘口,可以获得良好的治疗效果。     

颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的原因及处理

 目的 探讨颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的原因及处理对策。方法 回顾性分析2004年1月至2011年12月采用颈椎前路手术治疗2348例颈椎疾患患者资料,其中5例发生食管瘘,男3例,女2例;年龄14~48岁,平均34岁;颈椎外伤3例,颈椎病1例,颈椎结核1例。1例患者术中发现食管瘘,给予修补;另4例均为术后发现,行清创探查引流术,其中1例探查时发现食管瘘口遂给予修补,1例仅行清创探查术,1例清创探查术后二期行内固定取出术,1例清创探查术后二期行内固定取出及肌瓣填塞术。给予禁食、营养支持、伤口引流及抗生素治疗;定期吞服亚甲蓝,观察漏口情况。结果 经过9～61周治疗,所有患者食管瘘口愈合,恢复进食。随访6～48个月,无一例发生食管瘘复发、颈椎失稳及迟发感染;吞咽功能均良好;患者原有颈部疾患治疗效果均满意,颈椎外伤患者Frankel分级平均提高1级,颈椎病患者JOA评分由术前9分提高至术后15分。结论 采用食管瘘口修补、肌瓣填塞以及引流手术,并严格禁食禁水、营养支持,必要时取出内固定物,多数颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的患者能获得满意的疗效。术中仔细轻柔操作是预防食管瘘发生的关键。     

胸食管异物损伤病变的分级和外科治疗

目的探讨异物性胸食管损伤病变的分级及其治疗方法。方法对84例异物性胸食管损伤患者根据其病变程度进行分级,其中食管非穿透性损伤（Ⅰ级）18例;食管穿透性损伤伴食管周围炎或纵隔炎（Ⅱ级）39例;食管穿透性损伤并发严重纵隔和（或）胸内感染（Ⅲ级）17例;食管穿孔炎症累及邻近大血管（Ⅳ级）10例。根据食管损伤程度和炎症累及范围分别采取经胸食管切开异物摘取（Ⅰ级患者）,食管修补、食管部分切除、纵隔引流、瘘口修补（Ⅱ、Ⅲ级患者）或大动脉置换（Ⅳ级患者）等手术。结果Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级异物性胸食管损伤57例均治愈,Ⅲ级患者中死亡1例（1／17）,Ⅳ级患者中死亡9例（9／10）。结论对异物性胸食管损伤病变进行分级有助于制定科学、合理的治疗方案,降低病死率的关键是预防食管-主动脉瘘的发生。     

Treatment of Esophageal Perforation in a Referral Center in Taiwan

Purpose The high mortality associated with esophageal perforation can be reduced by aggressive surgery and good critical care. We report our experience of treating esophageal perforation in a clinic in Taiwan.Methods The subjects were 28 patients who underwent surgery for a benign esophageal perforation.Results The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 11 patients, spontaneous in 8, and caused by foreign body injury in 9. Most (22/28) of the patients were seen longer than 24 h after perforation, and 77% had empyema preoperatively. The perforation was located in the cervical area in 5 patients and in the thoracic esophagus in 23. We performed primary repair in 24 patients, esophagectomy in 3, and drainage in 1. Leakage occurred after primary repair in ten (41%) patients, resulting in one death, and two patients died of other diseases. Postoperative leakage prolonged the hospital stay but had no impact on mortality. Overall survival was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, timing of treatment, and cause and location of the perforation influenced outcome, but multivariate analysis failed to identify a predictor of mortality.Conclusions Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Primary repair is feasible even if the diagnosis is delayed.     

The Sealing Effect of a Fibrin Tissue Patch on the Esophageal Perforation Area in Primary Repair

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the fibrin tissue patch and to analyze its use in patients with esophageal perforation. Methods We studied 28 patients who were diagnosed with esophageal perforation between January 1990 and January 2006 at Akdeniz University Hospital. Sixteen (57.14%) were male. The average age was 59 ± 9 years. We performed surgery and primary repair reinforcement even if the diagnosis of esophageal perforation was late. Results Twenty-three (82.14%) perforations were the result of endoscopic instruments; spontaneous perforations occurred in three (10.71%) patients. Postoperative complication (Heller myotomy) caused perforation in one patient (3.57%) and blunt trauma in one patient (3.57%). Three (10.71%) patients had cervical perforation, and 25 (89.29%) patients had thoracic esophageal perforation. Twelve (42.86%) patients underwent emergency surgery (within the first 24 h). Ten (35.71%) patients underwent surgery within 48 h, and the remaining 6 (21.43%) underwent surgery after 48 h. Nine (32.14%) patients had primary repair, 7 (25%) had reinforcement of the primary repair with fibrin tissue patch, 7 (25%) had esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, and 2 (7.14%) had drainage and placement of metallic stents. In four patients of the nine who had primary repair, fistula complication was detected, whereas in only one of the seven who had reinforcement of the primary repair with fibrin tissue patch was a fistula detected. Three patients (10.71%), two of whom had Boerhaave’s syndrome, died. Conclusions Surgical primary repair with fibrin tissue patch is the most successful treatment option in the management of esophageal perforation.     

颈椎前路内固定术后中远期食管并发症

 目的 探讨颈椎前路内固定术后中远期食管并发症的发生率及其诊疗策略。方法 对2001年1月至2011年12月2316例行颈椎前路内固定手术患者发生的中远期食管并发症情况进行回顾性分析。食管中远期并发症包括术后2周以上发生的食管穿孔、食管气管瘘、食管皮下瘘、食管憩室、食管胸膜瘘及食管狭窄等。结果 共4例患者发生中远期食管并发症,发生率为0.17%(４/２３1６),其中食管穿孔发生率为0.09%(2例)。病例1为31岁男性患者,自体髂骨移植融合加钢板内固定(C5)术后7年发现食管憩室合并食管穿孔。手术取出内固定,清创后切除憩室,胸骨舌骨肌及肩胛舌骨肌肌瓣修补食管。病例2为46岁男性患者,自体髂骨移植融合加钢板内固定(C5)术后3年发现食管憩室。手术取出内固定,切除食管憩室,胸骨舌骨肌及肩胛舌骨肌肌瓣修补食管。病例3为58岁女性患者,自体髂骨移植融合加钢板内固定(C6)术后5年出现食管憩室。手术取出内固定,切除食管憩室,胸锁乳突肌肌瓣修补食管。病例4为56岁女性患者,钛网植骨融合加钢板内固定(C6)术后3年出现食管穿孔。手术取出内固定,清创后胸锁乳突肌肌瓣修补食管。4例患者术后食管并发症均获得成功治疗,恢复良好。结论 颈椎前路内固定术后中远期食管并发症的发生率较低,X线片、消化道造影及消化道内镜检查是主要的诊断方法,手术是其主要的治疗手段。     

Surgical management of esophageal perforation: role of esophageal conservation in delayed perforation

Definitive repair of esophageal perforation is considered the preferred treatment for patients presenting early (<24 hours). However, the optimal management of delayed presentation (>24 hours) has not been well defined. This study examined the management of esophageal perforation and compared the outcomes of early versus delayed presentation. Records of patients admitted with the diagnosis of esophageal perforation were reviewed. Contrast studies were used to confirm the diagnosis in all cases. Patient demographics and outcome were analyzed to determine differences between early and delayed presentation. A total of 22 cases of esophageal perforation were identified (eight early vs 14 delayed presentations). Operative interventions included primary repair (four), reinforced repair (14) either with intercostal muscle or pleural flap, and a complete esophageal resection (one). Debridement and drainage without repair were done in two patients and a proximal intramural tear was treated with antibiotics and observation. Two patients died during hospitalization. All surviving patients had near-normal restoration of esophageal function. Follow-up at 3 years has shown minimal gastrointestinal problems. One patient required repeat esophageal dilatations and two patients underwent antireflux therapy. Esophageal repair should be considered in all cases of nonmalignant esophageal perforation and should not be influenced by the time of presentation.