A Comparison of Trauma Intubations Managed by Anesthesiologists and Emergency Physicians

Although airway management by emergency physicians has become standard for general emergency department (ED) patients, many believe that anesthesiologists should manage the airways of trauma victims. OBJECTIVES: To compare the success and failure rates of trauma intubations performed under the supervision of anesthesiologists and emergency physicians. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of consecutive endotracheal intubations (ETIs) of adult trauma patients in a single ED over a 46-month period. All ETIs before November 26, 2000, were supervised by anesthesiologists (34 months), and all ETIs from November 26, 2000, onward were supervised by emergency physicians (12 months). Data regarding clinical presentation, personnel involved, medications used, number of attempts required, and need for cricothyrotomy were collected. Study outcomes were: 1) successful intubation within two attempts, and 2) failure of intubation. Failure was defined as inability to intubate, resulting in successful intubation by another specialist, or cricothyrotomy. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to compare results between groups. RESULTS: There were 673 intubations during the study period. Intubation within two attempts was accomplished in 442 of 467 patients (94.6%) managed by anesthesiologists, and in 196 of 206 of patients (95.2%) managed by emergency physicians (OR = 1.109, 95% CI = 0.498 to 2.522). Failure of intubation occurred in 16 of 467 (3.4%) patients managed by anesthesiologists, and in four of 206 (1.9%) patients managed by emergency physicians (OR = 0.558, 95% CI = 0.156 to 1.806). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians can safely manage the airways of trauma patients. Success and failure rates are similar to those of anesthesiologists.     

Analysis of an endotracheal intubation service provided by respiratory care practitioners

Our Respiratory Care Services Department provides an endotracheal intubation service that responds to all intubation requests. Intubation is performed by registered respiratory therapists who complete an 8-hour training program, advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training and certification, and clinical performance of intubation with supervision. The goals of this service are (1) to provide competent persons for performing this service, (2) to assure a rapid response time, and (3) to be cost-effective. EVALUATION METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our service was conducted over a 1-year period (7/90 to 6/91), and calculations were made of the intubation success rate and complication rate. RESULTS: Of the 833 total intubations, 791 were successfully performed by respiratory care practitioners; 730 of those successful intubations (92.3%) were accomplished in fewer than 3 attempts. Recognized complications occurred in 96 intubations (12.1%) and included oral bleeding, vomiting, and short periods of oxygen desaturation. In the 5.1% (42) of the patients not intubated by our service, 22 required heavy sedation, and an anesthesiologist was consulted; 17 patients were intubated by other physicians; and 3 tracheotomies were performed. Multiple intubation attempts were a result of secretions, induced bradycardia, blade-light malfunction, damaged cuff, and esophageal intubations. CONCLUSION: Respiratory Care Services can provide an effective intubation service. Cost savings were realized by centralizing equipment.     

Tracheal intubation in an urban emergency department in Scotland: A prospective,observational study of 3738 intubations

AimThe emergency department (ED) is an area where major airway difficulties can occur, often as complications of rapid sequence induction (RSI). We undertook a prospective, observational study of tracheal intubation performed in a large, urban UK ED to study this further.MethodsWe reviewed data on every intubation attempt made in our ED between January 1999 and December 2011. We recorded techniques and drugs used, intubator details, success rate, and associated complications. Tracheal intubation in our ED is managed jointly by emergency physicians and anaesthetists; an anaesthetist is contacted to attend to support ED staff when RSI is being performed.ResultsWe included 3738 intubations in analysis. 2749 (74%) were RSIs, 361 (10%) were other drug combinations, and 628 (17%) received no drugs. Emergency physicians performed 78% and anaesthetists 22% of intubations. Tracheal intubation was successful in 3724 patients (99.6%). First time success rate was 85%; 98% of patients were successfully intubated with two or fewer attempts, and three patients (0.1%) had more than three attempts. Intubation failed in 14 patients; five (0.13%) had a surgical airway performed. Associated complications occurred in 286 (8%) patients. The incidence of complications was associated with the number of attempts made; 7% in one attempt, 15% in two attempts, and 32% in three attempts (p < 0.001).ConclusionA collaborative approach between emergency physicians and anaesthetists contributed to a high rate of successful intubation and a low rate of complications. Close collaboration in training and delivery of service models is essential to maintain these high standards and achieve further improvement where possible.     

Impact of Emergency Medicine Faculty and an Airway Protocol on Airway Management

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of emergency medicine (EM) faculty presence and an airway management protocol on success rates of tracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data on rates of successful intubations between June 1997 and December 2001 in the ED of a large urban teaching hospital. The authors compared success rates of the first attempt at intubation and times to intubation prior to and after EM faculty presence and the institution of an airway management protocol. RESULTS: Prior to EM faculty presence and the airway management protocol, tracheal intubation was achieved on the first attempt 46% of the time; more than six attempts were required 2.9% of the time. The mean time to intubation was 9.2 minutes (+/-13.2 SD). Following EM faculty presence and the airway protocol, the success rate on the first attempt was 62%, more than six attempts were required 1.1% of the time, and the mean time to intubation was 4.6 minutes (+/-6.2 SD). CONCLUSIONS: First-attempt intubation success rates and decreased mean time to successful intubation improved following EM faculty presence and the introduction of an airway management protocol.     

Training and evaluation of respiratory therapists in emergency intubation.

Endotracheal intubation in emergency situations is a recognized function of respiratory therapists, as defined by the American Association for Respiratory Therapy in 1973. A training program based in the operating room, using one-on-one instruction, was the basis for a training program designed to meet JCAH standards for endotracheal intubation. To evaluate the success of our training and our system for attempting intubations, we recorded the results of 50 consecutive intubation attempts by our therapists. All 50 patients were eventually intubated, with 35 patients intubated on the first attempt. The average number of attempts per patient was 1.48. While 39 patients were intubated within one minute, 11 required more than one minute. In five patients, physicians had attempted intubation prior to a therapist's arrival; those intubations took eleven times longer than those that were attempted by therapists only. The average time for intubations attempted solely by therapists was 54 seconds.     

Video versus direct laryngoscopy on successful first-pass endotracheal intubation in ICU patients

BACKGROUND: Airway management in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of successful first-pass intubation in the ICU by using the direct laryngoscopy (DL) and that by using the video laryngoscopy (VL).METHODS: A randomized, non-blinded trial comparing first-pass success rate of intubation between VL and DL was performed. Patients were recruited in the period from August 2014 to August 2016. All physicians working at ICU received hands-on training in the use of the video and direct laryngoscope. The primary outcome measure was the first-pass intubation success.RESULTS: A total of 163 ICU patients underwent intubation during the study period (81 patients in VL group and 82 in DL group). The rate of successful first-pass intubation was not significantly different between the VL and the DL group (67.9% vs. 69.5%, P=0.824). Moreover, the overall intubation success and total number of attempts to achieve intubation success did not differ between the two groups. In patients with successful first-pass intubation, the median duration of the intubation procedure did not differ between the two groups. The Cormack-Lehane grades and the percentage of glottic opening score were similar, and no significant differences were found between the two groups. There were no statistical differences between the VL and the DL group in intubation complications (all P>0.05).CONCLUSION: Among ICU patients requiring intubation, there was no significant difference in the rate of successful first-pass intubation between VL and DL.     

An assessment of paramedic performance during invasive airway management

Objective. To assess the performance of paramedics, in a newly-initiated prehospital program, during invasive airway management. Methods. An audit of paramedic call reports for a 12-month period from January to December 1997 was performed. Call reports that documented invasive airway management were retrieved and relevant data were extracted using a preformulated data-entry form. Results. Paramedics attempted tracheal intubation in 453 patients and were successful in 408 (90.1%); 331 of the patients were in cardiopulmonary arrest with vital signs absent (VSA), 101 had medical emergencies, and 21 had trauma-related problems. In the VSA cohort, the tracheas of 96% of the patients were intubated successfully; 80.1% on the first attempt, 10.6% on the second, 4.5% on the third, and 0.9% after more than three attempts. In the medical cohort, the tracheas of 74.3% of the patients were intubated; 60.4% on the first attempt, 11.9% on the second, and 2.9% on the third. In the trauma cohort, 71.4% of the intubations were successful; 66.6% on the first attempt, 26.6% on the second, and 6.6% on the third. There was a difference (p < 0.001) in the incidence of successful intubations comparing the VSA cohort with the medical/trauma cohorts. There was also a difference (p < 0.001) between the success rate for nasal intubations (43 of 68, 63% of patients successfully intubated) and that for oral intubation (365 of 385, 94% of patients). Conclusion. This study demonstrated a difference in the paramedics' success rates for tracheal intubation in VSA patients compared with those with preserved airway reflexes and a lower success rate for nasal vs oral tracheal intubation. These differences may be due to inadequate training, technical difficulties experienced in the field, or lack of sufficient exposure to medical/trauma scenarios to gain management experience. Future training to address these issues, both in the initial training phase and in the continuing education program, may be beneficial in improving performance. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE 2000;4:164-167     

The factors associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency departments: A 13-emergency-department registry study

BACKGROUND: We investigated which factors are associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI) on the first attempt in emergency department (EDs) from multicentre emergency airway registry data. METHODS: We created a multicentre registry of intubations at 13 EDs and performed surveillance over 5 years. Each intubator filled out a data form after an intubation. We defined "paediatric patients" as patients younger than 10 years of age. We assessed the specialty and level of training of intubator, the method, the equipment, and the associated adverse events. We analysed the intubation success rates on the first attempt (first-pass success, FPS) based on these variables. RESULTS: A total of 430 ETIs were performed on 281 children seen in the ED. The overall FPS rate was 67.6%, but emergency medicine (EM) physicians showed a significantly greater success rate of 74.4%. In the logistic regression analysis, the intubator's specialty was the only independent predictive factor for paediatric FPS. In the subgroup analysis, the EM physicians used the rapid sequence intubation/intubation (RSI) method and Macintosh laryngoscope more frequently than physicians of other specialties. ETI-related adverse events occurred in 21 (7.2%) out of the 281 cases. The most common adverse event in the FPS group was mainstem bronchus intubation, and vomiting was the most common event in the non-FPS group. The incidence of adverse events was lower in the FPS group than in the non-FPS group, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The intubator's specialty was the major factor associated with FPS in emergency department paediatric ETI, The overall ETI FPS rate among paediatric patients was 67.6%, but the EM physicians had a FPS rate of 74.4%. A well structured airway skill training program, and more actively using the RSI method are important and this could explain this differences.     

An analysis of invasive airway management in a suburban emergency medical services system

INTRODUCTION: Airway management is the most critical and potentially life-saving intervention performed by emergency medical service (EMS) providers. Invasive airway management often is required in non-cardiac-arrest patients who are combative or otherwise uncooperative. The success of prehospital invasive airway management in this patient population was evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of the records of all such patients requiring endotracheal intubation over a three-year period (1987-1989). The study population included 278 patients enrolled by five advanced life support (ALS) units serving a suburban population of 425,000. Field trip sheets were reviewed for diagnosis, intubation method and success, number of intubation attempts, provider experience, reasons for unsuccessful intubations, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 394 invasive airway management attempts were performed on 278 patients. The overall successful intubation rate was 75% (41% orotracheal, 52% nasotracheal, 7% other or unknown). The most common diagnoses were COPD and pulmonary edema (30%) and trauma (24%). Experienced providers were successful on the first attempt in 57% of cases compared to 50% by inexperienced providers (p=.24). Multiple intubation attempts were required in 33% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference in success rates between the orotracheal and nasotracheal methods (p=.51). The most common reason for unsuccessful intubation was altered level of consciousness. Complications occurred with 7% of successful attempts and in 18% of unsuccessful attempts (p less than .001). Forty-six percent of the patients who were not intubated successfully in the field and required intubation in the emergency department (ED) received a neuromuscular blocking agent prior to successful intubation. CONCLUSION: Prehospital providers can intubate a high but improvable proportion of non-cardiac-arrested patients by both the orotracheal and nasotracheal routes. The use of pharmacologic adjuncts to facilitate the prehospital intubation of selected, non-cardiac-arrested patients is a promising adjunct that needs further evaluation.     

Success of the gum elastic bougie as a rescue airway in the emergency department

Background: The gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a rescue airway device commonly found in the emergency department (ED). However, data documenting its efficacy are lacking in the emergency medicine literature. Study Objectives: To determine the success rate of endotracheal intubation using a GEB and the reliability of “palpable clicks” and “hold-up” in the ED setting. Methods: The GEB was introduced at our two affiliated urban EDs with a 3-year residency training program and an annual census of 150,000. Physicians were trained in the use of the GEB before initiation of the study. Over the course of 1 year, we conducted a prospective, observational study of GEB practices in the ED. The study population included all adult patients on whom intubation was attempted with a GEB. All emergency physicians attempting intubation completed a structured data form after laryngoscopy, recording patient characteristics, grade of laryngeal view (using the modified Cormack-Lehane classification), and presence of “palpable clicks” and “hold-up.” Indications for GEB use in our ED include a difficult or rescue airway and for training purposes. Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods and 95% confidence intervals. Results: In our study period, there were 26 patients on whom intubation was attempted with a GEB. The overall success rate was 20/26 (76.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 60.7–93.1%). Among cases where the GEB was used for training purposes (all grade 1 or 2a laryngeal view), six of seven (85.7%) intubations were successful. When the GEB was used for clinically indicated purposes, 14 of 19 (73.7%; 95% CI 53.9–93.5%) intubations were successful. Palpable clicks were appreciated in 11/20 successful intubations (sensitivity 55.0%; 95% CI 33.2–76.8%); there was one false positive (specificity 80%; 95% CI 40.9–98.2%). Of 20 successful intubations, hold-up was deferred in five cases; of 15 remaining cases, hold-up was appreciated in 5/15 (sensitivity 33.3%; 95% CI 9.5–57.2%); there were no false positives (specificity 100%; 95% CI 60.7–100%). Conclusions: In our ED setting, the GEB had a success rate of 73.7% when utilized as a rescue airway after failed attempts. The characteristics of “palpable clicks” and “hold-up” were unreliable.     

急诊内科危重病人气管插管时机与方法的探讨

目的:总结急诊内科病人气管插管的特点,分析其治疗效果,并探讨其插管时机、方法与转归。方法:根据病人在急诊科治疗情况,将病人分成三组。第Ⅰ组23例,系到医院前已临床死亡;第Ⅱ组30例,经抢救无效在急诊科死亡;第Ⅲ组30例,经抢救病人在急诊科存活,后转入病房或急诊留观。结果:第Ⅰ组病人经口气管插管,抢救平均30分钟,无一例心跳呼吸恢复;第Ⅱ组虽经急诊CPR,但呼吸功能不能恢复正常,或因其原发病未能控制,最终在急诊科死亡;第Ⅲ组病人经口插管13例,经鼻插管17例,6例病人在急诊留观治疗后出院,12例病人经ICU或病房住院治疗后基本痊愈出院,另12例最终死亡。结论:急诊科所遇垂危病人,多数需气管插管者是由内科医师首诊实施。正确的插管方法和较高的成功率是直接影响病人转归的重要因素。     

Recertification of respiratory therapists' intubation skills one year after initial training: an analysis of skill retention and retraining

Allied health personnel and nonanesthesiologist physicians often undergo training in tracheal intubation but then may actually use the skill relatively infrequently. This study assessed retention of skills one year after initial training and identified specific areas of knowledge critical to successful performance of intubation. Eleven respiratory therapists on the staff of a 253-bed hospital, each of whom had been trained one year previously in airway management, were evaluated. Prior to returning to the operating room for skills assessment and recertification, each respiratory therapist took a 21-question written exam. Therapists then went to the operating room and a trained observer (anesthesiologist) monitored the intubations performed to see whether critical steps were followed, while a second observer monitored a checklist of skills performed. The attending anesthesiologist recertified the therapist only when all steps were correctly performed and the intubation was successful. There was a poor correlation (r = -0.25, p > 0.1) between the number of intubations performed by the therapists for emergencies in the previous year and the number of intubations needed to be recertified. There was a negative correlation (r = -0.8, p < 0.05) between the score on the written test and the number of intubations required for recertification-a higher score meant fewer intubations were needed to achieve recertification. First-pass success occurred significantly more frequently if all skills tested were performed correctly (50/75 first-pass successes had all skills performed correctly vs 10/28 for failed first-pass, p < 0.01). The most common errors were levering the blade on the upper teeth (12/91) and tube not inserted from the right side of the mouth (28/104). When the blade was levered, 8 of 10 intubations failed. When the tube was not inserted from the right side of the face, 6 of 12 failed. The useful findings of this study are: (1) occasional performance of intubation did not ensure skill maintenance; (2) cognitive and procedural abilities correlated, suggesting benefits to study as well as to practical training; and (3) two specific mistakes were associated with a high incidence of failure.     

Prehospital Standardization of Medical Airway Management: Incidence and Risk Factors of Difficult Airway

Objectives: The rate of difficult intubation in prehospital emergency medicine varies greatly among studies already published and depends on several factors. The authors' objective was to determine the rate of difficult intubations and to determine factors associated with prehospital difficult airways when a standard protocol for sedation and intubation was applied. Methods: This 30‐month clinical, observational, prospective study was performed in a suburb of Paris, France (Val de Marne, population 1,300,000) by a prehospital emergency medical unit. Airway management for patients who needed tracheal intubation was standardized. The pharmacological procedure recommended rapid sequence intubation for patients with spontaneous cardiac activity. In cases of difficult, laryngoscopy‐assisted intubation, a predefined algorithm was proposed. The Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) was calculated for all patients requiring tracheal intubation, and factors associated with difficult intubation, defined by IDS of >5, were identified by using multivariate statistical analysis. Results: During the study period, 1,442 patients were included; 640 (44%) were in cardiorespiratory arrest, and 802 had a spontaneous cardiac activity. Deviation from the pharmacological and airway management procedures occurred in 1% of cases. When the predefined difficult airway management algorithm was followed, failure to intubate was encountered twice (0.1%). One hundred six (7.4%) patients had an IDS of >5, and 60 (4.1%) required first (n= 56) then second (n= 4) alternative techniques for tracheal intubation. Semirigid leaders allowed tracheal access in 93% of difficult‐intubation patients. One patient required a prehospital cricothyroidotomy. Factors associated with difficult intubation were the following: a history of ear, nose, or throat neoplasia or surgery; obesity; facial trauma; the operator's status; and the operator's position. Conclusions: If prehospital medical airway management is standardized and performed by trained operators, failure to intubate is rare (0.1%), and the incidence of difficult tracheal intubation is 7.4%, independent of cardiorespiratory status.     

Prehospital airway management: a prospective evaluation of anaesthesia trained emergency physicians

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of prehospital tracheal intubation and the incidence of difficult-to-manage airways in out-of-hospital patients managed by emergency medicine physicians with anaesthesia training. METHODS: In a prospective study, conducted over a 4-year period, we evaluated all airway interventions performed by anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians. RESULTS: One thousand, one hundred and six out of 16,559 patients (6.8%) required tracheal intubation. Orotracheal intubation was attempted in 982, laryngoscopic aided nasotracheal intubation in 64 and blind nasotracheal intubation in 90 of the cases. Two techniques were used in 30 patients. Failure rates were 2.4, 8.1 and 25.6%, respectively. A Combitube or LMA was used in 2.0%. In one case of failed Combitube insertion successful needle cricothyrotomy was performed. In patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy, Cormack-Lehane laryngeal grade views I-IV were seen in 52.0, 28.8, 12.6 and 6.6% of cases, respectively. A difficult to manage airway (DMA) was reported in 14.8%, multiple intubation attempts in 4.3% and failed intubation in 2.0% of all cases. Grouping patients based on clinical presentation revealed a significantly higher incidence of DMA in trauma patients (18.6%) and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (16.7%) than in the remaining patient group (9.8%). Intubation failed significantly more often in trauma (3.9%) than in the remaining patient group (1.1%). CONCLUSION: When compared to studies on laryngoscopy performed in the operating room, this study demonstrated a higher incidence of difficult and failed laryngoscopy, DAM, and high laryngeal grade views when patients were managed in a prehospital setting by anaesthesia trained physicians.     

Airway management in pediatric patients at referring hospitals compared to a receiving tertiary pediatric ICU

Objective

To describe the current practice of pediatric airway management at referring hospitals and the associated adverse events compared to a receiving tertiary pediatric ICU.

Method

Retrospective chart and transport record review of all emergency critical care transports to our Pediatric ICU over 3 years. Data regarding tracheal intubation procedure, pre-defined adverse Tracheal Intubation Associated Events (TIAEs), and airway events before, during, and after the inter-hospital transport were collected using a standard National Emergency Airway Registry for children (NEAR4KIDS) definition. Tracheal intubation outcomes were compared to in-hospital P ICU intubations.

Results

253/1489 (17%) of critical care transports had airway management, all by tracheal intubation. The most common condition was seizure (34%), followed by pulmonary/lower airway disease (16%). 49 (19%) had TIAEs; the most common event was mainstem bronchial intubation (13%). Incidence of TIAEs was similar to PICU (p = 0.69). Thirteen had an inappropriate tracheal tube position upon PICU arrival, but none experienced accidental extubation during transport. An uncuffed tracheal tube was used in 108/172 (63%) of patients < 8 years, significantly higher than PICU (20%, p < 0.0001). 124 (49%) were extubated within 24 h, 153 (60%) within 48 h. Two patients had the tracheal tube changed to cuffed from uncuffed due to air leak.

Conclusion

Provider reported adverse TIAEs are common during airway management in children requiring critical care transport, but not higher compared to PICU intubations. Most inter-hospital transport patients are intubated with an uncuffed tracheal tube. Subsequent tracheal tube change from uncuffed to cuffed tube is rarely required.     

Patient safety in pre-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: a comprehensive meta-analysis of the intubation success rates of EMS providers

Introduction  

Pre-hospital airway management is a controversial subject, but there is general agreement that a small number of seriously ill or injured patients require urgent emergency tracheal intubation (ETI) and ventilation. Many European emergency medical services (EMS) systems provide physicians to care for these patients while other systems rely on paramedics (or, rarely, nurses). The ETI success rate is an important measure of provider and EMS system success and a marker of patient safety.     

Emergency endotracheal intubation by respiratory care personnel in a community hospital.

We designed and implemented a program to train respiratory therapy personnel to perform emergency endotracheal intubation in a community hospital. During a one-year study period, 143 emergency intubations were attempted by physicians, nurse anesthetists, and respiratory therapy personnel. Respiratory therapy personnel attempted 74 intubations, with 13 complications, for a complication rate per attempt of 18%. Physicians and nurse anesthetists attempted 69 intubations, with 39 complications, for a complication rate of 57%. We conclude that trained respiratory care personnel can safely and effectively secure an airway via endotracheal intubation under emergency circumstances in our institution.     

Assessment of candidemia-attributable mortality in critically ill patients using propensity score matching analysis

Introduction

Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC^? video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy.

Methods

In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC^?).

Results

A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC^? were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC^? resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC^? (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Use of the C-MAC^? video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.