ABO血型不合对HLA相合异基因外周血干细胞移植的影响

目的在非血缘移植比例增加、移植物抗宿主病（GVHD）发生率增加、免疫抑制剂用量加大的情况下,分析ABO血型不合对HLA相合异基因外周血干细胞移植（allo-BPSCT）的影响。方法将43例ABO血型不合的allo-PBSCT患者与同期49例ABO血型相合的受者进行比较。结果 ABO血型不合组与相合组输注红细胞量分别为（7.73±7.61）u和（4.33±3.24）u（P=0.040）,ABO血型不合组与相合组血红蛋白恢复到100g/L的时间分别为（54.08±45.24）d和（32.46±16.95）d（P=0.009）。ABO血型不合组较相合组红细胞输注量多,红系恢复时间长。两组间移植相关并发症差异无统计学意义。结论 ABO血型不合不影响造血干细胞移植的植活、主要合并症及预后。ABO血型不合组较相合组红细胞输注量多,红系恢复较慢。     

The outcomes of hypertransfusion in major ABO incompatible allogeneic stem sell transplantation

Major ABO incompatibility may be potentially associated with immediate or delayed hemolysis and delayed onset of erythropoiesis in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To determine if hemolysis can be prevented by the inhibition of graft erythropoiesis, we performed hypertransfusion and assessed red cell transfusion requirement and independence. Between October 1995 and December 2001, 28 consecutive patients receiving major ABO incompatible HSCT at Samsung Medical Center were hypertransfused to maintain their hemoglobin levels at 15 g/dL or more. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of these patients with those of 47 patients at Asan Medical Center whose target hemoglobin levels were 10 g/dL. Reticulocyte engraftment was significantly delayed in hypertransfused group (51 days vs. 23 days; p=.001). There was no significant difference in the total amount of red cells transfused within 90 days post-HSCT (25 units vs. 26 units; p=.631). No significant difference in the time to red cell transfusion independence was observed between the two groups (63 days vs. 56 days; p=.165). In conclusion, we failed to improve red cell transfusion requirement and independence in major ABO incompatible HSCT with hypertransfusion.     

Molecular Deciphering of the ABO System as a Basis for Novel Diagnostics and Therapeutics in ABO Incompatible Transplantation

In recent years ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (KTx) has become a more or less clinical routine procedure with graft and patient survival similar to those of ABO compatible transplants. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) for anti-A and anti-B antibody removal constitutes in many centers an important part of the treatment protocol. ABO antibody titration by hemagglutination is guiding the treatment; both if the recipient can be transplanted as well as in cases of suspected rejections if antibody removal should be performed. Despite the overall success of ABO incompatible KTx, there is still room for improvements and an extension of the technology to include other solid organs. Based on an increased understanding of the structural complexity and tissue distribution of ABH antigens and the fine epitope specificity of the ABO antibody repertoire, improved IA matrices and ABO antibody diagnostics should be developed. Furthermore, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind accommodation of ABO incompatible renal allografts could make it possible to induce long-term allograft acceptance also in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitized recipients and, perhaps, also make clinical xenotransplantation possible.     

Effect of ABO Blood Group Incompatibility on the Outcome of Single-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation after Myeloablative Conditioning

ABO blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient has been associated with poor transplant outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, its effect on the outcome of cord blood transplantation (CBT) has yet to be clarified. We retrospectively analyzed 191 adult patients who received single-unit CBT after myeloablative conditioning for malignant disease in our institute. Major mismatch showed a significantly lower incidence of platelet engraftment compared with ABO match as a reference (hazard ratio, .57; P = .01). Nevertheless, there was no increase in graft-versus-host disease, transplant-related mortality, and overall mortality after ABO-incompatible CBT. These data suggested that donor–recipient ABO incompatibility does not have a significant impact on outcome after myeloablative CBT for hematological malignancies.     

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura secondary to ABO group incompatible blood transfusion in a patient after cardiac surgery

The triggers of secondary thrombotic thrombopcytopenic purpura (TTP) include drug toxicity, radiation and high-dose chemotherapy, angioinvasive infections, surgery and acute graft versus host disease. TTP secondary to surgery have been reported in a number of cases. Most of the cases have been occurred after open heart surgery. Extensive endothelial damage is held responsible as the initiating mechanism in postoperative TTP cases. However, there is no report of secondary TTP describing development owing to ABO incompatible blood transfusion. Here, we describe a patient who developed TTP after transfusion of ABO incompatible blood during hospitalization for bypass surgery. We also propose a hypothesis which may account for the possible underlying mechanism.     

Desensitization protocols improving access and outcome in transplantation

Sensitization to antigens of the HLA and ABO system has been the biggest barrier to access in renal transplantation and, increasingly, in transplantation of other organs. Additionally, antibody to donor antigens has been shown to result in injury to the graft ranging from catastrophic, irreversible hyperacute rejection to the slower, more insidious, chronic form of rejection. The problem of access has been recognized globally and has been the incentive for measures to overcome the disadvantage experienced by the sensitized patient. However, early attempts to reduce sensitization achieved only transient success. Newer immunosuppressive agents that affect B-cell function or viability have permitted the development of treatment protocols to eliminate and, potentially, downregulate donor-specific antibodies. The use of these protocols has achieved successful transplants that were HLA and/or ABO incompatible prior to treatment and, as such, has provided some patients with their only opportunity for transplantation.     

Donor- and recipient-derived immunity in ABO incompatible living-related liver transplantation

This report describes how donor- and recipient-derived immunity was influenced by immunosuppressive treatment of ABO incompatibility (rituximab and immunoadsorption/plasmaphereses) in the long-term. We present an 8-year course of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity, isohemagglutinins and B cell numbers. Whereas cellular HBV immunity was transferred from the HBV vaccinated donor (blood group A1) to the HBV naïve recipient (blood group 0), humoral HBV specific immune transfer was lacking. Starting at month 17 after transplantation, the recipient was vaccinated six times against HBV. Anti-HBs did not appear until the sixth vaccination at month 44. Immunoadsorption prior to transplantation reduced anti-A1 IgG titers from 256 to 2. Titers after transplantation remained low (⩽64). B cell numbers were below standard values up to month 26, then normalized and exceeded normal values from year 7 to 8 post transplantation. In conclusion, donor-derived B cell immunity was lost but recipient-derived immunity persisted after ABO incompatible transplantation.     

Clinical evaluation of the endothelial tie-2 crossmatch in ABO compatible and ABO incompatible renal transplants

The necessity of detection of other than the classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) directed antibodies prior to organ transplantation has already been repeatedly reported. A commercial flow cytometric endothelial crossmatch (CM) using isolated peripheral blood tie-2 positive cells provides a tool to detect non-MHC antibodies in addition to antibodies directed to MHC class I and II. The vast majority of circulating tie-2 positive cells expresses HLA–DR but not the A, B blood group antigens. Tie-2 cells are circulating surrogate endothelial cells. In this retrospective study we evaluated the endothelial CM in 51 renal transplantations, 30 with ABO compatible grafts and 21 with ABO incompatible grafts. Fifteen of the ABO compatible recipients (group A) developed unexplained rejection episodes (RE) while the remaining 15 had no RE (group B). Five cases of group A and none of group B had a positive tie-2 CM before transplantation (p = 0.042). A positive tie-2 CM was also correlated with graft failure in ABO compatible transplants (p = 0.02). No significant correlation was found between a positive pre-transplant tie-2 CM and RE in the ABO incompatible group. This study strongly suggest that a positive tie-2 CM may predict post-transplantation complications in ABO compatible grafts while negative reactions are not predictive. The test is not significantly correlated with RE in ABO incompatible grafts possibly due to applied desensitization.     

A prospective observational study to compare transfusion outcomes in ABO identical versus ABO non-identical single donor platelet concentrates: An experience from a tertiary healthcare center in India

ABO incompatible single donor platelet concentrates (SDPC) have a concern about unsatisfactory increments as well as possibility of hemolytic transfusion reaction. But from Indian population no study has commented on the clinical and laboratory outcome of ABO mismatched platelet transfusion. The aim of study was to compare transfusion outcomes in ABO identical versus ABO non-identical single donor platelet concentrates. In this prospective observational study, 400 SDPC transfusions among different patients were included. In group A (n = 200), ABO identical SDPC transfusions and in group B (n = 200) ABO non-identical SDPC transfusions were added. Corrective count increment (CCI), absolute count increment (ACI), percent platelet recovery (PPR) were calculated and incidents of hemolytic transfusion reactions were noted. In group A mean ± SD of ACI, CCI and PPR were as 30.78 ± 12.51, 15.10 ± 6.677, 39,948.9 ± 20,099.392. In group B, mean ± SD of ACI, CCI and PPR were – 25.4 ± 15.65, 12.509 ± 5.906, 33,559.2 ± 22,150.304. And when CCI, ACI, PPR were compared with group A and group B, statistically significant differences were noted (P < 0.05). There was statistically significant difference in CCI, ACI and PPR in oncology patients and other prophylactic recipients except patients with dengue and other infectious disease. But there was no hemolytic transfusion reaction noted in any group. Our study clearly establish the potential benefits of ABO-identical PLT transfusion. It also points out that in emergency conditions or when there is a paucity in inventory, ABO non-identical SDPC transfusion may be lifesaving and clinically significant.     

ABO incompatibility and non myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation]

ABO incompatibility is not a barrier for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but is associated with specific complications. Major ABO incompatibility is associated with delayed erythroid engraftment, increased transfusion requirement and cases of pure red cell aplasia. Minor ABO incompatibility may be responsible for acute haemolytic reactions in the first months following transplantation. The widely used non myeloablative conditioning regimens might modify the management of ABO incompatibility. They could favour pure red cell aplasia development in the setting of major ABO mismatch since they are associated with a prolonged persistence of host anti-donor isohemagglutinins after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the setting of minor ABO incompatibility, the use of peripheral blood stem cells and the nature of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimen may have an impact on the incidence of haemolytic reactions. In that review, the clinical and therapeutic aspects of ABO incompatibility are studied, especially regarding the impact of the conditioning regimen intensity.     

Major ABO blood group mismatch increases the risk for graft failure after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Two hundred twenty-four patients with leukemia transplanted with an unrelated donor between 1991 and 2003 at the Karolinska University Hospital were analyzed according to association between graft failure and ABO, RhD, MNSs, and Kidd blood group antigen compatibility. Median age was 29 years (range: 0-55). Conditioning consisted of total-body irradiation or busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning. A bone marrow graft was given to 152 patients, and 72 patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Most patients received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with cyclosporine and MTX. Graft failure (GF) was seen in 6 (2.7%) patients. In the multivariate analysis major ABO mismatch (odds ratio [OR] 14.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-110, P = .008) and HLA-allele mismatch (6.42, 1.19-34.8, P = .03) was significantly associated to GF. In patients with and without major ABO mismatch the incidence of GF was 7.5% and 0.6% (P = .02), respectively. Using an ABO major mismatched graft increases the risk for GF after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.     

Bloodstream Infection after Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is the most common infectious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and can cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Identification of risk factors for BSI might be helpful in efforts to reduce transplantation-related death. This study analyzed the incidence of BSI and risk factors for BSI after HSCT in pediatric patients with aplastic anemia (AA). BSI occurred in 39 of the 351 patients with AA (11.1%). Onset of BSI occurred at a median of 8 days after HSCT (range, 0 to 92 days). The 5-year overall survival rate was lower in patients with BSI than in patients without BSI (63.32% ± 7.90% versus 93.35% ± 1.44%; P < .0001). Univariate analysis identified the following variables as associated with BSI: history of immunosuppressive therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG), transplantation from an unrelated donor, frequent blood transfusion before transplantation, major or major plus minor ABO type mismatch, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with tacrolimus and without cyclosporine, and long interval from diagnosis to transplantation. Among these factors, long interval from diagnosis to transplantation was the sole statistically significant risk factor for BSI on multivariate analysis. In patients who underwent HSCT from a related donor, age ≥14 years at transplantation was risk factor for BSI. In contrast, history of immunosuppressive therapy with ATG, frequent blood transfusion before HSCT, graft failure, and major or major plus minor ABO type mismatch were risk factors for BSI in patients who underwent HSCT from an unrelated donor. Because the overall 5-year survival rate without BSI was >90%, even in patients who were received a transplant from an unrelated donor, control of BSI is very important for successful HSCT in pediatric patients with AA.     

Utilisation patterns of group O red blood cell transfusion by ABO and D non-identical recipients in large academic hospital

ObjectivesSeveral studies have raised concerns that transfusion of O red blood cells (RBCs) to ABO and D non-identical recipients can intensify group O inventory shortages. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse particular clinical indications and polices responsible for O RBCs use by ABO and D non-identical recipients, as well as to assess the impact of this practice on the overall utilisation of O RBCs.Material and methodsData of all transfused RBCs from 2014 to 2018 were extracted from the comprehensive database of transfusion service. Extracted variables included date of transfusion, ABO and D group of the transfused RBCs and recipients, recipient's demographic, and specific characteristics regarding transfusion requirements.ResultsOver a 5-year period, 124,220 RBCs were transfused: 38,962 (31.4%) group O D+ and 9109 (7.3%) group O D?. ABO and D non-identical recipient received 4842 (10.1%) of all administered O RBCs: 2880 (7.4%) of all transfused O D+ and 1962 (21.5%) of all transfused O D? RBCs. The common indications for this practice were: ABO and D mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (52.5%), infants under the age of 4 months (18.6%), shortage of ABO identical RBCs (9.0%), phenotype-matched RBCs (8,1%), and urgent transfusion (7.2%).ConclusionsA significant proportion of O RBCs was transfused to ABO and D non-identical recipients, mainly due to transfusion of ABO and D mismatched HSCT recipients. However, the proportion of all transfused RBCs O D+ and especially O D? remained relatively low.     

Retrospective analysis of molecular biology mechanism of ABO blood group typing discrepancy among blood donors in Jinan blood station

BackgroundTo accurately identify ABO blood typing in pre-transfusion testing is very important to ensure blood transfusion safely, which is a major responsibility of blood station.MethodsEighty-one blood donors samples with ABO blood group typing discrepancy was collected among 61952 donor samples in our blood station from January 2019 to July 2020. Blood group serological method was used to detect ABO blood group. DNA Sequencing was used to determine the genotype. The antibody screening test detects antibodies other than ABO.ResultsIn total, 61,952 donor samples were analysed for ABO typing discrepancies. The incidence among blood donors was 0.13% (81/61952). The most common reason of ABO typing discrepancies was due to specific antibody or non-specific agglutination (54.32%, 44/81), mainly anti-M antibody, cold autoantibody, anti-D antibody, anti-N antibody and anti-Lea antibody. The major cause of forward typing discrepancies among blood donors was ABO subgroups (25.93%, 21/81), including 10 cases of A subtype (1 case of A2, 2 cases of A3, 2 cases of Ax, 3 cases of AxB, 1 case of Ael, 1 case of Ahm), 6 cases of B subtype (2 cases of B3, 1 case of Bel, 3 cases of AB3), 2 cases of B subtype (A), 1 case of cisAB, and 2 cases of acquired B. The serum antibody was weakened in 16 cases (19.75%).ConclusionsThe blood types should be correctly identified by combining serology with gene sequencing to ensure the safety of clinical blood transfusion, when the forward and reverse typing discrepancies among the blood donors.     

Incompatible kidney transplantation: lessons from a decade of desensitization and paired kidney exchange

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization and ABO incompatibility continue to pose significant barriers to further expansion of live donor renal transplantation. However, the recent development of effective desensitization protocols and creative paired donation strategies demonstrates that the presence of circulating donor HLA-specific antibodies and the use of ABO incompatible organs should no longer be considered contraindications for renal transplantation. It is estimated that as many as 6,000 patients on the kidney transplant waiting list have incompatible living donors and could benefit from these treatments. Furthermore, as our understanding of these treatment modalities has improved, it is now possible to predict whether desensitization, kidney paired donation or a combination of both will provide an individual patient with their best chance for successful renal transplantation.     

Passenger lymphocyte syndrome in ABO and Rhesus D minor mismatched liver and kidney transplantation: A prospective analysis

The increasing demand for solid organs has necessitated the use of ABO and Rhesus (Rh) D minor mismatched transplants. The passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) occurs when donor lymphocytes produce antibodies that react with host red blood cell (RBC) antigens and result in hemolysis. Our aim was to evaluate prospectively the role of PLS in post transplant anemia and hemolysis in ABO and RhD minor mismatched recipients of liver and kidney grafts and to study the association of PLS with donor lymphocyte microchimerism. We examined 11 liver and 10 kidney recipients at Day +15 for anemia, markers of hemolysis, direct antiglobulin test and eluates, and serum RBC antibodies. Microchimerism was determined in peripheral blood lymphocytes by genotyping of simple sequence length polymorphisms encoding short tandem repeats. Immune hemolytic anemia and anti-recipient RBC antibodies were observed in 2 out of 11 liver (18.2%) and 2 out of 10 kidney (20%) transplants. RBC antibody specificity reflected the donor to recipient transplant, with anti-blood group B antibodies identified in 2 cases of O to B and 1 case of A to AB transplants while anti-D antibodies were detected in 1 case of RhD-negative to RhD-positive transplant. Donor microchimerism was found in only 1 patient. In conclusion, passenger lymphocyte mediated hemolysis is frequent in minor mismatched liver and kidney transplantation. Recognizing PLS as a potential cause of post transplant anemia may allow for early diagnosis and management to decrease the morbidity and mortality in some patients.     

Morphologic aspects of bone marrow transplantation in patients with aplastic anemia.

Pre- and post-transplant bone marrow samples from 20 patients with aplastic anemia were studied. Morphologic evidence of marrow reconstitution was noted in 18 patients one to three weeks following transplantation. In most instances the engrafted marrow elements in early weeks appeared as small clusters of erythroid or myeloid precursors. Bone marrow biopsy or clot sections obtained four to eight weeks after transplantation were more cellular with larger clusters of hematopoietic cells, which were most often composed of mixed cellular elements, including megakaryocytes. Two patients with morphologic evidence of engraftment died shortly after transplantation and were excluded from further analysis. In four of the remaining 16 patients grafts were "rejected" three to eight weeks after transplant. A fifth patient who received a marrow graft from his identical twin showed a transient increase in marrow cellularity without clinical improvement. However, the second marrow transplantation in this patient using the same donor after conditioning with cyclophosphamide resulted in moderate clinical improvement. In four of the five patients developing graft "rejection" or failure there was an increase in marrow mast cells in pre- and post-transplant marrow samples. In contrast, only two of 11 patients with successful engraftment had an increase in mast cells. Although the pathophysiologic role of mast cells in marrow transplantation is unclear, the present study suggests a possible inverse correlation between the numbers of marrow mast cells and the likelihood of successful engraftment. Bone marrow samples in patients with graft versus host disease displayed a slight increase in the number of eosinophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Human Orthotopic Liver Allografts: A Study of Liver Transplantation Across ABO Blood Group Barriers

A clinicopathologic analysis of liver transplantation across major ABO blood group barriers was carried out 1) to determine if antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection was a cause of graft failure and if humoral rejection can be identified, 2) to propose criteria for establishing the diagnosis, and 3) to describe the clinical and pathological features of humoral rejection. A total of 51 (24 primary) ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver grafts were transplanted into 49 recipients. There was a 46% graft failure rate during the first 30 days for primary ABO-I grafts compared with an 11% graft failure rate for primary ABO compatible (ABO-C), crossmatch negative, age, sex and priority-matched control patients (P less than 0.02). A similarly high early graft failure rate (60%) was seen for nonprimary ABO-I grafts during the first 30 days. Clinically, the patients experienced a relentless rise in serum transaminases, hepatic failure, and coagulopathy during the first weeks after transplant. Pathologic examination of ABO-I grafts that failed early demonstrated widespread areas of geographic hemorrhagic necrosis with diffuse intraorgan coagulation. Prominent arterial deposition of antibody and complement components was demonstrated by immunoflourescent staining. Elution studies confirmed the presence of tissue-bound, donor-specific isoagglutinins within the grafts. No such deposition was seen in control cases. These studies confirm that antibody mediated rejection of the liver occurs and allows for the development of criteria for establishing the diagnosis.     

Analysis of Donor and Recipient ABO Incompatibility and Antibody-Associated Complications after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The impact of ABO incompatibility on clinical outcome is controversial. A retrospective analysis of 310 patients who underwent HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning between 1998 and 2011 was performed to investigate the frequency and clinical implications of anti-RBC antibodies in passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) after minor ABO mismatch (mm), persistent or recurring recipient type ABO antibodies (PRABO) after major ABO mm HSCT, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Transplantation characteristics and clinical outcome were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis for groups with or without anti-RBC antibodies. ABO blood group incompatibility did not affect clinical outcome despite an increased requirement of blood transfusion. Twelve patients with AIHA, 6 patients with PLS, and 12 patients with PRABO post-HSCT were identified. AIHA did not affect overall survival (OS) or transplant-related mortality (TRM), but patients with AIHA had a lower incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .05). OS in the PLS group was 0% compared with 61% in the whole group receiving minor ABO mm transplants (P < .001). Comparing PRABO patients with those receiving a major ABO mm HSCT, the OS was 17% versus 73% (P = .002) and TRM was 50% versus 21% (P = .03). At our center, PLS after minor ABO mm and PRABO antibodies after major ABO mm HSCT are significant risk factors for decreased OS and TRM. Our results suggest that occurrence of unexpected ABO antibodies after HSCT warrant a wider investigation individual to find the underlying cause.     

A rapid molecular method (polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers) to genotype for ABO blood group and secretor status and its potential for organ transplants

We hypothesize that kidneys from non-secretor blood group A₂ donors may be used for transplant into non-A recipients. In addition, we believe that organs from A₂ donors may be used in non-A recipients where the anti-A titer is low. In order to reliably identify non-secretor A₂ kidneys from cadaver donors, we have developed a rapid molecular method. The PCR-SSP-based method was developed to genotype ABO blood group and secretor status. Samples of known blood group ABO and Lewis phenotype determined by standard serological methods were used to appraise the method. A retrospective renal cadaver donor study was conducted to assess the potential of using A₂ non-secretor organs for transplantation into non-A recipients. Phenotype frequencies of blood group A donors were 76% and 24% for A₁ and A₂ subgroups respectively, whereas 27% of the donor sample population were non-secretors. Three donors were identified as A₂ non-secretors, and analysis was performed to theoretically place the organs by considering them as blood group O. These results coupled with a detailed analysis of HLA type and antibody status of our panel suggests that using A₂ donors would be a useful adjunct to strategies for transplanting highly sensitized patients and redressing the donor-recipient imbalance in terms of blood group.