Donepezil for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and cognitive impairment. METHODS: This was a double blind, randomised and placebo controlled, crossover study in which 14 patients with PD and cognitive impairment received donepezil (5 or 10 mg per day) or matching placebo during two sequential periods lasting 10 weeks each. The primary outcome measures were the mini mental state examination (MMSE) score, the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input (CIBIC+) score, and the motor subscale of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS). RESULTS: Two patients on donepezil (14%) dropped out after one and four weeks of the first treatment period because of peripheral cholinergic side effects, otherwise the adverse effects were few and not severe. Carryover or residual effects were not observed. Parkinsonism did not increase during donepezil treatment. After 10 weeks of treatment, the mean MMSE score was increased by 2.1(SD 2.7) points on donepezil and 0.3 (SD 3.2) points on placebo, and the CIBIC+ score was 3.3 (SD 0.9) on donepezil and 4.1 (SD 0.8) on placebo. Statistical analysis of the repeated measurements and crossover study design showed significant effects of donepezil compared with placebo for MMSE (p=0.013) and CIBIC+ (p=0.034). Five (42%) patients on donepezil and two (17%) on placebo were rated as improved on the basis of the CIBIC+ score. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil improves cognition, and seems to be well tolerated and not to worsen parkinsonism in patients with cognitive impairment.     

Investigation of the short- and long-term effects of donepezil on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease

Background: Donepezil is effective in maintaining cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, not all patients respond to donepezil. In the present study, we examined the short‐ and long‐term effects of donepezil on cognitive function after 2 years treatment. Methods: The present retrospective study was performed on 122 AD outpatients who had been taking donepezil for ≥1 year. All subjects underwent periodic examination of cognitive function (Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rorschach Cognitive Index (RCI)) and clinical evaluation on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR); first before starting treatment and then at 4‐month intervals after initiation of donepezil. Patients were divided into three groups: (i) MG, the ‘maintained’ group, in which the global CDR score was maintained during treatment; (ii) DeG, the ‘declined’ group, in which the global CDR score increased; and (iii) DrG, the drop out group, who discontinued the treatment. Changes in scores on the MMSE and RCI were compared before treatment and at 4‐month intervals within each group. In addition, over each 4‐month period, MMSE and RCI scores were compared between the three groups. Furthermore, to investigate the condition of effective treatment, the reasons why donepezil treatment was discontinued in the DrG were examined. Results: The most frequent reason for discontinuation was the appearance of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which were more frequently observed in the DrG. Although depression and/or disinclination were more frequent in the MG, hyperactivity was more frequent in the DeG and DrG. Before treatment, patients in the DrG exhibited significantly lower scores on the MMSE than did patients in the MG and DeG. Upon examination 4 months after starting treatment, patients in the MG showed cognitive improvement on the MMSE and RCI, whereas those in the DeG showed cognitive deterioration on the MMSE. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that when a short‐term beneficial effect of the donepezil on cognitive functions is seen, long‐term effect may also be expected at 2 years. Periodic clinical evaluation and examination of cognitive function is indispensable for effective donepezil treatment.     

Do extrapyramidal features in Alzheimer patients treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors predict disease progression?

The objective of the study is to explore the longitudinal course of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) with and without extrapyramidal signs (EPS) taking donepezil. A cohort of 106 community-dwelling patients with probable AD receiving donepezil in Sydney, Australia (n = 52) and Manchester, UK (n = 54) was followed over 12 months. Cognition was measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive test (ADAS-Cog) and function by the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL). A further follow-up at five years was conducted to examine mortality and institutionalisation. At baseline, EPS were correlated with MMSE (r = -0.467, p < 0.01), ADAS-Cog (r = 0.485, p < 0.01) and ADCS-ADL (r = -0.526, p < 0.01) scores. Patients with EPS had lower MMSE (F = 9.95, df = 1, p = 0.002) and ADCS-ADL (F = 9.41, df = 1, p = 0.003) scores than patients without EPS. Over one year no time main effects or time x group interaction effects were observed for either dependent variable. At five years patients with EPS were found to have a hazard of institution or death 2.2 times higher than those without EPS (p = 0.018; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.4). There was a positive association between EPS and cognitive and functional impairment. However, EPS did not predict more rapid cognitive or functional decline of patients taking donepezil or response to donepezil. The presence of EPS was a risk factor both for institutionalisation and for death.     

Chronic donepezil treatment is associated with slowed cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of cognitive decline between probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients treated with long-duration cholinesterase inhibitors (ChE-Is) and those who remained untreated. BACKGROUND: ChE-Is, including donepezil and tracrine, have shown beneficial effects on cognition and global functioning in patients with AD. The duration of these benefits is unknown because the longest double-blind placebo-controlled studies reported were only approximately 6 months long. Ethical concerns regarding randomization of patients to placebo for long periods make it difficult to undertake trials of longer duration. METHODS: We identified patients in 4 AD centers who were or were not consistently treated with ChE-Is and who had demographic, psychometric and follow-up data. We compared 205 ChE-I-treated and 218 untreated AD patients on baseline variables hypothesized to differ between these groups, on baseline Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores and on rates of MMSE change at 1 year. The analysis was performed initially with all ChE-I-treated patients as a single group versus untreated subjects, and then with donepezil versus untreated subjects and tacrine versus untreated subjects. RESULTS: As expected, treated and untreated patients differed with respect to age, education, ethnicity, percentage of community dwelling and exact days of follow-up (ANOVA and chi2) in several comparisons, but did not differ on baseline MMSE score. These baseline variables were highly intercorrelated. MMSE scores declined significantly more slowly after 1 year of ChE-I treatment compared to untreated patients (p = 0.05) after controlling for baseline differences in age, education, ethnicity and percentage of community dwelling. Slowing of decline was significant in the donepezil-treated patients (p = 0.007) but not in the tacrine-treated group (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: This study, utilizing concurrent, nonrandomized controls, suggests that donepezil continues to have efficacy over at least the first year of therapy. Other studies are needed to determine whether the benefits are maintained beyond 1 year.     

The clinical use of P300 event related potentials for the evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitors treatment in demented patients

Summary. Centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) improve cognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other forms of dementia. Evaluation of treatment efficacy is based mainly on subjective assessment methods such as standardized neuropsychological tests. Therefore, an additional objective tool for the evaluation of drug response would be most helpful. Thirty-two patients suffering from dementia of several etiologies were treated with ChEIs (tacrine 19, donepezil 5, rivastigmine 8). Cognitive response was assessed pre ChEIs initiation (baseline) and after 26 weeks, as optimal tolerated doses were achieved and maintained (endpoint). Evaluation included repeated measurements of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive part (ADAS-cog) and P300. For statistical analysis we used ANOVA with repeated measures and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results demonstrated improvement of mean ADAS-cog by 2.0 points (from 29.4, n = 31 to 27.4, n = 29; p = 0.08) while MMSE remained almost unchanged (20.1, n = 29 to 19.8, n = 28). Mean P300 latency reduced significantly by 24 ms (from 383 ± 7.9 msec, n = 32 to 359 ± 7 msec, n = 32; p = 0.0001). However mean amplitudes did not change significantly from baseline to endpoint (13.5 ± 6.2, n = 31 to 12.8 ± 6.1, n = 31). Significant correlations were found between mean ADAS-cog and mean P300 latency at baseline and end-point (R = 0.485 p = 0.019, R = 0.626 p = 0.001 respectively, n = 23) and between mean MMSE and P300 latency at baseline and endpoint (R = −0.420 p = 0.046, R = −0.703 p < 0.001 respectively, n = 23). Our data suggests that P300 is a reliable instrument for assessment of cognitive response to ChEIs in demented patients. Received March 18, 2002; accepted January 27, 2003 Published online April 7, 2003 Authors' address: Dr. E. A. Werber, Department of Neurology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel 70300, e-mail: werbered@bezeqint.net     

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Investigation of responders and non‐responders to long‐term donepezil treatment

Background: Donepezil is effective in maintaining the cognitive function of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, not all patients respond to donepezil. In the present study, we examined the clinical features of responders and non‐responders to long‐term donepezil treatment. Methods: The present retrospective study was performed on 95 AD outpatients who had been taking donepezil for ≥2 years. All subjects underwent periodic examinations of cognitive function, namely Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Rorschach Cognitive Index (RCI), as well as clinical evaluations using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. Patients were divided into three groups as follows: (i) the ‘maintained’ group (MG), in which the global CDR score was maintained over the ≥2 years of treatment; (ii) the ‘declined’ group (DeG), in which the global CDR score increased one rank over the treatment period; and (iii) the ‘obvious and rapid decline’ group (ORDeG), in which the global CDR score increased two ranks early during the treatment period. Clinical features, treatment outcome, the time lag between a caregiver's recognition of the onset of dementia and the start of treatment, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and cognitive functions were compared between the three groups. Results: Patients in the ORDeG (i.e. non‐responders) were significantly younger and had a longer time lag between the onset of dementia and the start of treatment than patients in the MG (P < 0.05). Of note, patients in the ORDeG had a longer period of executive dysfunction before treatment started than patients in the MG (P < 0.001). Evaluation of cognitive function revealed that mean changes from baseline on the MMSE and RCI were significantly lower for patients in the ORDeG compared with the MG at 8 and 4 months, respectively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Donezepil non‐responders are likely to be younger and to have a longer time lag between the onset of dementia and the start of treatment, in particular a longer duration of executive dysfunction. Furthermore, the non‐responders do not demonstrate maintenance of cognitive functions in the short term. Thus, the early diagnosis of dementia and prompt initiation of donepezil treatment is indicated for a good outcome. To this end, it is important to educate people to recognize a deterioration of executive function in daily living.     

Greater depression severity associated with less improvement in depression-associated cognitive deficits in older subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Elderly depressed patients often exhibit cognitive deficits, which may improve with drug therapy. The authors investigated the relationship of baseline depression severity and cognitive improvement with antidepressant treatment in depressed patients with mild cognitive impairment. METHODS: Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores were measured in 52 depressed geriatric patients without dementia at baseline, 6, and 12 months, during an intent-to-treat period. A repeated-measures regression model tested the effect of MADRS score on MMSE. RESULTS: MMSE changes were significant and linear over time, with an average increase of 0.72 in the MMSE per 6-month interval. The final model showed that for every point increase in baseline MADRS, the average 6-month increase in MMSE decreased by 0.12. Repeated MADRS measurements did not significantly alter its predictive value. CONCLUSION: Greater baseline depression severity in older subjects with mild cognitive deficits is associated with less improvement in those deficits even with successful antidepressant therapy.     

Donepezil in patients with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: a randomised double-blind trial in CADASIL

BACKGROUND: Cholinergic deficits might contribute to vascular cognitive impairment. Trials of cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with vascular dementia are difficult because of heterogeneous disease mechanisms and overlap between vascular and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in the age-group recruited. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic form of subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia. It represents a homogeneous disease process, and because of CADASIL's early onset, comorbid AD pathology is rare. We did a multicentre, 18-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised parallel-group trial to determine whether the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil improves cognition in patients with CADASIL. METHODS: 168 patients with CADASIL (mean age 54.8 years) were assigned to 10 mg donepezil per day (n=86) or placebo (n=82) by a computer-generated randomisation protocol. Inclusion criteria included a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of 10-27 or a trail making test (TMT) B time score at least 1.5 SD below the mean, after adjustment for age and education. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the score on the vascular AD assessment scale cognitive subscale (V-ADAS-cog) at 18 weeks. Secondary endpoints included scores on the ADAS-cog, MMSE, TMT A time and B time, Stroop, executive interview-25 (EXIT25), CLOX, disability assessment for dementia, and sum of boxes of the clinical dementia rating scale. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00103948. FINDINGS: 161 patients were analysed. There was no significant difference between donepezil (n=84) and placebo (n=77) in the primary endpoint. The least-squares mean change from baseline score was -0.81 (SE 0.59) in the placebo group and -0.85 (SE 0.57) in the donepezil group (p=0.956). There was a significant treatment effect favouring donepezil on the following secondary outcomes: TMT B time (p=0.023), TMT A time (p=0.015), and EXIT25 (p=0.022). Ten donepezil-treated patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events compared to seven placebo-treated patients. INTERPRETATION: Donepezil had no effect on the primary endpoint, the V-ADAS-cog score in CADASIL patients with cognitive impairment. Improvements were noted on several measures of executive function, but the clinical relevance of these findings is not clear. Our findings may have implications for future trial design in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment.     

Differential efficacy of treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease over a 6-month period

There are various anticholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). All AChEIs have shown greater efficacy than placebo in randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trials. No differential studies have yet been made of the efficacy between all AChEIs. The study aims to determine the differential efficacy of the AChEIs with respect to a historical sample of patients with AD that were not treated with AChEIs. An open-label, prospective, observational study with a retrospective control group was undertaken to examine the evolution of the cognitive function over a 6-month period. The patients were assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at study entry and at 6 months. A general linear model was applied for repeated measurements with the MMSE score as the dependent variable, treatment type as an independent variable and the severity of the deterioration, age and the MMSE baseline score as covariables. Of the sample of 147 patients, 40 initiated treatment with donepezil, 32 with galantamine, 30 with rivastigmine and 45 were part of a historical sample of the memory clinic patients between 1991 and 1996 that had not been treated with AChEIs. The average age was 73.7 years (SD = 6.9; range = 52-86), 67.3% were women, 78.2% of the cases were mild and the MMSE baseline score was 18.1 points (range = 11-27). No significant intergroup differences were observed in these variables. The average doses of donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine were 5.87 mg/day (SD = 1.92), 14.81 mg/day (SD = 6.25) and 6.41 mg/day (SD = 1.82), respectively. At 6 months, the difference in the MMSE score with respect to the untreated group was 1.6 points for donepezil (95% CI 0.79-2.37; p < 0.001), 0.99 points for galantamine (95% CI 0.14-1.85; p = 0.01) and 0.90 points for rivastigmine (95% CI 0.05-1.74; p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the efficacy among the groups treated with AChEIs (p > 0.05). Treatment with AChEIs significantly delays the global cognitive impairment associated with AD for at least 6 months. Our study found no significant differences in efficacy between donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine. Further studies in the context of daily clinical practice will determine the clinical significance of the changes observed. An important variability of the response to the treatment was observed in treated patients.     

Impact of donepezil hydrochloride on the care burden of family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease

Background: To evaluate the impact of donepezil hydrochloride on the care burden on family members of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). At present, donepezil is the only drug approved for the treatment of AD in Japan. Although the care burden on primary caregivers of AD patients comprises both physical and psychological burdens and donepezil is recognized to improve cognitive dysfunction and associated symptoms, there are few data on the effects of the drug on the care burden. Methods: Of the uninstitutionalized AD patients who visited a dementia clinic between June 2008 and May 2009 with their primary family caregivers, 416 subjects who satisfied the enrollment criteria were registered for the study. All participants provided informed consent. Assessment included changes in scores on the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (J‐ZBI) and the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), as well as the presence of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Caregivers answered the questionnaires at baseline and after 12 weeks treatment with donepezil (starting dose 3 mg, p.o., once daily, followed by 5 mg after 1 or 2 weeks). Results: There were significant changes in mean scores on the J‐ZBI (?1.9 ± 9.5; P < 0.01) and MMSE (+0.9 ± 2.9; P < 0.01) from baseline to Week 12, without significant correlation between these two scores. In patients with BPSD, there was a significant decrease in J‐ZBI scores over the 12 weeks (P = 0.013); in contrast, in patients without BPSD, the decrease in the J‐ZBI score did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.418). Conclusions: The results indicate that donepezil improves cognitive function and some of the BPSD. As a possible consequence of improvements in BPSD, donepezil may also reduce caregivers' burden.     

Comparison of functional and cognitive donepezil effects in Alzheimer's disease

Donepezil has been shown to improve aspects of cognitive functioning in persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its impact on instrumental activities of daily living has received little attention. In a within-subject design, 24 community-dwelling persons with AD were treated with open-label donepezil over a 12-month period. To assess functional abilities, a brief, objective measure of instrumental activities of daily living skills was used (Texas Functional Living Scale; TFLS). Global cognitive abilities were assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Changes in TFLS and MMSE scores were much the same. Improvements on the TFLS and MMSE were seen over a 3-month period. At 12 months, both TFLS and MMSE scores declined slightly below baseline. These results support an effect of donepezil on cognitive measures and day-to-day function and also suggest that the MMSE reflects well the actual functional ability of persons with moderate AD.     

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled donepezil augmentation in antidepressant-treated elderly patients with depression and cognitive impairment: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To assess combined antidepressant and cognitive enhancer treatment in elderly patients presenting with depression plus cognitive impairment. METHODS: Twenty-three elderly (>50 years old) depressed, cognitively impaired (DEP-CI) patients participated in a pilot study. We evaluated whether, after 8 weeks of open antidepressant treatment, donepezil HCl (Aricept) would afford added cognitive benefit compared to placebo in a randomized 12-week trial. A subsample continued in an 8-month extension phase of open treatment with donepezil. Neuropsychological testing (NPT) was performed and antidepressant response monitored at baseline and the 8, 20, and 52-week time points. RESULTS: At 8-weeks, the antidepressant response rate was 61% (14/23). Improvement in SRT immediate recall (SRT-IR; e.g. episodic verbal memory) was observed in responders compared to non-responders. During the 12-week, placebo-controlled, donepezil add-on trial, patients on donepezil showed further improvement in SRT-IR versus patients on placebo. In the open extension phase, patients who continued open donepezil treatment (n = 6) maintained improvement in memory and tended to show an advantage over patients who never received donepezil and were evaluated at the 52-week time point (n = 6). There were no observed significant donepezil effects on non-memory cognitive domains. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that addition of a cholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) following antidepressant medication treatment in elderly Dep-CI patients may improve cognition, and support the need for a confirmatory, larger randomized placebo-controlled trial.     

Effects of cholinesterase inhibitors appear greater in patients on established antihypertensive therapy

INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence that hypertension may contribute to development of dementia. Studies show that blood pressure lowering therapy might protect against cognitive deterioration and that antihypertensive treatment reduce the incidence of dementia. AIM: We hypothesize that administration of cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis) to patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) receiving antihypertensive medications therapy would result in clinical benefits for a period of 40 weeks in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with possible or probable AD were enrolled from 16 Alzheimer evaluation units (UVA) of Brescia and Cremona (Northern Italy). Patients treated with donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for 40 weeks independently of dosages were selected. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 16 weeks (T2) and 40 weeks (T3). RESULTS: 416 patients completed the study at 40 weeks; of these 255 were 'non users' while 161 utilized antihypertensive drugs ('users'). The mean change in MMSE score from baseline to week 40 demonstrate that antihypertensive-treated patients improved by 0.7 points while patients receiving only AChEis remain stables. Analyzing separately patients (n = 183) that ameliorate (responders) on cognition at T3 ( >/= 1 point MMSE score increase) a significant differences in favor of 'users' antihypertensive drugs over 'non users' on cognition at weeks 16 and 40 has been demonstrated. In particular, at T2 the mean change of MMSE from baseline in 'users' was 3.2 +/- 2.6 vs 'non users' 2.2 +/- 2.3 ( p = 0.016) and at T3 was 3.5 +/- 2.5 vs 'non users' 2.0.2.7+/-1.6 ( p = 0.018). Antihypertensive drugs were independently associated with cognitive improvement in responder patients treated with AChEis (95% CI: 0.41-1.79; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive medications in AD patients treated with AChEis are associated with an independent improvement on cognition after 40 weeks of treatment.     

Cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the effect of cognitive stimulation therapy on the progression of mild Alzheimer's disease in patients treated with donepezil

BACKGROUND: There is general consensus regarding the benefit of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g. donepezil) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the combined effect of acetylcholinesterase and cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study examines their combined effect on the progression of cognitive decline in AD by comparing the cognitive performance of 17 AD patients treated with CST and donepezil (combined treatment group) and 13 AD patients treated with donepezil alone (control group). METHODS: Patients in the combined treatment group received 5 mg of donepezil per day and about 20 one-hour CST sessions for one year, whereas the control group received only 5 mg of donepezil per day. The first eight sessions were carried out once a week, and subsequent sessions were generally once every two weeks. The patients were evaluated for changes in cognitive ability by administering the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) before the start of CST (baseline) and about one year later (follow-up). RESULTS: A repeated-measure analysis of variance revealed a significant group x time interaction. The MMSE score decreased significantly in the control group, but did not change significantly in the combined treatment group. Three patients in the control group declined by four points on the MMSE, compared to none in the combined treatment group. Effect size (ES) in the control group was relatively large and negative, while the ES in the combined treatment group was close to zero. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the possibility that donepezil plus CST slowed the rate of cognitive decline more than the administration of donepezil alone.     

多奈哌齐治疗老年性痴呆的临床研究

目的:探讨乙酰胆碱和促炎症细胞因子在AD发病机制中的相互关系。方法:采用对照研究,对36名阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’sdisease,AD)患者用MMSE量表测定其治疗前后认知功能;采用Elisa方法测定乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗前后脑脊液中白介素-1、肿瘤坏死因子、白介素-6等细胞因子的变化。结果:多奈哌齐组治疗24周后认知功能与治疗前比较明显提高,认知功能改善比脑复康组明显,同时CSF中IL-1、TNF-α、IL-6和sIL-6R的水平与治疗前相比,均明显降低且有显著意义(P<0.01)。结论:胆碱酯酶抑制剂多奈哌齐治疗AD,改善认知功能的同时,可使脑内促炎症细胞因子有所降低。提示胆碱能功能与促炎症细胞因子在AD发病中相互影响,具有密切联系。     

吡拉西坦联合盐酸多奈哌齐对血管性认知障碍患者MMSE评分和日常生活能力的影响

目的观察吡拉西坦联合盐酸多奈哌齐治疗血管性认知障碍(VCI)患者的临床疗效。方法选取2018-03—2020-02安阳市人民医院收治VCI患者114例为研究对象,按随机数表法分为联合组及对照组各57例。对照组患者给予单纯吡拉西坦治疗,联合组患者给予吡拉西坦联合盐酸多奈哌齐治疗,观察治疗前后2组认知功能、日常生活能力、血液生化指标[一氧化氮(NO)、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、内皮素(ET)]水平。结果治疗3个月后,联合组MMSE评分、NO水平明显高于治疗前及同期对照组(P<0.05);联合组ADL评分、Hcy、ET水平明显低于治疗前及同期对照组(P<0.05)。结论吡拉西坦联合盐酸多奈哌齐治疗VCI能够改善患者ET、NO水平,减轻脑损伤。     

Effects of donepezil on emotional/behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease patients

BACKGROUND: This open-label study examined the effects of the reversible cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil on emotional/behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. METHOD: Patients were diagnosed as having probable/possible AD by National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS/ADRDA) criteria. This study used the CERAD Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia (CBRSD) and its subscales to evaluate a group of 25 AD patients treated with donepezil. Dosage was increased at 4 months for most patients from 5 to 10 mg q.h.s. Analysis of variance was used to compare scores over a period of 12 months. These patients were also compared, using t tests, to a reference group that had received no donepezil or other anticholinesterase. RESULTS: Donepezil administration was associated with improvement in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and CBRSD total scores at 3-month evaluation (p< or =.05). CBRSD depression and behavioral dysregulation scores improved transiently at 4 months (p< or =.05). MMSE, CBRSD total, CBRSD depression, and CBRSD behavioral dysregulation scores returned to baseline levels at 12 months, in contrast to the reference group, whose MMSE and CBRSD total scores worsened minimally over the 12 months. CONCLUSION: Donepezil has a mildly positive effect on emotional/behavioral symptoms in AD in addition to its effect on cognitive function.     

Computed tomography in the assessment of seizure-induced supratentorial neuron loss.

Epilepsy patients develop atrophy of the hippocampus and the cerebellum. Because reports exist, in which diffuse atrophy of the CNS of epilepsy patients is mentioned, we wanted to investigate if computed tomography (CT) can demonstrate a decrease of the cerebral volume correlated with the length of time during which the patients have had seizures. We measured the bifrontal ratio, the bicaudate ratio, the lateral ventricular brain ratio, and the sylvian fissure ratio of the CT images of 124 neurologically intact patients with a duration of epilepsy from 3 months to 39 years. Multiple regression analysis revealed no correlation between the CT indices and the seizure types or the time elapsed from the first seizure to CT. The well-known decrease of the CT measures with advancing age was confirmed: among the women by all four measurements; the men only exhibited significant increases of the sylvian fissure and the bicaudate ratios. If diffuse cerebral atrophy occurs as a complication of epilepsy, it does not reach a degree, which allows it to be visualized by CT.     

Longitudinal trajectories of cognitive change in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a growth mixture modeling analysis

Preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) refers to a period of time prior to diagnosis during which cognitive deficits among individuals who will go on to receive a diagnosis of AD are present. There is great interest in describing the nature of cognitive change during the preclinical period, in terms of whether persons decline in a linear fashion to diagnosis, or exhibit some stability of functioning, followed by rapid losses in performance. In the current study we apply Growth Mixture Modeling to data from The Kungsholmen Project to evaluate whether decline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores during the preclinical period of AD follows a linear or quadratic function. At the end of a 7-year follow-up period, some individuals would be diagnosed with AD (n=71), whereas others would remain free of dementia (n=457). The results indicated that a two-group quadratic model of decline provided the best statistical fit measures, as well as the greatest estimates of sensitivity (67%) and specificity (86%). Differences in MMSE scores were apparent at baseline, but the preclinical AD group began to experience precipitous declines three years prior to diagnosis. Finally, persons who were misclassified as preclinical AD had fewer years of education and poorer MMSE scores at baseline.