Risk factors for implant failure of intertrochanteric fractures with lateral femoral wall fracture after intramedullary nail fixation

IntroductionFew studies have specifically evaluated the comminution extent of lateral femoral wall (LFW) fracture and risk factors of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures with LFW fracture. The aim of present study was to evaluate the influence of comminution extent of LFW fracture on implant failure and identify risk factors of implant failure in cases with LFW fracture after intramedullary fixation.MethodsThis retrospective study included 130 intertrochanteric fracture with LFW fracture treated with intramedullary fixation at a teaching hospital over a 13-year period from January 2006 to December 2018. Demographic information, cortical thickness index, the reduction quality, status of medial support, position of the screw/blade and status of lateral femoral wall were collected and compared. The logistic regression analyzes was performed to evaluate risk factors of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures with LFW fracture after intramedullary nail fixation.Results10 patients (7.69%) suffered from mechanical failure after intramedullary fixation. Univariate analyzes showed that comminuted LFW fracture (OR, 7.625; 95%CI, 1.437~40.446; p = 0.017), poor reduction quality (OR, 49.375; 95%CI, 7.217~337.804; p < 0.001) and loss of medial support (OR, 17.818; 95%CI, 3.537~89.768; p < 0.001) were associated with implant failure. After adjustment for confounding variables, the multivariable logistic regression analyzes showed that poor reduction quality (OR, 11.318; 95%CI, 1.126~113.755; p = 0.039) and loss of medial support (OR, 7.734; 95%CI, 1.062~56.327; p = 0.043) were independent risk factors for implant failure. Whereas, comminuted LFW fracture was not associated with implant failure (p = 0.429).ConclusionsThe comminution extent of the LFW fracture might influence the stability of intertrochanteric fractures; and intramedullary fixation might be an effective treatment method. Furthermore, poor reduction quality and loss of medial support could increaze the risk of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures with LFW fractures after intramedullary fixation. Therefore, we should pay great emphasis on fracture reduction quality in future.     

Clustering of morphological fracture lines for identifying intertrochanteric fracture classification with Hausdorff distance–based K-means approach

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a systematic three-dimensional (3D) classification of intertrochanteric fractures by clustering the morphological features of fracture lines using the Hausdorff distance–based K-means approach and assess the usefulness of it in the clinical setting.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 504 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary internal fixation. The morphological fracture lines of all patients extracted from computed tomography were transcribed freehand onto the template. All fracture lines were then clustered into five distinct types using the Hausdorff distance–based K-means clustering method. Five radiographic parameters and four functional parameters were used to evaluate the postoperative functional states and mobilization levels. Postoperative complications were also recorded.ResultsIntertrochanteric fractures were classified into five types: type I (108/504, 21.4%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall and greater trochanter fragment; type II (85/504, 16.9%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall with/without lesser trochanter detachment; type III (147/504, 29.2%), fractures with intertrochanteric crest detachment involving the lesser trochanter and greater trochanter with an intact lateral femoral wall; type IV (113/504, 22.4%), fractures with large intertrochanteric crest detachment and large lesser trochanter and greater trochanter detachment partially involving the lateral femoral wall and less medial cortical support; type V (51/504, 10.1%), a combination of pertrochanteric and lateral fracture line involving the entire lateral femoral wall and lesser trochanter detachment. Parameters of femoral neck–shaft angle and sliding distance of the cephalic nail were significantly different among types. The complication rate generally increased from type I to type V (P = 0.035).ConclusionsThe unsupervised clustering can achieve identification of the type of intertrochanteric fractures with clinical significance. The Tang classification can be used to describe fracture morphology, predict the possibility of achieving stable reduction and the risk of complications following intramedullary fixation.     

Reverse distal femoral locking compression plate a salvage option in nonunion of proximal femoral fractures

Background:When primary fixation of proximal femoral fractures with implants fails, revision osteosynthesis may be challenging. Tracts of previous implants and remaining insufficient bone stock in the proximal femur pose unique problems for the treatment. Intramedullary implants like proximal femoral nail (PFN) or surface implants like Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) are few of the described implants for revision surgery. There is no evidence in the literature to choose one implant over the other. We used the reverse distal femur locking compression plate (LCP) of the contralateral side in such cases undergoing revision surgery. This implant has multiple options of fixation in proximal femur and its curvature along the length matches the anterior bow of the femur. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this implant in salvage situations.Results:All fractures exhibited union without any complications. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically. One case of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture required bone grafting at the second stage for delayed union of the femoral shaft fracture.Conclusions:Reverse distal femoral LCP of the contralateral side can be used as a salvage option for failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures exhibiting nonunion.     

Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter

Background and purpose In recent years, intramedullary nails (INs) for the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures have gained prominence relative to conventional, sliding hip screws (SHSs). There is little empirical background for this development, however. A previous series of ours suggested that the use of SHS was not adequate in situations with fragile or fractured lateral femoral walls, where it often led to lack of healing in a maximally telescoped position. We hypothesized that INs would be the superior implant in these specific circumstances.

Methods We retrospectively examined 311 consecutive patients treated in our department between 2002 and 2008, with either an IN (n = 158) or an SHS (n = 153) mounted on a 4-hole side-plate, for an AO/OTA type 31A1–2 pertrochanteric fracture with a detached greater trochanter. The status of the lesser trochanter was assessed preoperatively and the integrity of the lateral femoral wall, fracture reduction, and position of the implants were assessed postoperatively. Reoperations due to technical failure were recorded for one year postoperatively.

Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the groups were similar regarding demographic and biomechanical parameters. The lateral femoral wall was more frequently fractured during SHS implantation (42 patients) than in the IN group (9 patients) (p < 0.001). 6 (4%) of the 158 patients operated with IN had to be reoperated, as compared to 22 (14%) in the SHS group of 153 patients (p = 0.001).

Interpretation IN had a lower reoperation rate than SHS in these pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter. IN left more lateral femoral walls intact.     

Long proximal femoral nail in ipsilateral fractures proximal femur and shaft of femur

Background:

Ipsilateral fractures of the proximal femur and femoral shaft are extremely uncommon injuries which occur in young adults who sustain a high energy trauma. A variety of management modalities have been tried to treat this complex fracture pattern ranging from conservative approach to recently introduced reconstruction nails. All these approaches have their own difficulties. We studied the outcome of long proximal femoral nail (LPFN) in the management of concomitant ipsilateral fracture of the proximal femur and femoral shaft.

Materials and Methods:

We analysed the prospective data of 36 consecutive patients who had sustained a high energy trauma (30 closed fractures and 6 open shaft fractures) who had concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the femoral shaft associated with proximal femur fractures treated with LPFN between December 2005 and December 2011. The mean age was 39 years (range 28-64 years). Twenty nine males and seven females were enrolled for this study.

Results:

The patients were followed up at three, six, twelve, and eighteen months. The mean healing time for the neck fractures was 4.8 months and for the shaft fractures was 6.2 months. The greater trochanter was splintered and widened in two cases which eventually consolidated. Two patients had superficial infection, two patients had lateral migration of the screws with coxa vara which was due to severe osteoporosis detected during the followup. We had two cases of nonunion of shaft fracture and one case of nonunion of neck fracture. Two cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head were detected after 2 years of followup. No cases of implant failure were noted. Limb shortening of less than 2 cms was noted in four of our patients. The functional assessment system of Friedman and Wyman was used for evaluating the results. In our series 59.9% (n = 23) were rated as good, 30.6% (n = 11) as fair, and 5.5% (n = 2) as poor.

Conclusion:

Long PFN is a reliable option for concomitant ipsilateral diaphyseal and proximal femur fractures.     

Laceration of a branch of the profunda femoris artery caused by a spike of the displaced lesser trochanter in an inter-trochanteric femoral fracture. A case report

IntroductionInjury of femoral vessels is an extremely rare complication in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. In most cases reported, the vascular lesion involves the superficial femoral artery, whereas in very few cases does it involve the profunda femoris artery.Presentation of case: We report a case of acute bleeding due to laceration of a perforating branch of the profunda femoris artery caused by a sharp fragment of the displaced lesser trochanter in an intertrochanteric femoral fracture; the lesion was treated by transcatheter embolization.DiscussionThe arterial injury may be iatrogenic, occurring during intramedullary internal fixation, or less frequently, the injury may be due to the fracture itself, caused by a sharp bone fragment that damages the profunda femoris artery or one of its perforating branches.ConclusionWe believe that intertrochanteric femoral fractures with avulsed lesser trochanter are at risk for femoral vessel injuries caused by the displaced bone spike, and we advise meticulous clinical and laboratory monitoring pre- and post-operatively to prevent serious complications.     

Morphology of the posteromedial fragment in pertrochanteric fractures: A three-dimensional computed tomography analysis

BackgroundIn this study we describe the morphology of the posteromedial fragment in pertrochanteric fractures using 3D CT scans and answer two questions 1) Do differences exist between the 3D CT appearances of posteromedial fragments and the depictions made in the AO classification 2) Does the posteromedial fragment affect stability in pertrochanteric fractures, in terms of fracture collapse?MethodsPreoperative CT scans of eight 31-A1 and fifty 31-A2 fractures were analysed. The presence of PM fragment, its fragmentation, greater trochanter (GT) involvement, lesser trochanter (LT) fragment size (in terms of its posterior and medial extent as well as LT length), LT fragment displacement (in terms of medial displacement and rotation) were determined. All fractures were treated with a DHS. Fracture collapse was determined on postoperative radiographs. The relationship between fracture collapse and patient factors including age, gender, fracture type (A1 versus A2), characteristics of the posteromedial fragment, and the presence of a lateral wall fracture were determined.ResultsThree out of eight 31-A1 fractures demonstrated a separate GT fragment (three part fracture). Out of the 50 31-A2 fractures, 12 had a single PM fragment, which included the LT and GT in continuity. The more common four part fractures seem to form by further fragmentation of this basic form. In A2 fractures, the GT was almost always broken and the broken fragment comprised a mean 56% of normal GT. The LT fragment involved an average of 74% of the posterior wall, and an average of 36% of the medial wall of the proximal femur. Larger LT fragments were less displaced as compared to smaller fragments. Univariate regression analyses revealed that fracture collapse was significantly correlated with fracture type (A1 versus A2, p 0.036), GT size (p 0.002) and the presence of a lateral wall fracture (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study revealed some important differences between the 3D CT appearances and AO classification of pertrochanteric fractures. Further, neither fragmentation of the posteromedial fragment, nor the size of the lesser trochanter fragment was found to predict stability in pertrochanteric fractures. A perioperative lateral wall fracture is the main determinant of stability in these fractures.     

DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side‐impact fracture model

The validity of dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measurements as predictors of pertrochanteric and femoral neck fracture loads was compared in an experimental simulation of a fall on the greater trochanter. 65 proximal femora were harvested from patients at autopsy. All specimens were scanned with use of DXA for areal bone mineral density and pQCT for volumetric densities at selected sites of the proximal femur. A three‐point bending test simulating a side‐impact was performed to determine fracture load and resulted in 16 femoral neck and 49 pertrochanteric fractures. Regression analysis revealed that DXA BMD trochanter was the best variable at predicting fracture load of pertrochanteric fractures with an adjusted R² of 0.824 (p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between densitometric parameters and the fracture load of femoral neck fractures. A significant correlation further was found between body weight, height, femoral head diameter, and neck length on the one side and fracture load on the other side, irrespective of the fracture type. Clinically, the DXA BMD trochanter should be favored and integrated routinely as well as biometric and geometric parameters, particularly in elderly people with known osteoporosis at risk for falls. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 32:31–38, 2014.     

Implant fracture of the TFNA femoral nail

BackgroundThe TFNA (Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced) Proximal Femoral Nailing System (DePuy Synthes) is frequently used for intramedullary fixation of proximal femoral fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate all TFNA implant fractures at a UK trauma unit to ascertain any patient or surgical factors associated with implant failure.MethodsA retrospective study was carried out identifying all patients that sustained a TFNA implant fracture over a five-year period. Data was collected on demographic information, ASA, co-morbidities, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern according to the AO/OTA classification, procedure details and time to failure. Radiographs were assessed by two independent reviewers to identify tip-apex distance (TAD), calcar TAD, reduction quality and union status at time of implant failure.ResultsSix cases were identified, all with implant breakage at the aperture for the proximal screw. All femoral fractures were intertrochanteric reverse obliquity type (OA/OTA 31A3). Two were traumatic fragility fractures and the remainder atraumatic. Mean time from index surgery to revision was 441 days (104–963). Mean TAD was 20.5 mm (15–24) and mean calcar TAD 24 mm (18–32). All six cases displayed radiographic non-union at the time of implant fracture.ConclusionPathological fractures resulting in reverse obliquity type fracture patterns and subsequent non-union appear to be contributory factors to TFNA breakage at the proximal screw aperture. This may be further exacerbated by alterations to the nail design from previous generations. In these patients, close follow up with clinical and radiographic surveillance should be employed. Further biomechanical and clinical studies are required to compare this finding against other nail designs.     

New classification focusing on the relationship between the attachment of the iliofemoral ligament and the course of the fracture line for intertrochanteric fractures

PurposeThere are various types of intertrochanteric fractures that are unstable pertrochanteric fractures of the hip. The aim of this study was to develop a systematic and comprehensive classification of intertrochanteric fractures.Materials and methodsThis study enrolled 74 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated by us between 2012 and 2015. The fractures were classified using 3D-CT images taken immediately after the fractures occurred based on the course of the lateral fracture line (LFL) that extends through the lateral femoral cortex distal to the vastus ridge of the greater trochanter in the intertrochanteric area. Furthermore, the presence or absence of additional typical fractures was also studied. Then, 4 orthopedic specialists examined the 3D-CT images of 20 patients randomly selected from the 74 patients to evaluate both the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement levels.ResultsIntertrochanteric fractures were classified into three types according to the LFL patterns. Type I (41.9%), the Lateral Wall Pattern, has a LFL that extends towards the lateral fiber bundle attachment area of the iliofemoral ligament. Type II (24.3%), the Transverse Pattern, has a LFL that extends towards the medial bundle attachment area. Type III (33.8%), the Reverse Oblique Pattern, has a LFL that extends between the lateral and medial fiber bundle area of the iliofemoral ligament. Each type showed characteristic displacement and was associated with various combinations of typical fractures (fracture across the intertrochanteric line, posteromedial fragment, including the lesser trochanter, posterolateral fragment posterior to the femoral greater trochanter, and banana-shaped big fragment, including both the greater trochanter and the lesser trochanter). The mean κ values for the interobserver and intraobserver agreement levels were 0.77 (0.70–0.85) and 0.76 (0.70–0.85), respectively, which were considered substantial agreement levels.ConclusionWe believe our new classification is a useful communication tool for medical professionals in the diagnosis of fractures.     

复位股骨大粗隆顶点骨折对PFNA治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折预后的影响

目的评估应用股骨近端防旋髓内钉（PFNA）内固定治疗合并股骨大粗隆顶点局部骨折的不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折术中将股骨大粗隆顶点局部骨折复位对预后的影响。方法合并股骨大粗隆顶点局部骨折的不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折46例,股骨大粗隆顶点局部骨折复位固定26例（复位组）,未复位固定20例（未复位组）。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后第2天血红蛋白及白蛋白水平、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症及末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分。结果复位组较未复位组手术时间更长、术中出血量更多,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;但复位组在术后并发症及末次随访时髋关节的功能恢复方面明显优于未复位组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;而2组在骨折愈合时间、术后第2天血红蛋白及白蛋白水平方面差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论复位固定移位的股骨大粗隆顶点骨折能够提高PFNA主钉进针定位的准确性,降低股骨大粗隆外侧壁继发性骨折的发生率,改善术后髋关节功能,减少术后隐性出血量。     

Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral nail.MethodsThis study was conducted on 50 cases of Intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated by a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. Patients were operated on standard fracture table under image intensifier control.ResultsThe average age of the patient was 62.3 years. Most common mechanism of fracture was domestic fall. Twenty percent four percent had stable, 58% unstable and 18% reverse oblique pattern of fracture. The unstable pattern was more common in old aged patients with higher grade of osteoporosis. The average blood loss was 100 and 250 ml in PFN and DHS group respectively. In PFN there were more no. of radiation exposure intraoperatively. The average operating time for the patients treated with PFN was 55 min as compared to 87 min in patients treated with DHS. Total complications were 15% with implant failure 6%, infection 4%, nonunion 2% and greater trochanter splintering 4%. In the PFN group the amount of sliding on X-rays was less as compared to DHS. The patients treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early period (at 1 and 3 month). In the long term both the implant had almost similar functional outcomes.ConclusionThe DHS was tolerated better by young patients with stable fracture while PFN had a better outcome with osteoporotic patients and weak bone mass and reverse oblique fractures.     

The proximal femoral nail (PFN) - a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: A prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months

In 1996, the AO/ASIF developed the proximal femoral nail (PFN) as an intramedullary device for the treatment of unstable per-, intra- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. In a prospective study, we treated 55 patients having proximal femoral fractures with the PFN from 1997 to 2000. In 34 patients, we achieved what was close to anatomic reduction of the main fracture fragments. Immediate full weight bearing was permitted in 49 patients. During the followup period of 15 months, complications occurred in 12 patients. 2 patients had a cut-out of the implant because we used too short proximal gliding screws. In 5 patients, closed fracture reduction could not be done and open fracture reduction with use of cerclage became necessary. Careful surgical technique and modification of the PFN can reduce the high complication rate. In conclusion, the PFN is a good minimal invasive implant of unstable proximal femoral fractures, if closed reduction is possible. If open reduction of the fracture becomes necessary and several fragments are found (especially of the greater trochanter), we prefer to use a dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the trochanter stablizing plate.     

The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months

In 1996, the AO/ASIF developed the proximal femoral nail (PFN) as an intramedullary device for the treatment of unstable per-, intra- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. In a prospective study, we treated 55 patients having proximal femoral fractures with the PFN from 1997 to 2000. In 34 patients, we achieved what was close to anatomic reduction of the main fracture fragments. Immediate full weight bearing was permitted in 49 patients. During the follow-up period of 15 months, complications occurred in 12 patients. 2 patients had a cut-out of the implant because we used too short proximal gliding screws. In 5 patients, closed fracture reduction could not be done and open fracture reduction with use of cerclage became necessary. Careful surgical technique and modification of the PFN can reduce the high complication rate. In conclusion, the PFN is a good minimal invasive implant of unstable proximal femoral fractures, if closed reduction is possible. If open reduction of the fracture becomes necessary and several fragments are found (especially of the greater trochanter), we prefer to use a dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the trochanter stablizing plate.     

重建外侧壁及股骨矩治疗Evans-JensenⅤ型股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析

目的：探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉（proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA）及重建钛板重建外侧壁及股骨矩治疗Evans-JensenⅤ型转子间骨折的手术疗效。方法：分析自2013年10月至2016年3月采用手术治疗的股骨转子间Evans-JensenⅤ型骨折患者30例。按手术方式分为两组：16例行闭合复位PFNA内固定（闭合复位组）;14例行小切口切开重建钛板重建股骨矩及外侧壁PFNA内固定（切开复位组）。观察比较两组患者手术中（失血量、手术持续时间）、手术后康复（手术后下床活动时间、骨性愈合时间）、手术相关并发症（内固定断裂、退出、螺旋刀片切出）,术后12个月行髋关节功能Harris评分,观察比较颈干角丢失度数。结果：30例患者均获随访,时间12~18个月。所有患者骨折顺利愈合,切开复位组患者手术失血量、手术持续的时间均明显大于闭合复位组（P<0.05）。切开复位组患者手术后下床活动时间、骨性愈合时间、手术相关并发症情况、术后12个月髋关节功能Harris评分、颈干角丢失度数均优于闭合复位组（P<0.05）。。结论：使用重建钛板对股骨矩及外侧壁进行复位和固定,PFNA髓内固定治疗Evans-JensenⅤ型的转子间骨折,能够恢复股骨矩及外侧壁对股骨头颈的支撑,有利于提高手术以后骨折断端及内固定的稳定性,减少单独采用PFNA治疗以后骨折断端移位、内固定松动、切出甚至断裂等风险。缩短老年患者卧床时间,减少手术相关的并发症,为Evans-JensenⅤ型股骨转子间骨折的治疗提供新的思路和方法。     

Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation

BACKGROUND: Reoperations after intertrochanteric fractures are often necessitated by fracture displacement following mobilization of the patient. The biomechanical complexity of the fracture, the position of the implant, and the patient's characteristics are known to influence postoperative outcome. We investigated the importance of an intact lateral femoral wall as a factor in postoperative fracture displacement after fixation with a sliding compression hip screw. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive patients with an intertrochanteric fracture were treated with a 135 degrees sliding compression hip screw with a four-hole side-plate between 2002 and 2004. The fractures were classified on preoperative radiographs according to the AO/OTA classification system. The status of the greater and lesser trochanters, the integrity of the lateral femoral wall, and the position of the implant were assessed postoperatively. Reoperations due to technical failure were recorded for six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Only 3% (five) of 168 patients with an intact lateral femoral wall postoperatively underwent a reoperation within six months, whereas 22% (ten) of forty-six patients with a fractured lateral femoral wall were operated on again (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses combining demographic and biomechanical parameters showed a compromised lateral femoral wall to be a significant predictor of a reoperation (p = 0.010). Seventy-four percent (thirty-four) of the forty-six fractures of the lateral femoral wall occurred during the operative procedure itself. A fracture of the lateral femoral wall occurred in only 3% (three) of the 103 patients with an AO/OTA type-31-A1.1, A1.2, A1.3, or A2.1 intertrochanteric fracture compared with 31% (thirty-one) of the ninety-nine with an AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 or A2.3 fracture (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative fracture of the lateral femoral wall was found to be the main predictor for a reoperation after an intertrochanteric fracture. Consequently, we concluded that patients with preoperative or intraoperative fracture of the lateral femoral wall are not treated adequately with a sliding compression hip-screw device, and intertrochanteric fractures should therefore be classified according to the integrity of the lateral femoral wall, especially in randomized trials comparing fracture implants.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Osteopetrosis

BackgroundOsteopetrosis is an inherited bone disease associated with high risk of osteoarthritis and fracture non-union, which can lead to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Bone quality and morphology are altered in these patients, and there are limited data on results of THA in these patients. The goals of this study were to describe implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and complications in patients with osteopetrosis undergoing primary THA.MethodsWe identified 7 patients (9 hips) with osteopetrosis who underwent primary THA between 1970 and 2017 utilizing our total joint registry. The mean age at index THA was 48 years and included two males and five females. The mean follow-up was 8 years.ResultsThe 10-year survivorship free from any revision or implant removal was 89%, with 1 revision and 1 resection arthroplasty secondary to periprosthetic femoral fractures. The 10-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 42%, with 4 additional reoperations (2 ORIFs for periprosthetic femoral fractures, 1 sciatic nerve palsy lysis of adhesions, 1 hematoma evacuation). Harris hip scores significantly increased at 5 years (P = .04). Five hips had an intraoperative acetabular fracture, and 1 had an intraoperative femur fracture. All postoperative femoral fractures occurred in patients with intramedullary diameter less than 5 mm at a level 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter.ConclusionPrimary THA in patients with osteopetrosis is associated with good 10-year implant survivorship (89%), but a very high reoperation (58%) and periprosthetic femoral fracture rate (44%). Femoral fractures appear associated with smaller intramedullary diameters.     

Distal femoral fractures: A comparison between single lateral plate fixation and a combined femoral nail and plate fixation

ObjectivesDistal femoral fractures occur in patients with osteoporotic bone and also as a consequence of high energy trauma. The recognised treatment options include closed or open reduction of the fracture and fixation using a locking plate or a femoral nail. Both these fixation modalities have some drawbacks. There is a risk of metalwork failure with single lateral locking plates and limited distal fixation with intramedullary nails. Since January 2018, we started using augmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a combination of a retrograde femoral nail and a lateral locking plate. This study compares the outcomes of single lateral femoral plating (SLP) and combined nail-plate fixation (NPF).MethodsThis is a single centre retrospective case control study including all patients who sustained distal femoral fractures (OTA 33-A2, 33-A3, 33-C, 33-V3B and 33-V3D) over the study period. Outcomes for SLP were compared to NPF. The principal outcome measure was fracture union. Secondary outcome measures were reoperation rate, mortality and post-operative weight bearing status.Results67 distal femoral fractures were included in the study. 19 patients had peri?prosthetic fractures. 40 were treated by SLP, 27 were managed with NPF.  23 (58%) patients in the SLP group were given instructions to non-weight bear or Toe touch weight bear for 6 weeks post-surgery compared to 1 (4%) in the NPF group (p = 0.000004). 7 (18%) patients treated with SLP had metalwork failure due to a non-union compared to none treated with NPF (p = 0.04). 11 fractures in the SLP group failed to unite compared to no non-unions in the NPF group (p = 0.01). These differences were magnified when assessing older (>50 years old) patients.ConclusionsAugmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a nail plate fixation provided significantly higher union and enabled early weightbearing compared to single plate fixation. We recommend nail plate fixation for the treatment of distal femoral fractures, particularly in osteoporotic fractures.     

Proximal Femur Geometry To Detect and Distinguish Femoral Neck Fractures from Trochanteric Fractures in Postmenopausal Women

Some proximal femur geometry (PFG) parameters, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), have been reported to discriminate subjects with hip fracture. Relatively few studies have tested their ability to discriminate femoral neck fractures from those of the trochanter. To this end we performed a cross-sectional study in a population of 547 menopausal women over 69 years of age with femoral neck fractures (n= 88), trochanteric fractures (n= 93) or controls (n= 366). Hip axis length (HAL), neck–shaft angle (NSA), femoral neck diameter (FND) and femoral shaft diameter (FSD) were measured by DXA, as well as the bone mineral density (BMD) of the nonfractured hip at the femoral neck, trochanter and Ward’s triangle. In fractured subjects, BMD was lower at each measurement site. HAL was longer and NSA wider in those with femoral neck fractures. With logistic regression the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease in BMD was significantly associated at each measurement site with femoral neck fracture (femoral neck BMD: OR 1.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.4–2.5; trochanter BMD: OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.0; Ward’s triangle BMD: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.2) and trochanteric fracture (femoral neck BMD: OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9–3.6; trochanter BMD: OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.2–4.1; Ward’s triangle BMD: OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4–2.3). Age-adjusted OR for 1 SD increases in NSA (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.7–2.8) and HAL (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6) was significantly associated with the fracture risk only for femoral neck fracture. In the best predictive model the strongest predictors were site-matched BMD for both fracture types and NSA for neck fracture. Trochanteric BMD had the greatest area (0.78, standard error (SE) 0.02) under the receiver operating characteristic curve in trochanteric fractures, whereas for NSA (0.72, SE 0.03) this area was greatest in femoral neck fractures. These results confirm the association of BMD with proximal femur fracture and support the evidence that PFG plays a significant role only in neck fracture prediction, since NSA is the best predictive parameter among those tested. Received: 24 April 2001 / Accepted: 1 August 2001     

A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones

Background:The incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures still remains controversial. Intramedullary devices such as Gamma nail or proximal femoral nail and proximal anatomic femur plates are in use for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. There are still many investigations to find the optimal implant to treat these fractures with minimum complications. For this reason, we aimed to perform a biomechanical comparison of the proximal femoral nail and the locking proximal anatomic femoral plate in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.Result:Nail and plate models were locked distally at the same level. Axial steady load with a 5 mm/m velocity was applied through the mechanical axis of femur bone models. Axial loading in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail group was 1.78-fold greater compared to the plate group. All bones that had the plate applied were fractured in the portion containing the distal locking screw.Conclusion:The proximal femoral intramedullary nail provides more stability and allows for earlier weight bearing than the locking plate when used for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinicians should be cautious for early weight bearing with locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.