Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and PSC

Noninvasive measurement of liver stiffness with transient elastography has been recently validated for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. The current study assessed the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for the determination of fibrosis stage in chronic cholestatic diseases. One hundred one patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC, n=73) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC, n=28) were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study. All patients underwent liver biopsy (LB) and LSM. Histological and fibrosis stages were assessed on LB by two pathologists. LSM was performed by transient elastography. Efficiency of LSM for the determination of histological and fibrosis stages were determined by a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Analysis failed in six patients (5.9%) because of unsuitable LB (n=4) or LSM (n=2). Stiffness values ranged from 2.8 to 69.1 kPa (median, 7.8 kPa). LSM was correlated to both fibrosis (Spearman's rho= 0.84, P < .0001) and histological (0.79, P < .0001) stages. These correlations were still found when PBC and PSC patients were analyzed separately. Areas under ROC curves were 0.92 for fibrosis stage (F) > or =2, 0.95 for F > or =3 and 0.96 for F=4. Optimal stiffness cutoff values of 7.3, 9.8, and 17.3 kPa showed F > or =2, F > or =3 and F=4, respectively. LSM and serum hyaluronic acid level were independent parameters associated with extensive fibrosis on LB. In conclusion, transient elastography is a simple and reliable noninvasive means for assessing biliary fibrosis. It should be a promising tool to assess antifibrotic therapies in PBC or PSC.     

FibroScan对原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者肝纤维化的诊断价值

目的探讨FibroScan对于原发性胆汁性肝硬化（primary biliary cirrhosis,PBC）肝纤维化诊断的准确性。方法选择2009年10月—2013年12月经肝脏穿刺病理诊断的PBC患者56例,进行FibroScan检测得到肝脏硬度测量（liver stiffness measurement,LSM）值。以肝脏活组织检查结果作为＂金标准＂,计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积（AUROC）,评价FibroScan对PBC肝纤维化的诊断价值。结果 LSM值平均为（13.714±7.475）kPa,与肝脏病理分期呈正相关,Kendall相关系数为0.897,P〈0.01。FibroScan诊断PBC肝纤维化≥S2期、≥S3期、S4期的AUROC分别为0.897、0.959、0.989。纤维化分期为≥F2、≥F3、F4时对应的最佳截断值分别为12.9、16.1和19.7 kPa。肝硬度、血清透明质酸、AST/PLT（APRI）均为肝脏病理分期独立相关因素。结论 FibroScan是一项方便、准确的用于诊断PBC肝纤维化程度的方法。     

Alanine aminotransferase-based algorithms of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography (Fibroscan) for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

Summary.  The aim of this study is to know the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) cutoffs for different stages of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to investigate the effect of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) on LSM. We prospectively studied consecutive CHB patients undergoing liver biopsy and transient elastography examinations. Diagnostic performance of LSM for different degrees of liver fibrosis was evaluated. One hundred and sixty-one CHB patients with adequate liver biopsy sample size were studied. Area under receiver operating characteristics curves of LSM for no fibrosis (F0 vs F1–4), bridging fibrosis (F0–2 vs F3–4) and liver cirrhosis (F0–3 vs F4) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89–0.97) respectively. For liver cirrhosis, these optimal cutoff values were 8.4 kPa (98% sensitivity), 9.0 kPa (maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity), 13.4 kPa (94% specificity) and 13.4 kPa (maximum diagnostic accuracy, 85%) respectively. Patients with the same fibrosis staging but higher ALT levels tend to have higher LSM, and the diagnostic performance for low stage fibrosis was most seriously affected when ALT was elevated. Different LSM cutoff values and algorithms were derived for normal and elevated ALT levels. Based on these algorithms, liver biopsy can be avoided in 62% and 58% of patients with normal and elevated ALT respectively. In conclusion, transient elastography is a reasonable noninvasive tool to substitute liver biopsy among the lowest and highest risk patients for the assessment of liver fibrosis.     

Proficiency of transient elastography compared to liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in HIV/HBV‐coinfected patients

Summary. Transient elastography (TE) is a noninvasive technique to evaluate liver fibrosis. We compared the performance of TE with liver biopsy (LB) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection. Patients prospectively underwent TE and LB. The diagnosis accuracy of TE was calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different stages of fibrosis, and optimal cut‐off values were defined. A sequential algorithm combining TE with biochemical score (Fibrotest®) is proposed. Fifty‐seven patients had both TE and LB (median time: 3 days) and two with proven cirrhosis, only TE. Forty‐six (78%) were under antiretroviral therapy with anti‐HBV drugs in 98%, and 19 (32%) had elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). A significant correlation was observed between liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and METAVIR fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001). Patients with elevated ALT tended to have higher LSM than those with normal ALT. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.85 for significant fibrosis (≥F2), 0.92 for advanced fibrosis (≥F3) and 0.96 for cirrhosis. Using a cut‐off of 5.9 kPa for F≥2 and 7.6 kPa for F ≥ 3, the diagnosis accuracy was 83% and 86%, respectively. With an algorithm combining TE and Fibrotest®, 97% of patients were well classified for significant fibrosis. Using this algorithm, the need for LB can be reduced by 67%. In HIV/HBV‐coinfected patients, most of them with normal ALT under antiretroviral treatment including HBV active drugs, TE was proficient in discriminating moderate to severe fibrosis from minimal liver disease.     

Transient elastography for measurement of liver stiffness measurement can detect early significant hepatic fibrosis in Japanese patients with viral and nonviral liver diseases

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported the efficiency of transient elastography, a noninvasive, reproducible, and reliable method for predicting liver fibrosis, in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and B (CHB), but there are few reports about nonviral chronic liver disease (CLD) such as primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). We therefore compared the efficiency of transient elastography between CHC and nonviral CLD. METHODS: We assessed the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using Fibroscan, and compared these values with those of hyaluronic acid, type 4 collagen, platelet count, prothrombin index, and AST/platelet ratio index (APRI) as indices for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in 114 patients with a variety of chronic liver diseases: CHC (n = 51), CHB (n = 11), NAFLD (n = 17), PBC (n = 20), and AIH (n = 15). The histology was assessed according to the METAVIR score by two pathologists. RESULTS: The number of fibrosis stage (F0/1/2/3/4) with CHC was 9/15/12/6/10, and that with nonviral CLD was 10/21/11/4/6, respectively. The ability, assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, to predict liver fibrosis F >or= 2 for LSM, HA, type 4 collagen, platelet count, prothrombin index, and APRI, was 0.92, 0.81, 0.87, 0.85, 0.85, and 0.92 in CHC patients, respectively; and 0.88, 0.72, 0.81, 0.67, 0.81, and 0.77 in nonviral CLD patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonviral CLD, LSM was most helpful in predicting significant fibrosis (F >or= 2). Transient elastography is a reliable method for predicting significant liver fibrosis, not only in CHC patients but also in nonviral CLD patients.     

Assessment of liver stiffness in patients after living donor liver transplantation by transient elastography

Objective. Recurrence of hepatitis and progression of fibrosis are major problems in liver transplantation (LT) for patients with hepatitis C. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography correlates well with histologic liver fibrosis stages in chronic liver diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of transient elastography for the assessment of fibrosis in patients after living donor LT. Material and methods. Seventy-nine patients who visited our institution, and in whom LSM was successfully evaluated, were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into three groups according to positivity for hepatitis C antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen as the hepatitis C virus (HCV) group (n=37), the hepatitis B virus (HBV) group (n=10), and the NBNC (negative for both hepatitis B and C) group (n=32). The correlation between LSM and histologic fibrosis stage was assessed in 36 patients. LSM was also compared with regard to the effect of interferon therapy in HCV patients. Results. The median value for liver stiffness was 6.8 kPa and the median time from LT was 3.1 years. In patients who underwent liver biopsy, stiffness was significantly correlated with the stages of fibrosis (p<0.001, rho = 0.848). In patients who received interferon therapy after LT, the LSM decreased over time in those with a sustained virological response, whereas LSM increased in patients without a response. Conclusion. Transient elastography may be an appropriate non-invasive procedure to sequentially assess the progression of liver fibrosis in patients after LT.     

Non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Background: The need for new non‐invasive tools to assess liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases has been largely advocated. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (FibroScan^®, Echosens^?) has been shown to be correlated to liver fibrosis in various chronic liver diseases. This study aims to assess its diagnosis accuracy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Patients and methods: We prospectively enrolled 202 patients with chronic hepatitis B in a multicentre study. Patients underwent liver biopsy (LB) and LSM. METAVIR and Ishak liver fibrosis stages were assessed by two pathologists. Results: LSM or LB was considered unreliable in 29 patients. Statistical analysis was conducted in 173 patients. LSM was significantly (P<0.001) correlated with METAVIR (r=0.65) and Ishak fibrosis stage (0.65). The area under receiver‐operating characteristic curves were 0.81 (95% confidence intervals, 0.73–0.86) for F≥2, 0.93 (0.88–0.96) for F≥3 and 0.93 (0.82–0.98) for F=4. Optimal LSM cut‐off values were 7.2 and 11.0 kPa for F≥2 and F=4, respectively, by maximizing the sum D of sensitivity and specificity, and 7.2 and 18.2 kPa by maximizing the diagnosis accuracy. Conclusion: In conclusion, LSM appears to be reliable for detection of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis in HBV patients and cut‐off values are only slightly different from those observed in HCV patients.     

Outreach screening of drug users for cirrhosis with transient elastography

Aims Transient elastography (TE) is a non‐invasive sensitive tool for diagnosing cirrhosis in hospital‐based cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate TE as a screening tool for cirrhosis among drug users. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting All treatment centres in the county of Funen, Denmark. Participants Drug users attending treatment centres during the presence of the study team. Measurements Liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by transient elastography using the Fibroscan device; blood tests for viral hepatitis, HIV infection and hyaluronic acid (HA) levels; and routine liver tests. Individuals with LSM ≥ 8 kPa were referred to the hospital for treatment evaluation. Individuals with LSM ≥ 12 kPa were recommended a liver biopsy. Findings Among 175 drug users negative for hepatitis C, 13% had LSM = 8–11.9 kPa and 4% had LSM ≥ 12 kPa; elevated LSM was associated with a body mass index (BMI) > 30. Among 128 drug users with chronic hepatitis C, 19.5% had LSM = 8–11.9 kPa and 21.1% had LSM ≥ 12 kPa (P < 0.001). Repeat LSM at liver biopsy performed a median 3 months after screening showed a significant decrease (<12 kPa) among 30% (six of 20), and this was independent of alcohol consumption, BMI, age and gender. In 29 patients where liver biopsy was performed a LSM ≥ 16 kPa predicted cirrhosis with 88.9% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Conclusions Transient elastography is a feasible screening tool for cirrhosis among drug users. Transient elastography identifies severe liver fibrosis in a significant proportion of drug users with hepatitis C infections but management should not be based on a single elevated liver stiffness measurement.     

Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient elastography (FibroScan; Echosens, Paris, France) is a novel, noninvasive, and rapid bedside method to assess liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness. We prospectively assessed the performance of FibroScan in patients with chronic hepatitis C, in comparison with and combined with currently available biochemical markers (Fibrotest; Biopredictive; and the aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index [APRI]); a liver biopsy examination performed the same day served as the reference. METHODS: We studied 183 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C (METAVIR fibrosis stage F1, n = 47; F2, n = 53; F3, n = 37; F4, n = 46). RESULTS: FibroScan values ranged from 2.4 to 75.4 kilopascals (median, 7.4 kilopascals). Cut-off values were 7.1 kPa for F > or = 2, 9.5 kPa for F > or = 3, and 12.5 kPa for F = 4. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of FibroScan, FibroTest, and APRI values were of the same order (.83, .85, and .78, respectively, for F > or = 2; .90, .90, and .84, respectively, for F > or = 3; and .95, .87, and .83, respectively, for F = 4). The best performance was obtained by combining the FibroScan and FibroTest, with areas under the ROC curve of .88 for F > or = 2, .95 for F > or = 3, and .95 for F = 4. When the FibroScan and FibroTest results agreed, liver biopsy examination confirmed them in 84% of cases for F > or = 2, in 95% for F > or = 3, and in 94% for F = 4. CONCLUSIONS: FibroScan is a simple and effective method for assessing liver fibrosis, with similar performance to FibroTest and APRI. The combined use of FibroScan and FibroTest to evaluate liver fibrosis could avoid a biopsy procedure in most patients with chronic hepatitis C.     

Transient elastography and other noninvasive tests to assess hepatic fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis

Summary. The limitations of liver biopsy (invasive procedure, sampling errors, inter‐observer variability and nondynamic fibrosis evaluation) have stimulated the search for noninvasive approaches for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis. A variety of methods including the measurement of liver stiffness, using transient elastography, and serum markers, ranging from routine laboratory tests to more complex algorithms or indices combining the results of panels of markers, have been proposed. Among serum indices, Fibrotest has been the most extensively studied and validated. Transient elastography appears as a promising method but has been mostly validated in chronic hepatitis C with performance equivalent to that of serum markers for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis. The combination of both approaches as first‐line assessment of liver fibrosis could avoid the performance of liver biopsy in the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C, a strategy that deserves further evaluation in patients with hepatitis B or HIV‐HCV coinfection. Transient elastography also appears to be an excellent tool for early detection of cirrhosis and may have prognostic value in this setting. Guidelines are now awaited for the use of noninvasive methods in clinical practice.     

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is a novel ultrasound‐based elastography method that is integrated in a conventional ultrasound machine. It might provide an alternative method to transient elastography for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. While previous studies have shown comparable diagnostic accuracy of ARFI to transient elastography in chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate ARFI for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. ARFI imaging involves the mechanical excitation of tissue using short‐duration acoustic pulses to generate localized displacements in tissue. The displacements result in shear‐wave propagation which is tracked using ultrasonic, correlation‐based methods and recorded in m/s. In the present international prospective study, patients infected with chronic hepatitis B received ARFI imaging, blood tests and if available transient elastography. The results were compared to liver biopsy as reference method analysed by a central pathologist. In 92 of 114 patients, a comparison of ARFI with transient elastography was possible. ARFI imaging and transient elastography correlated significantly with histological fibrosis stage. The diagnostic accuracy expressed as areas under ROC curves for ARFI imaging and transient elastography was 0.75 and 0.83 for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2), 0.93 and 0.94 for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis (F ≥ 3), and 0.97 and 0.93 for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, respectively. No significant difference was found between ARFI and transient elastography. ARFI imaging is a reliable ultrasound‐based method for the assessment of advanced stages of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.     

Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging as a noninvasive method for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.METHODS: We performed a prospective blind comparison of ARFI elastography, APRI index and FibroMax in a consecutive series of patients who underwent liver biopsy for CHC in University Hospital Bucharest. Histopathological staging of liver fibrosis according to the METAVIR scoring system served as the reference. A total of 74 patients underwent ARFI elastography, APRI index, FibroMax and successful liver biopsy.RESULTS: The noninvasive tests had a good correlation with the liver biopsy results. The most powerful test in predicting fibrosis was ARFI elastography. The diagnostic accuracy of ARFI elastography, expressed as area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) had a validity of 90.2% (95% CI AUROC =0.831-0.972, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2). ARFI sonoelastography predicted even better F3 or F4 fibrosis (AUROC = 0.993, 95% CI =0.979-1).CONCLUSION: ARFI elastography had very good accuracy for the assessment of liver fibrosis and was superior to other noninvasive methods (APRI Index,FibroMax) for staging liver fibrosis.     

Clinical application of transient elastography in patients with chronic viral hepatitis receiving antiviral treatment

Accurate evaluation of the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) is crucial, as liver fibrosis is important in determining the prognosis of liver diseases. Currently, liver biopsy (LB) is considered the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. However, utilization of LB in clinical practice is often limited because of its invasive nature, sampling error and interobserver variability. Recently, transient elastography (TE) was introduced as a noninvasive, highly reproducible technique for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis. After extensive studies, TE is now regarded as a reliable surrogate marker for grading the severity of liver fibrosis in patients with CLD. In the past few years, the role of TE in monitoring liver stiffness and determining prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who are undergoing antiviral treatment has been investigated. In patients with CHB, liver stiffness values decrease with antiviral treatment. TE can also be used to predict the incidence of liver‐related events during antiviral treatment. In patients with CHC, TE can be used to monitor potential regression of liver fibrosis after antiviral treatment and may predict the treatment outcome of CHC. In addition, TE is an adjunct tool for distinguishing inactive hepatitis B virus carriers from patients with chronic active hepatitis. This review article discusses the important findings from recent studies focusing on the clinical application of TE in patients with chronic viral hepatitis who are undergoing antiviral treatments.     

The usefulness of transient elastography by FibroScan for the evaluation of liver fibrosis

Introduction

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is used for the assessment of liver fibrosis. However, there is limited data in Indian patients.

Aims and Objective

The aim of this study was to find the correlation of LSM, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) with fibrosis as assessed by liver biopsy (LB), and predictors of discordance between LB and LSM.

Methods

One hundred and eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent liver biopsy and transient elastography (TE) were enrolled. Fibrosis was graded by two independent pathologists using the METAVIR classification. Area under receiver operating curves (AUROC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of transient elastography and APRI in diagnosing significant fibrosis (F>2) and cirrhosis (F4).

Results

Predominant etiologies were hepatitis B (46 %) and hepatitis C (26 %). LSM was unsuccessful in ten patients (5 %) because of small intercostal space (n?=?3) and obesity (n?=?7). Fibrosis is significantly correlated with LSM (r?=?0.901, p?=?0.001) and APRI (r?=?0.736, p?=?0.001). There was a significant difference in median LSM value in patients with no fibrosis (F0) in comparison to patients having mild fibrosis [mild portal fibrosis (F1)?+?fibrosis with few septa (F2)] (4.5 vs. 7.5 kPa, p?=?0.001) and advanced fibrosis [bridging fibrosis that is spreading and connecting to other areas that contain fibrosis (F3)?+?cirrhosis or advanced scarring of the liver (F4)] (4.5 vs. 19.4 kPa, p?=?0.001). Similarly, there was a significant difference in mean APRI value in patients with F0 in comparison to patients having mild fibrosis (F1?+?F2) (0.55?±?0.31 vs. 1.09?±?0.81, p?=?0.001) and advanced fibrosis (F3?+?F4) (2.3?±?1.3, p?=?0.001). AUROC for diagnosis of significant fibrosis was 0.98 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.963–0.999) for TE and 0.865 (95 % CI 0.810–0.920) for APRI. Optimal TE value was 10.0 kPa for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and 14.7 kPa for cirrhosis with specificity and sensitivity of 89 %, 98 % and 96 %, and 97 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, total bilirubin and histological activity index (HAI) were identified as an independent predictor of TE inaccuracy.

Conclusion

LSM is a reliable predictor of hepatic fibrosis in Indian patients. LSM is superior to APRI for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis, and high bilirubin (10.5 mg/dL) and Ishak HAI grade (>11) were independent predictors of discordance between LB and LSM.     

Transient elastography for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis: a multicentre Canadian study

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) is a promising tool for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility and performance of TE in a North American cohort of patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

LSMs were obtained using TE in 260 patients with chronic hepatitis B or C, or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from four Canadian hepatology centres. The accuracy of TE compared with liver biopsy for the prediction of significant fibrosis (Metavir fibrosis score of F2 or greater), bridging fibrosis (Metavir fibrosis score of F3 or greater) and cirrhosis (Metavir fibrosis score of F4 ) was assessed using area under ROC curves (AUROCs), and compared with the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. The influence of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and other factors on liver stiffness was determined using linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Failure of TE occurred in 2.7% of patients, while liver biopsies were inadequate for staging in 0.8%. Among the remaining 251 patients, the AUROCs of TE for Metavir fibrosis scores of F2 and F3 or greater, and F4 were 0.74 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.80), 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.94), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.97), respectively. LSM was more accurate than the aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for bridging fibrosis (AUROC 0.78) and cirrhosis (AUROC 0.88), but not significant fibrosis (AUROC 0.76). At a cut-off of 11.1 kPa, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for cirrhosis (prevalence 11%) were 96%, 81%, 39% and 99%, respectively. For significant fibrosis (prevalence 53%), a cut-off of 7.7 kPa was 68% sensitive and 69% specific, and had a positive predictive value of 70% and a negative predictive value of 65%. Liver stiffness was independently associated with ALT, body mass index and steatosis. The optimal LSM cut-offs for cirrhosis were 11.1 kPa and 11.5 kPa in patients with ALT levels lower than 100 U/L and 100 U/L or greater, respectively. For fibrosis scores of F2 or greater, these figures were 7.0 kPa and 8.6 kPa, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The major role of TE is the exclusion of bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis. However, TE cannot replace biopsy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis. Because liver stiffness may be influenced by significant ALT elevation, body mass index and/or steatosis, tailored liver stiffness cut-offs may be necessary to account for these factors.     

The use of transient elastography in the management of chronic hepatitis B

There has been increasing interest in noninvasive methods of assessing liver fibrosis over the last decade. The use of transient elastography in measuring liver stiffness has become the forefront of a wide range of noninvasive tools. Most of the other methods are based on measurements of biomarkers associated with fibrosis. There are several reasons for its wide acceptance, including the ease of performing a scan, the short procedure time, the results being immediately available on completion of the examination, and its reproducibility. For chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the cut-off values for F3 and F4 fibrosis range between 7.5–12.0 and 11.0–13.4 kPa, respectively, although the cut-offs may be slightly lower in those with normal ALT. In addition to measuring liver fibrosis, recent studies have demonstrated several other roles for transient elastography, including selecting patients who will benefit from antiviral therapy, monitoring response to antiviral therapy, and predicting long-term outcomes. However, there are limitations associated with transient elastography, including the confounding effects of inflammatory activity, and to a lesser extent, steatosis, on liver stiffness. There is also reduced accuracy observed in lower fibrosis stages (F0–F2). Furthermore, the incidences of failed and unreliable scan have been reported to be ~ 3 and 16%, respectively. Although liver biopsy can be avoided in an estimated 50–60% using transient elastography, in situations where liver stiffness measurement is nondiagnostic or inconsistent with the clinical picture, a biopsy is still recommended. Further studies are needed to consolidate the role of transient elastography in the management of CHB, and for incorporation of this method into current treatment guidelines.     

Is it better to use two elastographic methods for liver fibrosis assessment？

AIM:To find out if by combining 2 ultrasound based elastographic methods:acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI)elastography and transient elastography(TE),we can improve the prediction of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.METHODS:Our study included 197 patients with chronic hepatitis C.In each patient,we performed,in the same session,liver stiffness(LS)measurements by means of TE and ARFI,respectively,and liver biopsy(LB),assessed according to the Metavir score.10 LS measurements were performed ...     

How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness?

Background

In chronic liver diseases, a correct estimation of the severity of liver fibrosis is important for recommendations regarding the treatment. Nowadays, evaluation of fibrosis is done by noninvasive methods such as biochemical scores and transient elastography instead of liver biopsy. The lack of sensitivity to detect fibrosis, because of its heterogeneity is a drawback of liver biopsy (LB).

Objectives

To compare transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) for the evaluation of liver stiffness (LS), against percutaneous LB.

Patients and Methods

Our study comprised of 223 subjects; 52 without fibrosis (38 volunteers and 14 patients with F0 on LB), 36 with F1, 40 with F2, 26 with F3 and 69 with liver cirrhosis (46 with LB and 23 with signs of cirrhosis). For each patient we performed in the same session 10 TE and 5 ARFI measurements. The median values were calculated.

Results

A strong linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.870) was found between TE and fibrosis (P < 0.0001); there was also a weaker correlation between ARFI and fibrosis (Spearman rho = 0.646; P < 0.0001). TE measurements were also correlated with ARFI measurements (Spearman rho = 0.733, P < 0.0001). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE with a cut-off value of 7.1 kPa (AUROC 0.953). For ARFI, the cut-off value was 1.27 m/s-area under ROC curve (AUROC): 0.890, sensitivity (Se) of 88.7%, specificity (Sp) of 67.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (P = 0.0044). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4), the optimum cut-off values were 14.4 kPa for TE (AUROC: 0.985, Se: 95.6%, Sp: 94.7%, PPV: 89.2%, NPV: 98%) and 1.7 m/s for ARFI (AUROC: 0.931, Se: 93%, Sp: 86.7%, PPV: 73.6%, NPV: 96.9%) (P = 0.0102).

Conclusions

LS evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.     

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Infection with hepatitis B virus is an important healthproblem worldwide:it affects more than 350 millionpeople and is a leading cause of liver-related morbidity,accounting for 1 million deaths annually.Hepatic fibrosis is a consequence of the accumulation of extracellular matrix components in the liver.An accurate diagnosis of liver fibrosis is essential for the management of chronic liver disease.Liver biopsy has been considered the gold standard for diagnosing disease,grading necroinflammatory activity,and staging fibrosis.However,liver biopsy is unsuitable for repeated evaluations because it is invasive and can cause major complications,including death.Several noninvasive evaluations have been introduced for the assessment of liver fibrosis:serum biomarkers,combined indices or scores,and imaging techniques including transient elastography,acoustic radiation force impulse,real-time tissue elastography,and magnetic resonance elastography.Here,we review the recent progress of noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Most noninvasive evaluations for liver fibrosis have been validated first in patients with chronic hepatitis C,and later in those with chronic hepatitis B.The establishment of a noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis is urgently needed to aid in the management of this leading cause of chronic liver disease.     

Comparison of liver biopsy and transient elastography based on clinical relevance

BACKGROUND: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography has recently been validated for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. The present study focused on cases in which liver biopsy and LSM were discordant. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-six patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent a liver biopsy between December 2004 and April 2007 were studied. First, the optimal cut-off value of LSM was selected for the determination of cirrhosis based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Then, the cases in which liver histology and evaluation by LSM were discordant were selected. Laboratory test results such as serum total bilirubin concentration, prothrombin activity, albumin concentration, platelet count and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, together with the presence of esophageal varices, were analyzed. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value was chosen to be 15.9 kPa for cirrhosis (fibrosis stage [F] 4) determination to maximize the sum of sensitivity (78.9%) and specificity (81.0%). There were 78 discordant cases: 51 patients showed an LSM of 15.9 kPa or higher and a fibrosis stage of F1 to F3 (high LSM group), and 27 patients had an LSM lower than 15.9 kPa and a fibrosis stage of F4 (low LSM group). Esophageal varices were seen in 11 patients in the high LSM group (n=51) and in no patients in the low LSM group (n=27) (P=0.0012). The aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index was significantly higher in the high LSM group (1.49 versus 0.89, P=0.019). Other parameters did not differ significantly. However, platelet count, prothrombin activity and albumin concentration tended to be lower in the high LSM group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high LSM need proper attention for cirrhosis, even if liver biopsy does not reveal cirrhosis.