Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare thin-section low-dose multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients underwent CT colonography immediately before colonoscopy. Supine and prone CT colonographic acquisitions to image the region during a 30-second breath hold were performed. CT colonographic images were prospectively interpreted for the presence, location, size, and morphologic features of polyps. The time of image interpretation was noted. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT colonography were calculated, with 95% CIs, by using colonoscopic findings as the reference standard. The weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was calculated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: Median CT data interpretation time was 12 minutes. One hundred thirty-two polyps in 59 patients were identified at colonoscopy; no polyps were detected in 46 patients. Sensitivities for detection of polyps smaller than 5 mm, 6-9 mm, and larger than 10 mm in diameter were 12% (11 of 91 polyps), 70% (19 of 27 polyps), and 93% (13 of 14 polyps), respectively. Estimated overall specificity was 97.7% (515 of 527 imaging results). The total weighted CT dose index for combined supine and prone CT colonography was 11.4 mGy. The effective doses for combined CT colonography were 5.0 mSv and 7.8 mSv for men and women, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography has excellent sensitivity and specificity for detection of colorectal neoplasms 10 mm and larger.     

低剂量CT结肠成像的图像质量与辐射剂量评价

目的评估低剂量CT结肠成像的图像质量,并统计其辐射剂量,探讨其临床应用价值。资料与方法对51例患者进行低剂量CT结肠成像。俯卧位扫描条件为120kV,30mAs;仰卧位扫描条件为120kV,50mAs。由两名医师盲法判定两种体位CT结肠成像的图像质量。记录每例患者接受CT低剂量结肠成像时的容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP),并估算出有效剂量。结果结肠的CT图像质量评分:仰卧位与俯卧位各评分点之间均无显著性差异(P>0.05),其图像质量较高;肠外实质器官的CT图像质量评分:仰卧位图像可以满足诊断需要,而俯卧位图像影响诊断和观察,两者各评分点之间有显著性差异(P<0.05)。辐射剂量测定:低剂量CT结肠成像的CTDIvol及DLP比常规腹部扫描降低了约70.7%。结论低剂量CT结肠成像降低了患者的辐射剂量,结肠及腹部实质器官的图像质量满足诊断要求。     

Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study

The purpose was to evaluate low-dose CT colonography without cathartic cleansing in terms of image quality, polyp visualization and patient acceptance. Sixty-one patients scheduled for colonoscopy started a low-fiber diet, lactulose and amidotrizoic-acid for fecal tagging 2 days prior to the CT scan (standard dose, 5.8–8.2 mSv). The original raw data of 51 patients were modified and reconstructed at simulated 2.3 and 0.7 mSv levels. Two observers evaluated the standard dose scan regarding image quality and polyps. A third evaluated the presence of polyps at all three mSv levels in a blinded prospective way. All observers were blinded to the reference standard: colonoscopy. At three times patients were given questionnaires relating to their experiences and preference. Image quality was sufficient in all patients, but significantly lower in the cecum, sigmoid and rectum. The two observers correctly identified respectively 10/15 (67%) and 9/15 (60%) polyps ≥10 mm, with 5 and 8 false-positive lesions (standard dose scan). Dose reduction down to 0.7 mSv was not associated with significant changes in diagnostic value (polyps ≥10 mm). Eighty percent of patients preferred CT colonography and 13% preferred colonoscopy (P<0.001). CT colonography without cleansing is preferred to colonoscopy and shows sufficient image quality and moderate sensitivity, without impaired diagnostic value at dose-levels as low as 0.7 mSv.     

Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of lower-dose multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients underwent multi-detector row helical CT colonography (beam collimation, 4 x 2.5 mm; table feed, 17.5 mm/sec; voltage, 140 kV; and effective dose, 10 mAs) followed by conventional colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy served as the reference standard. Two radiologists interpreted CT colonographic images to assess the presence of polyps or carcinomas. Sensitivity was calculated on both a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. In the latter, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements obtained in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was estimated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: CT colonography correctly depicted all 22 carcinomas (sensitivity, 100%) and 52 of 74 polyps (sensitivity, 70.3%). Sensitivity for detection was 100% in all 13 polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter, 83.3% in 20 of 24 polyps 6-9 mm, and 51.3% in 19 of 37 lesions 5 mm or smaller. With regard to the per-patient analysis, CT colonography had a sensitivity of 96.0%, a specificity of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 94.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The total weighted CT dose index for combined prone and supine acquisitions was 2.74 mGy. The simulated effective doses for complete CT colonography were 1.8 mSv in men and 2.4 mSv in women. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography ensures substantial dose reduction while maintaining excellent sensitivity for detection of colorectal carcinomas and polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter.     

Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation-dose computed tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps by using two sequential colonoscopies, with the second colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Colonographic images were acquired by using a low-dose multi-detector row CT protocol (effective milliampere-second setting, 10 mAs). Three observers interpreted the CT colonographic data separately and independently by using a two-dimensional technique. Initial conventional colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist unaware of the CT colonographic findings. Second colonoscopy performed within 2 weeks by a colonoscopist aware of both the CT colonographic and the initial colonoscopic findings served as the reference standard. The sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy were calculated on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. Specificities and positive and negative predictive values also were calculated on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent CT colonography and initial conventional colonoscopy on the same day. Per-polyp sensitivities were 62% and 83% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Sensitivities for detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were 86% and 84% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Initial colonoscopy failed to depict 16 polyps, six of which were correctly detected with CT colonography. For identification of patients with polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively, had sensitivities of 84% and 90%, specificities of 82% and 100%, positive predictive values of 70% and 100%, and negative predictive values of 91% and 95%. CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT colonography compares favorably with colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, with markedly decreased performance for detection of polyps 5 mm in diameter or smaller.     

CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction--comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients

In a feasibility study, the authors compared polyp detection and interobserver variability at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in 15 patients with doses ranging from medium to very low (12.00-0.05 mSv). At levels down to 2% of the medium dose, the mean detection of polyps 5 mm or larger remained at least 74%, while the number of false-positive results decreased and the interobserver agreement remained constant. Initial observations indicate that it is feasible to reduce the radiation dose required for CT colonography. Further studies are needed, however, to investigate the clinical value of very low-dose CT colonography.     

Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience

Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions. Twenty-seven patients (14 men, 13 women) with clinical indication for conventional colonoscopy were recruited. Multislice spiral CT (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens, Germany) examinations were performed after standard oral colonoscopic preparation and colonic distension with room air. Images were acquired using 2.5-mm collimation, 3.0-mm slice thickness, standard reconstruction kernel, 140 kVp, and 10 mAs. Supine and prone acquisitions were obtained in all patients. Images were analyzed on a workstation by two gastrointestinal radiologists. Conventional colonoscopy was performed on the same day in all patients and represented the standard of reference. Total radiation exposure was also calculated. All colorectal cancers were correctly identified at CT colonography (9 of 9, sensitivity 100%). The CT colonography also detected 10 of 12 polyps (overall sensitivity 83.3%). Based on polyp diameter, the sensitivity for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger was 100% (3 of 3); between 6 and 9 mm, 100% (3 of 3); and 5 mm or smaller, 66.6% (4 of 6). Total radiation exposure for prone and supine acquisitions combined was 1.7 mSv (for men) and 2.3 mSv (for women). Although preliminary, our experience suggests that ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography is feasible. This technique provides a sensitivity comparable to that of previous experiences with CT colonography but with a 40–70% reduction of the radiation dose delivered to patients. Electronic Publication     

Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings

PURPOSE: To determine whether computer-aided detection (CAD) applied to computed tomographic (CT) colonography can help improve sensitivity of polyp detection by less-experienced radiologist readers, with colonoscopy or consensus used as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The release of the CT colonographic studies was approved by the individual institutional review boards of each institution. Institutions from the United States were HIPAA compliant. Written informed consent was waived at all institutions. The CT colonographic studies in 30 patients from six institutions were collected; 24 images depicted at least one confirmed polyp 6 mm or larger (39 total polyps) and six depicted no polyps. By using an investigational software package, seven less-experienced readers from two institutions evaluated the CT colonographic images and marked or scored polyps by using a five-point scale before and after CAD. The time needed to interpret the CT colonographic findings without CAD and then to re-evaluate them with CAD was recorded. For each reader, the McNemar test, adjusted for clustered data, was used to compare sensitivities for readers without and with CAD; a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the number of false-positive results per patient. RESULTS: The average sensitivity of the seven readers for polyp detection was significantly improved with CAD-from 0.810 to 0.908 (P=.0152). The number of false-positive results per patient without and with CAD increased from 0.70 to 0.96 (95% confidence interval for the increase: -0.39, 0.91). The mean total time for the readings was 17 minutes 54 seconds; for interpretation of CT colonographic findings alone, the mean time was 14 minutes 16 seconds; and for review of CAD findings, the mean time was 3 minutes 38 seconds. CONCLUSION: Results of this feasibility study suggest that CAD for CT colonography significantly improves per-polyp detection for less-experienced readers.     

Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal polyp and cancer detection by using colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients underwent CT colonography followed by standard colonoscopy. Bowel preparation consisted of magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol. After colonic air insufflation, patients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single breath hold. The transverse CT images, sagittal and coronal reformations, and three-dimensional endoluminal images were interpreted by two radiologists independently, and then a consensus reading was performed. CT colonographic findings were correlated with standard colonoscopic and histologic findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for polyp detection were 90.1% (164 of 182) and 72.0% (85 of 118), respectively. By using direct polyp matching, the overall sensitivity was 69.7% (365 of 524). The sensitivity was 90% (74 of 82) for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger, 80.1% (113 of 141) for polyps 5.0-9.9 mm, and 59.1% (178 of 301) for polyps smaller than 5 mm. The sensitivity was 94% (64 of 68) for the detection of adenomas 10 mm or larger, 82% (72 of 88) for adenomas 5.0-9.9 mm, and 66.9% (95 of 142) for adenomas smaller than 5 mm. CT colonography was used to identify all eight carcinomas. CONCLUSION: CT colonography has excellent sensitivity for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.     

Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality

OBJECTIVE. The radiation dose, artifact incidence, and image quality of high-resolution chest CT examinations performed with standard and low doses and patient cooperation were investigated in children and young adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Three successive controlled studies were conducted in different groups of children and young adults, totaling 203 patients. Dosimetry of high-resolution CT was performed at 180, 50, and 34 mAs in three groups of 25 patients. Streak artifact incidence using alternating 50- and 34-mAs slices was assessed and correlated with patient compliance with breath-holding commands in 44 children. Image quality was evaluated in scans obtained with 34 versus 180 mAs in cooperative patients (n = 42) and in scans obtained with 50 versus 180 mAs in noncooperative patients (n = 42). Artifacts and image quality were assessed by controlled repeated interpretations. RESULTS. Radiation dose was 5.4+/-1.6 mSv for 180 mAs, 1.5+/-0.5 mSv for 50 mAs, and 1.1+/-0.3 mSv for 34 mAs. Cooperation was obtained in 66% of the patients. Artifacts were more frequently seen in scans of noncooperative patients (30%) and in 34-mAs scans (47%); the highest incidence was found using 34 mAs in noncooperative patients (60%, p = 0.02). No differences in image quality scores were seen in scans obtained with 50 mAs versus those obtained with 180 mAs in noncooperative patients (p<0.05), and small differences were found in scans obtained with 34 mAs versus those obtained with 180 mAs in cooperative patients for fissures (p = 0.005) and peripheral structures (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION. Low-dose high-resolution CT provided a significant reduction in radiation dose (72% for 50 mAs and 80% for 34 mAs) and good-quality images of the lung when performed with 50 mAs in noncooperative and 34 mAs in cooperative pediatric and young adult patients.     

Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the clinical significance of polyps missed on CT colonography using histologic analysis and the natural history of colorectal polyps and to propose guidelines for follow-up colon surveillance based on CT colonographic findings. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred eighty-six men (age range, 40-87 years; mean, 62.3 years) underwent CT colonography immediately before conventional colonoscopy. All polyps detected on CT colonography were measured and imaged, and their segmental location was documented. All polyps detected on colonoscopy were measured, photographed, biopsied, and histologically analyzed. Results of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy were compared with the final pathology reports. Conventional colonoscopy was used as the gold standard unless CT colonography showed a lesion measuring 10 mm or more that was not detected on conventional colonoscopy and had characteristics of a polyp. In these cases, follow-up conventional colonoscopy was offered. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one polyps were detected on conventional colonoscopy. CT colonography prospectively detected 53 polyps. Histologic analysis of the polyps not detected on CT colonography showed that of those 5 mm or smaller, 58.1% were not adenomas, and of those measuring 6-9 mm, 42.8% were not adenomas. Both missed polyps at CT colonography of 10 mm or more were adenomas. Of the 22 polyps measuring 10 mm or more, three were not detected on conventional colonoscopy. Of these three, CT colonography showed a lesion having characteristics of a polyp, follow-up endoscopy confirmed the presence of the lesion, and histologic analysis showed a villous adenoma, a tubulovillous adenoma, and a tubular adenoma. CONCLUSION: If CT colonography shows no abnormality, follow-up screening in 5 years is recommended. If CT colonography detects a lesion smaller than 5 mm, follow-up imaging in 3-5 years is recommended. If CT colonography detects a lesion measuring 6 mm or more, endoscopy and polypectomy should be offered unless contraindicated.     

Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation,noise, and radiation dose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of low kilovoltage dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) on qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters and radiation dose. Dual-source CTCA with retrospective ECG gating was performed in 80 consecutive patients of normal weight. Forty were examined with a standard protocol (120 kV/330mAs), 20 were examined at 100 kV/330mAs, and 20 at 100 kV/220mAs. Two blinded observers independently assessed image quality of each coronary segment and measured the image parameters noise, attenuation, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The effective radiation dose was calculated using CT dose volume index and the dose-length product. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 99% of all coronary segments (1,127/1,140) without significant differences among the protocols. Image noise, attenuation, and CNR were significantly higher for 100 kV/330mAs (26 +/- 3 HU, 549 +/- 62 HU, 25.5 +/- 3.2; each P < 0.01) and 100 kV/220mAs (27 +/- 2 HU, 560 +/- 43 HU, 25.0 +/- 2.2; each P < 0.01) when compared to the 120-kV protocol (21 +/- 2 HU, 317 +/- 28 HU, 20.6 +/- 1.7). There was no significant difference between the two 100-kV protocols. Estimated effective radiation dose of the 120-kV protocol (8.9 +/- 1.2 mSv) was significantly higher than the 100 kV/330mAs (6.7 +/- 0.8 mSv, P < 0.01) or 100 kV/220mAs (4.4 +/- 0.6 mSv, P < 0.001) protocols. Dual-source CTCA with 100 kV is feasible in patients of normal weight, results in a diagnostic image quality with a higher CNR, and at the same time significantly reduces the radiation dose.     

Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of and improve a computer algorithm to automatically detect colonic polyps in real human computed tomographic (CT) colonographic data sets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with known polyps underwent CT colonography in the supine position. CT colonographic data were processed by using a shape-based algorithm that depicts masses that protrude into the lumen. We studied nine shape criteria and three isosurface threshold settings. Results were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy performed the same day. RESULTS: There were 50 polyps (28 were > or =10 mm in size; 12, 5-9 mm; 10, <5 mm). The sensitivity with optimal settings for detecting polyps 10 mm or greater was 64% (18 of 28). Sensitivity improved to 71% (10 of 14) for polyps 10 mm or greater in well-distended colonic segments. Performance decreased for polyps less than 10 mm, poorly distended colonic segments, and other shape algorithms. There was a mean of six false-positive lesion sites per colon. These sites were reduced 39% to 3.5 per colon by sampling CT attenuation at the lesion site and discarding sites having attenuation less than a threshold. CONCLUSION: Automated detection of colonic polyps, especially clinically important large polyps, is feasible. Colonic distention is an important determinant of sensitivity. Further increases in sensitivity may be achieved by adding prone CT colonography.     

Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate with computed tomographic (CT) colonography the prevalence and size distribution of nonadenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults and to compare the detection rates of adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1233 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.8 years; 505 women, 728 men) underwent same-day CT colonography and optical colonoscopy procedures. CT colonoscopy studies were interpreted prospectively with a primary three-dimensional approach immediately before optical colonoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test. Size, prevalence, and by-polyp detection differences were compared between adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-six (57.7%) colorectal polyps identified at optical colonoscopy in 410 (33.3%) patients were nonadenomatous; of these lesions, 622 (82.3%) were diminutive (相似文献   

Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of multidetector computed tomography (CT) increases the possibility of enhanced polyp detection using CT colonography. The effects of collimation and tube currents on polyp detection were investigated in pig colonic phantoms to determine the optimal scanning parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty pig colons were prepared, and polyps with diameters ranging from 3 mm to 15 mm were created and randomly distributed. There was a total of 60 polyps; 20 polyps were 3 to 5 mm in size, 21 polyps 6 to 9 mm, and 19 polyps 10 to 15 mm. The pig colons were sealed, distended with air, submerged in water, and were arranged to mimic the in vivo arrangement. CT was performed using a 4-row multidetector CT scanner with collimations of 1, 2.5, and 5 mm, a pitch of 1.75, and mA of 100. A low-dose protocol (mA of 50) was added with a collimation of 1 mm. Two blinded observers independently analyzed the datasets. RESULTS:: The overall sensitivities of CT colonography were 94.2% with 1-mm collimation, 80% with 2.5-mm collimation, and 75% with 5-mm collimation. Considering the sensitivity of each protocol for the size of the polyps, the 1-mm collimation protocol had a sensitivity of 87.5% for 3- to 5-mm polyps, 95.2% sensitivity for 6- to 9-mm polyps, and 100% sensitivity for 10- to 15-mm polyps; the 2.5-mm protocol had 50%, 92.9%, and 97.4% sensitivities, respectively; and the 5-mm protocol had 47.5%, 88.1%, and 89.5% sensitivities, respectively, for the respective polyp size group. A significant difference in sensitivity among the protocols was present in the 3- to 5-mm polyps. No significant difference was seen between the standard- and the low-dose protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of multidetector CT colonography for detecting polyps larger than 5 mm is robust over a range of collimation in pig colonic phantoms. However, reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or smaller requires a 1-mm collimation. Sensitivity is not influenced by lowering the mA from 100 to 50.     

Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the reliability and accuracy of optical colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography in polyp measurement, by using direct measurement as the reference standard, and to understand the basis for measurement discrepancy between both modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six simulated polyps that ranged from 3 to 15 mm were constructed by using pig colons obtained from an abattoir. Approval of the animal care and use committee for the study was not required. CT colonographic measurement was performed by two independent radiologists by using two-dimensional (2D) optimized multiplanar reformatted planes and three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal views. Optical colonoscopic measurement was performed by two independent gastroenterologists by using open biopsy forceps. Interobserver agreement, measurement error, measurement discrepancy defined as the result of subtracting the optical colonoscopic measurement from the CT colonographic measurement, and false-mismatch (ie, designation of matched polyps as mismatched between both modalities) rates according to different matching criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.879 (95% confidence interval: 0.780, 0.930) for optical colonoscopy, 0.979 (95% confidence interval: 0.956, 0.989) for 2D CT colonography, and 0.985 (95% confidence interval: 0.976, 0.990) for 3D CT colonography. The mean standardized polyp size +/- standard deviation for each observer was 76.3% +/- 14.7 and 85.3% +/- 18.8 for optical colonoscopy, 104.6% +/- 11.6 and 101.6% +/- 10.1 for 2D CT colonography, and 114% +/- 12.4 and 113.4% +/- 13.2 for 3D CT colonography. These values indicated that there was a statistically significant difference among the methods (P<.001). Measurement discrepancy was not proportional to polyp size. A percentage-of-error criterion showed increasing false-mismatch rates with decreasing polyp size, whereas a fixed margin-of-error criterion resulted in more uniform false-mismatch rates across polyp size. CONCLUSION: CT colonography is more reliable and accurate than optical colonoscopy for polyp measurement. A fixed margin-of-error criterion is better than a percentage-of-error criterion for polyp matching between CT colonography and optical colonoscopy with open biopsy forceps.     

低剂量64层螺旋CT测定冠状动脉钙化积分的准确性评价

目的 探讨低剂量64层螺旋CT测定冠状动脉钙化积分的准确性。方法 2006年8月至2009年9月间对43名冠状动脉钙化的患者连续进行2次64层螺旋CT扫描,管电流时间积分别为常规剂量(100 mAs)和低剂量(55 mAs),其余参数不变,由2名放射科副主任医师测定钙化积分并测量升主动脉CT值的均数及标准差。结果 低剂量与常规剂量钙化总积分和独立血管钙化积分取平方根转换后均直线相关(r =0.998、0.997)。低剂量管电流时间积所测升主动脉根部的CT值的均数与2倍标准差之和小于130 HU,可满足所要求的信噪比,与常规剂量扫描辐射剂量(1.32±0.08)mSv相比较,低剂量扫描有效剂量降低0.6 mSv(P <0.05)。结论 低剂量前瞻性心电门控64层MDCT钙化积分扫描图像能满足测量需要,测量结果具有较高的准确性。     

CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging

PURPOSE: To compare respiratory artifacts, colonic distention, and polyp detection at computed tomographic (CT) colonography by using single- and multi-detector row helical CT systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 237 consecutive patients received subcutaneously administered glucagon and underwent prone and supine CT colonography with single-detector row CT (n = 77) and multi-detector row CT (n = 160), followed by colonoscopy. Examination results were graded for colonic distention, respiratory artifacts, and polyp depiction by two radiologists working independently. RESULTS: Suboptimal colonic distention was significantly more common with single-detector row CT and was present in at least one segment in 52% (40 of 77 patients) of examinations versus only 19% (30 of 160 patients) with multi-detector row CT (P <.001). Mild respiratory artifacts were present in 61% (47 of 77 patients) of single-detector row CT examinations versus only 16% (26 of 160 patients) of multi-detector row CT examinations (P <.001). Depiction of polyps larger than 10 mm was 89% (eight of nine polyps) for single-detector row CT and 80% (eight of 10 polyps) for multi-detector row CT (P >.05). CONCLUSION: CT colonography performed with multi-detector row CT significantly improved the demonstration of colonic distention and depicted fewer respiratory artifacts compared with single-detector row CT. No significant differences in the depiction of polyps larger than 10 mm were demonstrated between single- and multi-detector row CT for a small number of polyps. Studies with a larger prevalence of clinically important polyps are needed for further evaluation of differences in polyp detection.     

Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA

To investigate the possibility of reducing X-ray exposure during multidetector-row spiral computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography and to compare the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of different dosages with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremities vessels. Seventy-five patients, randomly divided into three groups of 25 patients each, were evaluated for atherosclerotic disease with four-row spiral CT angiography (4×2.5 mm) and DSA. MDCT scanning parameters were kept constant, except for milliamperage (mAs): group A: 50 mAs; group B: 100 mAs; group C: 130 mAs. Images were analysed by two vascular radiologists in consensus. DSA represented the standard of reference. The diagnostic value of MDCT and total radiation exposure were evaluated for each data set. The simulated effective dose was 3.7 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.2 mSv for 100 mAs and 13.7 mSv for 130 mAs for men, and 4 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.9 mSv for 100 mAs and 14.8 mSv for 130 mAs for women. The dose reduction was 74% for group A and 40% for group B. The evaluation of the presence and degree of stenoses revealed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 96%, 94%, 95%, 83% and 99% for Group A (50 mAs), 96%, 96%, 96%, 89% and 99% for Group B (100 mAs) and 98%, 96%, 97%, 91% and 100% for the standard dose protocol, Group C (130 mAs). Low-dose scanning is thus a feasible and accurate option for four-row CT angiography of the peripheral vessels. This technique provides substantial reduction of the radiation dose delivered to the patient while maintaining optimal diagnostic accuracy.     

ASIR提高低剂量CT结肠成像息肉检出率有效性的体模研究

目的评价应用不同水平自适应统计迭代重建技术(adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction,ASIR)在低剂量CT结肠成像中提高结肠息肉检出率的有效性。材料与方法选用一段离体猪结肠通过结扎法获得20枚1～10 mm(≤5 mm 10枚,>5 mm 10枚)连续的模拟息肉,运用宝石高分辨CT在不同剂量(120 kVp,10、20、30、40、50及100 mAs)下扫描,并分别应用6种不同ASIR水平(0、10%、30%、50%、70%及100%)进行数据重建,获得CT仿真内镜、多平面重组(MPR)和虚拟分割(VD)图像。由两名有经验的影像科医师采用盲法对不同采集条件、不同ASIR水平的图像进行客观和主观评价,测量并比较平均噪声、平均信噪比(signal to noise ratio,SNR)及平均对比噪声比(contrast noise ratios,CNR)和息肉检出率。结果结肠模拟息肉模型研究显示不同管电流-时间下噪声随应用ASIR水平升高而降低,SNR及CNR随应用ASIR水平升高而增高(P<0.05)。>5 mm结肠息肉在低剂量扫描时应用ASIR对提高检出率...