Urgent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES: The use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become widespread, since it has proven less invasive and to promote early recovery. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of off-pump CABG in patients in the evolving phase of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was carried out for patients undergoing urgent isolated off-pump and on-pump CABG at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between January 1991 and June 2001. The patients' demographic, operative data, and postoperative results were collected. RESULTS: The off-pump group consisted of 19 males and 11 females with a mean age of 72.0 years and the on-pump group of 91 males and 38 females with a mean age of 64.3 years. Preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pumping and preoperative shock was more frequently observed in the on-pump group. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.1 +/- 0.9 in the off-pump group and 3.2 +/- 1.1 in the on-pump group (p = NS). Intubation time (18.5 vs 32.9 hours), ICU stay (3.4 vs 4.9 days), and postoperative stay (13.5 vs 24.3 days) were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (P < 0.05). The frequency of the major complications was significantly lower in the off-pump group (9/30, 30%) than the on-pump group (65/129, 50.4%), especially for postoperative low output syndrome (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the recovery period by use of off-pump CABG. Early follow-up results were similar between the two groups, in terms of late cardiac events and survival. CONCLUSION: Urgent off-pump CABG is safe and provides early recovery, provided that the patient's intraoperative hemodynamics are taken into account.     

Efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for the patients on chronic hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) under a beating heart is reported to be less invasive and promise earlier recovery. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of off-pump CABG in patients with end-stage renal failure. METHODS: Isolated CABG was performed on 40 hemodialysis patients at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between September 1, 1993, and December 31, 2000. Among them, off-pump CABG was performed in 16 and on-pump CABG in 24. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Patient's demographics and coronary risk factors were similar in off-pump and on-pump groups. The mean number of bypass grafts was 1.9 +/- 1.1 in the off-pump group and 2.8 +/- 1.1 in the on-pump group (P < 0.05). Blood transfusion was significantly less frequent in the off-pump group than in on-pump group. Postoperative complications were more frequently observed in the on-pump group (7.1% off-pump vs 25.0% on-pump). There were two hospital deaths in the on-pump group and none in the off-pump group. Postoperative intubation time, ICU stay, and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. Although follow-up period was short (1.1 +/- 0.7 years), no cardiac events occurred in the off-pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG for hemodialysis patients is safe and useful and it enables early recovery. Postoperative cardiac events were controlled effectively during the short period of follow-up.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for hemodialysis patients is high risk compared with other patient groups. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential benefits of off-pump CABG for hemodialysis patients. METHODS: From April 1994 through December 2000, 26 hemodialysis patients underwent CABG. The off-pump group consisted of 15 patients operated on without a pump and the on-pump group consisted of 11 patients operated on with a pump. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups with regard to mean age, mean number of diseased vessels and mean number of anastomoses per patient. No patient died in either group during hospitalization. The postoperative complication rate was low in both groups. The postoperative ventilation time was shorter in the off-pump group (8.5 vs 26.1 hours, p < 0.001, respectively [off-pump group vs on-pump group]). The length of ICU stay was shorter in the off-pump group (1.7 vs 3.5 days, p = 0.01, respectively [off-pump group vs on-pump group]). The medial cost was lower in the off-pump group (26,200.80 dollars versus 44,024.10 dollars p = 0.0001 respectively [off-pump group vs on-pump group]). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG provided excellent less-invasive cardiac surgical results for dialysis patients.     

Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND: Reoperative (redo) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than first-time CABG. It is unknown, however, whether CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump) may yield an improved clinical outcome over conventional on-pump redo CABG. METHODS: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients with single-vessel disease who underwent on-pump (n = 41) versus off-pump (n = 91) redo CABG between April 1992 and July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification: mean Parsonnet scores were 26 +/- 9 for on-pump versus 24 +/- 8 for off-pump patients (p = nonsignificant). RESULTS: On-pump redo patients had a higher rate of postoperative transfusions (58% on-pump versus 27% off-pump, p = 0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (17% on-pump versus 4% off-pump, p = 0.03), and a higher rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (29% on-pump versus 14% off-pump, p = 0.04). On-pump redo CABG was also associated with prolonged postoperative length of stay (8 +/- 4 days on-pump versus 5 +/- 2 days off-pump, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in on-pump than in off-pump patients (10% versus 1%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Single-vessel off-pump redo CABG can be performed safely with a lower operative morbidity and mortality than on-pump CABG and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional on-pump redo CABG.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for elderly patients

Background. The use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has recently become widespread, and it has been proven to be less invasive and to facilitate early recovery. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of off-pump CABG for patients aged 75 years or more.

Methods. A retrospective chart review was carried out for patients who underwent isolated off-pump and on-pump CABG at Shin-Tokyo Hospital between January 1997 and December 2000. The patients’ demographic, operative data, and postoperative results were collected.

Results. The off-pump group consisted of 60 men and 44 women with a mean age of 78.8 years, and the on-pump group consisted of 54 men and 20 women with a mean age of 77.6 years. Distal anastomoses were significantly fewer in the off-pump group (2.4 in off-pump group versus 3.7 in on-pump group), but total arterial bypass was more frequently achieved in off-pump group (82.7% versus 25.7%). Intubation time (8.4 versus 18.4 hours), intensive care unit stay (2.2 versus 3.5 days), and postoperative stay (13.8 versus 20.0 days) were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (p < 0.05). The frequency of the occurrence of major complications was significantly lower in the off-pump group than the on-pump group, especially in regard to postoperative stroke and respiratory failure (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that off-pump CABG significantly reduced patient recovery period and the incidence of postoperative complications. Early follow-up results, cardiac event-free and survival rates, did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusions. Off-pump CABG is safe for the elderly patient. Off-pump CABG successfully facilitates early recovery and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications among elderly patients.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians

Objectives: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become accepted for myocardial revascularization because it reduces perioperative morbidity. We assessed the safety and efficacy of bypass surgery on the beating heart in elderly patients. Methods: Off-pump CABG was done in 25 patients aged 80 years or older between February 1996 and February 2001. We retrospectively compared clinical results for these patients to those of 18 consecutive age-matched patients undergoing on-pump CABG during the same period. Results: Mean patient age in both groups was similar −82.2±2.3 years in the off-pump group vs 81.9±2.0 years in the on-pump group (p=0.66). Preoperative risk was similar in both groups, but significantly more patients in the on-pump group had triple-vessel disease. Distal anastomoses were significantly fewer in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group at 2.0±1.0 vs 2.8±0.5 (p<0.01). The off-pump group had a shorter postoperative ventilation −13.4±17.2 hours vs 45.2±52.8 hours (p<0.05)—, and less blood transfused −16% vs 89% (p<0.01)—than the on-pump group. Mean postoperative hospitalization and intensive care unit stay were 18.6 days and 3.2 days in the off-pump group, versus 37.1 days and 9.4 days in the on-pump group (p<0.05). No difference was seen in the incidence of major postoperative complications between groups. No hospital deaths occurred in the off-pump group. Conclusion: Off-pump CABG is thus a safe and effective for myocardial revascularization in the elderly.     

Renal function following CABG: On-pump vs off-pump

Background Despite the success of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), potential risk of renal dysfunction (RD) related to cardio pulmonary bypass (CPB) is well documented. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that off-pump CABG can be performed safely with results similar to on-pump CABG. Hence renal function in two groups was evaluated to aid in assessment and prevention of acute RD. Methods Study group consisted of 60 patients (30 on-pump, mean age 51.9±8.9 years and 30 off-pump, mean age 56.3±10.1 years) who underwent elective primary CABG. Blood samples were collected pre-operatively and at 6, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively for estimation of serum creatinine and thereby assessment of creatinine clearance. Results 46.66% and 20% of patients developed RD in on-pump and off-pump CABG respectively. Creatinine clearance decreased from a pre-operative value of 81±19.7 ml/min to a postoperative (24hours) value of 72.9±20.5 ml/min in off-pump and from preoperative value of 78.8±24.3 ml/min to a postoperative (24 hours) value of 62.7±18.2 ml/min in on-pump. Creatinine clearance remained significantly depressed for 48 hours in on-pump group where as it was well preserved in the off-pump patients. Decrease in creatinine clearance in on-pump group was significant at 24 hours post-operatively (p=0.045), thus suggesting that renal function was impaired in on-pump group. Hypertension, diabetes and ejection fraction <40% have not influenced significantly in developing RD during on-pump or off-pump CABG. We also found that there was a negative correlation of creatinine clearance with age suggesting that increased age proves to be a risk factor for developing RD in on-pump group. Conclusions Renal function is better preserved in patients undergoing off-pump CABG than on-pump CABG. Increased age proves to be a risk factor for patients undergoing on-pump CABG and hence elderly people have to be preferably allocated to off-pump than on-pump CABG.     

Evaluation of Cystatin C as a marker of renal injury following on-pump and off-pump coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass is regarded as an important contributor to renal injury, whereas off-pump surgery is considered less damaging. Cystatin C, a cystine protease inhibitor, is more sensitive and specific than creatinine in the assessment of renal function. We assessed the value of Cystatin C in quantifying clinical and subclinical renal injury following on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients were recruited: 30 patients undergoing on-pump CABG and 30 patients undergoing off-pump CABG. Blood samples were collected pre-operatively and on days 1, 2 and 4 postoperatively to measure serum creatinine and serum Cystatin C. Urinary samples were collected concurrently to measure microalbumin and N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase, denoting changes in renal glomerular and tubular function respectively. RESULTS: The off-pump group were older (65+/-11 vs. 61+/-8 years; P=0.046), had a higher mean Parsonnet score (9.4+/-6.2 vs. 5.4+/-3.6, P<0.01) and received fewer grafts (2.4+/-0.9 vs. 3.1+/-0.7; P<0.01) compared to the on-pump group. The groups were otherwise matched with respect to preoperative renal function and left ventricular function. Patients undergoing on-pump CABG had greater increases in all four parameters of renal injury. Adjustment for preoperative differences increased the size and significance of the effect of off-pump vs. on-pump surgery (percent difference 13%; 95% CI 2-26 for creatinine, and 16%; 95% CI 4-29 for Cystatin C). Cystatin and creatinine were strongly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass may reduce renal injury particularly in higher risk patients. Cystatin C proved to be a simple and sensitive measure of overall renal function and can be used in the routine assessment of renoprotective strategies.     

Cardioplegic arrest does not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is a considerable source of morbidity, prolongs hospital stay and increases costs of treatment. Atrial cannulation, cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest have been suggested to play a role in the development of AF after CABG. The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the role of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest in the development of postoperative AF. METHODS: Data from 114 patients undergoing CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest (off-pump) between October, 1998 and December, 2002 were evaluated for the occurrence of postoperative AF. Each patient was individually matched by gender, age (+/-3 years), left ventricle ejection fraction (+/-5%), history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and beta-blocker medication with patients undergoing CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest (on-pump) during the same period. The data from off-pump and on-pump groups were compared. RESULTS: Off-pump and on-pump groups had similar preoperative characteristics. The number of distal anastomoses was lower in the off-pump (2.3+/-0.9) than in the on-pump (3.9+/-1.1, (P<0.001) group. However, the incidence of postoperative AF in the off-pump (36.8%) and the on-pump groups (36.0%) did not differ from each other. Old age was the only independent predictor of AF after CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Neither cardiopulmonary bypass nor cardioplegic arrest increases the risk of postoperative AF after CABG.     

Risk factors for hemorrhage-related reexploration and blood transfusion after conventional versus coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: The premise of coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) proposes that patient morbidity and, potentially, mortality can be reduced without compromising the excellent results of conventional revascularization techniques (on-pump CABG). It is unknown, however, whether coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) is associated with similar hemorrhage related reexploration rates and blood transfusion requirements compared to the on-pump approach. METHODS: Between January 1998 and June 2002, 3646 patients underwent off-pump CABG and were compared with a contemporaneous control group of 5197 on-pump CABG patients. A logistic regression model was used to test the difference in the postoperative hemorrhage related reexploration rates and need for postoperative blood transfusions between the groups, controlling for preoperative risk factors. The patients undergoing off-pump CABG were matched to on-pump patients by propensity score. RESULTS: Hemorrhage related reexploration rates were comparable between the 2 groups (odds-ratio [OR]=0.80, 95% confidence intervals [CI]=0.55-1.09, P=0.15). Off-pump CABG was associated with a lower need for single and multiple unit postoperative blood transfusions (OR=0.30, CI=0.24-0.31, P<0.01 and OR=0.4, CI=0.36-0.51, P<0.01, respectively) compared to on-pump CABG patients. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG eliminates the risks of cardiopulmonary bypass and the systemic inflammatory response it elicits. A substantially lower need for postoperative blood transfusions and a comparable hemorrhage-related reexploration rate suggests that off-pump CABG may avoid the morbidity and mortality associated with excessive postoperative blood loss.     

Early neuropsychological dysfunction in elderly high-risk patients after on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery

Purpose Advanced age is associated with systemic atherosclerosis and is a risk factor for neurological dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, few studies have investigated early neurological dysfunction after off-pump CABG in elderly patients. Methods Data were collected prospectively on 218 patients (≥60 years) who underwent elective off-pump (n = 89) or on-pump CABG (n = 129). Four cognitive tests were performed preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively. Neuropsychological (NP) dysfunction was defined as a decrease in an individual's performance in more than two tests of at least 20% from baseline. We compared the incidence of NP dysfunction, stroke, graft patency grading, and systemic atherosclerosis between patients who underwent off-pump and on-pump CABG. Results Off-pump patients were more likely to have a history of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, multiple cerebral infarctions, and severe aortic atherosclerosis. None of the off-pump and three on-pump patients suffered intraoperative strokes (P = 0.27). The incidence of NP dysfunction was 11.2% in the off-pump group and 22.5% in the on-pump group, (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that NP dysfunction was associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and multiple cerebral infarctions. The off-pump group had fewer vessels grafted (2.4 vs 3.4; P < 0.01), and a higher rate of stenosis (>50%) and occlusion of the grafted vessels (13.0% vs 7.4%; P = 0.01) than the on-pump group. Conclusion Off-pump CABG reduced postoperative NP dysfunction in elderly patients with severe systemic atherosclerosis compared to on-pump CABG.     

A comparison of early clinical outcomes of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in elderly patients

Background: The reply of question of “which coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) technique is superior in elderly patients, off-pump or on-pump CABG surgery?” is controversial. We aimed to compare the early clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing off-pump and on-pump CABG.

Methods: From January 2009 to January 2015, 344 elderly patients (aged 70 or older) underwent off-pump (n?=?137) or on-pump (n?=?207) CABG. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and their baseline preoperative characteristics, operative data and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, thereby a comparison of early outcomes between off-pump and on-pump patients was performed.

Results: Mean age of patients was 74.4?±?3.8 years. Both groups were statistically similar in terms of baseline preoperative characteristics. Number of distal bypass was significantly lower in off-pump group than in on-pump group. Postoperative length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were similar between two groups. Amounts of transfused blood products were significantly lower in off-pump CABG group. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications and mortality between two groups.

Conclusions: Our results did not reveal a significant benefit of either surgical technique with respect to early-term clinical outcomes in elderly CABG patients. Further investigations are needed to determine whether off-pump CABG is superior than on-pump CABG in elderly patients.     

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: oxidative stress and renal function.

OBJECTIVES: Oxidative stress and renal dysfunction occur in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG). Whether the same adverse effects also occur during off-pump CABG is the question in this study. METHODS: Forty patients, 27 men and 13 women, undergoing elective CABG were included; 20 patients underwent on-pump CABG and 20 patients underwent off-pump CABG. Renal and ischemia/reperfusion injury parameters were studied, as well as malondialdehyde as a parameter for oxidative stress. RESULTS: The renal function measured as the mean urinary creatinine excretion decreased significantly during surgery for the on-pump CABG group from 7.62+/-4.74 before surgery to 3.07+/-1.49 mmol/l after surgery, whereas no changes occurred in the off-pump CABG group. The mean urinary concentrations of hypoxanthine, xanthine and malondialdehyde expressed as creatinine ratios for the on-pump group increased significantly from 1.92+/-1.36, 6.06+/-3.62 and 0.21+/-0.07 before surgery to 11.88+/-5.77, 13.11+/-6.61 and 0.57+/-0.31 mmol/mol creatinine, respectively at arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU). During the next time-points, the purines and malondialdehyde decreased to 9.21+/-7.46, 7.55+/-3.95 and 0.32+/-0.13 mmol/mol creatinine, respectively after a 20 h stay at the ICU. For the off-pump CABG group, the mean ratios also increased significantly from 1.71+/-1.38, 2.01+/-0.96 and 0.16+/-0.10 before surgery to 4.73+/-3.19, 5.15+/-3.74 and 0.23+/-0.17 mmol/mol creatinine, respectively at arrival to the ICU. During the next time-points, the ratios of xanthine and malondialdehyde decreased to 3.80+/-2.92 and 0.24+/-0.13 mmol/mol creatinine, respectively. The ratio for hypoxanthine reached the highest ratio (6.97+/-5.67 mmol/mol creatinine) after a 9 h stay at the ICU, after which the ratio decreased to 5.98+/-5.56 mmol/mol creatinine after a 20 h stay at the ICU. However, all ratios from the on- and off-pump CABG patients still remained elevated compared with preoperative ratios. In addition, all ratios for the on-pump CABG group were elevated significantly at all time-points for xanthine, at time-points T2 and T4 for hypoxanthine and at time-point T2 for malondialdehyde as compared with the off-pump CABG group. CONCLUSIONS: Only mild signs of oxidative stress and no renal dysfunction were found during and after off-pump CABG compared with on-pump CABG.     

Operative mortality after conventional versus coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (CABG) is a safe revascularization option with comparable or superior results to the conventional on-pump CABG. However, comparative analysis of the type of surgical approach on the mortality rate is largely unknown. This study sought to investigate whether CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) is associated with lower operative mortality than the conventional on-cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) approach. METHODS: From October 1998 to June 2001, off-pump CABG was performed on 2477 patients and on-pump CABG was performed on 3077 patients. The patients undergoing off-pump CABG were randomly matched to on-pump patients via propensity score. Seventy-four percent of the off-pump CABG patients were matched with on-pump patients via propensity scores. A logistic regression model was used to test the difference in the postoperative mortality rate between off-pump CABG and on-pump CABG, controlling the correlation between matched sets. A multiple logistic regression model predicting the risk of mortality adjusted by risk factors of mortality and operation type was computed. RESULTS: Results from the general estimating equation showed that patients who had on-pump CABG were 1.6 (95% confidence intervals (CI)=1.2-2.0, P<0.01) times more likely to die during the first 30 days after surgery than patients who had off-pump CABG. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality identified from the multiple logistic model included on-pump CABG (versus off-pump CABG), advanced age, female gender, carotid artery disease, chronic renal failure, depressed ejection fraction, reoperative CABG, preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, and recent myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Excellent clinical results and a lower operative mortality rate can be achieved with the off-pump CABG technique compared with the conventional on-pump approach.     

On-pump coronary artery surgery versus off-pump exclusive arterial coronary grafting: a matched cohort comparison

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and with exclusive use of arterial grafts (arterial off-pump CABG) offers any significant short-term advantages over standard CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass. Accordingly, we performed a comparison of the short-term outcomes of arterial off-pump and standard CABG patients matched for preoperative risk and number of grafts. METHODS: We studied 90 consecutive arterial off-pump CABG patients during a 2-year period, obtained demographic and clinical features and surgical characteristics, and calculated their predicted surgical risk (EuroSCORE). Using a database of 750 contemporaneous patients treated with standard CABG, we created a matched cohort of 90 patients using an iterative process prioritizing number of grafts, target vessels, EuroSCORE, age, and sex. We compared the two groups for baseline features and short-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences in age (65.9 versus 64.7 years), sex, EuroSCORE (3.3 versus 3. 6), number of grafts (2.1 versus 2.1), and preoperative left ventricular function. Arterial off-pump CABG, however, was associated with decreased duration of operation (213 versus 252 minutes; p < 0.0013), decreased peak postoperative troponin I levels (mean, 10.8 versus 29.1 ng/mL; p < 0.0001), decreased peak norepinephrine dose (2.3 versus 4.1 microg/ min; p < 0.0082), and decreased likelihood of receiving red blood cell transfusion (17.8% versus 40%; p = 0.0016). There were no differences in duration of intensive care unit or hospital stay, incidence of atrial fibrillation, or other clinical complications. There was one death in each group. CONCLUSIONS: After matching for number of grafts and other important preoperative risk markers, arterial off-pump CABG still decreases the need for red blood cell transfusion and offers other moderate clinical advantages compared with standard on-pump CABG.     

非体外循环和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在二次冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用

目的研究对比在二次冠状动脉旁路移植术(re-CABG)患者中分别采用非体外循环和体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump CABG和on-pump CABG)的临床早期结果,探讨通过合理手术方式的选择,提高re-CABG的手术疗效。方法自2000年4月到2006年6月,21例首次CABG后因心绞痛复发患者在阜外心血管病医院接受了re-CABG手术,其中10例行off-pump CABG(off-pump组),11例行on-pump CABG(on-pump组)。两组患者术前性别、年龄、体重、心肺功能、心绞痛程度、左心室舒张期末内径、射血分数、合并高血压、糖尿病等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结果 On-pump组中患者术后死亡1例,冠状动脉远端吻合口数多于off-pump组(P<0.05);off-pump组无手术死亡,在手术时间、术后呼吸机辅助时间、胸腔引流液量、输血量和手术后住院时间等方面,均明显少于on-pump组(P<0.05)。结论 Off-pump CABG和on-pump CABG技术在re-CABG中都可以取得满意疗效,off-pump CABG下施行re-CABG安全可靠。     

高风险冠心病患者接受体外或非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床对比研究

目的比较体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（on—pump coronary artery bypass grafting，on—pump CABG）和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术（off—pump CABG）治疗高风险冠心病患者的临床疗效。方法2003年10月～2007年10月，共对290例高风险[心脏手术风险评估欧洲系统（EuroSCORE）≥6分]冠心病患者实施CABG术，其中on—pumpCABG140例，offpumpCABG150例。比较2组手术死亡率、再血管化指数、桥血流量、呼吸机支持时间、二次开胸率、引流量、输血量及肾功能变化。结果2组在死亡率、再血管化指数、桥血流量、二次开胸率、术后脑梗塞率和心房纤颤率方面无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。与on—pumpCABG组相比，off-pumpCABG组呼吸机支持时间短[（4．8±1．9）h vs（8．9±2．1）h，t=17．453，P=0．000]，引流量少[（660±111）ml vs（660±111）ml，t=17．173，P=0．000]，输血量少[（270±77）ml vs（510±144）ml，t=17．861，P=0．000]，肾功能损害少[2．0％（3／150）VS7．9％（11／140），X^2=5．407，P=0．020]。结论较on—pump CABG，off-pump CABG治疗高风险冠心病患者的疗效同样确切，并且能显著减少呼吸机使用时间、引流量、输血量以及肾脏损害，更加适用于高风险冠心病患者。     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery does not reduce gastrointestinal complications.

OBJECTIVES: Gastrointestinal (GI) complications following on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are rare, but carry a high mortality rate. Prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been associated with a higher incidence of such complications. Little is known about the effect of avoiding CPB on GI complications. Our hypothesis was that off-pump CABG might reduce such complications. METHODS: A total of 2327 consecutive cases undergoing isolated CABG between April 1997 and May 2001 were identified from four consultants' practice at the two cardiothoracic centres involved in this study. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for development of post-operative GI complications. Potential risk factors considered in the logistic model were age, sex, angina, ejection fraction, peripheral vascular disease, renal dysfunction, redo operations, previous GI complications, priority of surgery and the use of CPB. RESULTS: A total of 1210 cases were performed on CPB, compared to 1117 off-pump. The incidence of GI complications was 1.2% (n = 14) in the on-pump group and 1.6% (n = 18) in the off-pump group (P = 0.347). The incidence of in-hospital mortality, in the patients who had a GI complication, was 28.6% (n = 4) and 22.2% (n = 4), respectively (P = 0.681). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that renal dysfunction, advancing age and previous history of GI surgery are significant risk factors for GI complications after coronary bypass surgery whether CPB is used or not. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that off-pump and on-pump techniques are similar in the rates of GI complications. We suggest that a properly designed randomized control trial is needed to verify our findings.     

Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: different approaches and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. METHODS: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. RESULTS: Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.