Intermediate-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement with bioprosthetic or mechanical valves in patients on hemodialysis

ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of choice of prosthesis (bioprosthetic valves or mechanical valves) on intermediate-term outcomes in patients on hemodialysis undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted in 18 Japanese centers. All adult patients on chronic hemodialysis who underwent AVR from 2008 and 2015 were included (n = 491). The early and late results were compared between groups. The hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression and Fine–Gray models with adjustment for propensity score based on 41 confounders. The mean follow-up period was 2.5 ± 2.1 years (up to 8.3 years) with 98% completeness.ResultsThere were 323 patients who received a bioprosthetic valve (group B), and 168 patients who received a mechanical valve (group M). There was no significant difference for in-hospital death rate between groups (group B: 12.1%; group M: 8.9%; P = .29). The overall survival rate at 5 years after surgery was 39.3% in group B and 50.4% in group M (P = .42). Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 97.1% in group B and 97.8% in group M (P = .88). On propensity-score adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences in overall survival between groups.ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in overall survival between bioprosthetic valves and mechanical valves in patients on hemodialysis undergoing AVR.     

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with a small mechanical prosthetic valve

BACKGROUND: Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only effective treatment for patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it is recognized that the use of small prosthetic valves due to a small aortic root often affects postoperative course after AVR. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of small prosthetic valves was a risk factor of AVR for AS. METHODS: We compared various perioperative factors and operative outcomes between patients with a small mechanical prosthetic valve (small group) and patients with a large mechanical prosthetic valve (large group). RESULTS: Early mortality was 0% in each group and the 5-year mortality was 25% in the small group and 10% in the large group. There were no significant differences in perioperative factors between the two groups. The small group patients were significantly older and smaller compared to the large group patients. The valve size was significantly correlated with age and BSA. CONCLUSIONS: The use of small mechanical prostheses was not a risk factor of AVR for AS when it was proportionate to the BSA even for elderly patients. AVR using a small mechanical prosthetic valve may be performed with good results in the short- and long-term.     

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic observation of left ventricular filling dynamics after aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation]

The 23 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic regurgitation (AR) from 1977 to 1990 were studied with pulsed Doppler echocardiography. The patients were divided into two groups. The A group consisted of 5 patients whose end-systolic volume index (ESVI) were more than 200 ml/m2 and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) were less than 0.35 before AVR. The B group consisted of 18 patients whose ESVI were less than 200 ml/m2 and EF were more than 0.35 before AVR. A Doppler volume sampler was placed at the center of mitral orifice to measure the transmitral inflow velocity after AVR (mean 28 months). Left ventricular filling dynamics were assessed by the peak velocity in the rapid filling phase (R), the peak velocity in the atrial contraction phase (A) and the ratio of A by R (A/R ratio) of mitral flow velocity pattern. The deceleration rate of early diastolic rapid inflow (DeR) determined as the slope a straight line drawn between the peak of early diastolic inflow and a point at half peak velocity on the fall side of the envelope. Result was as follows; 1) The DeR showed significant correlation with the EF (r = 0.56, p < 0.01). The DeR showed significant inverse correlation with the ESVI (r = -0.52, p < 0.05). 2) The R velocity (mean 43.9 +/- 7.9 cm/sec) in group A was significantly lower than in group B (mean 61.4 +/- 18.6 cm/sec), (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of myocardial preservation technique on supraventricular tachycardia following aortic valve replacement

We studied 100 patients who underwent an isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) between 1974 and 1991. The patients were divided into the following two groups and compared: group A, which consisted of 40 patients operated on before 1978 who underwent continuous left coronary perfusion with blood; and group B, which consisted of 60 patients operated on after 1979 in whom St. Thomas solution was used in combination with topical cardiac cooling. Moreover, we divided the group B patients into two subgroups: group Bl, who underwent AVR before 1986 during which we administered St. Thomas solution with ice slush every 30 min; and group B2, who had AVR after 1986 in which we used St. Thomas solution with a cold saline (4°C) solution and treated with a small amount of slushed ice every 15 min. The incidence of supraventricular tachycardias was 15% in group A, 50% in group BI, and 15% in group B2. The severity of preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, the type of valve lesions, cardiothoracic ratio, left ventricular function, aortic clamp time, bypass time, and use of drugs did not correlate with the incidence of supraventricular tachycardias in either group A or B. In group B2 patients, we paid a lot of attention to cooling the right atrium as well as the left ventricle by immersing the whole heart using a 4°C saline solution, which led to a remarkable reduction of the incidence of supraventricular tachycardia. This fact indicates that right atrial preservation is one of the most important factors for reducing the incidence of supraventricular tachycardia.     

Impacts of aortic valve replacement on cardiac function in patients with aortic stenosis

To prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR), we set up our original standard criteria for the selection of the size of the prosthetic valve. We also routinely perform supra-annular enlargement in patients with small aortic annuli. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of our procedure on the postoperative cardiac function of patients suffering from aortic stenosis (AS). We retrospectively reviewed 102 consecutive surgical patients with AS from 1999 to 2004. The patients were classified into the following 3 groups based on the sizes of their prosthesis (group S : 19 mm prosthesis, n = 34; group M : 21 mm prosthesis, n = 51; and group L : > 23 mm prosthesis, n = 17). Cardiac function was evaluated using echocardiography preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months after the operation. There were no hospital deaths during the study period. A favorable hemodynamic outcome of all 3 groups was achieved. Our surgical strategy for AS was thought to be useful to prevent PPM after AVR.     

Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Implantation of St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valves in Small Aortic Roots

In this study, we analyzed the extent of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients who received small St. Jude Medical (SJM) aortic valves and compared the results with those of another group receiving larger valves. Eighty-eight patients received either 19 or 21 mm valves (Group 1, 25 patients) or either 23 or 25 mm valves (Group 2, 53 patients). Echocardiographic studies were done before the operation and 5 years postoperatively. At follow-up a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass was found for both patient groups (p < 0.0001). Doppler echocardiography derived pressure gradients for both groups were obtained during the follow-up period. As expected, the patients in Group 1 had higher peak pressure gradients than did those in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups or any significant correlations between peak pressure gradients and body surface area (BSA). Actuarial survival was 84.7% at 15 years for Group 1 and 85.9% at 17 years for Group 2. Actuarial freedom from valve related events was 91.4 % at 15 years for Group 1 and 82.7% at 17 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in survival or valve related event free curves between the 2 groups. After implantations of SJM valves in small aortic roots, significant left ventricular mass regression was obtained, and the results were comparable to those for valves of other sizes. The long-term performance of aortic valve replacement with small valves was satisfactory as judged by improvement in the functional class of patients and survival statistics, the durability of the prosthesis, and valve related morbidity comparable to that of valves of other sizes.     

Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Short (< or =3 months)- and middle (> or =4 months)-term results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) bioprosthetic valves and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic (MM) bioprosthetic valves in patients with small aortic annulus were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our facility, AVR was performed using bioprostheses in 110 patients from April 1999 to March 2006. Of these patients, 40 were treated using 19-mm CEP (Group C), and 9 using 19-mm MM (Group M). Evaluation by inquiry, physical examination, and echocardiography was performed before, a short term after, and a middle term after surgery, and the effects of AVR were compared. RESULTS: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class grade showed improvements in both groups. The aortic valve peak pressure gradient was 29.8 +/- 10.1 mmHg in Group C and 53.8 +/- 17.3 mmHg in Group M, being higher in Group M, a middle term after surgery. However, the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) showed improvements in both groups compared with the values before surgery, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was maintained. During the middle term after surgery, the frequency of cardiac events showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients treated with 19-mm MM, the aortic valve peak pressure gradient was higher than in those treated with 19-mm CEP, but acceptable improvements in the LVMI, maintenance of the LVEF, and avoidance of cardiac events were observed in both groups.     

Long-term results of the 19 mm low-profile bileaflet valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus

Between April, 1979, and November, 1986, 20 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the small aortic anulus with either 19 mm St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis or 19 mm Duro-Medics valve prosthesis, which are relatively new, low-profile bileaflet valve prostheses. There were two male and 18 female patients ranging from 35 to 69 years old (mean, 54.7 years). Average body surface area was 1.37 +/- 0.11 m2 (range 1.20 to 1.55 m2). One patient died of arrhythmia at 22 postoperative day. The 19 survivors have been followed up for as long as 61 months (mean, 31.2 months). There were two late complications, cerebral infarctions, and event free ratio was 0.85 at five years. All long-term survivors were in New York Heart Association Functional Class I (15 patients) and Class II (three patients). Preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms demonstrated significant decreases in mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) (48.9 +/- 8.3 mm vs 42.2 +/- 5.7 mm; p less than 0.01) and in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) (32.2 +/- 8.2 mm vs 25.7 +/- 4.9 mm; p less than 0.01). Mean left ventricular wall thickness was decreased to 24.5 +/- 3.7 mm from 25.8 +/- 6.4 mm. The average peak systolic gradient at rest with Doppler ultrasound was 26.0 +/- 9.3 mmHg (range nine to 36 mmHg). Though transprosthetic gradient did occur in patients who received 19 mm low-profile bileaflet valves in narrow aortic roots, progressive prosthetic stenosis was not observed and small aortic prostheses provide acceptable palliation for long-term results clinically.     

Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women

BACKGROUND: Implantation of small aortic valve prostheses has been reported to be associated with impaired left ventricular (LV) mass regression and incomplete resolution of symptoms although these data have been generated largely with male patients. Therefore we sought to determine the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of female patients who received a 19-mm aortic valve. METHODS: Between May 1995 and December 2000, 38 female patients (average age 73 years, range 42 to 89) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR; n = 22) or AVR plus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG; n = 16) with a 19-mm aortic prosthesis. The average New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 3.08 and of the 26 patients who had angina, 47.2% were in CCS class III or IV. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was done an average of 33.4 months (8 to 72) after surgery. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 10.5%. Overall survival at an average of 33 months was 71.1%. The average NYHA class was 1.52 +/- 0.34 postoperatively (p < 0.001 versus preoperative) and 95% had no anginal symptoms or were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I. The LV mass index showed significant regression (114 +/- 11 g/m2 to 89 +/- 9 g/m2, p = 0.001) despite an effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.64 +/- 0.09 cm2/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a very small EOAI, elderly female patients with 19-mm prosthetic aortic valves can experience a satisfactory improvement in symptoms and normalization of LV mass. This finding suggests that small prosthetic aortic valves continue to have an application in contemporary cardiac surgical practice. The current perception of patient-prosthesis mismatch may need to be reconsidered for select populations.     

Left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves

Objective The degree of Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) regression following aortic valve replacement correlates with long-term survival. This study aims to assess the extent of LVMI regression at 3 months following aortic valve replacement (AVR) with different types and sizes of mechanical valves in rheumatic aortic valve disease. Methods The LVMI regression was studied in 34 consecutive patients, undergoing elective AVR for rheumatic aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation. They were grouped in A and B, matched in age, body surface area and pre-operative LVMI, receiving respectively a tilting disc and a bileaflet mechanical valve. The LVMI was calculated by M-mode echocardiography using the Devereux' formula pre-operatively and three months post-operatively. The trend of LVMI reduction was compared between the two groups and amongst the patients with stenotic, regurgitant and mixed aortic valve, pathologies; and receiving different sizes of valves. Results The mean preoperative LVMI was 199g±79.5 g/m². At three months post aortic valve replacement, the mean LVMI was 130g±49.0 g/m². There was a significant reduction of LVMI post-operatively (p=0.001) at three months follow-up. The extent of LVMI regression following surgery amongst the groups A and B did not vary significantly (p=0.92). The extent of LVMI regression did not vary significantly in patients with different aortic valve pathology nor with different sizes of the valves implanted. Conclusions There is a significant early LVMI regression following aortic valve replacement in rheumatic aortic valve disease. The type and the size of the mechanical prosthesis or the rheumatic pathology do not appear to influence this regression.     

The importance of aortic compliance as a prognostic factor after aortic valve replacement

A variety of clinical variables and physiological parameters have been discussed in relation to postoperative survival and symptoms in aortic regurgitation (AR). Many of them have been derived from left ventricular morphology and functions, but there has been no parameter from aortic functions. As the heart is united with the aortic tree to form a circulatory system and both heart and aorta affect each other, aortic functions also have an important prognostic value after aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study was performed to clarify the participation of aortic functions in determining the prognosis after AVR. Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing isolated AVR for AR were evaluated. Twenty-one preoperative hemodynamic and dimensional variables of both heart and aorta were analyzed to determine the risk factors for early postoperative morbidity. These variables were obtained from chest X-ray film, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, cine-aorto-ventriculogram and pressure manometries. All patients were divided in two groups according to the postoperative course. Group I composed of 10 patients took relatively smooth postoperative course, except two patients suffering from cardiac tamponade. Group II composed of 5 patients suffered from low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) and/or dangerous arrhythmias postoperatively. Two out of them died of uncontrollable ventricular arrhythmias. There were no statistic differences between two groups in the factors derived from preoperative examinations, i.e. CTR, LVDsI, PWT, R/Th, %FS, EDVI, EF, CI, LVEDP, etc. Mean aortic compliance of group II, (3.8 +/- 2.1) X 10(-4) mmHg-1, was, however, significantly lower than that of group I, (21.7 +/- 4.8) X 10(-4) mmHg-1, (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of aortic valve replacement involving small severely calcified aortic annulus in elderly patients

We performed aortic valve replacement in 24 patients aged over 70 with small calcified valves. The surgical management of such patients remains controversial as the extensive calcification compromises implantation. Hence, we used an ultrasonic debridement instrument to remove calcium and selected a small prosthesis with the largest possible orifice without enlargement of the aortic annulus. Echocardiography showed significant reductions in left ventricular mass index compared with preoperative values. Early and mid-term prognosis has been relatively good.     

Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis with a Small Mechanical Prosthetic Valve

ABSTRACT Background: Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only effective treatment for patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it is recognized that the use of small prosthetic valves due to a small aortic root often affects postoperative course after AVR. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of small prosthetic valves was a risk factor of AVR for AS. Methods: We compared various perioperative factors and operative outcomes between patients with a small mechanical prosthetic valve (small group) and patients with a large mechanical prosthetic valve (large group). Results: Early mortality was 0% in each group and the 5-year mortality was 25% in the small group and 10% in the large group. There were no significant differences in perioperative factors between the two groups. The small group patients were significantly older and smaller compared to the large group patients. The valve size was significantly correlated with age and BSA. Conclusions: The use of small mechanical prostheses was not a risk factor of AVR for AS when it was proportionate to the BSA even for elderly patients. AVR using a small mechanical prosthetic valve may be performed with good results in the short-and long-term.     

Long-term results of conventional aortic valve replacement for small aortic annulus

We studied cardiac function, clinical outcome and quality of life (QOL) long after aortic valve replacement for pure aortic stenosis. Forty-four patients in small group [St. Jude Medical (SJM) 17 HP, 19 A], and 69 patients in non-small group (19 HP, 21 A, 23 A) operated on from 1984 to 2004 were enrolled in this study. We assessed the clinical data, aortic pressure gradient, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and ejection fraction (EF) by preoperative and postoperative echocardiography. Moreover to evaluate QOL after the operation, we performed SF-36 used for the evaluation of health and QOL worldwide. Mean follow-up is 7.1 +/- 4.8 years in small group, and 6.8 +/- 4.6 years in non-small group. There were 2 hospital deaths in small group, and 1 in non-small group. The actual survival rate at 10-year were 89.2% in small group, and 85.6% in non-small group. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality, LVMI, long-term survival rate, and the scores of SF-36 between the 2 groups. The use of small sized prosthetic valves in patients with small aortic annulus might be justified when there is no patient-prosthesis mismatch.     

Risk factors influencing the prognosis of severe aortic valve disease following aortic valve replacement

As a result of improvement in intraoperative and postoperative management, severe aortic valve disease can be cured by operation, however, late cardiogenic sudden death after aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been existed as one of the important unsolved problem. This report is aimed to predict the risk factors influencing the postoperative prognosis of severe aortic valve disease. Twenty-three cases with aortic regurgitation (AR) and 20 cases with aortic stenosis (AS) were selected by postoperative period over 12 months. In 18 AR cases with normal coronary artery substantiated by selective coronary angiography, cross sectional area index of left ventricular wall (CSAI) and ST depression in left chest leads of electrocardiogram correlated well as the CSAI increased, so decreased the ST segment. This shows the increment of CSAI leads left ventricular endocardial ischemia. By means of introduction of this indicator, 23 AR and 20 AS patients were divided into two groups as group C-I having CSAI over 20 cm2/m2 and group C-II under 20 cm2/m2. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was selected as an predictive indicator of left ventricular function. As same as CSAI, AVR cases were divided into two groups as group E-I having EF under 50% and E-II over 50%. Each group was compared concerning with the complication rate of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) and late cardiogenic sudden death. In C-I group of AR, 55% cases accompanied with LOS, 18% died due to LOS and 18% died suddenly from late cardiogenic cause, however, none of cases in C-II group had these complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

主动脉瓣置换术650例临床分析

目的 总结主动脉瓣人工瓣膜置换术的临床经验.方法 主动脉瓣置换手术650例,年龄11～76岁,平均(43.2±12.6)岁.60岁以上52例.风湿性病变475例,先天性瓣叶畸形58例,退行性变49例,感染性心内膜炎(IE)47例,人工瓣膜感染性心内膜炎4例,外伤性2例.合并升主动脉瘤样扩张或主动脉夹层52例,冠心病36例,陈旧性脑血管意外14例,室间隔缺损10例,房间隔缺损2例,动脉导管未闭7例.心功能Ⅲ级385例,Ⅳ级119例.射血分数(EF)平均0.56±0.11,左室舒张末直径平均(LVED)(58.59±12.55)mm,左室舒张末容积(KVEDV)(191.58±89.88)ml,主动脉瓣跨瓣压差13.00～118.25 mm Hg(1mmHg=0.133kda).生物瓣占8.77%.主动脉瓣二次置换9例,同期行冠状动脉旁路术36例,主动脉大血管手术52例.体外循环110～208 mnin,升主动脉阻断54～129min.结果 人工瓣膜直径≤21 mm者术后跨瓣压差平均为30.00 mm Hg,直径>21 mm者术后跨瓣压差平均为23.00mmHg,差异有统计学意义.术后30d内死亡40例,1987-1996年死亡29例(9.21%);1997-2007年死亡11例(3.28%).平均随访58个月.结论 随着手术技术、心肌保护技术和围术期处理技术的提高,生物瓣的使用和对合并缺血性心脏病病人的再血管化,手术并发症和病死率明显下降.     

升主动脉置换术或成形术治疗主动脉瓣病变合并的升主动脉瘤样扩张

目的 对比分析主动脉瓣病变合并升主动脉瘤扩张在行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的同时施行升主动脉置换术(A组)或成形术(B组)的结果,探讨两种方法的临床效果及适应证.方法 A、B两组术前年龄、性别、心功能分级、主动脉瓣病变、左室射血分数等差异均无统计学意义.A组主动脉直径(49.45±3.96)mm,B组(49.31±3.68)mm,差异亦无统计学意义.行AVR后A组常规置换升主动脉,B组纵行切除部分升主动脉壁,缝合后包裹28～30 mm人工血管.结果 A、B两组术后均无死亡.A组主动脉阻断(71.70±17.13)min、体外循环(110.52±27.51)min,均明显大于B组的(57.13±16.32)min(P=0.025)和(97.31±19.46)min(P=0.004).两组术中及术后输血量、并发症发生率差异无统计学意义.结论 主动脉瓣病变合并升主动脉瘤样扩张,年轻病人主动脉直径≥40 mm时应积极手术处理扩张的升主动脉.升主动脉成形术,同时外包裹人工血管的方法较升主动脉置换术更为简单、安全,但升主动脉壁必须无粥样硬化或溃疡.     

Influence of St. Jude medical valve in patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus on cardiac function and late survival result

This clinical study analyzes our experience of postoperative cardiac function and long-term survival rate in patients with aortic stenosis and small-size St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Sixty-eight patients who underwent aortic valve replacement by SJM valve were divided into two groups by preoperative aortic annulus diameter. Group 1 consisted of 44 patients with small aortic annulus and small-size SJM valve (19 mm or 21 mm). In Group 1, small SJM standard valves were implanted in 16 patients, and small SJM Hemodynamic Plus (HP) valves were implanted in 28 patients. Group 2 consisted of 24 patients with large-size SJM standard valve (23 mm or larger). Preoperative left ventricular mass index, left ventricular dimension, the dimension of ascending aorta, and body surface area were significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Average age at surgery was older in Group 1 than in Group 2. Effective orifice area index of the SJM valve measured by the manufacturer's data was smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Postoperative left ventricular mass indexes of Group 1 (standard valve or HP valve) and Group 2 significantly decreased in comparison with the preoperative mass indexes. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction and the peak ejection rate of Group 1 were not different from those of Group 2. The 10 year survival rate of Group 1 was 79%, and the rate of Group 2 was 77%. At 10 years after surgery, freedom from valve-related complication of Group 1 was 80%, and freedom from complication of Group 2 was 81%. Our results demonstrated that small-size SJM valve afforded satisfactory long-term survival rate and valve-related event-free rate for elderly patients with small body surface area and small aortic annulus.     

Aortoventriculoplasty and left ventricle function: long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Depressed cardiac function after aortoventriculoplasty is well known during the postoperative period. Little data exist concerning the long-term follow-up. The aim of this study is to determine whether septal incision has any permanent effect on the left ventricle function. METHODS: From 1988 to 2002, 45 patients received aortic mechanical prosthesis. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 26 patients 5-18 years old, who underwent simple aortic valve replacement. Group B consisted of 19 patients 4-20 years old, who underwent the Konno procedure. Systolic and diastolic functions of the left ventricle were analyzed using echocardiography. For the systolic function, the following parameters were assessed: pressure gradient between left ventricle and ascending aorta, shortening and ejection fraction of the left ventricle. For the diastolic function, left ventricle-filling parameters were assessed: ratio of early to late filling velocity, deceleration slope of the early filling velocity and left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time. Furthermore the percentage fraction of the aortic valve index (AOVI%) was calculated and compared between these two groups. RESULTS: After the surgery in group A, AOVI% dropped from 110+/-21 to 98+/-11%, while in group B it increased from 82+/-16 to 114+/-11%. As a result a higher residual pressure gradient across the aortic valve was noted in group A: 21.26+/-15 as compared to 11.17+/-5 mmHg in group B. A mean pressure above 30 mmHg appeared in group A 2 years after the surgery, while in group B this was obtained after 6 years. As for the diastolic function no significant difference was noted between these two groups. Overall there was one late death in group A, and in group B two early deaths, two reoperations because of excessive drainage and in two patients permanent pacemakers had to be implanted. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of the systolic function after the surgery was noted in both groups. In patients with low AOVI%, postsurgical pressure gradient, either residual or recurrent, appeared during the follow-up. As for the septal incision, it may have some transient effects on the left ventricle function in the postoperative period, but no permanent sequelae were observed in the long-term follow-up.     

Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

OBJECTIVES: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. RESULTS: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.