Liver fibrosis scores and risk of liver-related mortality in young adults with chronic hepatitis B: A cohort study

The predictive role of noninvasive liver fibrosis scores on liver-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B below 40 years of age remains unclarified. We examined the association of liver fibrosis scores with liver-related mortality in young (<40 years) and older adults with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A cohort study was performed in 21,360 HBsAg-positive Korean adults without liver cirrhosis or liver cancer at baseline who were followed up for up to 18 years. The liver fibrosis scores were determined using the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI). Patients’ vital status and cause of death were ascertained through the National Death Records. During a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 283 liver-related deaths were identified (liver-related mortality, 127.4/10⁵ person-years). The liver fibrosis scores were significantly associated with increased risks of liver-related mortality; this association did not differ by age group (<40 vs. ≥40 years). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for liver-related mortality comparing intermediate and high to low FIB-4 scores were 4.23 (1.99–9.00), and 15.16 (5.18–44.38), respectively, among individuals under 40, and 4.46 (3.03–6.56) and 22.47 (15.11–33.41), respectively, among older individuals. These associations were similar in analyses using APRI. In this cohort of HBsAg-positive individuals, the liver fibrosis scores were associated with increased risks of liver-related mortality in young and older adults. The liver fibrosis scores have a role in predicting liver mortality, even in young adults with HBV.     

AST to Platelet Ratio Index and fibrosis 4 calculator scores for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Background & aimsLiver fibrosis is the single most important prognostic factor in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The predictive value of the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) score, originally developed for fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, is much less known in the context of NAFLD patients.MethodsWe retrospectively compared the performance of APRI and fibrosis 4 calculator (FIB-4) scores in NAFLD patients with documented liver biopsies, to their performance in chronic HCV patients.Results153 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 297 patients with biopsy-proven chronic HCV infection were included. The APRI score was a good predictor for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients (area under the ROC curve 0.8307) although it was modestly inferior as compared to the well-validated FIB-4 score (area under the ROC curve 0.8959). The predictive value of APRI score in NALFD patients was inferior as compared to its predictive value in HCV patients (area under the ROC curve of 0.8307 versus 0.9965). In contrast to FIB-4, APRI score was not a good discriminator between intermediate stages of fibrosis in NAFLD patients.ConclusionsAPRI and Fib-4 scores are reasonable tools to allocate NAFLD patients with advanced fibrosis. FIB-4 may better discriminate between intermediate fibrosis stages.     

Diagnostic performance of three non-invasive fibrosis scores (Hepamet,FIB-4, NAFLD fibrosis score) in NAFLD patients from a mixed Latin American population

Introduction and aimsSeveral non-invasive scoring systems have been developed and validated worldwide to predict the risk of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, information about the performance of these systems in Latin American populations is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of the Hepamet Fibrosis Score, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) in a mixed Latin American group of NAFLD patients.MethodsClinical, laboratory and liver biopsy data collected from 379 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients from Latin American tertiary health centers were reviewed. Histological fibrosis stages were classified using the Kleiner score. Accuracy was determined, and new fibrosis score thresholds were calculated to better compare the performances of non-invasive tests and to explore their usefulness in excluding fibrosis.ResultsThe distribution of fibrosis stages among the sample population was as follows: F0 (45%), F1 (27%), F2 (8%), F3 (16%) and F4 (4%). Using modified thresholds, the areas under the ROC curves (AUROC) for Hepamet and FIB-4 (0.73 and 0.74, respectively) to detect significant fibrosis were higher than that of NFS (0.58). However, the AUROCs of the three scores were not significantly different in advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. To exclude fibrosis, we calculated lower cutoffs than standard thresholds for Hepamet, FIB-4 and NFS with similar performances.ConclusionThresholds of non-invasive fibrosis scores (Hepamet, FIB-4 and NFS) can be modified to maximize diagnostic accuracy in Latin American patients with NAFLD.     

Indices of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in prediabetes and association with diabetes development in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes study

AimsNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common comorbidity that leads to poor outcomes in people at high risk for development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Vitamin D is a possible mediator. In the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes study (D2d), we investigated the relationship of baseline indices of NAFLD with incident T2D and whether the effect of vitamin D on diabetes was modified by NAFLD.MethodsCross-sectional associations of indices of NAFLD with glycemia and vitamin D status were assessed in 3972 individuals screened for the D2d study. In those with prediabetes randomized to vitamin D or placebo (n = 2423), we examined longitudinal associations of NAFLD indices with incident T2D. We used validated non-invasive scores to assess steatosis [(hepatic steatosis index (HSI); NAFLD-liver fat score (NAFLD-LFS)] and advanced fibrosis [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index; AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI)].ResultsEighty-five percent of screened participants had likely steatosis by HSI and 71 % by NAFLD-LFS; 3 % were likely to have advanced fibrosis by FIB-4 and 1.2 % by APRI. FIB-4 indicated that 20.4 % of individuals require further follow up to assess liver health. Steatosis and fibrosis scores were higher among participants with worse glycemia. The NAFLD-LFS and APRI predicted development of diabetes (hazard ratios [95%CI] 1.35 [1.07, 1.70]; P = 0.012) and 2.36 (1.23, 4.54; P = 0.010), respectively). The effect of vitamin D on diabetes risk was not modified by baseline NAFLD indices. Individuals with likely steatosis had a smaller increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in response to vitamin D than those without steatosis.ConclusionsThe predicted high prevalence of steatosis, the need for further fibrosis workup, and the relationship between liver health and incident T2D suggest that routine screening with clinically accessible scores may be an important strategy to reduce disease burden.     

Assessment of liver disease by non-invasive methods in perinatally infected Brazilian adolescents and young adults living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

IntroductionEffective and long-term combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has decreased morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. Despite treatment advances, HIV-infected children continue to develop noninfectious conditions, including liver fibrosis.MethodsCross-sectional study designed to identify liver fibrosis in HIV-infected adolescents and young adults, in an outpatients clinic of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Division at Escola Paulista de Medicina/Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), diagnosed by noninvasive methods (liver elastography–FibroScan®, APRI and FIB4). Variables examined included demographics, clinical, laboratories, HIV treatment. All participants underwent FibroScan® to measure liver parenchyma elasticity. Values equal to above 7.0 kPa were interpreted as the presence of significant liver fibrosis. Two different biomarkers of liver fibrosis were employed: the AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and the Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4). APRI values above 1.5 have been considered as levels of clinically significant liver fibrosis and FIB-4 values above 3.25 suggested the presence of advanced fibrosis.ResultsBetween August 2014 and March 2017, the study enrolled 97 patients, age 10–27 years old, fourteen of 97 subjects (14.4%) presented liver stiffness (≥7 kPa) detected by the liver elastography. No patient had APRI> 1.5. No patient had FIB4 value > 3.25. The only isolated laboratory parameter that could be significantly associated with high liver stiffness was thrombocytopenia (p = 0.022, Fisher's exact test).ConclusionLiver stiffness was identified in 14.4% (14/97) of this cohort by liver elastography. Liver disease in HIV-infected adolescents and young adults manifests itself silently, so should be routinely investigated.     

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography with APRI and FIB-4 to Identify Significant Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Introduction and aim. In chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with equivocal indication for antiviral therapy, therapeutic decision currently depends on histopathology of the liver. We aimed to evaluate if acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) in conjunction with aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score could replace liver biopsy to indicate treatment for CHB.Material and methods. We prospectively enrolled 101 clinically non-cirrhotic patients whose serum alanine aminotransferase was mildly elevated (1-2 folds above the upper normal limit) despite a high viral load (HBV DNA > 2,000 IU/mL). All participants underwent liver biopsy, and measurement of ARFI, APRI and FIB-4. The ability of the markers to distinguish fibrosis ≥ METAVIR F2 was evaluated.Results. According to histopathology, liver fibrosis was METAVIR F0 in 2 (2.0%), F1 in 43 (42.6%), F2 in 34 (33.7%), F3 in 16 (15.8%), and F4 in 6 (5.9%) patients, and was correlated with ARFI (p = 0.0001), APRI (p = 0.012), and FIB-4 (p = 0.004). The six patients with cirrhosis were included for analysis, and received antiviral therapy. The C statistics of ARFI, APRI, and FIB-4 for fibrosis ≥ F2 were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.80), 0.62 (95% CI, 0.51-0.73), and 0.64 (0.53-0.75), respectively. The cut-off values for 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity to identify significant fibrosis were 0.97 m/sec and 1.36 m/sec for ARFI, 0.36 and 1.0 for APRI, 0.63 and 2.22 for FIB-4, respectively. Using a combination of these 3 indices, 44 patients (43.6%) could be spared a liver biopsy procedure.Conclusions. A combination of ARFI, APRI, and FIB-4 may spare some CHB patients with equivocal indication for antiviral treatment a liver biopsy.     

Novel non-invasive score to predict cirrhosis in the era of hepatitis C elimination: A population study of ex-substance users in Singapore

BackgroundChronic hepatitis C infection is common among people with history of substance use. Liver fibrosis assessment is a barrier to linkage to care, particularly among those with history of substance users. The use of non-invasive scores can be helpful in predicting liver cirrhosis in the era of HCV elimination, especially in countries where transient elastography (TE) is not available. We compared the commonly used non-invasive scores with a novel non-invasive score in predicting liver cirrhosis in this population.MethodsHCV patients with history of substance use between 2011 and 2016 were analyzed. All patients had TE for liver fibrosis assessment. Clinical performance of established non-invasive scores for fibrosis assessment and novel score were compared. Youden's index was used to determine optimal cut-off of the novel score.ResultsA total of 579 patients were included. In multivariate logistic regression, cirrhosis on TE was associated with age (P = 0.002), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.004), and platelet count (P < 0.001), but not alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P = 0.896). These form the components of modified AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score. Modified APRI was superior to APRI in predicting cirrhosis (AUROC, 0.796 vs. 0.770, P = 0.007), but not fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) (P = 1.00). Modified APRI at cut-off of 4 has sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.4%, 26.9% and 92.6%, respectively, and at 19, has sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 33.3%, 96.2% and 77.1%, respectively. FIB-4 has a NPV and PPV of 88.6%, 41.8% and 78.5%, 77.6%, at cut-off of 1.45 and 3.25, respectively. Using the cut-off of 4 and 14 for modified APRI, 32.5% of patients can be correctly classified and misses out only 5.6% of cirrhosis patients.ConclusionsModified APRI score is superior in predicting cirrhosis in HCV population, with 32.5% of the population being correctly classified using cut-off of 4 and 14. Further studies are required to validate the findings.     

DAAs therapy associated with improved hepatic fibrosis in HCV-GT4 patients co-infected with HIV

ABSTRACT

Background: The present work aimed at evaluation of the potential dynamic changes in hepatic fibrosis following treatment of chronic HCV using DAAs in patients coinfected with HIV.

Patients and methods: In total, 50 HCV/HIV coinfected patients [age; 34.68 ± 10.38 years, 82% men] were included. For all included patients, liver stiffness measured using transient elastography as well as serum liver fibrosis scores; [fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) score and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI)] were calculated at baseline and at 12 and 24-weeks following 12 weeks therapy of HCV with once daily sofosbuvir 400 mg plus daclatasvir 60 mg.

Results: Most of the included patients (70%, n = 35) were on anti-retroviral therapy. SVR24 was achieved by 93.48% of the patients. There was significant serial improvement in baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM), FIB-4 and APRI among responders; [LSM: baseline, 7.05 ± 4.84 kPa vs. 5.66 ± 2.63 kPa at SVR24, p < 0.001], [FIB-4: baseline, 1.24 ± 1.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.64 at SVR24, p 0.001) and (APRI: baseline, 0.725 ± 0.66 vs. 0.36 ± 0.19at SVR24, p 0.001) respectively.

Conclusion: Treatment of HCV patients coinfected with HIV using DAAs is associated with a rapid significant regression in hepatic fibrosis, as evaluated by FibroScan, FIB-4, and APRI scores.     

Evolution of liver fibrosis after interferon-based anti-hepatitis C virus therapy failure in 3,049 chronic hepatitis C patients without cirrhosis

Background and study aimsLiver fibrosis is the underlying cause of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease progression to endpoints such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of our study was to assess changes in hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV who had a fibrosis evaluation at two time points at least six months apart.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that included patients who had failed interferon therapy and received HCV retreatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) at least six months later. Patients were evaluated previously for fibrosis according to liver biopsy and fibrosis biomarkers were evaluated before pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG/RBV) therapy. Fibrosis was re-evaluated with fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores before starting DAAs.ResultsA total of 3,049 patients were included [age 43.47 ± 9.07 years, 55.20 % males] and baseline histopathology showed F1, F2, and F3 in 16.86 %, 46.21 %, and 36.93 %, respectively. The mean time interval between the last dose of previously failed IFN-therapy to the first dose of DAAs was 2.38 (±1.07) years. Overall, there was a significant increase in FIB-4 scores at retreatment times (from 11.71 ± 1.13 to 22.26 ± 1.68, p < 0.001). Patients with baseline FIB-4 < 1.45 (n = 1,569) and between 1.45 and 3.25 (n = 1,237) had significant increases in their FIB-4 at the retreatment time point [median difference; 0.41 (0.91) and 0.24 (1.5), p < 0.001, respectively], whereas patients with FIB-4 > 3.25 had significant reduction of their FIB-4 score at a retreatment timepoint [−0.98 (2.93), p ≤ 0.001].ConclusionFibrosis progressed in most patients, even within six months for some patients, and this indicates retreatment of non-system vascular resistance patients even if they do not have significant fibrosis.     

Evolution of liver fibrosis after interferon-based anti-hepatitis C virus therapy failure in 3,049 chronic hepatitis C patients without cirrhosis

Background and study aimsLiver fibrosis is the underlying cause of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease progression to endpoints such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of our study was to assess changes in hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV who had a fibrosis evaluation at two time points at least six months apart.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that included patients who had failed interferon therapy and received HCV retreatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) at least six months later. Patients were evaluated previously for fibrosis according to liver biopsy and fibrosis biomarkers were evaluated before pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG/RBV) therapy. Fibrosis was re-evaluated with fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores before starting DAAs.ResultsA total of 3,049 patients were included [age 43.47 ± 9.07 years, 55.20 % males] and baseline histopathology showed F1, F2, and F3 in 16.86 %, 46.21 %, and 36.93 %, respectively. The mean time interval between the last dose of previously failed IFN-therapy to the first dose of DAAs was 2.38 (±1.07) years. Overall, there was a significant increase in FIB-4 scores at retreatment times (from 11.71 ± 1.13 to 22.26 ± 1.68, p < 0.001). Patients with baseline FIB-4 < 1.45 (n = 1,569) and between 1.45 and 3.25 (n = 1,237) had significant increases in their FIB-4 at the retreatment time point [median difference; 0.41 (0.91) and 0.24 (1.5), p < 0.001, respectively], whereas patients with FIB-4 > 3.25 had significant reduction of their FIB-4 score at a retreatment timepoint [−0.98 (2.93), p ≤ 0.001].ConclusionFibrosis progressed in most patients, even within six months for some patients, and this indicates retreatment of non-system vascular resistance patients even if they do not have significant fibrosis.     

Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive models for the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

Introduction. Although it is standard procedure in the evaluation of liver diseases, biopsy is an invasive method subject to sampling error and intra or inter-observer variability. Thus, surrogate markers of liver fibrosis have been proposed, with variable availability and accuracy.Aim. Validate and compare the performance of APRI and FIB-4 as predictors of liver fibrosis in HCV patients.Material and methods. Cross-sectional study including patients with HCV-RNA (+) who underwent liver biopsy. Significant fibrosis was defined as METAVIR stage ≥ 2. The diagnostic performance of the models in predicting significant fibrosis were evaluated and compared by ROC curves.Results. The study included 119 patients, mean age 43.7 ± 10.6 years and 62% males. Significant fibrosis was identified in 41 patients. The AUROCs observed were: APRI = 0.793 ± 0.047, FIB-4 = 0.811 ± 0.045 and AST/ALT = 0.661 ± 0.055 (P = 0.054 for APRI vs. AST/ALT, and P = 0.014 for FIB-4 vs. AST/ALT). Considering classic cutoffs, the PPV and NPV for APRI and FIB-4 were, respectively, 77% and 92% and 83% and 81%. Thirteen (19%) patients were misdiagnosed by APRI and 16 (18%) by FIB-4. By restricting the indication of liver biopsy to patients with intermediate values, it could have been correctly avoided in 47% and 63% of the patients with APRI and FIB-4, respectively.Conclusion. The models APRI and FIB-4 were superior to AST/ALT ratio in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Even though the overall performance of APRI and FIB-4 was similar, a higher proportion of patients may be correctly classified by FIB-4.     

Comparison of FibroTouch and FibroScan for staging fibrosis in chronic liver disease: Single-center prospective study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the FibroTouch and FibroScan in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) for staging fibrosis.MethodsA prospective study was conducted in 435 CLD patients between 2014 and 2017. Index tests (FibroTouch, FibroScan, APRI, and FIB-4 score) and a reference standard (liver biopsy) were performed within one week.ResultsThe area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of the FibroTouch was similar with that of the FibroScan for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, or cirrhosis; however, the AUROC of the FibroTouch was higher than that of APRI or FIB‐4 (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation (rho = 0.85, p < 0.001) between the FibroTouch and FibroScan for liver stiffness. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FibroTouch for significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, or cirrhosis was 73.3%, 83.2%, or 84.1%, respectively. No significant differences between the FibroTouch and FibroScan were detected regarding the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy. The optimal cut-off values for each stage of fibrosis were similar between the FibroTouch and FibroScan.ConclusionThe FibroTouch is a valuable diagnostic tool for diagnosing liver fibrosis with good diagnostic accuracy which was comparable with that of the FibroScan, but superior to that of the APRI and FIB-4.     

Simplified follow-up of patients with mild chronic hepatitis C in areas with limited access to antiviral therapy

Background and aimsIn some areas of the world, antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is not available for all patients. The optimal interval for liver stiffness measures (LSM) and noninvasive scores to assess fibrosis progression has not been studied. We evaluated the usefulness of consecutive LSM, APRI, FIB-4 and Forns scores to predict disease progression.MethodsPatients with CHC and at least two annual LSM within 3 years were followed for a minimum of 5 years. Noninvasive scores were assessed. Evolution of LSM and scores were expressed as change/year (Delta).Results623 non-cirrhotic patients were included. Median baseline LSM was 6.6 kPa (IQR 5.4–8.4). During a median follow-up of 6 years, 61(9.7%) patients developed cirrhosis. Baseline LSM ≥ F2 and Forns ≥ 6.9 were the main predictors of cirrhosis (C-index 0.97). The addition of Delta variables did not improve its prediction. In patients with mild fibrosis (F0-1), progression to ≥F2 occurred in 80 (23%) within the first 3 years. Baseline BMI ≥ 24 kg/m² and LSM ≥ 5.9 kPa were associated to progression.ConclusionsBaseline LSM and Forns are highly predictive of cirrhosis development. In patients with mild CHC, BMI < 24 and LSM < 5.9, the likelihood of progression is very low, allowing for a significant spacing of noninvasive assessments over time.     

血清HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者APRI、FIB-4和血清TGF-β1水平变化*

目的 调查血清HBeAg阴性的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值(APRI)、基于4因子指数(FIB-4)和血清转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)的变化。方法 2018年1月～2019年5月我院诊治的血清HBeAg阴性的CHB患者78例和同期健康人78例,采用ELISA法测定血清TGF-β1水平,常规检测血生化指标,计算APRI和FIB-4评分。CHB患者接受肝活检,并行肝纤维化分期。结果 CHB患者APRI评分为(0.9±0.4),显著高于健康人【(0.3±0.1),P<0.05】;FIB-4评分为(1.4±0.4),显著高于健康人【(0.5±0.2),P<0.05】,血清TGF-β1水平为(14.5±5.3)ng/ml,显著高于健康人【(7.4±3.5)ng/ml,P<0.05】;33例CHB患者肝组织F0～1者APRI评分为(0.5±0.2),显著低于24例肝组织F2者【(1.0±0.3),P<0.05】,显著低于12例肝组织F3者【(1.3±0.5),P<0.05】,也显著低于9例肝组织F4者【(1.8±1.6),P<0.05】;F0～1患者FIB-4评分为(0.9±0.3),显著低于F2患者【(1.5±0.4),P<0.05】,显著低于F3患者【(1.9±0.4),P<0.05】,也显著低于F4患者【(3.2±0.6),P<0.05】;F0～1患者血清TGF-β1水平为(9.7±3.6)ng/ml,显著低于F2患者【(10.5±4.4)ng/ml,P<0.05】,显著低于F3患者【(15.8±5.9)ng/ml,P<0.05】,也显著低于F4患者【(19.5±6.2)ng/ml,P<0.05】。结论 血清HBeAg阴性的CHB患者APRI、FIB-4和血清TGF-β1水平发生了显著的变化,随着肝纤维化程度的加重,这些指标变化更明显,可能有助于提高对肝纤维化的诊断。     

FibroScan分别与GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4联合应用对慢性乙型肝炎合并非酒精性脂肪性肝病进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值比较

目的评价FibroScan、GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4单独应用及FibroScan分别与GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4联合应用对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)合并非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值。方法选取2014年11月-2018年8月在四川省人民医院行肝穿刺病理检查并确诊为CHB合并NAFLD的患者92例。根据肝穿刺病理SAF分级诊断标准,分为轻中度肝纤维化(F1+F2)组(n=69)和进展期肝纤维化(F3)组(n=23)。同时应用FibroScan测得肝脏硬度值,根据临床指标分别计算GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4。计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;相关性分析采用Spearman秩相关;多因素二元logistic回归构建联合预测因子(向前逐步回归法),绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC),并采用Delong方法进行比较,评价各种无创诊断方法单独及联合应用对CHB合并NAFLD进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值。结果轻中度肝纤维化组的FibroScan、GPR、APRI、NFS及FIB-4水平明显低于进展期肝纤维化组(Z值分别为-4.910、-3.425、-3.837、-3.873、-3.990,P值均<0.05)。相关性分析结果显示,FibroScan、GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4与肝纤维化病理分期均呈正相关(r值分别为0.518、0.361、0.405、0.407、0.418,P值均<0.001)。FibroScan、GPR、APRI、NFS及FIB-4单独应用对诊断进展期肝纤维化均有一定价值(AUC分别为0.844、0.740、0.770、0.771、0.779,P值均<0.001),但FibroScan诊断价值并不优于GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4(P值均>0.05)。将FibroScan分别与GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4联合,诊断进展期肝纤维化的AUC均较单独应用时明显提高(Z值分别为1.977、2.076、2.361、2.206,P值均<0.05);将FibroScan与GPR+APRI+NFS+FIB-4同时联合诊断进展期肝纤维化的AUC及95%可信区间为0.896(0.813~0.950)。结论FibroScan、GPR、APRI、NFS及FIB-4诊断进展期肝纤维化均有一定的临床价值,FibroScan分别与GPR、APRI、NFS、FIB-4联合诊断进展期肝纤维化的效能优于单项血清学模型,其中FibroScan联合NFS或FIB-4的临床价值可能最佳。     

Overestimate of Fibrosis by FIBROSpect? II in African Americans Complicates the Management of their Chronic Hepatitis C

Background: Evaluation of advanced fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is used to facilitate decisions on treatment strategy and to initiate additional screening measures. Unfortunately, most studies have predominately Caucasian (Cau) patients and may not be as relevant for African Americans (AA). Aims: This study specifically addresses the issue of defining minimal vs. significant fibrosis in African Americans (AA) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) using noninvasive assays. Methods: All patients (n = 319) seen between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2013 for whom a FibroSpect II® (FSII) assay was performed and had data for calculation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were identified using the medical records. Results: When liver biopsy score and FSII assay results for the AA patients with CHC were compared, 31% of AA had advanced FSII fibrosis scores (F2-F4) despite a biopsy score of F0-F1. In contrast, 10% of Cau over-scored. The AA false positive rate was 14% for APRI and 34% for FIB-4. Combining FSII with either APRI (7% false positive) or FIB-4 (10% false positive) improved the false positive rate in AA to 7% (FSII + APRI) and 10% (FSII + FIB-4) but reduced the sensitivity for significant fibrosis. Conclusions: The FSII assay overestimates fibrosis in AA and should be used with caution since these patients may not have significant fibrosis. If the APRI or FIB-4 assay is combined with the FSII assay, minimal fibrosis in AA can be defined without subjecting the patients to a subsequent biopsy.     

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis C: Shear wave elastography and APRI versus liver biopsy

Background and study aimsHepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic hepatitis. Although liver histopathological examination remains the reference standard for liver fibrosis assessment, noninvasive means of assessment such as shear wave elastography (SWE) and aspartate aminotransferase–platelet ratio index (APRI) have been developed to reduce the need for biopsy. We evaluated the efficacy of SWE and APRI versus liver biopsy for liver fibrosis assessment in children with chronic HCV infection.Patients and methodsFibrosis staging was performed in 46 children (35 boys, 11 girls; mean age: 15.52 ± 2.71 years) with liver biopsy-proven chronic HCV infection according to the METAVIR system. SWE was performed within 6 months of liver biopsy. APRI scores were calculated using data collected on the day of biopsy.ResultsEighteen children had no or mild fibrosis (<F2, 39.1%) and 28 had significant fibrosis (≥F2, 60.9%), with a significant difference between the corresponding mean APRI scores (0.43 ± 0.23 vs 1.26 ± 1.24; p = 0.043). The APRI scores exhibited a significant correlation with the METAVIR stage (r = 0.630; p < 0.001). The SWE values were significantly higher in those with significant fibrosis than in those with no or mild fibrosis (10.43 vs 4.26 kPa; p < 0.000). These values exhibited significant correlations with the METAVIR stage and APRI score (r = 0.863 and 0.544, respectively; both p < 0.001). For differentiating significant fibrosis, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for an APRI cutoff value of 0.62 were 46.43%, 94.4%, 92.9% and 53.1%, respectively, and these values for an SWE cutoff value of 7.6 kPa were 55.88%, 100%, 100% and 44.4%, respectively.ConclusionIn the clinical assessment of children, the APRI score and SWE can help differentiate between no or mild fibrosis and significant fibrosis. The routine use of SWE and APRI may help decrease the number of liver biopsies performed.     

PRO-C3: a new and more precise collagen marker for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Objective: Detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis remains important in treatment and follow-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C Infection (CHC). The aim of this study was to assess the ability of PRO-C3 to identify significant fibrosis (Ishak score?≥3) and cirrhosis (Ishak score?≥5) both as a single test and as a part of algorithms.

Materials and methods: PRO-C3 was assessed in baseline samples from the NORDynamIC trial. 270 patients were stratified into groups according to baseline biopsy. Baseline APRI, FIB-4 and GUCI scores were available for comparison in 232 patients.

Results: PRO-C3 increased with Ishak scores (p?=?.001). Area under the curve (AUC) for significant fibrosis was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68–0.81) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.68–0.84) for cirrhosis. FIB-4, APRI and GUCI had similar AUCs. In a PRO-C3 algorithm including age, platelet count, body mass index (BMI) and international normalised ratio (INR), the diagnostic efficacy improved to 0.85 (CI 0.80–0.89) and 0.90 (IQR 0.84–0.96) for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively.

Conclusions: In our study, PRO-C3 was an independent predictor of fibrosis stage, and may play an important role in managing CHC patients.     

A comparative study of non-invasive methods for fibrosis assessment in chronic HCV infection

Background and Aims

To compare several non-invasive methods of fibrosis assessment in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (platelet count, the APRI score, the Forns score, the Lok score, FIB-4, Transient Elastography [TE]), versus percutaneous liver biopsy (LB).

Methods

Our study included 150 patients with chronic HCV infection in which LB, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by means of TE and biological tests needed for calculating the scores (according to the classic formulas) were performed in the same session.

Results

The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F = 2 Metavir) was LSM with AUROC-0.773, followed by APRI (AUROC-0.763), Forns (AUROC-0.744), platelet count (AUROC-0.732), Lok (AUROC-0.701) and FIB-4 (AUROC-0.669), but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For excluding cirrhosis, all the tests had excellent NPV (>97%). The best test for predicting cirrhosis was LSM (AUROC-0.979), significantly better than platelet count (AUROC- 0.899, P = 0.022) and than FIB-4 (AUROC-0.839, P = 0.042), otherwise the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). All of the non-invasive tests were statistically significantly correlated (P < 0.0001) to the severity of fibrosis: APRI r=0.570; Forns r=0.540; Lok r=0.4843; FIB-4 r=0.4171; platelet count r=-0.4842.

Conclusions

LSM by means of TE seems to be more sensitive than APRI, Forns, Lok and FIB-4 scores and than platelet count for the prediction of significant fibrosis, but the differences are not statistically significant. The APRI score and Forns scores correctly identified most (71%) of the patients having, or not having, significant fibrosis. LSM was the best method for predicting cirrhosis, but all the evaluated tests had excellent predictive value (AUROCs 0.839-0.979).     

The preoperative fibrosis score 4 predicts posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction and ObjectivesThe fibrosis score 4 (FIB-4) has been identified as a biochemical surrogate for histological fibrogenesis and fibrosis in cirrhosis. This study investigates the impact of preoperative FIB-4 on postoperative liver failure of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and methodsData from 205 patients who underwent curative resection for HCC were retrospectively analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of the FIB-4. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative liver failure. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients with high FIB-4 and low FIB-4.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value of the FIB-4 was set at 5.92 for postoperative liver failure according to ROC curve. By univariate and multivariate analysis, the number of resected segments, FIB-4, and model for end-stage liver disease score were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative liver failure. Patients with preoperative FIB-4 > 5.92 had poorer liver function and higher occurrence of postoperative liver failure.ConclusionsPreoperative FIB-4 was associated with postoperative liver failure. Patients with preoperative FIB-4 > 5.92 carry a high risk of postoperative liver failure.