Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block

Blockade of conduction in the saphenous nerve is important in providing surgical anaesthesia in the lower leg. Unfortunately, previously described techniques have lacked clinical effectiveness in practice. We developed a transsartorial approach for conduction block of the saphenous nerve. We first confirmed its potential clinical utility in 12 cadaveric specimens by demonstrating that the saphenous nerve was consistently stained by injections of methylene blue. Subsequently, we compared the relative rates of successful saphenous nerve block and the extent of conduction block provided by three techniques: (1) transsartorial saphenous nerve block (TSSNB), (2) above knee femoral paracondylar field block (FPFB), and (3) below knee field block (BKFB) of the saphenous nerve in 20 ASA I volunteers. The transsartorial saphenous nerve block proved to be highly successful (80% success rate) and was superior to the other two approaches in providing cutaneous analgesia to pinprick in the saphenous nerve distribution (P < 0.05). The success rates of the BKFB and FPFB were 65% and 40% respectively. A successful block with the transsartorial approach provided complete anaesthesia of the medial malleolus in 94% of subjects whilst the BKFB and FPFB provided complete anaesthesia of the medial malleolus in less than 40% of the successful blocks. We recommend the transsartorial approach for more effective block of the saphenous nerve.     

Comparison of 4 techniques for internal saphenous nerve block

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 4 techniques for internal saphenous nerve block with 10 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine. METHODS: Eighty ASA I-II patients scheduled for foot (hallux valgus) surgery with combined sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks were randomized to receive the saphenous nerve block by one of the following techniques: a paravenous approach (n = 20), a transsartorial approach (n = 20), a femoral nerve approach in the inguinal region using a nerve stimulator (n = 20), and by subcutaneous infiltration between the tibial tuberosity and the internal gastrocnemius muscle (n = 20). A pressure cuff was placed 10 cm below the knee of all patients. Success was assessed by pin prick inside the ankle 30 minutes after initiation of the block. Tolerance of the pressure cuff and discomfort during performance of the technique were also assessed. RESULTS: The 4 groups were similar as to distribution of males and females and mean weight, age, and height. Blocking the saphenous nerve by way of the femoral nerve in the inguinal region was the most effective approach (success in 95% of patients), significantly better than the other 3 techniques (P < 0.05). The paravenous approach was successful in 60% of cases, the transsartorial approach in 50%, and the subcutaneous infiltration technique in 45%. The pressure cuff was well tolerated by all patients (100%) in whom the femoral nerve approach was used. The cuff was tolerated by 70% in the paravenous approach group, by 65% in the transsartorial approach group, and by 60% in the subcutaneous infiltration group. Patients reported more discomfort during initiation of the blockade in the paravenous approach and subcutaneous infiltration groups than in the femoral nerve or transsartorial approach groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The femoral nerve approach in the inguinal region, with nerve stimulator, to block the internal saphenous nerve led to a larger number of successful blocks than did the paravenous or transsartorial approaches, or the technique of subcutaneous infiltration between the tibial tuberosity and internal gastrocnemius muscle.     

Efficacy of an ultrasound-guided subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve block: a case series

Purpose

The saphenous nerve, a branch of the femoral nerve, is a pure sensory nerve that supplies the anteromedial aspect of the lower leg from the knee to the foot. There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided techniques to block the saphenous nerve. We therefore undertook a retrospective case series to investigate the efficacy of an ultrasound-guided subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve block.

Methods

During a four-month period, all patients receiving a subsartorial saphenous nerve block for lower extremity surgery at our institution had their medical records reviewed. Patient demographics and data were recorded, including block characteristics, intraoperative anesthetic management, pre-block, post-block, and postoperative pain scores, as well as postoperative analgesic dosing. Preoperative block success was defined by minimal intraoperative analgesic administration and a pain score of 0 in the postanesthesia care unit not requiring analgesic supplementation. Postoperative block success was defined by reduction of pain score to 0 without need for additional analgesic dosing.

Results

Thirty-nine consecutive patients were identified as receiving an ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous nerve block. Overall, this ultrasound-guided technique was found to have a 77% success rate.

Conclusion

This case series shows that an ultrasound-guided subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve blockade is a moderately effective means to anesthetize the anteromedial lower extremity. The success rate is based on stringent criteria with an endpoint of postoperative analgesia. A randomized prospective study would provide a more definitive answer regarding the efficacy of this technique for surgical anesthesia.     

La neurostimulation n’augmente pas le taux de succès du bloc du nerf saphène

PURPOSE: To evaluate neurostimulation of motor components of the vastus medialis muscle and the rectus femoris muscle, with a view to blocking the medial sensory fibres of the saphenous nerve. METHOD: First we dissected four femoral trigones, in order to select our puncture point. We were able to observe that, at the flexion crease of the thigh, the different fibers that make up the femoral nerve were clustered together and the saphenous nerve and the vastus medialis nerve had not yet separated from the femoral stem. Secondly, we conducted a prospective clinical study among 71 patients who had undergone surgery on the lower third of the leg with a sciatic block and a saphenous nerve block. The saphenous nerve block was performed using 10 mL of local anesthetic, by puncturing the flexion crease of the thigh in a bid to obtain one of two muscle responses: medial (contraction of the vastus medialis muscle) or anterior (contraction of the rectus femoris muscle and elevation of the patella). RESULTS: There was an overall success rate of 80% with the saphenous nerve block, with no statistical difference existing between the two response types. Average duration for the block to be completed was two minutes and it took an average of 15 min before the anesthesia took effect. No complications were encountered, apart from a puncture of the femoral artery, which was clinically inconsequential. CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation of the vastus medialis muscle has the same effect as neurostimulation of the rectus femoris muscle with respect to anesthesia of the saphenous nerve. Neurostimulation of the medial compartment of the femoral nerve saves local anesthetic, compared to a standard femoral block.     

An evaluation of the cutaneous distribution after obturator nerve block.

In 1973, Winnie et al. introduced the inguinal paravascular three-in-one block, which allegedly provides anesthesia of three nerves--the femoral, lateral cutaneous femoral, and obturator nerves--with a single injection. This concept was undisputed until the success of the obturator nerve block was reassessed by using evidence of adductor weakness rather than cutaneous sensory blockade, the latter being variable in its distribution and often absent. We performed this study, therefore, to evaluate the area of sensory loss produced by direct injection of local anesthetic around the obturator nerve. A selective obturator nerve block with 7 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was performed in 30 patients scheduled for knee surgery. Sensory deficit and adductor strength were evaluated for 30 min by using sensory tests (cold and light-touch perception) and the pressure generated by the patient's squeezing a blood pressure cuff placed between the knees. Subsequently, a three-in-one block was performed, and the sensory deficit was reassessed. The obturator nerve block was successful in 100% of cases. The strength of adductors decreased by 77% +/- 17% (mean +/- SD). In 17 patients (57%), there was no cutaneous contribution of the obturator nerve. The remaining 7 patients (23%) had an area of hypoesthesia (cold sensation was blunt but still present) on the superior part of the popliteal fossa, and the other 6 (20%) had sensory deficit located at the medial aspect of the thigh. The three-in-one block resulted in blockade of the lateral aspect of the thigh in 87% of cases, whereas the anteromedial aspect was always anesthetized. By use of magnetic resonance imaging in eight volunteers, we demonstrated that the obturator nerve has already divided into its two branches at the site of local anesthetic injection. However, the injection of blue dye after having simulated the technique in five cadavers showed that the fluid regularly spread to both branches. We conclude that after three-in-one block, a femoral nerve block may have been assessed as an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when testing the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve on the medial aspect of the thigh. IMPLICATIONS: Previous studies reporting an incidence of obturator nerve block after three-in-one block may have mistaken a femoral nerve block for an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve was assessed on the medial aspect of the thigh. The only way to effectively evaluate obturator nerve function is to assess adductor strength.     

Ultrasound-guided medial mid-thigh approach to sciatic nerve block with a patient in a supine position

We report the use of a ‘medial mid-thigh approach (medial approach),’ a new approach for performing ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve blockade (SNB) with patients in a supine position. Fifty-four patients undergoing knee surgery under general anesthesia and a combined femoral nerve block (FNB) and SNB were included in the study. After FNB, an ultrasound-guided medial approach was used to perform the SNB. The patient was placed in a supine position, and the hip and knee joints were flexed with the leg rotating externally. A linear ultrasound transducer was positioned perpendicular to the skin at the level of the upper mid-thigh. The sciatic nerve was identified in all patients using ultrasound imaging, and the distance to the nerve was 3.0–5.5 cm. A combined ultrasound- and nerve stimulator-guided SNB was then performed, and 0.375% ropivacaine was administered. The block was successful in all patients, and the mean duration of the sensory and motor blockade was 11.9 and 8.2 h, respectively. In this study, the medial approach was highly successful and easy to perform. As performing a simultaneous FNB and SNB with patients in a supine position has several potential advantages, future studies should compare this approach with other more proximal approaches for performing SNB.     

The effects of three different approaches on the onset time of sciatic nerve blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine

We studied three different injection techniques of sciatic nerve block in terms of block onset time and efficacy with 0.75% ropivacaine. A total of 75 patients undergoing foot surgery were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve blockade by means of the classic posterior approach (group classic; n = 25), a modified subgluteus posterior approach (group subgluteus; n = 25), or a lateral popliteal approach (group popliteal; n = 25). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency, 2 Hz; intensity, 2-0.5 mA) and 30 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. Onset of nerve block was defined as complete loss of pinprick sensation in the sciatic nerve distribution with concomitant inability to perform plantar or dorsal flexion of the foot. In the three groups, an appropriate sciatic stimulation was elicited at <0.5 mA. The failure rate was similar in the three groups (group popliteal: 4% versus group classic: 4% versus group subgluteus: 8%). The onset of nerve block was slower in group popliteal (25 +/- 5 min) compared with group classic (16 +/- 4 min) and group subgluteus (17 +/- 4 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the onset of nerve block between group classic and group subgluteus. No differences in the degree of pain measured at the first postoperative administration of pain medication were observed among the three groups. We conclude that the three approaches resulted in clinically acceptable anesthesia in the distribution of the sciatic nerve. The subgluteus and classic posterior approaches generated a significantly faster onset of anesthesia than the lateral popliteal approach. IMPLICATIONS: Comparing three different approaches to the sciatic nerve with 0.75% ropivacaine, the classic and subgluteal approaches exhibited a faster onset time of sensory and motor blockade than the lateral popliteal approach.     

The pharmacodynamics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks for total knee arthroplasty

The potency of ropivacaine compared with bupivacaine in regional anesthesia remains controversial. Therefore, we compared the pharmacodynamics of equal concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Fifty patients received 40 mL of either 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) divided between the sciatic (15 mL) and the femoral (25 mL) nerves before induction of anesthesia. Loss and recovery of sensory (% of cold sensation compared to opposite side) and motor (no contraction or normal muscle force) functions were recorded in the distribution of the femoral, saphenous, common peroneal, and tibial nerves. Pain scores and morphine consumption over 48 h were also evaluated. There were no difference between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in terms of onset of sensory and motor blockade. However, resolution of sensory and motor function was faster in the ropivacaine group but only significantly so for the sciatic nerve and between 24 to 28 h for sensory resolution and 12 to 20 h for motor function. Overall, pain scores and morphine consumption were similar. In conclusion, we showed that block resolution is different between bupivacaine and ropivacaine when administered for combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks. A new systematic method to assess sciatic and femoral nerve blockade is proposed.     

Cutaneous Branch of the Obturator Nerve Extending to the Medial Ankle and Foot: A Report of Two Cadaveric Cases

The area of skin supplied by the cutaneous branch of the obturator nerve (CBO) is highly variable. Although most introductory anatomy texts describe the CBO as innervating only a portion of the medial thigh, there are numerous reports in the literature of CBOs passing the knee to innervate the proximal, middle, or even distal leg. There are no previous reports of CBOs extending to the ankle and foot. Herein we describe 2 cases of CBOs extending at least to the medial foot. Both cases were discovered incidentally, during routine cadaver dissections by osteopathic and podiatric medical students in the anatomy laboratory of Western University of Health Sciences in California. In both instances, the anomalously long CBOs shared several characteristics: (1) they arose as direct branches of the anterior division of the obturator nerve, not from the subsartorial plexus; (2) they coursed immediately posterior to the great saphenous vein from the distal thigh to the distal leg, only deviating away from the saphenous vein just above the medial malleolus; and (3) they terminated in radiating fibers to the posterior half of the medial ankle and foot. In both cases, the saphenous branch of the femoral nerve was present but restricted to the area anterior to the great saphenous vein. It is likely that the variant CBOs carried fibers of the L4 spinal nerve and thus provided cutaneous innervation to the medial foot and ankle, a function most commonly reserved for the saphenous branch of the femoral nerve distal to the knee. Saphenous neuropathy is a common postoperative complication of saphenous cutdowns for coronary artery bypass grafts, so the potential involvement of a long CBO can add additional complexity to regional anesthetic blocks for foot and ankle surgery and procedures such as vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafts.     

A review of approaches and techniques for lower extremity nerve blocks

PURPOSE: The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding approaches and techniques for lower extremity nerve blocks. SOURCE: Using the MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2007) and EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2007) databases, medical subject heading (MeSH) terms "lumbosacral plexus", "femoral nerve", "obturator nerve", "saphenous nerve", "sciatic nerve", "peroneal nerve" and "tibial nerve" were searched and combined with the MESH term "nerve block" using the operator "and". Keywords "lumbar plexus", "psoas compartment", "psoas sheath", "sacral plexus", "fascia iliaca", "three-in-one", "3-in-1", "lateral femoral cutaneous", "posterior femoral cutaneous", "ankle" and "ankle block" were also queried and combined with the MESH term "nerve block". The search was limited to RCTs involving human subjects and published in the English language. Forty-six RCTs were identified. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared to its anterior counterpart (3-in-1 block), the posterior approach to the lumbar plexus is more reliable when anesthesia of the obturator nerve is required. The fascia iliaca compartment block may also represent a better alternative than the 3-in-1 block because of improved efficacy and efficiency (quicker performance time, lower cost). For blockade of the sciatic nerve, the classic transgluteal approach constitutes a reliable method. Due to a potentially shorter time for sciatic nerve electrolocation and catheter placement than for the transgluteal approach, the subgluteal approach should also be considered. Compared to electrolocation of the peroneal nerve, electrostimulation of the tibial nerve may offer a higher success rate especially with the transgluteal and lateral popliteal approaches. Furthermore, when performing sciatic and femoral blocks with low volumes of local anesthetics, a multiple-injection technique should be used. CONCLUSIONS: Published reports of RCTs provide evidence to formulate limited recommendations regarding optimal approaches and techniques for lower limb anesthesia. Further well-designed and meticulously executed RCTs are warranted, particularly in light of new techniques involving ultrasonographic guidance.     

Combination Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks and Their Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining postoperative outcomes following single site and combined peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including (1) sciatic and femoral nerve, (2) popliteal and saphenous nerve, and (3) popliteal and ankle nerve, during elective foot and ankle surgery. We hypothesized that combination blocks would decrease postoperative narcotic consumption and afford more effective postoperative pain control as compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or single site PNBs. A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2009 to October 2019. We identified studies by using synonyms for “foot,” “ankle” “pain management,” “opioid,” and “nerve block.” Included articles explicitly focused on elective foot and ankle procedures performed under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, PNB, or with some combination of these techniques. PNB techniques included femoral, adductor canal, sciatic, popliteal, saphenous, and ankle blocks, as well as blocks that combined multiple anatomic sites. Outcomes measured included postoperative narcotic consumption as well as patient-reported efficacy of pain control. Twenty-eight studies encompassing 6703 patients were included. Of the included studies, 57% were randomized controlled trials, 18% were prospective comparison studies, and 25% were retrospective comparison studies. Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels were reduced over the first 24 to 48 hours with the use of combined PNBs when compared with single site PNBs, both when used as primary anesthesia or when used in concert with general anesthesia either alone or combined with systemic/local anesthesia in the first 24 to 48 hours following surgery. Studies demonstrated higher reported patient satisfaction of postoperative pain control in patients who received combined PNB. Nine of 14 (64%) studies reported no neurologic related complications with an overall reported rate among all studies ranging from 0% to 41%. Our study identified substantial improvement in postoperative pain levels, postoperative opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction in patients receiving PNB when compared with patients who did not receive PNB. Published data also demonstrated that combination PNB are more effective than single-site PNB for all data points. Notably, the addition of a femoral nerve block to a popliteal nerve block during use of a thigh tourniquet, as well as addition of either saphenous or ankle blockade to popliteal nerve block during use of calf tourniquet, may increase overall block effectiveness. Serious complications including neurologic damage following PNB administration are rare but do exist.     

The nerves of the leg and foot

The leg below the knee receives all its motor, and much of its sensory innervation from the two terminal branches of the sciatic nerve: the tibial and common peroneal nerves. The tibial nerve supplies the muscles of the posterior (flexor) compartment of the leg and the intrinsic muscles of the plantar foot, as well as the skin of the back of the leg (sural nerve) and the plantar skin. The common peroneal nerve is the only palpable nerve in the lower limb as it winds around the neck of the fibula (where it may be injured). It divides into the superfical peroneal nerve, which supplies the two peroneal foot evertor muscles, and the deep peroneal, supplying the extensor group, as well as sensory supply to the front of the leg and dorsum of the foot, which is reinforced by two sensory branches of the common peroneal – the sural communicating and the lateral cutaneous nerve of the calf. The only nerve below the knee not derived from the sciatic is the saphenous nerve. This nerve arises from the femoral nerve below the groin and supplies skin on the medial side of the knee, leg and foot. It runs with the long saphenous vein in the lower part of its course and can be damaged during operations on the vein.     

Skin temperature during regional anesthesia of the lower extremity

Increase in skin temperature (Ts) occurs early during neuraxial blocks. However, the reliability of Ts to predict successful peripheral block is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether an increase in Ts more than 1 degrees C precedes or follows an impairment of sensation after combined femoral and sciatic nerve block as well as after epidural anesthesia. In this prospective, nonrandomized study we determined Ts changes in 33 patients undergoing knee or foot surgery under femoral and sciatic nerve block and 10 patients undergoing epidural anesthesia. Perception and motor function were assessed every 5 min. An increase in Ts (> or =1 degrees C) at the foot occurred later after sciatic nerve block than after epidural anesthesia (10.3 +/- 2.8 versus 5.0 min; P < 0.01). Alterations of Ts at skin innervated by the femoral nerve were <1 degrees C. Ts increase preceded sensory block after sciatic nerve block in 6.6% of patients but indicated a successful block (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy = 100%). We conclude that an increase of Ts is a reliable, but late, sign of successful sciatic nerve block. Therefore it is of limited clinical value. Ts changes after femoral nerve block are negligible and late.     

Sciatic nerve block

In combination with a lumbar plexus, femoral, or saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve blocks provide complete anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for lower-extremity surgery. Contrary to common belief, sciatic nerve blocks are relatively simple to perform and master. However, the deep location of the sciatic nerve mandates proper training and thorough knowledge of anatomy. Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in sciatic nerve block techniques and several new and more reliable techniques have been described. This article provides an overview of the relevant anatomy, development in the field, and describes several common approaches to the sciatic nerve. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.     

Correlation between Evoked Motor Response of the Sciatic Nerve and Sensory Blockade

Background: Incomplete sensory blockade of the foot after sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa may be related to the motor response that was elicited when the block was performed. We investigated the appropriate motor response when a nerve stimulator is used in sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa.

Methods: Six volunteers classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I underwent 24 sciatic nerve blocks. Each volunteer had four sciatic nerve blocks. During each block, the needle was placed to evoke one of the following motor responses of the foot: eversion, inversion, plantar flexion, or dorsiflexion. Forty milliliters 1.5% lidocaine was injected after the motor response was elicited at < 1 mA intensity. Sensory blockade of the areas of the foot innervated by the posterior tibial, deep peroneal, superficial peroneal, and sural nerves was checked in a blinded manner. Motor blockade was graded on a three-point scale. The width of the sciatic nerve and the orientation of the tibial and common peroneal nerves were also examined in 10 cadavers.

Results: A significantly greater number of posterior tibial, deep peroneal, superficial peroneal, and sural nerves were blocked when inversion or dorsiflexion was seen before injection than after eversion or plantar flexion (P < 0.05). Motor blockade of the foot was significantly greater after inversion. Anatomically, the tibial and common peroneal nerves may be separate from each other throughout their course. The sciatic nerve ranged from 0.9-1.5 cm in width and was divided into the tibial and common peroneal nerves at 8 +/- 3 (range, 4-13) cm above the popliteal crease.     

Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know

Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.     

Comparison of tumescent versus ultrasound guided femoral and obturator nerve blocks for treatment of varicose veins by endovenous laser ablation

BackgroundEndovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is a new method for treating greater saphenous vein insufficiency. Most of physicians use local anesthesia for needle punctures and tumescent anesthesia (TA) to prevent pain and protects the surrounding tissues from the conduction of heat that would originate from the effects of laser energy on the venous wall. The aim of this study is to compare the use of local tumescent anesthesia alone or combined with ultrasound guided femoral and obturator nerve blocks for treatment of varicose veins by endovenous laser ablation.MethodologyThis is a randomized, double blind study included 80 patients scheduled for endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins of the great saphenous vein (GSV) located in the anterior or medial aspect of the leg were prospectively divided into two groups of 40 patients each. Group (A) had EVLA using tumescent anesthesia given by the surgeon. Group (B) had femoral and obturator nerves block before tumescent anesthesia was done. Intraoperative pain associated with applying the tumescent anesthesia and during performing ablation was measured using visual analogue scale. Volume of tumescent was compared in both groups. After finishing the operation, femoral and obturator motor block were evaluated. Postoperative VAS, time of stay in recovery area, patient and doctor satisfaction were also measured.ResultsPain on application of tumescent anesthesia and during surgery revealed that group (A) had more intense pain than group (B). Volume of tumescent used during surgery; group (B) used statistically significant less tumescent solution than group (A). Motor block was measured after finishing the operation, 100% of group (A) had no restriction to active movements while 2.5%, 80% and 7.5% had no restriction, mild restriction and moderate restriction to active movements, respectively in group (B). Group (A) had more pain than group (B) postoperatively. Duration of post procedure stay in recovery area showed no statistically significant difference between the two studied groups. Patients and doctors satisfaction was significantly higher in group (B) in comparison to group (A).ConclusionUltrasound guided femoral and obturator nerve blocks combined with tumescent anesthesia are effective methods of anesthesia during endovenous laser ablation than using tumescent anesthesia alone.     

Sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: description of a new medial approach

PURPOSE: Sciatic nerve blocks through lateral approaches in the popliteal fossa have been proposed. We describe a new medial approach to the sciatic nerve at this level. METHODS: After an anatomical study on six cadavers, we performed sciatic nerve blocks on 20 patients. A 100-mm insulated needle and a nerve stimulator were used; 20 mL of lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine were injected. RESULTS: Patients lied in the supine position, the thigh flexed, abducted and rotated externally (30 degrees in all directions). The leg was flexed at 130 degrees . In this position, above the adductor tubercle, a depression known as Jobert's fossa is palpated. Through this groove, a medial approach to the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa is possible. The mean distance between the adductor tubercle and the puncture site is 6.18 cm (range 4-8 cm) and the mean distance between the skin and the sciatic nerve is 6.62 cm (range 4-9 cm). Mean time to perform the block was 100 sec (range 55-165 sec). Complete motor blockade was obtained after a mean time of 30 min (range 5-60 min) inside the common peroneal nerve area and 43 min (range 15-75 min) inside the tibial nerve area. Motor block was complete in 17 patients and sensory block in 18 patients. No vessel puncture was observed. CONCLUSION: We describe a new medial approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. More studies will be required to demonstrate the technique is effective and safe.     

改良髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在单侧大隐静脉曲张手术中的应用

目的观察改良髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在单侧大隐静脉曲张手术中的麻醉效果。方法选择择期行单侧大隐静脉高位结扎加抽剥术患者60例,男32例,女28例,年龄42~76岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法将其分为改良髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝坐骨神经阻滞组(N组)和硬膜外阻滞组(E组),每组30例。N组先行腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,再在超声图像上确认髂筋膜和股神经位置,先行股神经阻滞,再在同一穿刺点从缝匠肌内侧缘开始,由外向内沿髂筋膜下给1%利多卡因10ml和0.5%罗哌卡因10ml,同时超声探头在腹股沟韧带水平向内移动,内侧达股动脉上方;E组采用L2~3间隙行硬膜外阻滞。记录两组阻滞前(T0)、阻滞后10min(T1)、30min(T2)、60min(T3)的SBP、DBP及HR;记录两组阻滞完成时间、感觉阻滞起效时间、术中麻黄碱使用情况、麻醉效果及术后48h恶心呕吐、头痛及尿潴留发生情况。结果与T0时比较,T2时E组的SBP和DBP明显降低(P0.05),T2时N组SBP和DBP明显高于E组(P0.05);N组感觉阻滞起效时间明显短于E组、术中麻黄碱使用率明显低于E组(P0.05);E组整体麻醉效果优于N组(P0.05),但两组麻醉效果优良率差异无统计学意义;术后48hN组尿潴留发生率明显低于E组(P0.05)。结论改良髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝坐骨神经阻滞用于单侧大隐静脉高位结扎加抽剥术中,麻醉效果良好,较硬膜外阻滞具有血流动力学影响小、术后并发症少及适应证更广等优点。