Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The Experience of the European Institute of Oncology in Special Clinical Scenarios

BACKGROUND: While axillary nodal status is still one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has evolved as a main procedure to strongly reduce postsurgical morbidity improving early and long-term quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, we performed 18,884 SLNBs for breast cancer, successfully confirming the validity of this technique and its positive impact on patients' quality of life, even though decision-making processes for adjuvant treatment strongly depend on biological features. RESULTS: This paper summarizes published data mainly collected in our institute considering special clinical scenarios such as ductal intraepithelial neoplasia, intramammary sentinel nodes, multicentric breast cancer, prior breast surgery, previous breast aesthetic surgery, second axillary SLNB, pregnant patients, primary chemotherapy, and male patients. CONCLUSIONS: In general, we believe that SLNB represents the standard procedure for axillary staging in virtually all clinical situations, even in those which were previously considered a contraindication for this procedure. At the moment, the only contraindication to SLNB is the presence of documented axillary metastases.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?

Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the axillary staging accuracy comparing three different methods: axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy with the traditional 4-6 sections and sentinel node biopsy with complete analysis of the lymph node. 527 consecutive patients (525 females and 2 males) with invasive breast cancer < or = 3 cm and clinically negative axillary nodes were divided into 3 different groups: group A treated with axillary dissection, group B treated with sentinel nodal biopsy analysed with 4-6 sections, and group C treated with sentinel node biopsy with analysis of the entire node. All patients underwent a quadrantectomy to treat the tumor. Group differences and statistical significance were assessed by ANOVA. The percentages of N+ in group A and group B were 25.80% and 28% respectively, while in the third group it rose to 45%, or almost half the patients. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (p = 0.02). From our analysis of the data it emerges that axillary dissection and sentinel node biopsy with analysis of 4-6 sections have the same accuracy in staging the nodal status of the axilla; analysis of the entire sentinel lymph node revealed an increased number of patients with axillary nodal involvement, proving more powerful in predicting nodal stage. SLNB with complete examination of the SLN removed can be considered the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients with clinical negative nodes. In our study, the percentage of metastases encountered after complete examination of SLN was 45% compared to the accuracy of axillary dissection that was only 25.8%. Moreover, this approach avoids the useless axillary cleaning in about 55-60% of cases, decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.     

超声定位下可疑淋巴结取样在早期乳腺癌手术中的临床研究

目的 探讨早期乳腺癌更为合理的腋窝淋巴结处理方法,明确腋窝可疑淋巴结取样结合前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)替代单纯SLNB时的假阴性率是否明显降低,为临床应用提供依据.方法 采用传统的腋窝淋巴结外科学分群方法,对符合入组条件的42例早期乳腺癌患者术前行B超引导下钩丝定位,术中行腋窝SLNB和定位的可疑淋巴结活检,再行全腋窝...     

Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: Sentinel node vs Observation after axillary UltraSouND)

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard approach for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. Recent data showed no outcome difference in patients with positive sentinel node between axillary dissection vs no further axillary surgery, raising doubts on the role of SLNB itself. Therefore, a new trial was designed comparing SLNB vs observation when axillary ultra-sound is negative in patients with small breast cancer candidates to breast conserving surgery.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy before versus after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in the treatment of breast cancer. In recent years, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced conventional axillary lymph node dissection for predicting axillary lymph node status with higher accuracy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being used increasingly to treat not only patients with locally advanced inoperative breast cancer, but also those with initially operable breast cancer. The application of SLNB has now expanded to include this patient population, who were not previously considered good candidates for SLNB. A number of recent studies have evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of SLNB after NAC in breast cancer patients. Moreover, SLNB has been shown to be accurate in patients scheduled to receive NAC, and repeat SLNB has been performed after NAC for patients with positive nodes detected by the initial SLNB before NAC. Thus, the optimal timing of SLNB for patients with breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting remains controversial. This article reviews the issues surrounding SLNB before vs. after NAC, according to the published literature and our experience.     

Sentinel node biopsy in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in a general hospital with a dedicated surgical team

The aims of this study were to analyse the feasibility and accuracy of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure as performed in a general hospital compared with the literature results; to report on the organizational aspects of planning surgical time with higher accuracy of pathological analysis; and to verify that there is a real advantage of SLNB in the surgical management of breast cancer. From October 1999 to September 2000, 371 consecutive patients with T1-2N0 breast lesions underwent SLNB. The immunoscintigraphic method of sentinel node identification was the main one used, the blue dye method being used only when the lymphoscintigraphic method was unsuccessful in identifying sentinel nodes. SLNB was done under either general or local anaesthesia, depending on how the surgical procedure was organized and clinically planned. SLNB was successful in 99% of these T1-2N0 breast cancer cases, and in 71% no metastases were found in the sentinel node. In 47% of cases with axillary metastasis only the sentinel node was involved. Nodal involvement was not present in any case of microinvasive or in situ carcinoma. In T1 cancers nodal involvement was present in 21%; in T2 cases the corresponding rate reached 51%. The results obtained with the SLNB procedure at Bergamo Hospital are similar to the literature data. When a dedicated surgical team, the nuclear medicine department and the pathology department work together, a general hospital can provide breast cancer patients with appropriate surgical treatment.     

T1期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检41例报告

目的 探讨前哨淋巴结活检术(sentinel lymph node biopsy，SLNB)在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。方法 使用美蓝染色，对2001年9月至2002年8月连续收治的41例T1期乳腺癌，临床检查腋窝淋巴结阴性的病人行前哨淋巴结活检术。结果 SLNB成功率87．8％(36／41)，假阴性率5．88％(1／17)，准确率97．2％(35／36)。结论 SLNB能够准确预测T1期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结的转移情况，在缩小手术范围、减少术后并发症的同时，提高了腋窝淋巴结分期的准确性。     

Intraoperative palpation for clinically suspicious axillary sentinel lymph nodes reduces the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely used to identify the first lymph node draining breast tumors. When the sentinel lymph node is free of metastasis, axillary dissection is avoided because the rest of the nodes are expected to be negative as well. A false-negative rate of 5% is considered acceptable. In the case of a false-negative SLNB, adjuvant local and systemic treatments might be suboptimal. We assessed the effect of intraoperative axillary palpation for clinically suspicious lymph nodes that are not otherwise detected by radioactive tracer or blue dye on the false-negative rate of SLNB in breast cancer patients. Our prospective database of patients having surgery for primary invasive breast cancer and who had a SLNB from 2000 to 2004 was reviewed. Only patients with clinically negative nodes preoperatively were included. The procedure included preoperative injection of radiotracer, with dye injection as backup, and intraoperative palpation of the axilla for suspicious lymph nodes that were not radioactive or blue. Of the 290 patients, 89 (30.7%) had sentinel node involvement by tumor. Seven patients had clinically suspicious nodes identified solely by palpation and not by tracer, in addition to sentinel lymph nodes detected by tracer. In five of the seven patients, the nodes harbored metastasis. In four of these five patients (4.5% of the 89 patients with axillary involvement), the palpable nodes were the only ones involved. A generous axillary incision and systematic palpation of the axilla reduces the false-negative rate and should be a part of the SLNB procedure.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer

The role of axillary surgery for the treatment of primary breast cancer is in a process of constant change. During the last decade, axillary dissection with removal of at least 10 lymph nodes (ALD) was replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure. Since then, the indication for SLNB rapidly expanded. Today's surgical strategies aim to minimize the rate of patients with a negative axillary status who undergo ALD. For some subgroups of patients, the indication for SLNB (e.g. multicentric disease, large tumors) or its implication for treatment planning (micrometastatic involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is being discussed. Although the indication for ALD is almost entirely restricted to patients with positive axillary lymph nodes today, the therapeutic effect of completion ALD is more and more questioned. On the other hand, the diagnostic value of ALD in node-positive patients is discussed. This article reflects today's standards in axillary surgery and discusses open issues on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of SLNB and ALD in the treatment of early breast cancer.     

Quadrantectomy and removal of the sentinel lymph node under local anaesthesia in the day hospital setting

In recent years, breast carcinoma diagnostics and therapy have evolved very considerably, allowing conservative surgery in most cases. These kinds of major operations have been greatly simplified since the introduction of the sentinel lymph node approach, with the possibility of a day surgery operation under local anaesthesia. The aim of this study, after thorough analysis of the axillary lymph nodes with ultrasound and cytological examinations, was to assess whether it would be possible to distinguish between negative and metastatic lymph nodes and whether the operation could be performed under local anaesthesia without hospitalisation. From January 2005 to January 2007, 54 breast carcinoma patients with negative axillary lymph nodes (after ultrasound examination) had a quadrantectomy and sentinel lymph node removal under local anaesthesia together with sedation where appropriate. Eight patients who presented micrometastases or isolated tumour cells in the sentinel lymph node underwent a subsequent lymphadenectomy. Our data show that, thanks to thorough analysis of the axillary cavity, it may be possible to use the sentinel lymph node approach with a good chance of the patient remaining free of distant metastases and of operating under local anaesthesia.     

Preoperative lymphatic mapping does not predict the number of axillary sentinel lymph nodes identified during surgery in breast cancer patients

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care in most centers for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. Multiple radioactive nodes are often identified at surgery. The finding of multiple sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been shown to be associated with lower rates of false-negative results in the SLNB procedure, hence the importance of removing and examining all SLNs. Often preoperative lymphatic mapping (PLM) is performed prior to surgery. In this study we examined whether the exact number of SLNs identified during surgery can be accurately predicted by PLM. During the years 2001-2004, 155 patients underwent both PLM and a SLNB in our breast unit. During surgery, an attempt was made to remove all radioactive nodes. The number of axillary radioactive foci found on PLM was compared with the number of radioactive nodes identified during surgery. The average number of sentinel nodes harvested was 2.3 (range 1-9). The average number of radioactive foci identified on PLM was 1.8 (range 0-5). Of the 155 patients, the number of sentinel nodes retrieved in surgery was greater than that found in preoperative mapping in 65 patients (41.9%), equal to that found in preoperative mapping in 60 patients (38.7%), and less than that found in preoperative mapping in 30 patients (19.4%). Thus in most patients, the number of SLNs found on PLM did not reflect the number of SLNs found intraoperatively. Therefore, even when the number of nodes identified on PLM has been reached in surgery, a meticulous search for additional nodes should still be carried out. The number of hot spots in preoperative mapping should serve as a rough indicator of the smallest number of nodes the surgeon should attempt to resect, but not the exact number of nodes expected to be found.     

Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered a standard of care in the staging of breast cancer. The objective was to examine our experience with reoperative SLNB. METHODS: We identified 19 patients in our breast cancer database who had a SLNB in the reoperative setting. All 19 patients had undergone previous breast-conserving surgery with either an axillary lymph node dissection or an SLNB. The reoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified using blue dye, radioisotope, or both. RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 84% of the reoperative cases. Of these successful cases, both blue dye and radioisotope were used in five cases, and radioisotope alone was used in 11 cases. Radioisotope identified the SLN in the 100% of successful SLNB cases (P = .0003). There were 3 unsuccessful cases in which blue dye and radioisotope failed to identify the sentinel node. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative SLNB after previous axillary surgery is technically feasible.     

Pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy before sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

Pre-operative lymphoscintigram for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may not be required for successful SLNB. The 117 consecutive patients who underwent SLNB had pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy. The operating surgeon was blinded to the results of the lymphoscintigram before SLNB. After SLNB was complete, the surgeon was unblinded to the results of the lymphoscintigram; re-exploration carried out if more nodes were predicted on the lymphoscintigram. 116 patients (99%) had successful SLNB before unblinding. In 85 patients (73%), operative findings corresponded with scintigraphic findings. In 26 patients (22%), the lymphoscintigram predicted more sentinel nodes than had been found; further nodes were identified and excised in only 4 patients (3%). None were positive for cancer. SLNB was successful in 99% of cases without pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy. Only 3% of patients had further nodes identified as a result of the lymphoscintigram. Pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy does not improve the ability to perform axillary SLNB during breast cancer surgery.     

临床腋淋巴结阴性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结研究

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（ｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｌｙｍｐｈ ｎｏｄｅ ｂｉｏｐｓｙ, ＳＬＮＢ）在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。方法：使用专利蓝和美蓝染色,对１９９９年９月～２００１年４月连续收治的１４５例临床查体腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌病人行前哨淋巴结活检术。结果：ＳＬＮＢ成功率为９６．５％（１４０／１４５）,假阴性率为２３．５％,准确率为９１．４％。病人年龄、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤部位、注射染料类型及是否活检对成功率和假阴性率无影响。结论：ＳＬＮＢ能够准确预测腋窝淋巴结的转移状况,在缩小手术范围、减少术后并发症的同时,提高了腋窝淋巴结分期的准确性;美蓝与专利蓝均可成功确定ＳＬＮ。     

Second Biopsy of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node for Reappearing Breast Cancer After Previous Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate axillary staging procedure for patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 5% to 15% will develop local relapses that necessitate reoperation. Although a previous SLNB is often considered a contraindication for a subsequent SLNB, few data support this concern. Methods Between January 2000 and June 2004, 79 patients who were previously treated at our institution with breast-conserving surgery and who had a negative SLNB for early breast cancer developed, during follow-up, local recurrence that was amenable to reoperation. Eighteen of these patients were offered a second SLNB because of a clinically negative axillary status an average of 26.1 months after the primary event. Results In all 18 patients (7 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and 11 with invasive recurrences), preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed an axillary sentinel lymph node, with a preoperative identification rate of 100%, and 1 or more SLNs (an average of 1.3 per patient) were surgically removed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in two patients with invasive recurrence, and a complete axillary dissection followed. At a median follow up of 12.7 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred in patients who did not undergo axillary dissection. Conclusions Second SLNB after previous SLNB is technically feasible and likely effective in selected breast cancer patients. A larger population and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.     

Advantage of sentinel lymph node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment

Lymph node status is a key factor in determining the stage of breast cancer and the most appropriate therapy and for predicting the outcome of patients. Accurate identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) preoperatively is of clinical importance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) causes less lymph edema of the upper arm than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with a high accuracy rate and low false-negative rate (FNR). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can be given not only to patients with locally advanced breast cancer, but also to those with axillary lymph node metastasis and an operable tumor. However, SLNB after NAC results in a lower identification rate and a higher FNR than SLNB before treatment. Recently, a hybrid imaging device has been developed, which consists of single photon emission computed tomography (CT, SPECT) and a low-dose CT installed on the same platform. This imaging system offers an easy and safe method of performing SLNB under local anesthesia. To identify the initial cancer stage in patients who will be treated by systemic therapy before surgery, SLNB should be performed prior to systemic treatments, using a well-developed navigating tool, such as SPECT/CT.     

Day surgery for breast cancer in the elderly

Early diagnosis of breast cancer and improvement of new technologies for identification and analysis of sentinel node allow more conservative surgical approaches, which guarantee both excellent local control and a good quality of life, also in elderly patients. We have studied a series of 28 women aged 70 years or older and affected by breast cancer. They underwent breast-preserving surgery either alone or in association with axillary lymphadenectomy and all of them had early discharge from hospital. This approach demonstrated to be safe and effective, so we may conclude that day-surgery treatment of breast cancer in these patients is possible in the majority of cases, is associated with low morbidity and is profitable for clinical, social and economic issues.     

Feasibility and oncological safety of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with a local recurrence

ObjectivesTo investigate the role and feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with a local recurrence and no clinically positive axillary lymph nodes.Materials and MethodsA total of 71 patients underwent SLNB for breast cancer recurrence. At first surgery, they had received SLNB (46.5%), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (36.6%) or no axillary surgery (16.9%).ResultsLymphatic migration was successful in 53 out of 71 patients (74.6%) and was significantly higher in patients with previous SLNB or no axillary surgery than in those with previous ALND (87.9% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.009). Aberrant lymphatic migration pathways were observed in 7 patients (13.2%). The surgical SLNB was successfully performed in 51 patients (71.8%). In 46 patients (90.2%) the SLN was histologically negative, in 3 patients (5.9%) micrometastastatic and in 2 patients (3.9%) macrometastatic. The 2 patients with a macrometastates in SLN underwent ALND, In 4 out of the 18 patients with failure of tracer migration ALND, performed as surgeon’s choice, did not find any metastatic node. After a median follow-up period of 39 months (range: 2–182 months), no axillary recurrence has been diagnosed.ConclusionA SLNB in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer, no previous ALND and negative axillary lymph nodes is technically feasible and impacts on the ALND rate. In patients who at primary surgery received ALND, migration rate is significantly lower, aberrant migration is frequent and no clinically useful information has been obtained.     

Use of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral breast recurrence or second primary breast cancer can develop in patients who have undergone breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This brings into question the necessity of complete axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) versus a second SLNB (remapping). Our objective is to determine the feasibility of a reoperative SLNB. STUDY DESIGN: A review of patients receiving a reoperative SLNB between April 1994 and December 2006 was conducted with IRB approval. Fifty-six patients underwent a second SLNB on the ipsilateral side an average of 42.5 months after their first SLNB. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully remapped in 45 of 56 (80.4%) patients. Of 45 patients successfully remapped, 36 (80%) were node negative and were spared CALND. There was only 1 patient (2.2%) in whom a sentinel lymph node was identified outside of the ipsilateral axilla. At 26 months mean followup for the second SLNB, there have been no axillary recurrences and 1 death. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that remapping sentinel nodes in patients with ipsilateral recurrence or new primary breast cancer after SLNB achieved success in 80.4% of patients. Overall, 80.0% (36 of 45) of the successfully remapped patients were spared a CALND.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer--a modified audit for surgeons in private practice.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a technique that is widely used in the management of early breast cancer. Surgeons are encouraged to validate their initial SLNB results by performing an audit in which both a SLNB and an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are performed. For surgeons in solo private practice this is not financially viable as the SLNB would not be paid for by the medical insurance companies. METHODS: Forty consenting patients were enrolled in the audit. The initial 5 patients (group A) were entered into a traditional audit - an ALND and a SLNB. The next 35 patients (group B) formed part of a modified audit - an axillary sample was performed if the sentinel node was negative (group B1) and an ALND if the node was positive (group B2). RESULTS: Ninety-two per cent of patients with an ipsilateral sentinel axillary node on preoperative scintigraphy had their node identified at the time of surgery. Eight patients had evidence of lymphatic spread. Two patients had parasternal sentinel nodes which were not removed. Group A had a mean of 10.8 nodes removed, group B1 5.8 nodes, and group B2 13.2 nodes. Twenty-three of 35 patients (66%) in group B were spared an axillary dissection. CONCLUSION: The modified audit of group B allowed patients to benefit from the procedure (and thus the medical aids charged) and yet permitted our team to ascertain the accuracy of the technique in our hands. We feel this is an approach that may be used by other surgeons working alone.