Optimized intensity-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer treatment.

We recently implemented intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) at our institution. In this study, we evaluate the dosimetric merits of the application of this technique to the treatment of prostate cancer. Each IMAT treatment plan incorporated bilateral overlapping arcs. The dose from each beam segment was computed using the three-dimensional dose model of a clinical treatment planning system (Render Plan 3.5, Precision Therapy). The weights assigned to the individual arc segments were optimized using a gradient search method. For 12 patients, comparisons were made between the IMAT treatment plans and corresponding plans using fixed cone-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) from a commercial inverse planning system (CORVUS, NOMOS Corp.). We found that the optimized IMAT treatments produced similar dose distributions to the IMRT deliveries. Compared with the IMRT treatments, the IMAT treatments produced slightly less target dose homogeneity with consistently greater sparing of the rectum in regions of lower dose. The trade-off between target dose conformity and rectum sparing can be adjusted in both optimization procedures. Because the total beam-on time for IMAT delivery is 1 to 2 minutes with approximately 5-6 minutes of patient setup time, the delivery efficiency of the IMAT treatment was significantly better than the multiple-beam IMRT treatment.     

Dose–volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) are two arc-based approaches to the delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Through plan comparisons we have investigated the potential of IMAT, both with constant (conventional or IMAT-C) and variable (non-conventional or IMAT-NC, a theoretical exercise) dose-rate, to serve as an alternative to helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with prostate tumours treated by HT with a moderately hypo-fractionated protocol, involving a simultaneous integrated boost, were re-planned as IMAT treatments. A method for IMAT inverse-planning using a commercial module for static IMRT combined with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) arc-sequencing was developed. IMAT plans were compared to HT plans in terms of dose statistics and radiobiological indices. RESULTS: Concerning the planning target volume (PTV), the mean doses for all PTVs were similar for HT and IMAT-C plans with minimum dose, target coverage, equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumour control probability (TCP) values being generally higher for HT; maximum dose and degree of heterogeneity were instead higher for IMAT-C. In relation to organs at risk, mean doses and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values were similar between the two modalities, except for the penile bulb where IMAT was significantly better. Re-normalizing all plans to the same rectal toxicity (NTCP=5%), the HT modality yielded higher TCP than IMAT-C but there was no significant difference between HT and IMAT-NC. The integral dose with HT was higher than that for IMAT. CONCLUSIONS: with regards to the plan analysis, the HT is superior to IMAT-C in terms of target coverage and dose homogeneity within the PTV. Introducing dose-rate variation during arc-rotation, not deliverable with current linac technology, the simulations result in comparable plan indices between (IMAT-NC) and HT.     

Feasibility of non-coplanar tomotherapy for lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy

To quantify the dosimetric gains from non-coplanar helical tomotherapy (HT) arcs for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer, we created oblique helical arcs by rotating patient's CT images. Ten, 20 and 30 degrees of yaws were introduced in the treatment planning for a patient with a hypothetical lung tumor at the upper, middle and lower portion of the right lung, and the upper and middle left lung. The planning target volume (PTV) was 43 cm(3). 60 Gy was prescribed to the PTV. Dose to organs at risk (OARs), which included the lungs, heart, spinal cord and chest wall, was optimized using a 2.5 cm jaw, 0.287 pitch and modulation factor of 2.5. Composite plans were generated by dose summation of the resultant plans. These plans were evaluated for its conformity index (R(x)) and percentile volume of lung receiving radiation dose of x Gy (V(x)). Conformity index was defined by the ratio of x percent isodose volume and PTV. The results show that combination of non-coplanar arcs reduced R(50) by 4.5%, R(20) by 26% and R(10) by 30% on average. Non-coplanar arcs did not affect V(20) but reduced V(10) and V(5) by 10% and 24% respectively. Composite of the non-coplanar arcs also reduced maximum dose to the spinal cord by 20-39%. Volume of chest wall receiving higher than 30 Gy was reduced by 48% on average. Heart dose reduction was dependent on the location of the PTV and the choice of non-coplanar orientations. Therefore we conclude that non-coplanar HT arcs significantly improve critical organ sparing in lung SBRT without changing the PTV dose coverage.     

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy

PURPOSE: To date, most intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery has occurred using linear accelerators (linacs), although helical tomotherapy has become commercially available. To quantify the dosimetric difference, we compared linac-based and helical tomotherapy-based treatment plans for IMRT of the oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We compared the dosimetry findings of 10 patients who had oropharyngeal carcinoma. Five patients each had cancers in the base of the tongue and tonsil. Each plan was independently optimized using either the CORVUS planning system (Nomos Corporation, Sewickly, PA), commissioned for a Varian 2300 CD linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with 1-cm multileaf collimator leaves, or helical tomotherapy. The resulting treatment plans were evaluated by comparing the dose-volume histograms, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), dose uniformity, and normal tissue complication probabilities. RESULTS: Helical tomotherapy plans showed improvement of critical structure avoidance and target dose uniformity for all patients. The average equivalent uniform dose reduction for organs at risk (OARs) surrounding the base of tongue and the tonsil were 17.4% and 27.14% respectively. An 80% reduction in normal tissue complication probabilities for the parotid glands was observed in the tomotherapy plans relative to the linac-based plans. The standard deviation of the planning target volume dose was reduced by 71%. In our clinic, we use the combined dose-volume histograms for each class of plans as a reference goal for helical tomotherapy treatment planning optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Helical tomotherapy provides improved dose homogeneity and normal structure dose compared with linac-based IMRT in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma resulting in a reduced risk for complications from focal hotspots within the planning target volume and for the adjacent parotid glands.     

Tomotherapeutic stereotactic body radiation therapy: Techniques and comparison between modalities

Presentation and comparison of tomotherapeutic intensity-modulated techniques for planning and delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Serial tomotherapeutic SBRT has been planned and delivered at our institution since 8/2001. Since 12/2005, 12 patients have been treated using a helical tomotherapy unit. For these 12 patients both helical and serial tomotherapy plans were computed and clinically approved. Techniques and considerations of tomotherapy SBRT planning, associated image-guidance, and delivery are presented. The respective treatment plans were compared based on dosimetric parameters as well as time to develop a treatment plan and delivery times. Also the associated quality of megavoltage CT (MVCT) image-guidance inherent to the helical tomotherapy unit was assessed. Tumor volumes averaged 9.3, 9.8, and 58.7 cm3 for liver, lung, and spinal targets. Helical and serial tomotherapy plans showed comparable plan quality with respect to maximum and average doses to the gross tumor and planning target volumes. Time to develop helical tomotherapy plans averaged 3.5 h while serial tomotherapy planning consistently required less than one hour. Treatment delivery was also slower using helical tomotherapy, with differences of less than 10 min between modalities. MVCT image-guidance proved satisfactory for bony and lung targets, but failed to depict liver lesions, owing to poor soft-tissue contrast. SBRT planning and delivery is clinically feasible using either tomotherapeutic modality. While treatment planning time was consistently shorter and more readily accomplished in a standardized approach using the serial tomotherapy modality, actual plan quality and treatment delivery times are grossly comparable between the modalities. MVCT volumetric image-guidance, was observed to be valuable for thoracic and spinal target volumes, whereas it proved challenging for liver targets.     

Apport de la RCMI rotationnelle et de la tomothérapie hélicoïdale dans les cancers pelviens : étude dosimétrique prospective sur 51 patients

PurposeTo compare the dosimetric results of different techniques of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients treated for a pelvic cancer with nodal irradiation.Patients and methodsData of 51 patients included prospectively in the Artpelvis study were analyzed. Thirty-six patients were treated for a high-risk prostate cancer (13 with helical tomotherapy, and 23 with Rapid’Arc^®) and 15 patients were treated for a localized anal cancer (nine with helical tomotherapy and six with Rapid’Arc^®). Plan quality was assessed according to several different dosimetric indexes of coverage of planning target volume and sparing of organs at risk.ResultsAlthough some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, helical tomotherapy and Rapid’Arc provided very similar and highly conformal plans. Regarding organs at risk, Rapid’Arc^® provided better pelvic bone sparing with a lower non-tumoral integral dose.ConclusionIn pelvis cancer with nodal irradiation, Rapid’Arc and helical tomotherapy provided very similar plans. The clinical evaluation of Artpelvis study will verify this equivalence hypothesis.     

Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): first clinical experience

PURPOSE: Whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy (WAPRT) is a treatment option in the palliation of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. With conventional techniques, kidneys and liver are the dose- and homogeneity-limiting organs. We developed a planning strategy for intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and report on the treatment plans of the first 5 treated patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five consecutive patients with histologically proven relapsed ovarian cancer were sent to our department for WAPRT. The target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated on 0.5-cm-thick CT slices. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the total peritoneal cavity. CTV and kidneys were expanded with 0.5 cm. In a preset range of 8 degrees interspaced gantry angles, machine states were generated with an anatomy-based segmentation tool. Machine states of the same class were stratified in arcs. The optimization of IMAT was done in several steps, using a biophysical objective function. These steps included weight optimization of machine states, leaf position optimization adapted to meet the maximal leaf speed constraint, and planner-interactive optimization of the start and stop angles. The final control points (machine states plus associated cumulative monitor unit counts) were calculated using a collapsed cone convolution/superposition algorithm. For comparison, two conventional plans (CONV) were made, one with two fields (CONV2), and one with four fields (CONV4). In these CONV plans, dose to the kidneys was limited by cerrobend blocks. The IMAT and the CONV plans were normalized to a median dose of 33 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV). Monomer/polymer gel dosimetry was used to assess the dosimetric accuracy of the IMAT planning and delivery method. RESULTS: The median volume of the PTV was 8306 cc. The mean treatment delivery time over 4 patients was 13.8 min. A mean of 444 monitor units was needed for a fraction dose of 150 cGy. The fraction of the PTV volume receiving more than 90% of the prescribed dose (V(90)) was 9% higher for the IMAT plan than for the CONV4 plan (89.9% vs. 82.5%). Outside a build-up region of 0.8 cm and 1 cm away from both kidneys, the inhomogeneity in the PTV was 15.1% for the IMAT plans and 24.9% for the CONV4 plans (for CONV2 plans, this was 34.9%). The median dose to the kidneys in the IMAT plans was lower for all patients. The 95th percentile dose for the kidneys was significantly higher for the IMAT plans than for the CONV4 and CONV2 plans (28.2 Gy vs. 22.2 Gy and 22.6 Gy for left kidney, respectively). No relevant differences were found for liver. The gel-measured dose was within clinical planning constraints. CONCLUSION: IMAT was shown to be deliverable in an acceptable time slot and to produce dose distributions that are more homogeneous than those obtained with a CONV plan, with at least equal sparing of the OARs.     

Dosimetric and clinical review of helical tomotherapy

As a modality for delivering rotational therapy, helical tomotherapy offers dosimetric advantages by combining a continuously rotating gantry with a binary multileaf collimator. Helical tomotherapy, embodied in the TomoTherapy(?) Hi-Art II(?) system, delivers intensity-modulated fan beams in a helical pattern using binary multileaf collimator leaves while the couch is translated through the gantry. Helical tomotherapy offers the possibility of treating a variety of cases--from simple to complex--with improved target conformality and sensitive structure sparing compared with 3D or conventional static field IMRT plans, thereby allowing biologically effective dose escalation. For precise irradiation and possible treatment adaptation, the fully integrated on-board image-guidance system provides online volumetric images of patient anatomy using 3.5-MV x-ray beams and the xenon computed tomography detector. Several review articles were published before the year 2007 but emphasized the technical aspects of helical tomotherapy. In this article, we review very recent papers and focus on the dosimetric and clinical aspects of helical tomotherapy.     

Assessment of extended-field radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy

PURPOSE: To perform a dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans for pelvic and para-aortic RT in postoperative endometrial cancer patients; and to evaluate the integral dose (ID) received by critical structures within the radiation fields. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We selected 10 patients with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer. For each patient, three plans were created with 3D-CRT, IMRT, and HT. The IMRT and HT plans were both optimized to keep the mean dose to the planning target volume (PTV) the same as that with 3D-CRT. The dosimetry and ID for the critical structures were compared. A paired two-tailed Student t test was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the 3D-CRT plans, the IMRT plans resulted in lower IDs in the organs at risk (OARs), ranging from -3.49% to -17.59%. The HT plans showed a similar result except that the ID for the bowel increased 0.27%. The IMRT and HT plans both increased the IDs to normal tissue (see Table 1 and text for definition), pelvic bone, and spine (range, 3.31-19.7%). The IMRT and HT dosimetry showed superior PTV coverage and better OAR sparing than the 3D-CRT dosimetry. Compared directly with IMRT, HT showed similar PTV coverage, lower Ids, and a decreased dose to most OARs. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated RT and HT appear to achieve excellent PTV coverage and better sparing of OARs, but at the expense of increased IDs to normal tissue and skeleton. HT allows for additional improvement in dosimetry and sparing of most OARs.     

Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy

During helical tomotherapy, gantry angle accuracy is one of the vital geometric factors that assure accurate dose delivery to the target and organs at risk adjacent to it. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric impact of gantry angle misalignment on the target volume and critical organs during helical tomotherapy treatment. Five prostate cases were chosen to calculate the effects of gantry angle deviations on both patient-specific delivery quality assurance (DQA) and helical tomotherapy treatment plans. For DQA plans, the cheese phantom was rotated for up to +/-5 degrees from the preset position to simulate the gantry angle deviations during tomotherapy. Point doses at 5 mm below the isocenter and the dose distribution for each gantry angle were measured and reconstructed, respectively. For helical tomotherapy treatment plans, the same gantry misalignment effect was simulated by adjusting the automatic roll correction for up to +/-5 degrees using Planned Adaptive software. Variations of dose volume histograms (DVHs) and isodose lines were evaluated for both target and critical organs. There was no significant difference found, however, among the point dose measurements for gantry rotation up to +/-5 degrees in DQA plans. Shifts of isodose lines could be observed for gantry rotations larger than +/-27 degrees. Dosimetric discrepancies (less than 2%) were also found among DVHs of the PTV in the cases when gantry angle misalignment was larger than +/-2 degrees. However, for DVHs of either bladder or rectum under different gantry rotations, no significant differences were detected when gantry angle errors were up to +/-5 degrees. In summary, point dose measurements alone cannot reveal the dosimetric deviation due to gantry angle misalignment in DQA plans. For a 5 degrees gantry deviation, the dose to PTV increased by 0.5% comparing to the planned dose. The influence on organs at risk, i.e., rectum and bladder, is also negligible. Further studies are needed on the dosimetric impacts of gantry angle deviations for other treatment sites.     

Evaluating target coverage and normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant radiotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of helical tomotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma and compare target homogeneity, conformity and normal tissue dose with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and permetrexed followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) were treated in our department with 54 Gy to the hemithorax delivered by step-and-shoot IMRT. A planning comparison was performed by creating radiation plans for helical tomotherapy. The different plans were compared by analysing target homogeneity using the homogeneity indices HI(max) and HI(min) and target conformity by using the conformity index CI(95). To assess target coverage and normal tissue sparing TV(90), TV(95) and mean and maximum doses were compared. RESULTS: Both modalities achieved excellent dose distributions while sparing organs at risk. Target coverage and homogeneity could be increased significantly with helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT. Mean dose to the contralateral lung could be lowered beyond 5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Our planning study showed that helical tomotherapy is an excellent option for the adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy of MPM. It is capable of improving target coverage and homogeneity.     

Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer

PURPOSE: In rectal cancer, combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either pre- or postoperatively, is an accepted treatment. Late small bowel (SB) toxicity is a feared side effect and limits radiation-dose escalation in a volume-dependent way. A planning strategy for intensity- modulated arc therapy (IMAT) was developed, and IMAT was clinically implemented with the aim to reduce the volume of SB irradiated at high doses and thus reduce SB toxicity. We report on the treatment plans of the first 7 patients, on the comparison of IMAT with conventional 3D planning (3D), and on the feasibility of IMAT delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven patients, who were referred to our department for preoperative (n = 4) or postoperative (n = 3) radiotherapy for rectal cancer, gave written consent for IMAT treatment. All patients had a planning CT in prone position. The delineation of the clinical target volume was done after fusion of CT and MRI, with the help of a radiologist. For the IMAT plan, arcs were generated using an anatomy-based segmentation tool. The optimization of the arcs was done by weight optimization (WO) and leaf position optimization (LPO), both of which were adapted for IMAT purposes. The 3D plans used one posterior and two lateral wedged beams, of which the outlines were shaped to the beam's-eye view projection of the planning target volume (PTV). Beam WO was done by constrained matrix inversion. For dose-volume histogram analysis, all plans were normalized to 45 Gy as median PTV dose. Polymer gel dosimetry (PGD) on a humanoid phantom was used for the validation of the total chain (planning to delivery). IMAT treatments were delivered by an Elekta SliPlus linear accelerator using prototype software with the same interlock class as in clinical mode. RESULTS: The IMAT plan resulted in 3 to 6 arcs, with a mean delivery time of 6.3 min and a mean of 456 monitor units (MU) for a 180 cGy fraction. The minimal dose in the PTV was not significantly different between 3D and IMAT plans. Inhomogeneity was highest for the IMAT plans (14.1%) and lowest for the 3D plans (9.9%). Mean dose to the SB was significantly lower for the IMAT plans (12.4 Gy) than for the 3D plans (17.0 Gy). The volume of SB receiving less than any dose level was lower for the IMAT plans than for 3D plans. Integral dose was lower in the IMAT plans than for the 3D plans (respectively 244 J and 262 J to deliver 45 Gy). Differences between the PGD measured dose and the calculated dose were as small for IMAT as for 3D treatments. CONCLUSION: IMAT plans are deliverable within a 5-10-minute time slot, and result in a lower dose to the SB than 3D plans, without creating significant underdosages in the PTV. PGD showed that IMAT delivery is as accurate as 3D delivery.     

Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: The study evaluates and quantifies the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive NPC patients curatively treated by HT were examined. Each case was planned by HT and SaS-IMRT (ADAC Pinnacle(3)) planning system, respectively. Dose plans were compared using dose volume histograms (DVH), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and minimal dose to 1cc (D(min_1cc)) of the planned target volume (PTV) and a comprehensive quality index (CQI) of ten organs at risk (OARs). The prescribed dose/fractionation was 72Gy to the PTV, 64.8Gy to the elective PTV, and 54Gy to the clinically negative neck region. The plan of 54Gy to the PTV (PTV(54)) was used to evaluate the CI and HI in the target. The cumulative doses of the three PTV plans to the OARs were calculated. RESULTS: We observed the HT plans significantly improved the CI (improvement ratio: 11.9+/-5.5%) and HI (improvement ratio: 8.8+/-1.5%) of the PTV(54) compared with SaS-IMRT plans. In addition, the mean/maximal dose of most of the OARs except chiasm was significantly reduced in HT plans, with the CQI of 0.92+/-0.08. A negative result of HT in chiasm was observed but only significantly revealed in cases without skull base infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: A dosimetric gain in CI and HI of PTV and sparing of OARs was significantly obtained in HT versus SaS-IMRT plans in NPC patients. Whether such dosimetric superiority in HT could transfer into clinical advantages needs further investigation.     

Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE: The goal of this planning study was to compare step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with helical dynamic IMRT plans for oropharynx patients on the basis of dose distribution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with oropharynx cancer had been previously treated by step-and-shoot IMRT at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands, applying five fields and approximately 60-90 segments. Inverse planning was carried out using Plato, version 2.6.2. For each patient, an inverse IMRT plan was also made using Tomotherapy Hi-Art System, version 2.0, and using the same targets and optimization goals. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired t test. RESULTS: All tomotherapy plans compared favorably with the step-and-shoot plans regarding sparing of the organs at risk and keeping an equivalent target dose homogeneity. Tomotherapy plans in particular realized sharper dose gradients compared with the step-and-shoot plans. The mean dose to all parotid glands (n = 10) decreased on average 6.5 Gy (range, -4 to 14; p = 0.002). The theoretical reduction in normal tissue complication probabilities in favor of the tomotherapy plans depended on the parotid normal tissue complication probability model used (range, -3% to 32%). CONCLUSION: Helical tomotherapy IMRT plans realized sharper dose gradients compared with the clinically applied step-and shoot plans. They are expected to be able to reduce the parotid normal tissue complication probability further, keeping a similar target dose homogeneity.     

T2期鼻咽癌旋转调强与固定野动态调强计划的剂量学比较研究

目的：比较旋转调强（ intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy,IMAT）与固定野动态调强（ dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy,dIMRT）在T2期鼻咽癌放射治疗计划中的剂量学差异。方法：随机选取10例已经接受固定野动态调强放射治疗的T2期鼻咽癌病例,将这10例放疗计划改为旋转调强方式,重新进行计划优化,比较两种计划的等剂量分布、靶区和危机器官的剂量参数、机器跳数以及治疗时间等。结果：两种计划的靶区剂量分布D98、D95以及D2等参数均无统计学差异（P〉0．05）,IMAT计划的脑干Dmax和D1cc、脊髓Dmax、右腮腺Dmean、右颞颌关节Dmax以及左中耳Dmean和Dmax均明显小于dIMRT计划的受量（P〈0．05）;同时IMAT计划的左右晶体Dmax、左右视神经Dmax和视交叉Dmax均明显大于dIMRT计划的受量（P〈0．05）。 IMAT计划正常组织受照剂量为5Gy的总体积明显大于dIMRT计划（P〈0．05）,而受照剂量在20Gy和30Gy的总体积明显小于dIMRT计划（P〈0．05）。 IMAT比dIMRT计划的单次照射总机器跳数平均减少了47．0%,单次照射时间平均减少48．2%。结论：对于T2期鼻咽癌,两种计划的剂量分布均满足临床要求,在靶区剂量分布没有统计学差异的情况下,IMAT技术能显著降低机器跳数,大大缩短治疗时间。     

Feasibility of cranio-spinal axis radiation with the Hi-Art tomotherapy system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Helical tomotherapy can eliminate the need for junction lines. The goal of this study is to evaluate tomotherapy in the delivery of CSA radiation and measurement of plan quality using physical parameters in comparing conventional (CSA-RT) and helical tomotherapy (CSA-TOMO) plans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CSA-TOMO and CSA-RT plans were created for dosimetric comparison. Integral dose values were calculated. The ratios D50% (dose received by 50% of the organ at risk's volume) and D10% (dose received by 10% of the organ at risk's volume) were calculated representing large volumes and small volumes of organs at risk receiving significant dose. RESULTS: When considering D50% and D10%, CSA-TOMO has a dosimetric advantage over CSA-RT for most organs at risk. The body integral dose was higher for the CSA-TOMO plan by approximately 6.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Tomotherapy is a feasible alternative for treatment of CSA. Analysis shows that tomotherapy improves dose ratios over conventional radiation for most organs at risk. The impact of a small increase in whole body integral dose is unknown. Long-term follow-up will be needed to answer this question as others have argued of the possibility of increased risk of secondary malignancies due to delivery of radiotherapy with IMRT.     

螺旋断层IMRT全骨髓照射流程可行性探讨

目的 探讨应用螺旋断层IMRT实施全骨髓照射(TMI)的流程可行性。方法 12例患者骨髓移植前1周均实施TMI预处理,处方剂量12 Gy分3次,1 次/d。按照TMI流程依次完成体位固定、CT定位、靶区勾画、计划设计及剂量验证等步骤,并实施治疗。统计靶区和正常组织的剂量参数,观察剂量验证结果与图像引导结果的相关性。结果 与全身照射(TBI)相比,TMI可显著降低正常组织受量,正常组织除口腔外中位数均<6.0 Gy,其中晶体D50(1.8±0.1) Gy,脑D50(5.7±0.2) Gy,双肺D50(5.2±0.2) Gy,肝D50(4.6±0.2) Gy。3 mm/3%标准下各部位γ通过率>95%,头颈段x轴摆位误差小于盆腔段,而z轴摆位误差则大于盆腔段。结论 应用螺旋断层IMRT可顺利实施TMI,剂量学优势明显,治疗流程合理可行。