Sequential bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide maintenance therapy after single autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

We report feasibility and response results of a phase II study investigating prolonged weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone as maintenance therapy after single autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma. Within 4 to 8 weeks of ASCT, patients received weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone for six cycles, followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone for six more cycles. Thalidomide alone was continued until disease progression. Forty-five patients underwent ASCT. Forty patients started maintenance therapy; of these, 36 patients received four cycles, and 32 completed six cycles of maintenance bortezomib. Of these 40 patients, nine (22%) were in complete response (CR) before ASCT, 13 (32%) achieved CR after ASCT but before bortezomib maintenance therapy, and 21 (53%) achieved CR after bortezomib maintenance therapy. Nine patients not previously in CR (33%) upgraded their response to CR with bortezomib maintenance. At 1 year post-ASCT, 20 patients achieved CR, and two achieved very good partial response. Twenty-seven patients experienced peripheral neuropathy during bortezomib therapy, all grade 1 or 2. Our findings indicate that prolonged sequential weekly bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide maintenance therapy after single ASCT is feasible and well tolerated. Bortezomib maintenance treatment upgraded post-ASCT CR responses with no severe grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy.     

Early Response to Bortezomib Combined Chemotherapy Can Help Predict Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation

Novel agents to treat multiple myeloma (MM) have increased complete respone (CR) rates compared with conventional chemotherapy, and the quality of the response to treatment has been correlated with survival. The purpose of our study was to show how of early response to bortezomib combined chemotherapy influences survival in patients with newly diagnosed MM who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. We assessed patient responses to at least four cycles of bortezomib using the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria. The endpoints were comparisons of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between early good response group (A group) and poor response group (B group). We retrospectively analyzed data from 129 patients registered by the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party, a nationwide registration of MM patients. The 3 yr PFS for the A and B groups was 55.6% and 18.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3 yr OS for the A and B groups was 65.3% and 52.9%, respectively (P = 0.078). The early response to at least four cycle of bortezomib before next chemotherapy may help predict PFS in patients with MM who are ineligible stem cell transplantation.     

Weekly Low-Dose Docetaxel for Salvage Chemotherapy in Pretreated Elderly or Poor Performance Status Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Although docetaxel monotherapy has shown clinical benefits for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the efficacy of salvage docetaxel chemotherapy for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status (PS) is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly low-dose docetaxel monotherapy in these patients. Forty NSCLC patients, who had been previously treated with one or more chemotherapy regimens, received docetaxel at a dose of 25 mg/m² weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. All patients were ≥65 yr or had a PS of grade 2 in the cases of <65 yr. Weekly low-dose docetaxel was well-tolerated. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were rare; fatigue in 3 patients (8%), anorexia in 3 patients (8%) and stomatitis in 2 patients (5%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was noted in only one patient (3%). By intent-to-treat analysis, nine patients (23%) had partial responses and eleven patients (28%) demonstrated stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.9 weeks and 37.7 weeks, respectively. Weekly low-dose docetaxel therapy provides a reasonable alternative for NSCLC salvage treatment in pretreated elderly patients or in patients with a reduced PS.     

PD方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效分析

目的观察硼替佐米联合地塞米松（PD）方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效和不良反应。方法2009年9月至2011年12月收集安康市中心医院MM患者16例,均给予PD方案为一线治疗：硼替佐米1．3mg／m2,静脉注射,第1、4、8、11天;地塞米松20mg／d,静脉滴注,第1,4,8～11天。每3周为1个周期,所有患者至少接受1个疗程的治疗。采用国际骨髓瘤工作组（IMWG）标准观察疗效和不良反应。结果患者接受1～6个疗程的治疗后,总有效率为94％,其中完全缓解（CR）9例（56％）,非常好的部分缓解（VGPR）1例（6％）,部分缓解（PR）3例（19％）,轻微反应（MR）2例（13％）,疾病稳定（SD）1例（6％）。可见初始疗效的中位时间为3（1—5）周。最常见的不良反应为胃肠道症状,其中便秘6例（38％）,恶心、呕吐3例（19％）;其次为血液学改变,血小板减少5例（31％）;另外,周围神经病变6例（38％）,乏力3例（19％）;给予对症处理后均好转。结论PD方案治疗初治MM患者疗效明确,不良反应较轻且大多可逆,具有较好的耐受性。     

Changes in circulating endothelial progenitor cells predict responses of multiple myeloma patients to treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone

Four cycles of chemotherapy are required to assess responses of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We investigated whether circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) could be a biomarker for predicting patient response in the first cycle of chemotherapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone, so patients might avoid ineffective and costly treatments and reduce exposure to unwanted side effects. We measured cEPCs and stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) in 46 MM patients in the first cycle of treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone, and investigated clinical relevance based on patient response after four 21-day cycles. The mononuclear cell fraction was analyzed for cEPC by FACS analysis, and SDF-1α was analyzed by ELISA. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the response to chemotherapy: good responders (n=16), common responders (n=12), and non-responders (n=18). There were no significant differences among these groups at baseline day 1 (P>0.05). cEPC levels decreased slightly at day 21 (8.2±3.3 cEPCs/μL) vs day 1 (8.4±2.9 cEPCs/μL) in good responders (P>0.05). In contrast, cEPC levels increased significantly in the other two groups (P<0.05). SDF-1α changes were closely related to changes in cEPCs. These findings indicate that change in cEPCs at day 21 in the first cycle might be considered a noninvasive biomarker for predicting a later response, and extent of change could help decide whether to continue this costly chemotherapy. cEPCs and the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis are potential therapeutic targets for improved response and outcomes in MM patients.     

Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone Followed by Escalating Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Patients with Multiple Myeloma Relapsing or Progressing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Multiple myeloma relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) has a poor outcome. To assess the safety and efficacy of bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) combination followed by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in myeloma patients relapsing or progressing after alloSCT, a prospective phase II study was designed. The treatment plan consisted of three VD courses followed by escalated doses of DLIs in case of response or at least stable disease. Nineteen patients were enrolled with a median age of 57 years (range, 33 to 67); 14 patients were allografted from human leukocyte antigen–identical siblings and 5 from alternative donors. Sixteen of 19 patients received the planned treatment, but 3 patients did not: 2 patients because of disease progression and 1 refused. After the VD phase the response rate was 62%, with 1 complete remission, 6 very good partial remissions, 5 partial remissions, 2 patients with stable disease, and 5 with progressive disease. After the DLI phase, the response rate was 68%, but a significant upgrade of response was observed: 3 stringent complete remissions, 2 complete remissions, 5 very good partial remissions, 1 partial remission, 4 with stable disease, and 1 with progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 29 to 68), the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 31% and 73%, respectively. Neither unexpected organ toxicities, in particular severe neuropathy, nor severe acute graft-versus-host disease flares were observed. VD-DLIs is a safe treatment for multiple myeloma patients relapsing or progressing after alloSCT and may be effective.     

Updated survivals and prognostic factor analysis in myeloma treated by a staged approach use of bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant eligible patients

Background  

Bortezomib, an NFkB inhibitor, is an active agent for the treatment of myeloma (MM). We have reported a promising complete remission (CR) rate for newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated by a staged approach, in which chemosensitive patients underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) while less chemosensitive patients received salvage therapy with bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone prior to auto-HSCT.     

Spotlight on Lenalidomide in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

In several countries, including the US and in Europe, oral lenalidomide in combination with oral dexamethasone is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients (aged ≥18 years) who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. The key therapeutic mechanisms of action of lenalidomide (a thalidomide analog) reside in its immunomodulatory, antiproliferative, and anti-angiogenic properties. In patients with multiple myeloma, lenalidomide has dual effects, exerting a direct antitumor response by inhibiting proliferation and by inducing apoptosis of tumor cells. Lenalidomide also acts to enhance the immune system by inducing the activation of immune effector cells, such as T cells and natural killer cells, and inducing cytokine production. In the pivotal MM-009 and MM-010 phase III registration trials, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone was effective and had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in relapsed or refractory patients with multiple myeloma. In robust pharmacoeconomic analyses based on these trials, relative to dexamethasone, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment met the assumed willingness-to-pay threshold for cost effectiveness from the UK and Scottish healthcare payer perspective in this patient population. The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Scottish Medicines Consortium considered that the health economic case for lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was demonstrated for patients who had received at least two prior antimyeloma therapies. In addition, in pharmacoeconomic analyses based on indirect comparisons of clinical efficacy, regulatory agencies in Norway and Sweden considered that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment was cost effective relative to bortezomib in patients who have received at least one prior antimyeloma therapy. Furthermore, compared with placebo plus dexamethasone, treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly prolonged the median time to progression, increased overall response rates and prolonged overall survival, with significantly longer median time to progression and overall response rates observed for all subgroups of patients. Thus, combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone provides a valuable option for the treatment of relapsed or refractory adult patients with multiple myeloma.     

Bone formation following lenalidomide-dexamethasone combination therapy in cases of multiple myeloma refractory to high-dose chemotherapy with bortezomib and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: report of a case and review of the literature

A 41-year-old man presented with the chief complaint of right hip pain that had persisted for 6 months. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging showed FDG accumulation in the right pubic bone. A bone biopsy specimen from the site revealed findings suggestive of a plasma cell tumor. Bone marrow examination and serum and urine immunofixation tests showed no abnormalities. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed as having non-secretory multiple myeloma. FDG accumulation in the right pubic bone diminished following four cycles of weekly bortezomib and concomitant dexamethasone therapy. Tandem autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was performed, followed by monthly bortezomib/dexamethasone maintenance therapy. A further FDG-PET/CT scan 9 months after the start of therapy indicated that FDG accumulation in the right pubic bone had worsened. Consequently, the therapy was switched to twice-weekly bortezomib/dexamethasone as remission re-induction therapy. New FDG uptake in the right hip bone was noted after six cycles of the therapy, and plain X-ray examination revealed osteolytic changes. The patient was then administered eight cycles of combined lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy, which resulted in a marked decrease of the FDG accumulation in the right pubic bone and disappearance of uptake in the right hip bone. There was radiographic evidence of bone formation at these sites. This is only the second reported case in which treatment with the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide and concomitant dexamethasone has been found to induce bone formation.     

Complete Remission Status before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is an Important Prognostic Factor in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Upfront Single Autologous Transplantation

Upfront high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy followed by a single autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for patients under the age of 65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Because disease status after induction chemotherapy is variable, we evaluated the prognostic effect of disease status before ASCT, especially in patients who were initially chemosensitive. We retrospectively analyzed the initially chemosensitive MM patients (≥ partial remission [PR]) enrolled in the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party Web-based registration system (www.myeloma.or.kr). Between November 1996 and January 2007, 197 MM patients (median age 53 years) were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by a single ASCT. All patients received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support after conditioning with melphalan (Mel) alone. We considered those patients with no detectable M-protein regardless of the result of immunofixation to be in complete remission (CR) in this study. The median follow-up times were 29.2 months (range, 5.4 to 103.8 months) from the day of diagnosis and 22.4 months (range, 0.4 to 96.0 months) from the day of ASCT. Before ASCT, 63 patients (32%) were in CR and 134 (68%) were in partial remission (PR). The patients in CR had significantly longer overall survival (OS) from the day of ASCT compared with those in PR (P = .0015). Among the patients who received induction chemotherapy with vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (n = 162), the same difference in OS was seen between those in CR and those in PR before ASCT (P = .0016). CR after ASCT also predicted longer OS (P = .0135); however, patients with continued CR after ASCT had significantly higher OS after ASCT compared with patient with induced CR after ASCT who were in PR before ASCT (P = .0178). Multivariate analysis indicated that remission status pre-ASCT (CR vs PR) is a significant prognostic factor for predicting OS after ASCT (P = .012, Cox proportional hazard analysis; odds ratio = 2.83; 95% confidence interval = 1.25 to 6.37). We conclude that patients with MM who are in CR before ASCT have a better OS than those in PR before ASCT. Continued CR after ASCT may be an important prognostic factor as well. Our findings suggest that the development of more effective induction regimens, including novel antimyeloma agents to improve initial response, should be pursued to enhance clinical benefits post-ASCT.     

Pilot Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Pre- and Post-Risk-Adapted Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis

Treatment for AL amyloidosis aims to eradicate clonal plasma cells, thereby disrupting the amyloid deposition causing organ damage. Risk-adapted high-dose melphalan plus autologous stem cell transplantation (RA-ASCT) is an effective therapy. We conducted a prospective pilot analysis of a comprehensive approach using bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) before and after RA-ASCT in 19 patients. BD induction (up to 3 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg orally [p.o.] or i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) was followed by RA-ASCT and then BD consolidation (6 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg p.o. or i.v. weekly for 4 weeks, every 12 weeks). The overall hematologic response rate (partial response or better) was 95%, including 37% minimal residual disease negative [MRD(-)] complete response (CR) by flow cytometry (sensitivity up to 1/10⁶ cells). At 2 years, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 93%) and 84% (95% CI, 69% to 99%), respectively, with median duration of follow-up in survivors of 61 months (range, 42 to 84 months). In a landmark analysis, patients achieving MRD(-) CR had superior PFS (P= .008). This approach is safe and yields deep and durable remissions promoting organ recovery. Each treatment phase deepened the response. Future aims include improving the efficacy and toxicity of each phase.     

Triptolide overcomes dexamethasone resistance and enhanced PS-341-induced apoptosis via PI3k/Akt/NF-kappaB pathways in human multiple myeloma cells

Human multiple myeloma is a presently incurable hematological malignancy and novel biologically based therapies are urgently needed. Triptolide (TPL) is a purified diterpenod isolated from the Chinese herb, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. F that has shown antitumor activities in various cancer cell types. But its activity in Dex-resistant multiple myeloma cell lines and the main upstream signaling pathway has not been reported. Here we show that TPL induces apoptosis in dexamethasone-sensitive (MM.1S) and dexamethasone-resistant (MM.1R) cells, most importantly its main upstream signaling pathway is through the PI3k/Akt/NF-kappaB pathway and is also associated with MAPK pathway, via mitochondrial apoptotic signaling and is also associated with the caspase and Bcl-2 family members. Moreover, TPL was able to enhance the activities of dexamethasone or bortezomib/PS-341 in multiple myeloma cell lines. Collectively, these findings provide the framework for a clinical evaluation of TPL, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone or bortezomib/PS-341, to overcome drug resistance and improve outcome for patients with this universally fatal hematological malignancy.     

A Phase I/II,Open-Label,Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lower Doses of Bortezomib Plus Busulfan and Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: The KMM103 Study

A phase I/II trial was conducted to explore the safety and activity of the addition of bortezomib on days -6, -3, and +1 relative to the day of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a conditioning regimen with busulfan and melphalan (BuMel; 3.2 mg/kg/day busulfan on days -5 to -3 and 140 mg/m²/day melphalan on day -2) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) following bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy. In phase I, doses of bortezomib (.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m²) with BuMel were administered to groups of 3 patients each. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib was 1.3 mg/m²/day. A subsequent cohort with 41 patients was analyzed in a phase II trial to identify safety and efficacy. The phase II trial showed a 75% response rate, including very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and a 55% rate of complete response (CR) at 3 months; For post-transplantation best response, an 83% rate of VGPR or better (68% CR) was observed. With a median follow-up of 31.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 26.8 months. The probability of 2 year-PFS was 56.5%, and median overall survival (OS) could not calculated. Specifically, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with adverse survival outcomes compared with standard-risk cytogenetics (median PFS, 12.2 months versus 35.7 months, P = .039; median OS, 26.7 months versus 73.3 months; P = .086). With a median of 11 days to neutrophil engraftment and 10 days for platelet engraftment, no graft failure or delayed engrafting were observed. The most common grade 3 or severe nonhematologic adverse events included neutropenic fever (73.2%) and stomatitis (14.6%). Except for 3 patients with transplantation-related mortality due to sepsis, other adverse events were manageable. These findings demonstrate that bortezomib is safe and has a potential role in conditioning regimens in combination with BuMel for patients with transplantation-eligible MM.     

Pralatrexate in Combination with Bortezomib for Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma in 5 Elderly Patients

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with poor prognosis. Elderly (age ≥ 65years) patients generally have impaired bone marrow function, altered drug metabolism, comorbidities, and poor functional status. Thus, treatment of elderly patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL remains a challenge for clinicians. A recent study disclosed that pralatrexate has a synergistic effect in combination with bortezomib. Weekly pralatrexate and bortezomib were administered intravenously for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Of 5 patients, one achieved complete response after 4 cycles which has lasted 12 months until now. Another patient attained partial response after 2 cycles. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Two patients suffered from grade 3 mucositis. Combination therapy with pralatrexate and bortezomib may be used as a salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory PTCL in the elderly with a favorable safety profile.     

High immunoproteasome concentration in the plasma of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib is predictive of longer OS

PurposeProteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib or carfilzomib among them, play a crucial role in the modern standard therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, we intended to evaluate whether immunoproteasome (IMP) concentration could act as an effective biomarker which determines the probability of response to treatment with bortezomib, in order to detect groups of patients who are more likely to respond to treatment with PI.Materials and methodsIn our study, we evaluated IMP concentration in the plasma of 40 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and 116 patients with newly diagnosed MM during treatment with or without PI.ResultsThe values of all the studied parameters after the applied chemotherapy in the responders’ group of patients declined considerably during the consecutive cycles of chemotherapy compared to their initial levels. On the contrary, in the group of non-responders, we observed no change in the measured IMP parameters during the consecutive cycles of therapy. We also showed that higher baseline IMP concentration might indicate longer overall survival (OS) in all patients.ConclusionsOur results indicate that assessing plasma IMP concentration can be applied as a strong biomarker for predicting clinical response to treatment and OS in patients with newly diagnosed MM.     

Comparative evaluation of treatment results in advanced multiple myeloma with the help of polychemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (VAD) or only with dexamethasone]

A prospective clinical trial was undertaken to determine the therapeutical effectiveness of multidrug chemotherapy consisting of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) or only high dose of dexamethasone (D) in 56 patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The group of patients included 41 with intermediate (II) and 15 with high (III) tumor mass. The final evaluation was performed in 19 patients treated with D and in 19 receiving VAD regimen. Improvement was defined by at least 50% reduction of serum myeloma protein concentration or disappearance of light chain proteinuria. The VAD regimen was more effective giving improvement in 90% of patients with no prior therapy and in 44% of patients with reflectory myeloma. In this respect, cytoreduction of the same magnitude was noted both in stages II and III. Higher therapeutical effect of VAD regimen was observed independently of the immunological type of MM. The treatment with D has given the improvement in 56% of patients with no previous therapy. Our results support the usefulness of VAD regimen in MM-patients with no prior therapy and with refractory myeloma. High frequency of therapy-related complications, however, indicates that VAD treatment should rather be reserved for the patients with resistant MM.     

New therapies in multiple myeloma

The melphalan-prednisone regimen has been considered as standard therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) for many years. Recently, high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support has extended progression-free survival and increased overall survival, and it is now considered conventional therapy in younger patients. However, most patients relapse and the salvage treatment is not very effective. New active drugs, including immunomodulatory agents, thalidomide (Thal) and lenalidomide, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, have shown promising anti-myeloma activity. These novel treatments are aimed at overcoming resistance of tumour cells to conventional chemotherapy, acting both directly on myeloma cells and indirectly by blocking the interactions of myeloma cells with their local microenvironment and suppressing growth and survival signals induced by autocrine and paracrine loops in the bone marrow. Thal has been widely studied, mostly in combination regimens in patients with relapsed MM and, more recently, in front-line therapy, showing efficacy in terms of response rate and event-free survival. Bortezomib has been found to possess remarkable activity, especially in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, in relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM, as well as in patients presenting adverse prognostic factors. Lenalidomide, in combination with dexamethasone, is showing high overall response rates in relapsed and refractory MM and promising results also in first-line therapy. In this paper, the results of the most significant trials with Thal, bortezomib and lenalidomide are reported. Several ongoing clinical studies will hopefully allow the identification of the most active combinations capable of improving survival in patients with MM.     

Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma offers higher response rates and improved survival compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, successful autografting requires effective cytoreduction and rapid hematologic reconstitution. We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of 2 cycles of priming chemotherapy with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization followed by autologous transplantation. The major study end points were the comparative utility of G-CSF versus GM-CSF, the percentage of patients achieving complete response after transplantation, and overall and progression-free survival. Priming chemotherapy included cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), mitoxantrone (8 g/m2 every day for 2 days), and dexamethasone (20 mg/m2 every 12 hours for 2 days) followed by randomization to either G-CSF or GM-CSF daily until completion of leukapheresis. Conditioning for transplantation included cyclophosphamide (75 mg/kg every day for 2 days) plus total body irradiation (165 cGy twice daily for 3 days), and patients received maintenance immunotherapy with interferon alpha. Seventy-two patients were randomized, and 64 underwent autologous transplantation. The median age at transplantation was 52 years, and the median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 10 months; 58% of the patients had received >4 cycles of pretransplantation chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 16.4 x 10(6)/kg in the G-CSF arm versus 12.8 x 10(6)/kg in the GM-CSF arm (P = .8). Neutrophil recovery was faster in the G-CSF group after both cycle 1 (median, 13 days with G-CSF and 16 days with GM-CSF; P < .01) and cycle 2 (median, 13 days versus 17 days in the 2 groups, respectively; P = .03). Although platelet recovery was similar after cycle 1, platelet recovery to >100000/microL was notably faster in the G-CSF group both after cycle 2 and after transplantation (P = .03). Response and overall and disease-free survival were similar in both cohorts. Overall, 23% of the patients achieved a complete response after priming chemotherapy, which improved to 33% after transplantation. An additional 47% attained a partial response after transplantation, for a total response rate of 80%. With a median follow-up of 2 years (range, 0.7-8 years), the overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-96%) at 1 year and 65% (95% CI, 51%-79%) at 3 years. Progression-free survival was 73% (95% CI, 62%-84%) at 1 year and 40% (95% CI, 26%-54%) at 3 years. Relapse or progressive disease was the most common cause of death (25 [83%] of 30 deaths). We conclude that mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus GM-CSF results in similar CD34+ progenitor collections, even in patients exposed to multiple cycles of alkylator-based chemotherapy. Earlier neutrophil and platelet recovery was seen with G-CSF priming. Two cycles of priming chemotherapy plus autologous transplantation yields survival rates similar to those in published reports, including those using tandem transplantation.     

Baricitinib plus dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective analysis

ObjectiveWe aimed to analyze clinical outcomes from patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia that received either baricitinib plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone monotherapy.MethodologyWe performed a retrospective comparative study. Data from hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (saturation <93%, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates) that were treated with baricitinib plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone were collected. Our primary objective was to compare overall mortality and secondly to compare progression to mechanical ventilation and over infection rates.ResultsA total of 793 patients were assessed for inclusion criteria, 596 were excluded and 197 were analyzed for primary outcome: 123 in the baricitinib plus dexamethasone group and 74 in the dexamethasone monotherapy group. The mean age was 59.9 years (SD ± 14.5) and 62.1% (123/197) were male. 42.9% (85/197) of the cases required ICU admission and 25.8% (51/197) underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Overall thirty-day mortality was 27.9% (55/197); Mortality was significantly lower in the baricitinib plus dexamethasone group compared to the dexamethasone monotherapy group (20.3% vs 40.5%, P = <.05). There was no difference in hospital acquired infections between both groups.ConclusionThirty-day mortality was significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with baricitinib plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone monotherapy. No difference was observed in progression to invasive mechanical ventilation and hospital acquired infections.     

Trends in the Use of Chemotherapy before and after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in Korea

We investigated trends in perioperative chemotherapy use, and determined factors associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use in Korean patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We recruited 1,324 patients who had MIBC without nodal invasion or metastases and had undergone radical cystectomies (RC) between 2003 and 2013. The study''s cut-off time for AC was three months after surgery, and the study''s timespan was divided into three periods based on NAC use, namely, 2003-2005, 2006-2009, and 2010-2013. Complete remission was defined as histologically confirmed T0N0M0 after RC. NAC and AC were administered to 7.3% and 18.1% of the patients, respectively. The median time interval between completing NAC and undergoing RC was 32 days and the mean number of cycles was 3.2. The median time interval between RC and AC was 43 days and the mean number of cycles was 4.1. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were most frequently used in combination for NAC (49.0%) and AC (74.9%). NAC use increased significantly from 4.6% between 2003 and 2005 to 8.4% between 2010 and 2013 (P < 0.05), but AC use did not increase. Only 1.9% of patients received NAC and AC. Complete remission after NAC was achieved in 12 patients (12.5%). Multivariable modeling revealed that an advanced age, the earliest time period analyzed, and clinical tumor stage ≤ cT2 bladder cancer were negatively associated with NAC use (P < 0.05). While NAC use has slowly increased over time, it remains an underutilized therapeutic approach in Korean clinical practice.