荧光原位杂交技术检测BCR/ABL融合基因的研究

目的建立荧光原位杂交技术平台,应用FISH技术检测在CML检测BCR/ABL融合基因,探讨FISH技术在在CML中应用的价值。方法应用FISH对BCR/ABL探针进行前期的验证,建立正常阈值,再应用该探针检测CML中BCR/ABL融合基因,进行临床检测评估。结果主要假阳性信号模式的正常阈值为1G1R1F 11%、1G1R2F 2%。75例样本FISH检测出48例阳性,15例经细胞遗传学检测,12例检测结果与FISH结果一致,3例CG为阴性,FISH检测为阳性。结论荧光原位杂交技术应用于临床检测之前应进行探针的前期验证,制定一套规范实验流程,且FISH技术在CML诊断、分型、临床治疗方案的制定、预后的判断以及微小残留病变检测上均有重要的价值。     

9q34 rearrangements in BCR/ABL fusion-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The t(9;22)(q11.2;q34) translocation is found in a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The presence of this translocation involving the fusion of BCR/ABL genes represents a poor prognostic group. Because of the importance in detecting t(9;22) in ALL patients and because occasionally a cytogenetically cryptic BCR/ABL fusion is detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), our laboratory routinely performs BCR/ABL FISH tests on all newly diagnosed ALL patients. In the past year, 25 consecutive, newly diagnosed, untreated ALL cases were analyzed. We report the cytogenetics and FISH findings of three cases containing a rearranged 9q34 region with an intact BCR (22q11.2) region and an absence of the BCR/ABL fusion. A split ABL signal representing a translocation of the 9q34 region with chromosome segments other than 22q11.2 (BCR) was observed in 3 cases. Two of these patients were 3 years old; one was 21 at the time of diagnosis. A split ABL FISH signal without the involvement of BCR does not represent a t(9;22) translocation, and prognostic implications of this apparent subgroup of ALL cases have not been determined. Cytogenetic, pathologic, and clinical aspects of these three cases are presented.     

A FISH study of variant Philadelphia rearrangements

A total of 39 variant Philadelphia (Ph) translocations were studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using MBCR/ABL, mBCR/ABL, or DBCR/ABL probes. Seven cases did not have a BCR/ABL fusion signal. Of a total of 32 fusion-positive cases, 5 were simple variants involving chromosome 22 and another chromosome apart from chromosome 9; 23 were complex variants involving chromosomes 22, 9, and a third chromosome (18 cases), or 22, 9, and two other chromosomes (4 cases). Masked Ph rearrangements were detected in 4 cases. One case was a Ph chromosome mimic. Fluorescence in situ hybridization has become a widely used method for studying Ph rearrangements. The latest probe that is being used is the DBCR/ABL (double reciprocal BCR/ABL signals). The expected pattern for this probe is one green ABL signal (1G) on the normal 9, one red BCR signal (1R) on the normal 22, and two fusion signals, BCR/ABL and ABL/BCR (2F), on a derivative 22 and a derivative 9, respectively. Deviant patterns from 1G1R2F, and sometimes 1G1R2F, were indicative of a variant, as long as there was a fusion signal. However, in interphase analysis, it is not possible to visualize a variant rearrangement, and when a deviant pattern involving at least one fusion signal is observed, the following possibilities should be contemplated. The different patterns observed in fifteen Ph variants are described. The patterns observed in variants studied with the DBCR/ABL probe were 2G2R1F (40%), 1G1R2F (20%), 1G1R1F (20%), 1G2R1F (13.3%), and 2G1R1F (6.66%). A single mechanism is involved in the formation of each of these patterns. A 2G2R1F, FISH pattern in 6 cases appears to involve a single concerted event of simultaneous breaks on the participating chromosomes followed by mismatched joining. The three cases with 1G1R2F most probably arose by two sequential rearrangements. The 1G1R1F pattern suggests that either the BCR and ABL breakpoints are different, or there are deletions at the breakpoints, because residual signals are not observed. Two independent events appear to be involved in 1G2R1F with a reverse cryptic 9,22 rearrangement as the first event. In one case of 2G1R1F, the plausible explanation is an insertion of ABL next to BCR and either a simultaneous or a sequential translocation with another chromosome.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the signal patterns of dual color dual fusion (DCDF) probe and extra signal (ES) probe in the detection of BCR/ABL fusion gene, and illustrate the relation between the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pattern and the karyotype. Methods Sixty-five cases of chronic myelocytic leukemia(CML) and 50 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were detected by FISH with DCDF probe, the BCR/ABL positive samples were detected by FISH with ES probe. Among these cases, 47 cases of CML and 40 cases of ALL perform conventional cytogenetics simultaneously. Results All 65 cases of CML were all BCR/ABL positive by FISH. 17 cases showed the atypical pattern by DCDFFISH, and 12 cases showed the atypical pattern by ES-FISH. There were 7 cases of BCR/ABL positive in 50 cases of ALL by FISH. By ES-FISH, there were 5 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in m-bcr, 2 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in M-bcr. Conventional cytogenetics demonstrated that 43/44(98 %) cases of CML and 7/32(22 %) cases of ALL were Ph positive.Conclusion The features of DCDF-FISH, ES-FISH and conventional eytogenetic are different from each other. According to the features of these method, it can increase the precision of the adjustment of genetic feature to analyze these results comprehensively.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.     

荧光原位杂交技术检测慢性粒细胞白血病微小残留病

目的 研究应用荧光原位杂交技术(FISH)检测慢性粒细胞白血病微小残留病，及用FISH技术对缓解期慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者外周血进行检测，评价其体内微小残留病的意义。方法 应用CG和I-FI舛对30例CML(13例给予化疗、17例移植后)患者初发和／或缓解期的骨髓及外周血标本进行分析，分别检测Ph染色体和BCR/ABL融合基因的存在。结果 对13例临床给予化疗的患者初发期的外周血和骨髓进行CG分析，Ph检出率分别为15％(2／13)、100％(13／13)。同时进行I-FISH分析，均可检出BCR/ABL融合基因。对初发期骨髓的CG、I-FISH分析结果进行统计学分析，两组无显著差异；对外周血的CG、I-FISH分析结果进行统计学分析，两组有显著差异。对其缓解期骨髓CG、I-FISH分析结果进行统计学分析，两组有显著差异；对缓解期外周血CG、I-FISH结果进行统计学分析，两组有显著差异；对缓解期外周血I-FISH和骨髓I-FISH结果进行统计学分析，两组呈显著相关。对17例移植后患者CG、I-FISH结果进行统计学分析，两组有显著差异。结论 FISH技术检测慢性粒细胞白血病微小残留病敏感性大大高于常规细胞遗传学分析；采集缓解期外周血进行荧光原位杂交分析，可作为一种方便易行的手段评价微小残留病。     

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of gene rearrangements in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The aims of this study were to estimate the incidences of BCR/ABL, MLL, TEL/AML1 rearrangements, and p16 deletions in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), to identify new abnormalities, and to demonstrate the usefulness of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We performed G-banding analysis and FISH using probes for BCR/ABL, MLL, TEL/AML1 rearrangements, and p16 deletions on 65 childhood ALL patients diagnosed and uniformly treated at a single hospital. Gene rearrangements were identified in 73.8% of the patients using the combination of G-banding and FISH, while the chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 49.2% using G-banding alone. Gene rearrangements were disclosed by FISH in 24 (72.7%) of 33 patients with normal karyotype or no mitotic cell in G-banding. Among the gene rearrangements detected by FISH, the most common gene rearrangement was p16 deletion (20.3%) and the incidences of others were 14.1% for TEL/AML1, 11.3% for MLL, and 1.8% for BCR/ABL translocations. Infrequent or new aberrations such as AML1 amplification, MLL deletion, ABL deletion, and TEL/AML1 fusion with AML1 deletion were also observed. We established the rough incidences of gene rearrangements in childhood ALL, found new abnormalities and demonstrated the diagnostic capability of interphase FISH to identify cryptic chromosome aberrations.     

Deletion of any part of the BCR or ABL gene on the derivative chromosome 9 is a poor prognostic marker in chronic myelogenous leukemia

To evaluate the prognostic significance of submicroscopic deletions of the ABL or BCR gene associated with t(9;22) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), we investigated the incidence of an ABL or BCR deletion on derivative chromosome 9 using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH was performed using the LSI BCR/ABL dual-fusion translocation probe on bone marrow cells of 86 patients with CML. Of 86 patients, ABL deletion was detected in 13 (15.1%) patients and BCR deletion in 8 patients (9.3%). Patients with ABL deletion showed shorter event-free survival time (EFS) than those without ABL deletion (P = 0.020). Patients with BCR deletion showed significantly short overall survival time (OS; P = 0.039). Patients with ABL and/or BCR deletion (14/86 patients, 16.3%) showed significantly short OS and EFS (median OS, 43.0 months; median EFS, 40.0 months), compared to the patients without any BCR or ABL gene deletions (median OS, 94.0 months; median EFS, 90.0 months; P = 0.041 for OS, P = 0.008 for EFS). All the patients with BCR deletion, except for one, had a concomitant ABL deletion, suggesting that BCR deletion occurs in conjunction with ABL deletion. In patients with ABL deletion only, BCR/ABL rearrangement with b2a2 mRNA type tended to be more frequent than in patients without any deletion of the two genes (P = 0.073). Deletion of any of the BCR or ABL genes on derivative chromosome 9 was associated with both short OS and EFS. We conclude that deletion of not only the ABL gene, but also of the BCR gene, is a poor prognostic marker that indicates rapid disease progression in CML.     

Studies of complex Ph translocations in cases with chronic myelogenous leukemia and one with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The BCR/ABL gene fusion, the hallmark of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is generated in 2-10% of patients by a variant Ph translocation involving 9q34, 22q11.2, and one or more additional genomic regions. The objective of this study was the characterization by conventional and molecular cytogenetics of complex variant Ph translocations present at diagnosis. FISH studies were performed in 7 cases using the LSI BCR/ABL ES probe allowing the detection of the fusion BCR/ABL gene on the Ph chromosome in all of them and 9q34 deletions in 2 cases. Three cryptic complex rearrangements were detected by FISH studies. The third and the fourth chromosome regions involved in the 8 complex variant translocations were: 1q21, 1p36, 5q31, 11q13, 12q13, 12p13, and 20q12. In conclusion, FISH studies have been useful in the detection of the BCR/ABL rearrangements and 9q34 deletions, and to identify complex rearrangements that differ from the ones previously established by conventional cytogenetics.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization studies for the detection of 9q34 deletions in chronic myelogenous leukemia: a practical approach to clinical diagnosis

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) in more than 90% of cases. Recent studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have shown that in a subset of patients with CML, deletions of 9q34 involving the argininosuccinate synthetase region occur at the time of the Philadelphia translocation and are associated with a poor prognosis. We performed interphase FISH studies in 152 cases of CML using a dual-color, dual-fusion probe system with a third probe directed at 9q34. Cytogenetic studies showed a simple (typical) Ph in 124/152 (82%), a cryptic Ph in 11/152 (7%), and a variant Ph chromosome with a complex translocation in 17/152 (11%) of cases. Interphase FISH studies showed single BCR/ABL fusion patterns in 48/152 (32%) of cases. Deletions of 9q34 were observed in 14% of all the cases and were present in 46% of cases with single BCR/ABL fusion pattern. All the 9q34 deletions occurred in cases with single BCR/ABL fusion signal. However, a single-fusion pattern is not specific for 9q34 deletions, and cases should be routinely screened for the presence of this prognostically significant abnormality by using a third probe directed specifically at 9q34.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

荧光原位杂交检测慢性粒细胞白血病

目的 探讨对慢性粒细胞白血病进行荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测的意义.方法 对158例慢性粒细胞白血病标本采用24 h短期培养法制备染色体,然后应用双色双融合BCR/ABL探针进行FISH检测,部分标本同时采用R显带技术进行染色体核型分析.结果 158例中共检出Ph阳性标本98例,其中69例(70.4%)为典型双色双融合BCR/ABL探针信号模式(1R1G2F),其余29例(29.6%)为3类12种非典型模式.各种非典型信号模式中出现频率较高的依次为:1R1G1F7例(7.1%)、2R1G1F 5例(5.1%)、1R1G2F&1R1G3F 4例(4.1%)、2R2G1F 3例(3.1%).对18例有核型资料的非典型信号的病例分析显示:其中3例特殊信号系由变异Ph易位引起;2例中出现的3个融合信号来源于附加的Ph染色体;4例核型与FISH结果不吻合,提示染色体分析存在错漏之处;3例染色体为典型Ph易位,而FISH结果为单个融合信号,系由der(9)号的部分缺失所致;3例核型中未发现Ph染色体.但FISH显示40%～64%的细胞中存在一个融合信号,从而明确慢性粒细胞白血病诊断;3例是移植或经格列卫治疗后的患者,染色体均为正常核型,而FISH检测到极小比例的阳性细胞.结论 FISH在慢性粒细胞白血病诊断、判断变异易位、隐匿Ph易位、衍生9号缺失、干扰素及格列卫的疗效观察以及移植后监测等诸多方面均具有重要价值.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

A near‐haploid clone harboring a BCR/ABL1 gene fusion in an adult patient with newly diagnosed B‐lymphoblastic leukemia

The detection of recurrent genetic abnormalities in B‐lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) is critical for risk stratification and therapy‐related decisions. Near‐haploidy (24‐30 chromosomes), a subgroup of hypodiploidy (<46 chromosomes), and BCR/ABL1 gene fusions are both recurrent genetic abnormalities in B‐ALL and are considered adverse prognostic findings, although outcomes in BCR/ABL1‐positive patients have improved with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. While near‐haploid clones are primarily observed in children and rarely harbor structural abnormalities, BCR/ABL1‐positive B‐ALL is primarily observed in adults. Importantly, recurrent genetic abnormalities are considered mutually exclusive and rarely exist within the same neoplastic clone. We report only the second case to our knowledge of a near‐haploid clone that harbors a BCR/ABL1 fusion in an adult with newly diagnosed B‐ALL. Conventional chromosome studies revealed a near‐haploid clone (27 chromosomes) along with a der(22)t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) in 17 of 20 metaphases analyzed. Our B‐ALL fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel confirmed the BCR/ABL1 fusion and monosomies consistent with chromosome studies in approximately 95% of interphase nuclei. Moreover, no evidence of a “doubled” near‐haploid clone was observed by chromosome or FISH studies. This highly unusual case illustrates that while rare, recurrent genetic abnormalities in B‐ALL can exist within the same neoplastic clone.