Effectiveness of procyclidine in combination with carbamate prophylactics against diisopropylfluorophosphate poisoning

The protective effect of cholinolytics such as procyclidine and atropine, in combination with carbamate prophylactics, against diisopropylfluorophosphate poisoning was examined in mice. Doses of carbamates were optimized, based on the maximum sign-free dose, the time course of cholinesterase inhibition and the protective potential against diisopropylfluorophosphate poisoning. Centrally-active physostigmine was more toxic than centrally-inactive pyridostigmine and the toxic signs of carbamates appeared to be closely related to the level of inhibition of brain cholinesterase activity. In combination with atropine, physostigmine was more effective than pyridostigmine in protecting mice intoxicated with diisopropylfluorophosphate. Moreover, centrally-active atropine sulfate was a more effective co-antidote to carbamates than centrally-inactive atropine methylnitrate. The most prominent protection was achieved with the combination of carbamates and procyclidine, a centrally-active cholinolytic showing anticonvulsion, which was also observed to prevent diisopropylfluorophosphate-induced convulsions (Kim et al., 1997). Taken together, it is suggested that procyclidine could be a possible substitute for atropine as an antidote to diisopropylfluorophosphate poisoning.     

Dose-Response Effects of Atropine and Hi-6 Treatment of Organophosphorus Poisoning in Guinea Pigs

ABSTRACT

HI-6 (1-2-hydroxyiminomethyl-1-pyridino-3-(4-carbamoyl-1-pyridino)-2-oxapropane dichloride) has been evaluated as an oxime alternative to pralidoxime, and toxogonin in the treatment of organophosphorus (OP) poisoning. The dose response effects of atropine (ATR) and HI-6 were investigated to more fully explore the interaction of these compounds in the treatment of OP poisoning. ATR, HI-6 and various combinations of the two drugs were evaluated against lethal poisoning by soman (GD) and tabun (GA) in guinea pigs. The effect of adjunctive diazepam treattment on the efficacy of atropine and HI-6 against soman was also investigated. Animals of either sex were challenged s.c. with OP and treated i.m. 1 min later with ATR and/or HI-6. When used, diazepam was injected immediately after ATR+HI6. LD50s of each treatment were calculated from probit models based on 24-hour survival against 5 levels of nerve agent and 6 animals per challenge level. A protective index (PI) was calculated by dividing the nerve agent LD50 in the presence of treatment by the LD50 in the absence of treatment. Treatment with HI-6 alone had little effect on the toxicity of either OP Treatment with ATR alone was more effective than HI-6 alone and was significantly more effective against soman than against tabun. When used in combination atropine and HI-6 had a strong synergistic effect against both agents. The dose of atropine used with HI-6 was critical in determining the efficacy of HI-6 against either agent. The slopes of the dose-lethality curves were minimally affected by the dose of ATR or HI-6. Adjunctive treatment with diazepam enhanced the efficacy of HI-6 and atropine against soman. It is concluded that 1) ATR has a large effect on the efficacy of HI-6 against OP poisoning, 2) the dose of ATR must be carefully selected in studies investigating the efficacy of HI-6 against OP poisoning, 3) the effective dose of ATR in the guinea pig is approximately 16 mg/kg, and 4) diazepam is a useful adjunct to atropine and HI-6.     

Evaluation of antidotal effects of adamantyl derivative Tamorf in soman poisoning

The nerve agent soman, a powerful inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE; EC 3.1.1.7), causes an array of toxic effects in the central nervous system. Adamantyl tenocyclidine derivative Tamorf (1-[2-(2-thienyl)-2-adamantyl] morpholine), a compound with potential activity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and with neuroprotective properties, is effective against convulsions and brain lesions related to soman poisoning. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antidotal potency of Tamorf (2.5 mg kg(-1)), which was tested alone as a pretreatment or in combination with atropine (10.0 mg kg(-1)) as a therapy in rats poisoned with two different sub-lethal doses of soman (1/4 and 1/2 of LD50). The effect of Tamorf was compared with carbamate physostigmine (0.1 mg kg(-1)). The study also determined the possible genotoxic effects of Tamorf and physostigmine, especially primary DNA damage in white blood cells, liver and brain tissue. Tamorf administered 5 min before poisoning stopped soman-induced seizures, was successful against sub-lethal doses of soman and protected AChE activity in the brain (P = 0.0014, P = 0.0019), and in plasma (P = 0.0464, P = 0.0405). Compared with Tamorf, physostigmine was slightly effective in the elimination of soman-induced poisoning in rats. The pharmacological effect of Tamorf and atropine was less effective as therapy, but did not increase soman toxicity (P > 0.05 for all interactions). The results obtained indicate that Tamorf and physostigmine are not genotoxic to rats in the concentrations tested. Treatment with Tamorf seems to be a good alternative for current pretreatment in soman poisoning. Its antidotal mechanism is complex and is based on combined biochemical and receptor properties.     

A comparison of the efficacy of HI6 and 2-PAM against soman, tabun, sarin, and VX in the rabbit

This study compared the efficacy of HI6 and 2-PAM against nerve agent (soman, tabun, sarin, and VX) -induced lethality in the atropinesterase-free rabbits pretreated with vehicle (controls) or pyridostigmine. Treatment was administered at signs or 2 min after agent challenge and consisted of oxime (100 μmol/kg) + atropine (13 mg/kg) (alone or together with diazepam). Twenty-four-h LD₅₀, values were calculated for soman- and tabun-intoxicated animals, whereas 24-h survival was noted in animals given 10 LD₅₀s of sarin or VX. In pyridostigmine and control rabbits intoxicated with soman and treated with oxime + atropine (alone or together with diazepam), HI6 was 3–5 times more effective than 2-PAM. In contrast, HI6 was less effective than 2-PAM against tabun poisoning. In pyridostigmine-pretreated animals exposed to tabun, efficacy was increased more than 3-fold when compare to tabun-challenged animals treated with atropine + HI6 alone. Both oximes were highly effective against sarin and VX. These findings suggest that HI6 could replace 2-PAM as therapy for nerve agent poisoning, because it is superior to 2-PAM against soman, and when used in pyridostigmine-pretreated animals, it affords excellent protection against all four nerve agents when used in combination with atropine (alone or together with diazepam) therapy.     

Minimum effective drug concentrations of a transdermal patch system containing procyclidine and physostigmine for prophylaxis against soman poisoning in rhesus monkeys

A transdermal patch system containing procyclidine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist possessing anticholinergic action, and physostigmine, a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, was developed, and its prophylactic efficacy against soman intoxication was investigated. Male rhesus monkeys were shaved on the dorsal area, attached with a matrix-type patch with various sizes (2 × 2 to 7 × 7 cm) for 24 or 72 h, and challenged with 2 × LD₅₀ doses (13 μg/kg) of soman. The smallest patch size for the protection against lethality induced by soman intoxication was 3 × 3 cm, resulting in blood procyclidine concentration of 10.8 ng/ml, blood physostigmine concentration of 0.54 ng/ml, which are much lower concentrations than maximum sign-free doses, and blood cholinesterase inhibition of 42%. The drug concentrations and enzyme inhibition rate corresponding to a diverging point of survivability were presumably estimated to be around 7 ng/ml for procyclidine, 0.35 ng/ml for physostigmine, and 37% of enzyme inhibition. Separately, in combination with the patch treatment, the post treatment consisting of atropine (0.5 mg/kg) plus 1-[([4-(aminocarbonyl)pyridinio]methoxy)methyl]-2-[(hydroxyimino)methyl]pyridinium (HI-6, 50 mg/kg) exerted protection against 5 × LD₅₀ challenge of soman, which means the posttreatment remarkably augmented the efficacy of the patch. Additionally, it was found that brain injuries induced by soman toxicity were effectively prevented by the patch treatment according to histopathological examinations. These results suggest that the patch system could be an effective alternative for diazepam, an anticonvulsant, and the current pyridostigmine pretreatment, and especially in combination with atropine plus HI-6, could be a choice for quality survival from nerve-agent poisoning.     

Protection by a transdermal patch containing physostigmine and procyclidine of soman poisoning in dogs

The prophylactic efficacy of a combinational patch system containing physostigmine and procyclidine against soman intoxication was evaluated using dogs. Female beagle dogs (body weights 9-10 kg) were shaved on the abdominal side, attached with a matrix-type patch (7x7 cm) containing 1.5% of physostigmine plus 6% procyclidine for 2 days, and challenged with subcutaneous injection of serial doses (2-10 LD50) of soman. Separately, in combination with the patch attachment, atropine (2 mg/dog) plus 2-pralidoxime (600 mg/dog) or atropine plus 1-[([4-(aminocarbonyl)pyridinio]methoxy)methyl]-2-[(hydroxyimino)methyl]pyridinium (HI-6, 500 mg/dog) were injected intramuscularly 1 min after soman poisoning. The LD50 value of soman was determined to be 9.1 microg/kg, and high doses (> or = 1.4 LD50) of soman induced salivation, emesis, defecation and diarrhea, tremors and seizures, and recumbency of dogs, leading to 100% mortality in 24 h. The prophylactic patch, which led to mean 18.5-18.8% inhibition of blood cholinesterase activity by physostigmine and mean 7.9-8.3 ng/ml of blood concentration of procyclidine, exerted a high protection ratio (4.7 LD50), in comparison with relatively-low effects of traditional antidotes, atropine plus 2-pralidoxime (2.5 LD50) and atropine plus HI-6 (2.7 LD50). Noteworthy, a synergistic increase in the protection ratio was achieved by the combination of the patch with atropine plus HI-6 (9 LD50), but not with atropine plus 2-pralidoxime (5 LD50). In addition, the patch system markedly attenuated the cholinergic signs and seizures induced by soman, especially when combined with atropine plus HI-6, leading to elimination of brain injuries and physical incapacitation up to 6 LD50 of soman poisoning. Taken together, it is suggested that the patch system containing physostigmine and procyclidine, especially in combination with atropine and HI-6, could be a choice for the quality survival from nerve-agent poisoning.     

Two medical therapies very effective shortly after high levels of soman poisoning in rats,but only one with universal utility

A treatment regimen consisting of HI-6, scopolamine, and physostigmine (termed the physostigmine regimen) has been based on the serendipitous discovery that it exerts powerful antidotal effects against high levels of soman poisoning if it is administered 1 min after exposure. A medical therapy with corresponding efficacy, but without the time limitation of the latter regimen, has been developed through studies of microinfusions of anticonvulsants into seizure controlling sites in the forebrain of rats. From these studies procyclidine emerged as the most potent anticonvulsant, and its potency was further enhanced when being combined with the antiepileptic levetiracetam during systemic administration. In the present study, the capacity of HI-6, levetiracetam, and procyclidine (termed the procyclidine regimen) was tested against that of the physostigmine regimen. The results showed that both regimens were very effective against supralethal doses of soman (3, 4, 5 × LD₅₀) when given 1 and 5 min after intoxication. When the treatments were administered 10 and 14 or 20 and 24 min after soman exposure, only the procyclidine regimen was able to terminate seizures and preserve lives. When used as prophylactic therapies, both regimens protected equally well against seizures, but only the procyclidine regimen provided neuroprotection. The procyclidine regimen has apparently capacities to serve as a universal therapy against soman intoxication in rats.     

Efficacy of Antidotes against Soman Poisoning in Female Physostigmine-Protected Rats

Abstract: Female rats have been found much more sensitive to lethal effects of soman than male rats. Therefore it was of interest to examine the efficacy of different antidotes against soman poisoning in females which are usually not being used in soman poisoning studies. The effects of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) non-reactivating antidotes atropine and diazepam were analyzed in combination with physostigmine prophylaxis against supralethal doses of soman. Physostigime prophylaxis was much more effective when supplemented by atropine and diazepam therapy, applied at the onset of the first signs of poisoning. The interval between the injection of a supralethal dose of soman and the appearance of signs of poisoning was shorter in physostigmine pretreated animals than in non-pretreated controls poisoned with the same supralethal dose of soman. The prophylactic effect of physostigmine (used at maximal dose) disappeared in about 120 min. The addition of HI-6, an AChE-reactivating oxime, to atropine+diazepam therapy further increased the survival in soman-poisoned and physostigmine-pretreated rats, yielding the highest protective ratio of 6.4. Pretreatment with physostigmine offered marked protection against inhibition of AChE by soman, as shown by enzyme activity determination in different brain regions and in diaphragm muscle. Application of HI-6 in addition to the combination of the above mentioned antidotes even preserved more AChE activity in the skeletal muscle but did not influence inhibition of the enzyme in brain.     

Protection of guinea pigs against soman poisoning with ferrocene carbamate

The protective effect of ferrocene carbamate pretreatment against soman poisoning was studied in guinea pigs. At doses corresponding to 1/20 x and 1/10 × LD₅₀ of this carbamate a 20% and 45% decrease of the acetylcholinesterase in blood and brain, respectively, was obtained. In combination with additional pretreatment, diazepam, and therapy, HI-6 and atropine, the protective ratios (LD₅₀ of soman in treated animals/LD₅₀ of soman in untreated animals) were around 20 and 40, respectively. Animals pretreated with the high dose of the ferrocene carbamate that survived 10 x and 15xLD_50s of soman showed no remaining signs of poisoning after 24 h. Thus, the ferrocene carbamate afforded a better protection against soman than physostigmine. The explanation for this could be due to the properties of the ferrocene carbamate, not correlated to its cholinesterase inhibiting activity. This hypothesis is discussed.     

Protection of acetylcholinesterase by meptazinol in mice exposed to di-isopropyl fluorophosphate. Comparison with physostigmine.

The protective action of meptazinol against acute di-isopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP) intoxication has been evaluated in mice by measuring the effects on the DFP LD50 of the pretreatment of the animals with increasing doses of the drug. Meptazinol at the doses 15, 30 and 45 mg kg-1 injected 15 min before DFP caused a dose-dependent increase in the DFP LD50, resulting in protection ratios equal to 2.1, 4.8 and 9.7, respectively, in the absence of atropine and 2.5, 4.7, and 8, respectively, in the presence of atropine sulphate (17.4 mg kg-1) therapy. Under the same experimental conditions, the protective ratio of 0.1 mg kg-1 physostigmine sulphate was 2.2 and 7.3 in the absence and presence of atropine therapy, respectively. In separate experiments, the time course of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity recovery was evaluated in the brain and diaphragm of mice pretreated with meptazinol (30 mg kg-1) or physostigmine (0.1 mg kg-1) 15 min before poisoning with DFP (8 mg kg-1). Ten minutes after poisoning, residual AChE activity in the brain averaged 4, 47 and 15% of that in controls in animals pretreated with atropine alone, atropine plus meptazinol or atropine plus physostigmine, respectively. Twenty four hours after poisoning, brain AChE activity averaged 31 and 47% of that in controls in mice protected by meptazinol and physostigmine, respectively. The data from the diaphragm closely paralleled those from the brain. It is concluded that high doses of meptazinol exert antidotal action against acute DFP poisoning in the mouse comparable in efficacy with that of physostigmine combined with atropine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of combinational prophylactics composed of physostigmine and procyclidine on soman-induced lethality, seizures and brain injuries

The antidotal, anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects of physostigmine (PhS) and procyclidine (PC), the combinational prophylactics for organophosphate poisoning, were evaluated. For the investigation of dose-response relationship in rats and guinea pigs, various doses (0-6 mg/kg) of PC in combination with a fixed dose (0.1 mg/kg) of PhS were pretreated subcutaneously 30 min prior to subcutaneous poisoning with soman. Procyclidine in combination with PhS exhibited remarkable synergistic effects in a dose-dependent manner, leading to 1.92-5.07 folds of protection ratio in rats and 3.00-4.70 folds in guinea pigs. On the other hand, a low effect (1.65 fold) was achieved with the traditional antidotes atropine (17.4 mg/kg) plus 2-pralidoxime (30 mg/kg) treated immediately after soman poisoning, compared with a marked protection (5.50 fold) with atropine (17.4 mg/kg) plus HI-6 (125 mg/kg) in unpretreated rats. Noteworthy, the combinational prophylactics greatly potentiated the effect of atropine plus 2-pralidoxime to 6.13 or 12.27 folds and that of atropine plus HI-6 to 12.00 or 21.50 folds with 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg of PC, respectively. A high dose (100 μg/kg, 1.3×LD(50)) of soman induced severe epileptiform seizures in rats pretreated with HI-6 (125 mg/kg), resulting in brain injuries in discrete brain regions under histopathological examination in 24 h. Interestingly, such seizures and excitotoxic brain injuries were fully prevented by pretreatment with PhS (0.1 mg/kg) and PC (1 mg/kg). Taken together, it is proposed that the prophylactics composed of PhS and PC could be a promising regimen for the prevention of lethality, seizures and brain injuries induced by soman poisoning.     

The combination of donepezil and procyclidine protects against soman-induced seizures in rats

Current treatment of nerve agent poisoning consists of prophylactic administration of pyridostigmine and therapy using atropine, an oxime and a benzodiazepine. Pyridostigmine does however not readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier giving ineffective protection of the brain against centrally mediated seizure activity. In this study, we have evaluated donepezil hydrochloride, a partial reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) clinically used for treating Alzheimer's disease, in combination with procyclidine, used in treatment of Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia, as prophylaxis against intoxication by the nerve agent soman. The results demonstrated significant protective efficacy of donepezil (2.5 mg/kg) combined with procyclidine (3 or 6 mg/kg) when given prophylactically against a lethal dose of soman (1.6 x LD(50)) in Wistar rats. No neuropathological changes were found in rats treated with this combination 48 h after soman intoxication. Six hours after soman exposure cerebral AChE activity and acetylcholine (ACh) concentration was 5% and 188% of control, respectively. The ACh concentration had returned to basal levels 24 h after soman intoxication, while AChE activity had recovered to 20% of control. Loss of functioning muscarinic ACh receptors (17%) but not nicotinic receptors was evident at this time point. The recovery in brain AChE activity seen in our study may be due to the reversible binding of donepezil to the enzyme. Donepezil is well tolerated in humans, and a combination of donepezil and procyclidine may prove useful as an alternative to the currently used prophylaxis against nerve agent intoxication.     

The efficacy of bispyridinium derivatives in the treatment of organophosphonate poisoning in the guinea-pig

The efficacy of a number of bispyridinium compounds, including both oxime and non-oxime derivatives, has been determined against poisoning by sarin, soman, tabun and VX in guinea-pigs receiving various supporting treatments. In conjunction with atropine therapy only, the oximes were effective against sarin and VX poisoning and of them only the 4-substituted oximes were beneficial against tabun poisoning. None of the compounds was effective against poisoning by soman. When the supporting drug treatment consisted of pyridostigmine pretreatment and therapy with atropine and diazepam (this treatment itself gave considerable protection against organophosphate poisoning) both the non-oxime and oxime derivatives increased the protection against all four agents although obidoxime and TMB-4 were not beneficial against soman poisoning. The results are discussed in relation to published studies in which these compounds have been found to be beneficial against soman poisoning in atropine-treated rats and mice. It is suggested that the guinea-pig is a better model for predicting the efficacy of treatments for organophosphate poisoning in primate species.     

Protection against nerve agent poisoning by a noncompetitive nicotinic antagonist

The acute toxicity of organophosphorus (OP) nerve agents arises from accumulation of acetylcholine (ACh) and overstimulation of ACh receptors. The mainstay of current pharmacotherapy is the competitive muscarinic antagonist, atropine. Nicotinic antagonists have not been used due to the difficulties of administering a dose of a competitive neuromuscular blocker sufficient to antagonise the effects of excessive ACh, but not so much that it paralyses the muscles. An alternative approach would be to use a noncompetitive antagonist whose effects would not be overcome by increasing ACh concentrations. This study demonstrates that the compound 1,1′-(propane-1,3-diyl)bis(4-tert-butylpyridinium), which blocks open nicotinic ion channels noncompetitively, is able to reverse the neuromuscular paralysis after nerve agent poisoning in vitro and to protect guinea pigs against poisoning by nerve agents when used as part of a therapeutic drug combination including a muscarinic antagonist. In contrast to the oxime HI-6, this compound was equally effective in protecting against poisoning by sarin or tabun. Further studies should identify more effective compounds with this action and optimise doses for protection against nerve agent poisoning in vivo.     

The role of diazepam in the treatment of nerve agent poisoning in a civilian population

The main site of action of diazepam, as with other benzodiazepines, is at the GABA(A) receptor, although it has been suggested that some of the potentially beneficial actions of diazepam in nerve agent poisoning are mediated through other means. It is likely that convulsions may have long-term sequelae in the central nervous system, because of damage by anoxia and/or excitotoxicity. Numerous pharmacodynamic studies of the action of diazepam in animals experimentally poisoned with nerve agents have been undertaken. In nearly all of these, diazepam has been studied in combination with other antidotes, such as atropine and/or pyridinium oximes, sometimes in combination with pyridostigmine pretreatment. These studies show that diazepam is an efficacious anticonvulsant in nerve agent poisoning. There is considerable experimental evidence to support the hypothesis that diazepam (and other anticonvulsants) may prevent structural damage to the central nervous system as evidenced by neuropathological changes such as neuronal necrosis at autopsy. In instances of nerve agent poisoning during terrorist use in Japan, diazepam seems to have been an effective anticonvulsant. Consequently, the use of diazepam is an important part of the treatment regimen of nerve agent poisoning, the aim being to prevent convulsions or reduce their duration. Diazepam should be given to patients poisoned with nerve agents whenever convulsions or muscle fasciculation are present. In severe poisoning, diazepam administration should be considered even before these complications occur. Diazepam is also useful as an anxiolytic in those exposed to nerve agents.     

The prophylactic use of l-methyl, 2-hydroxyiminomethylpyridinium methanesulfonate (P2S) in the treatment of organophosphate poisoning.

Studies have been carried out to determine the effects of prophylactic treatment with P2S (1-methyl,2-hydroxyinimomethylpyridinium methanesulfonate) on the survival of animals poisoned by lethal doses of sarin, soman, tabun, or VX (O-ethyl S-diisopropylaminoethyl methylphosphonothiolate). The influence of such prophylaxis on the efficacy of therapy with atropine and P2S after poisoning by the same organophosphates has also been investigated. Following pretreatment with P2S there was a significant increase, compared with control animals, in the survival time of rabbits and guinea pigs poisoned by 2.3 LD50 of sarin and VX. With soman and tabun, the increase in the time of survival was slight, but consistent. In every case, the time taken for signs of poisoning to occur was unaffected by the pretreatment. P2S prophylaxis enhanced the effectiveness of therapy with atropine, and P2S given after poisoning with organophosphates had a similar effect, although the extent of the protection against soman poisoning was considerably less than that achieved against poisoning by sarin or VX.     

Successful pretreatment/therapy of soman, sarin and VX intoxication.

Chemical pretreatment is effective against a 2 LD50 challenge of soman, sarin or VX or a 5 LD50 challenge of tabun. Chemical pretreatment followed by post challenge therapy should be effective against greater levels of agent. Such tests in guinea pigs are reported here; pretreatment regimens (PRGs) consisted of physostigmine (0.15 mg/kg, im) and an adjunct. The adjuncts [mg/kg, im] used were aprophen [8], atropine (AT)[16], azaprophen (AZA)[5], benactyzine [1.25], benztropine (BT) [4], scopolamine [0.08] and trihexyphenidyl [2]. Pretreatment was given 30 min before, and atropine (16 mg/kg, im) and 2-PAM (25 mg/kg, im) therapy (T) at one min after, 5 LD50s of agent. Results indicate that, all of the PRG+T regimens, except BT-not tested with T, prevent lethality by soman; trihexyphenidyl and scopolamine (the only adjuncts used therein) regimens each prevent lethality by sarin and VX. Against soman, all PRG+T regimens (vs PRG only) may shorten the median recovery time to 2 hrs or less. Even without therapy, the PRGs containing AT, AZA or BT prevent lethality by 5 LD50s of soman; however, used alone, only the PRG containing AZA reduces the incidence of convulsions at this level of soman.     

Cognitive side effects in rats caused by pharmacological agents used to prevent soman-induced lethality

It is important that prophylactics used to protect military and emergency personnel against lethal doses of nerve agents do not by themselves produce impairment of cognitive capability. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether physostigmine, scopolamine, and various doses of procyclidine might reduce rats' innate preference for novelty. When these drugs were tested separately, the results showed that physostigmine (0.1 mg/kg) and procyclidine (3 mg/kg) did not affect preference for novelty, whereas scopolamine (0.15 mg/kg) and procyclidine in a higher dose (6 mg/kg) resulted in a preference deficit (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, the combination of physostigmine and scopolamine or physostigmine and procyclidine (6 mg/kg) caused a marked deficit in preference for novelty. A much milder deficit was observed when physostigmine was combined with lower doses (1 or 3 mg/kg) of procyclidine. The latter combinations also had milder adverse impact on the animals' interest in the test environment and activity measures than the former combinations. By combining physostigmine with anticholinergics, a potentiation of adverse effects on behavior was seen. It is concluded that a slight cognitive impairment might be unavoidable with effective prophylactics.     

Combination anticonvulsant treatment of soman-induced seizures

These studies investigated the effectiveness of combination treatment with a benzodiazepine and an anticholinergic drug against soman-induced seizures. The anticholinergic drugs considered were biperiden, scopolamine, trihexaphenidyl, and procyclidine; the benzodiazepines were diazepam and midazolam. Male guinea pigs were implanted surgically with cortical screw electrodes. Electrocorticograms were displayed continually and recorded on a computerized electroencephalographic system. Pyridostigmine (0.026 mg x kg(-1), i.m.) was injected as a pretreatment to inhibit red blood cell acetylcholinesterase by 30-40%. Thirty minutes after pyridostigmine, 2 x LD50 (56 microg x kg(-1)) of soman was injected s.c., followed 1 min later by i.m. treatment with atropine (2 mg x kg(-1)) + 2-PAM (25 mg x kg(-1)). Electrographic seizures occurred in all animals. Anticonvulsant treatment combinations were administered i.m. at 5 or 40 min after seizure onset. Treatment consisted of diazepam or midazolam plus one of the above-mentioned anticholinergic drugs. All doses of the treatment compounds exhibited little or no antiseizure efficacy when given individually. The combination of a benzodiazepine and an anticholinergic drug was effective in terminating soman-induced seizure, whether given 5 or 40 min after seizure onset. The results suggest a strong synergistic effect of combining benzodiazepines with centrally active anticholinergic drugs and support the concept of using an adjunct to supplement diazepam for the treatment of nerve-agent-induced seizures.     

Behavioral efficacy of diazepam against nerve agent exposure in rhesus monkeys.

The possibility that nerve agents will be used on the battlefield is real. The traditional therapy against nerve agent exposure consists of pyridostigmine pretreatment and atropine-pralidoxime chloride therapy administered after nerve agent exposure. This therapy regimen is extremely effective in preventing mortality in laboratory animals exposed to multilethal concentrations of nerve agent, yet these animals often display convulsions, brain damage, and behavioral incapacitation. We report here that the addition of diazepam to the traditional therapy for nerve agent (soman) exposure not only decreases the incidence of convulsions, but also attenuates the cognitive impairments of rhesus monkeys trained on a Serial Probe Recognition (SPR) task. Monkeys which received diazepam treatment required only 6 days before their performance on the SPR task returned to presoman exposure levels, compared to nondiazepam-treated monkeys which required 15 days. Moreover, only 1 out of the 5 monkeys which received diazepam treatment suffered tonic-clonic convulsions; in contrast all 5 monkeys which did not receive diazepam treatment experienced severe convulsive episodes. These results suggest that diazepam would be an excellent adjunct to traditional nerve agent therapy to facilitate behavioral recovery from nerve agent intoxication that might be encountered by US military personnel on the battlefield or accidental organophosphate poisoning encountered in industrial or agricultural accidents.