Information on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) voluntarily submitted by patients can be a valuable source of information for improving drug safety; however, public awareness of reporting mechanisms remains low. Whilst methods to automatically detect ADR mentions from social media posts using text mining techniques have been proposed to improve reporting rates, it is unclear how acceptable these would be to social media users.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore public opinion about using automated methods to detect and report mentions of ADRs on social media to enhance pharmacovigilance efforts.
MethodsUsers of the online health discussion forum HealthUnlocked participated in an online survey (N = 1359) about experiences with ADRs, knowledge of pharmacovigilance methods, and opinions about using automated data mining methods to detect and report ADRs. To further explore responses, five qualitative focus groups were conducted with 20 social media users with long-term health conditions.
ResultsParticipant responses indicated a low awareness of pharmacovigilance methods and ADR reporting. They showed a strong willingness to share health-related social media data about ADRs with researchers and regulators, but were cautious about automated text mining methods of detecting and reporting ADRs.
ConclusionsSocial media users value public-facing pharmacovigilance schemes, even if they do not understand the current framework of pharmacovigilance within the UK. Ongoing engagement with users is essential to understand views, share knowledge and respect users’ privacy expectations to optimise future ADR reporting from online health communities.
相似文献Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of many cancers as they improve clinical outcomes. However, ICIs have also been associated with the development of immune-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Among immune-related ADRs, cardiac immune-related ADRs are rare, but also associated with high mortality rates.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiac ADRs reported with ICIs in the European spontaneous reporting system.
MethodsWe retrieved individual case safety reports on ICI-induced cardiac ADRs from the website of suspected ADR (www.adrreports.eu) of the European pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance). Data were retrieved from the date of marketing authorization of each ICI (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and cemiplimab) to 14 March, 2020. The reporting odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were computed to assess the reporting frequency of cardiac ADRs for each ICI compared to all other ICIs.
ResultsA total of 2478 individual case safety reports with at least one ICI as the suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 249 (10%) reported more than one ICI. The three most reported ICIs were nivolumab (43.2%), pembrolizumab (32.5%), and the association of nivolumab/ipilimumab (9.4%). A total of 3388 cardiac ADRs were identified. Cardiac ADRs were serious (99.4%) and had a fatal outcome (30.1%). The most reported cardiac events were myocarditis, cardiac failure, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, and myocardial infarction. Nivolumab was reported with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs (reporting odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.18).
ConclusionsImmune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiac ADRs were serious and had unfavorable outcomes. In our study, nivolumab was the only ICI with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs. In this regard, further head-to-head studies are needed.
相似文献Areas covered: This narrative review examines the current state of pharmacovigilance for biologics in the European Union (EU) and discusses relevant information on pharmacovigilance of biosimilars, the current EU pharmacovigilance system, and areas that could be improved.
Expert opinion: Although steps have been taken to improve pharmacovigilance of biologics in the EU, several enhancements can still be made, including additional training for healthcare professionals on ADR reporting, the use of 2D barcodes that enhance traceability, and an open discussion of potentially missed opportunities in the pharmacovigilance of biosimilars. 相似文献
Research design and methods: In this retrospective observational study, we extracted all the individual case safety reports related to oral anticoagulants recorded in the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance Database (January 2010 to April 2015). The annual incidence of suspected ADRs was estimated using drug exposure data. Disproportionality of reporting ADR was addressed through reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 99% confidence intervals.
Results: We appraised 794 suspected ADR (78% related to NOACs). The annual number of ADRs increased overtime with 9 ADRs/million Defined Daily Dose (DDD) at the end of 2014. The incidence of NOACs ADRs decreased from 2012 onwards. VKA showed a disproportion in ‘Investigation’ (ROR 0.10, 99%CI 0.05–0.22) and ‘Injury, poisoning and procedural complications’ (ROR 0.36, 99%CI 0.19–0.69) ADRs compared with NOACs. NOACs had a higher significant disproportion of ‘Nervous system disorders’ related ADRs (ROR 3.98, 99%CI 1.50–10.53).
Conclusions: Reporting of ADRs associated with oral anticoagulants (mainly NOACs), is increasing. Exploratory disproportion analyses showed an increase of reports of nervous system ADRs with NOACs, and INR-related ADRs with VKA. 相似文献
Areas covered: Data were gathered from prior surveys, previous initiatives and a review of relevant literature was done. New technologies provide an opportunity in the way safety information is collected, helping generate new knowledge for safety profile of drugs as well as unique insights into the evolving pharmacovigilance system in general. It is critical that these capabilities are harnessed in a way that is ethical, compliant with regulations, respecting data privacy and used responsibly. At the same time, the process for managing and interpreting this new information must be efficient and effective for sustenance, thoughtful use of resources and valuable return of knowledge. These approaches should complement the ongoing progress toward personalized medicine.
Expert opinion: This Web-RADR initiative should provide some directions on ‘what and how’ to use social media to further proactive pharmacovigilance and protection of public health. It is expected to also show how a multipronged expert consortium group comprising regulators, industry and academia can leverage new developments in technology and society to bring innovation in process, operations, organization and scientific approaches across its boundaries and beyond the normal realms of individual research units. These new approaches should bring insights faster, earlier, specific, actionable and moving toward the target of AE prevention. The possibilities of a blended targeted pharmacovigilance (PV) approach where boundaries between stakeholders blur and cultures mix point to very different future for better, healthier and longer lives. 相似文献
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently requires chronic immunosuppressive treatment and active involvement from patients during treatment decision making. Information about the risk of developing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to IBD therapies is required in this process.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the ADRs reported in IBD patients from real-world data, using the Dutch nationwide IBDREAM registry, and compare the occurrence and cumulative incidences with the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of the associated drugs.
MethodsIn this retrospective multicentre study, ADRs related to IBD medication were assessed. Only reports associated with the use of drugs used for the maintenance treatment of IBD were included. All ADRs were verified by healthcare professionals and coded by trained pharmacovigilance assessors.
ResultsIn total, 3080 ADRs were reported in 1179 patients. Twenty-three new drug–ADR associations related to the use of azathioprine, mercaptopurine, infliximab, oral mesalamine and thioguanine were reported in the IBDREAM registry that were not mentioned in the corresponding SmPCs. The most frequently reported new association was pyrexia for azathioprine (3.1%) and mercaptopurine (4.9%). In addition, there were seven ADRs with a higher cumulative incidence in IBDREAM compared with the SmPC, and included, among others, arthralgia during mercaptopurine use (2.5%), and diarrhoea (1.4%), alopecia (1.2%) and infections (1.6%) during azathioprine use.
ConclusionsBased on real-world data, ADR reporting demonstrated new ADRs and higher incidences of ADRs to IBD therapies. This information will contribute to drug safety by updating the SmPCs, allowing better risk assessment and communication towards patients.
相似文献Method: Data are extracted from EV database, which collects suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) of medicinal products in Europe. We are appointed to supervise digoxin, nicardipine, delapril, manidipine and hydrochlorothiazide/ramipril. ADRs are coded through MedDRA Preferred Terms and collected in the electronic Reaction Monitoring Report (eRMR). Statistical analysis is based on the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) as a measure of disproportionality.
Results: Up to April 2016 we have analyzed 45 eRMR for each drug. Two signals for nicardipine were submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee of European Medicines Agency (EMA): acute pulmonary oedema (off-label use as tocolytic) and thrombocytopenia.
Conclusions: Our experience shows the scientific and regulatory value of signal detection activity on EV data in order to continuously evaluate the benefit/risk profile of recent and older drugs. 相似文献
The impact of pharmacovigilance activities on public health remains under-investigated, and measuring the impact on health of pharmacovigilance activities for a specific safety signal is challenging.
ObjectiveTo gain more insight into the methodological challenges and the data required, we assessed the impact of pharmacovigilance on public health for four identified product-specific safety signals using publicly available data in the Netherlands. The assessment was on the impact of the intertwined and complementary steps of the pharmacovigilance pathways.
MethodsThe impact of pharmacovigilance on public health was assessed using the assessment support tool and ‘open data’ from the Netherlands for four different types of pharmacovigilance safety signals: (1) off-label use of cyproterone acetate/ethinyloestradiol (CPA/EE) and thrombotic risk after pharmacovigilance measures after 2014; (2) pergolide and the risk of cardiac valvulopathy after pharmacovigilance activities in 2003; (3) proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hypomagnesaemia after pharmacovigilance activities in 2011; (4) rosiglitazone withdrawal from the market because of cardiovascular effects in 2010.
ResultsFor the signals on CPA/EE and pergolide, a crude estimation of the impact could be made with varying degrees of assumptions based on the risk described in the literature and utilisation data.
ConclusionThis article highlights the methodological challenges and the data required to assess the impact of product-specific safety signals. A structured assessment support tool can be used as a guide for the necessary data elements and steps needed for the measurement or estimation of impact of pharmacovigilance activities on public health, provided that the appropriate data are available.
相似文献Methods: Patients who reported an ADR to the Dutch Pharmacovigilance Centre for the first time in the period between October 2012 and April 2013 were included. Reporters received personalized feedback or a general acknowledgement letter. Satisfaction towards the received feedback, expressed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 very good to 5 very poor), was studied using a web-based questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson Chi-square test and linear regression analysis. Statistical significance was based on p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 471 patient-reporters were contacted with a total response of 52.5%. Respondents of both groups were satisfied with the received feedback, average score 2 (good). Respondents of the personalized feedback-group were however more satisfied score 2.0 versus 2.5 (p < 0.001) and considered the feedback more clear and useful compared with respondents of the acknowledgement letter-group, respectively score 1.6 versus 1.7 (p = 0.01) and score 2.1 versus 2.5 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients reporting ADRs are satisfied with feedback received from the pharmacovigilance centre, whether this is a personalized feedback or a general acknowledgment letter. They find it clear, useful and it meets their expectation. Although differences were found between the two types of feedback, these differences did not indicate dissatisfaction towards the received feedback. 相似文献