肝肾联合移植15例报道

目的探讨肝肾联合移植的适应证和疗效。方法对2001年2月至2003年12月施行肝肾联合移植术的15例患者进行了随访。15例中,乙型肝炎后肝硬化合并肝肾综合征8例、合并尿毒症2例、合并糖尿病肾病1例;多囊肝和多囊肾2例;Caroli病合并多囊肾1例;酒精性肝硬化合并尿毒症1例。对肝肾联合移植患者的手术方式,围手术期并发症,术后急、慢性排斥反应和乙型肝炎复发情况及随访结果进行了分析。结果15例肝肾联合移植术后移植物功能均恢复良好,6个月和1年生存率为100%。1例术前有严重营养不良者,术后给与48d的呼吸机支持后康复。术后创面出血和消化道出血各1例,经非手术治疗后治愈。胆道吻合口狭窄1例,用内镜下球囊扩张术治愈。1例术后2周发生急性移植肝排斥反应,给予激素冲击治疗后得到控制。1例术后30个月时因停用拉米夫定后乙型肝炎复发死于移植肝功能丧失。结论肝肾联合移植是终末期肝病合并慢性肾功能衰竭或肾功能损害的安全有效方法。对乙型肝炎患者术后尽早应用拉米夫定和乙型肝炎病毒免疫球蛋白预防肝炎复发。     

肝移植治疗终末期自身免疫性肝病的预后分析

目的探讨肝移植治疗终末期自身免疫性肝病(AILD)的预后情况。方法回顾性分析1996年5月至2013年4月在第二军医大学附属长征医院实施原位肝移植术的48例终末期AILD受者的临床资料。计算受者的术后累积生存率,分析死亡病例的死因,了解术后排斥反应、病毒性肝炎新发感染及AILD复发情况。结果 48例AILD受者中,存活38例,AILD受者术后5年累积生存率为76%。10例死亡受者的死亡原因包括多器官功能衰竭、移植肝衰竭、脓毒症、肺部感染、出血、肝动脉栓塞、肾衰竭。48例AILD受者中,肝移植术后发生急性排斥反应者9例(19%),有3例分别在术后1~2年内新发乙型肝炎病毒感染,有2例原发性胆汁性肝硬化受者于术后2年出现原发病复发,经积极治疗均长期生存。结论终末期AILD肝移植受者多数可获得长期生存,应重视肝移植术后早期免疫抑制方案的制定,预防感染及排斥反应和术后新发病毒性肝炎,及时发现原发病复发等问题。     

Living related renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation from a brain-dead donor

We report a case in which a living related renal transplantation was successfully performed for end-stage renal disease that had progressed after a liver transplantation from a brain-dead donor for liver cirrhosis associated with type C hepatitis. Because the transplanted liver function had been excellent with the use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, the same immunosuppressive agents with prednisolone were employed for the renal transplantation. Both grafts are functioning well without recurrence of hepatitis at 10 months after the renal transplantation. From our experience, renal transplantation should not be contraindicated even if the patient has undergone liver transplantation or has hepatitis C viral infection.     

Hepatitis C: indication for anti-viral therapy?

Abstract  Hepatitis C infection is a frequent indication for liver transplantation. In general, recurrent graft hepatitis is assumed to be mild, but may be the cause of lethal postoperative complications in a small patient population. Out of 500 transplants in 458 patients, 123 patients were transplanted due to hepatitis C infection (26.7 %) between September 1988 and April 1994. Cumulative 1– to 6-year patient survival was similar for patients transplanted due to hepatitis C (87.0 %) and those transplanted for other indications (86.0 %). In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), death, in 50 % of the cases, was related to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. Four patients (25.0 %) died because of severe infection and multiple organ failure syndrome unrelated to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. The incidence of retransplantation was similar in HCV (9.8 %) and other patients (8.4 %). In HCV patients, 6 of 12 retransplantations (50.0 %) were performed due to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. Of 123 HCV patients, 45 experienced histo-logically proven recurrent graft hepatitis between 2 weeks and 5.5 years after transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar in both groups. The incidence of steroid-resistant rejection was, however, higher in HCV patients (29.3 %) than in those transplanted for other indications (14.5 %; P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant association between acute rejection and the development of recurrent graft hepatitis. In conclusion, patients with hepatitis C may be transplanted with as good patient and graft survival rates as patients transplanted for other indications. However, the combination of recurrent graft hepatitis and chronic rejection remains the most limiting factor for some of these patients, which strengthens the necces-sity for a specific anti-viral therapy.     

Cytokine profile of liver- and blood-derived nonspecific T cells after liver transplantation: T helper cells type 1/0 lymphokines dominate in recurrent hepatitis C virus infection and rejection

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a successfultreatment in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated end-stage liver disease worldwide. T lymphocytes and their cytokines are believed to have a pivotal role in the defense against HCV and in allograft rejection. An immunosuppressive drug regimen may cause a cytokine imbalance toward a T helper (TH) cell type 2 profile that is associated with the persistence of infection and acceptance of the graft. The aim of this study is to assess whether cytokine imbalances toward a TH 1- or TH2-type response may have a role in recurrent HCV infection and rejection after OLT Twenty-one intrahepatic Tcell lines of 15 patients with recurrent HCV infection after OLT (group A) and 15 lines of 11 patients with rejection (group B) were studied. Both patient groups had received liver allografts because of HCV-associated end-stage liver disease. Patients with HCV-induced liver disease who did not undergo OLT served as controls: 17 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) and 8 patients with cirrhosis. At the time of liver biopsy, 14 blood-derived Tcell lines of 12 patients with recurrent HCV infection, 7 of 10 patients with rejection, and 18 of 18 control patients were also investigated. Regardless of the underlying disease (recurrent HCV infection, rejection, HCVinduced hepatitis, and cirrhosis), all liver tissue-derived Tcell lines produced interferon-'Y; some additionally produced interleukin-4 (IL-4), but none produced IL-10, indicating that the TH0/1 cytokine profile dominates. Tcell lines showing a TH1 cytokine profile derived from intrahepatic T cells could be established significantly more often in recurrent HCV infection and rejection than in controls with CH-C (Fisher's exact test, P < .05). The cytokine profile of intrahepatic T cells did not differ from that obtained in peripheral blood. TH0/1 cytokine profile dominates the intrahepatic and blood-derived immune response in recurrent HCV infection and rejection after OLT regardless of the mode of immunosuppressvn. The lymphokine profile of immunocompromised patients with recurrent HCV infection or rejection does not differ principally from that of patients with HCV-induced hepatitis and cirrhosis, but seems to show a TH1 profile significantly more often.     

Indications and results of liver transplantation]

More than 20,000 human liver transplantations have been performed world-wide. The procedure has become universally accepted by hepatologists and applied most broadly for numerous indications in end-stage liver disease. Most common indications for transplantation are benign liver diseases, leading to cirrhosis and/or liver failure. In non-resectable tumor stages liver transplantations have been less frequently performed. The main problem remains to define the "best timing" for the operation. The disease stage will influence the incidence of perioperative complications, postoperative mortality and survival after transplantation. Liver transplantation should be considered, before chronic liver disease reaches its final stage and extra-hepatic liver-related organ complications determine the course. "Ultima ratio" decisions in very late disease stages will leave the patient with only a small chance of surviving. High tumor recurrence rates and inferior survival figures after liver transplantation in malignant liver diseases necessitate a restrictive indication policy in such patients. Probably neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with liver transplantation will expand the therapeutic modalities in unresectable situations.     

Should patients with chronic hepatitis C infection be transplanted?

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million people throughout the world and 2 to 3 million Americans. End-stage liver disease secondary to chronic HCV infection is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in this country. Currently, the gold standard for treatment for immunocompetent patients is a combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin for 6 to 12 months depending on the genotype. This treatment achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54% to 61% of patients overall. Almost 50% of patients do not respond or have recurrences posttreatment and progress in over 10 to 20 years into chronic liver disease and its complications. Liver transplantation is the only therapeutic modality that impacts on quality of life and survival of these patients. However, recurrence of HCV in the new allograft is universal with accelerated progression to cirrhosis in 5 to 10 years. Response to treatment is usually low (20% to 30%), and associated with significant side effects and depression. A significant percentage of patients with recurrent HCV after transplantation require retransplantation to control the complications of end-stage liver disease. Other solid organ transplants recipients already HCV-positive, or infected at the time of transplantation from blood transfusions or an infected graft, develop accelerated, progressive liver disease facilitated by the adverse effects of immunosuppression in addition to HCV replication. To prevent morbidity, mortality, and high costs related to the consequences of HCV infection, all solid organ transplant candidates should be tested for HCV infection and treated appropriately with PEG-IFN and ribavirin prior to transplantation.     

Management of chronic viral hepatitis before and after renal transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is present in 2-50% of renal transplant recipients and patients receiving hemodialysis. Renal transplantation confers an overall survival benefit in HCV positive (HCV+) hemodialysis patients, with similar 5-year patient and graft survival to those without HCV infection. However, longer-term studies have reported increased liver-related mortality in HCV-infected recipients. Unfortunately, attempts to eradicate HCV infection before transplant have been disappointing. Interferon is poorly tolerated in-patients with end-stage renal disease and ribavirin is contraindicated because reduced renal clearance results in severe hemolysis. Antiviral therapy following renal transplantation is also poorly tolerated, because of interferon-induced rejection and graft loss. Although the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in hemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients since the introduction of routine vaccination and other infection control measures, it remains high within countries with endemic HBV infection (especially Asia-Pacific and Africa). Renal transplantation is associated with reduced survival in HBsAg+ hemodialysis patients. Unlike interferon, lamivudine is a safe and effective antiviral HBV treatment both before and after renal transplantation. Lamivudine therapy commenced at transplantation should prevent early posttransplant reactivation and subsequent progression to cirrhosis and late liver failure. This preemptive therapy should also eradicate early liver failure from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Because cessation of treatment may lead to severe lamivudine-withdrawal hepatitis, most patients require long-term therapy. The development of lamivudine-resistance will be accelerated by immunosuppression and may result in severe hepatitis flares with decompensation. Regular monitoring with liver function tests and HBV DNA measurements should enable early detection and rescue with adefovir. Chronic HCV and HBV infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The best predictor for liver mortality is advanced liver disease at the time of transplant, and liver biopsy should be considered in all potential HBsAg+ or HCV+ renal transplant candidates without clinical or radiologic evidence of cirrhosis. Established cirrhosis with active viral infection should be considered a relative contraindication to isolated renal transplantation.     

HBV and HCV infections in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HTx) recipients risk acquiring hepatotropic viral infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the impact of these infections on post-HTx survival remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to define the prevalence, clinical features, and natural history of HBV and HCV infections in a cohort of HTx recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 360 consecutive patients who had undergone HTx. Clinical picture, hepatic injury indexes, and HBV/HCV viral serology were followed post-transplant. RESULTS: During follow-up (average, 8 +/- 3.1 years), 49 (16.5%) of the HTx recipients tested positive for at least 1 of the 2 viruses (3.1% HBV, 12% HCV, 0.5% concomitant infection). The prevalence of HCV infection in heart transplant recipients transplanted before and after 1990 was 28% and 4.2%, respectively, the latter being markedly lower (p < 0.001) than in earlier series of HTx recipients and much lower than expected in the age- and sex-matched general population. All HBV-positive and 58% of HCV-positive recipients developed chronic liver disease. Sixteen percent of patients developed cirrhosis during follow-up, and 8% died of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBV and HCV in a large population of HTx recipients is not very different from that reported in the general population. Active viral replication of HBV and an aggressive natural history of both infections are seen in HTx recipients, however. The low prevalence of HBV- and HCV-related infection in recent series probably reflects current viral screening and vaccination policies.     

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma related to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are currently the most common indications for liver transplantation. The number of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) procedures has increased given the shortage of donor organs from deceased donors. However, recurrence of HCV infection is universal and affects graft survival. This mini-review compared the outcomes for HCV-positive recipients after LDLT with those after deceased donor liver transplantation.     

Liver transplantation: the initial experience of a Canadian centre

At the University Hospital in London, Ont., 19 patients have received 24 liver transplants. The commonest indications for transplantation were primary biliary cirrhosis and cirrhosis from chronic active hepatitis. The first three patients in the series died of infectious complications. Eleven of the subsequent 16 recipients are alive from 5 months to 2 1/2 years after transplantation. Eight patients who are alive more than 1 year after the operation have an excellent quality of life. Cyclosporine and steroids in combination are used for immunosuppression. With current surgical techniques, modern immunosuppression and good patient selection, the restoration of patients with advanced irreversible liver disease to good health by liver transplantation is a realistic goal. Much effort and considerable resources are required to run a liver transplant program.     

Recent advances in living-related liver transplantation and in liver transplantation for patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Living-related-donor liver transplantation has been performed in more than 700 patients in Japan. This article deals with recent advances in living-related-donor liver transplantation and the strategy for liver transplantation for patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The indication for living-related-donor liver transplantation has gradually widened to include urgent cases as well as adult patients. In living-related-donor liver transplantation for adults, limitation of graft volume has led to the use of left hepatic lobe grafts including the caudate lobe, or right hepatic lobe grafts. The results of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis, hepatitis C cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma have improved, due mainly to advances in patient selection and perioperative medical Care. The widespread use of liver transplants from both living and cadaveric donors is necessary in Japan, where adult patients with viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma account for the majority of patients with end-stage liver disease.     

Retransplantation for end-stage liver disease: a single-center Asian experience

Liver retransplantation carries a significantly higher morbidity and mortality compared with patients after single transplantations. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes in liver retransplantations. From February 1984 to February 2007, 409 liver transplantations were performed on 396 patients, including 13 retransplantations (3.2%) in 12 patients. The mean follow-up was 1.6 ± 0.4 years (range, 0.1-5.2). The mean duration between the first and the second transplantation was 2.8 ± 1.0 years (range, 15 days-11.6 years). The indications for the first liver transplantation included biliary atresia (n = 3), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis with hepatoma (n = 3), fulminant hepatic failure (n = 2), HBV-related end-stage liver disease (n = 1), hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (n = 1), neonatal hepatitis (n = 1), and glycogen storage disease (n = 1). The indications for retransplantations were secondary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3), veno-occlusive disease-related liver failure (n = 2), hepatic arterial occlusion and graft failure (n = 2), chronic rejection with hepatic graft failure (n = 2), recurrent HBV (n = 1) and de novo HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis (n = 1), and idiopathic graft failure (n = 1). There were 4 living donor and 9 deceased donor liver retransplantations. The cumulative survival rate was 71.4 ± 14.4%, with an estimated mean survival time of 3.9 ± 0.7 years. Our results showed that minimizing the rate of retransplantation was critical to enhance overall patient survival. Moreover, living donor liver retransplantation is another option within the short, yet critical, waiting period, after failure of the first graft. Provided that a suitable living donor is available, we recommend early retransplantation to minimize the risk of morbidity and mortality.     

HCV infection and hemodialysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are frequent in hemodialyzed patients and are mainly related to transfusions and nosocomial contamination. HCV-related infection may result in cirrhosis in 10% of dialysis patients and is worsened by transplantation because of the immunosuppressive therapy for prevention of graft rejection. Because there is a risk for significant liver disease and because cirrhosis contraindicates a renal transplantation, a liver biopsy should be performed early in HCV-RNA positive hemodialysis patients to evaluate histologic impact of the liver disease. A combined liver-kidney transplantation should be discussed in dialysis patients with cirrhosis. Standard alpha-interferon is the only treatment for HCV in dialysis patients because ribavirin is contraindicated by a high risk for hemolytic anemia. It leads to an overall 30% rate of sustained viral eradication. It is indicated in dialysis patients with acute hepatitis C, significant liver disease (fibrosis score > or =2), or symptomatic cryoglobulinemia, and to candidates for renal transplantation, whatever the severity of the liver disease. Indeed, alpha-interferon is contraindicated in kidney recipients given the risk for rejection. Preventive treatment for HCV is only respect for universal hygiene rules in the dialysis setting because there is no available vaccine.     

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quantitation of serum hepatitis C virus RNA in liver transplant recipients: Relationship with severity of histological recurrence and implications in the pathogenesis of HCV infection

The reasons for the wide variation of incidence and severity of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation are not clear. We have studied liver transplant recipients to assess the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype and HCV RNA quantification on HCV recurrence after transplantation. Twenty-two patients received transplants for HCV cirrhosis and were followed up with virological and histological assessments. Mean follow-up was 39 months. HCV genotype was determined with line probe assay (Inno-Lipa). HCV RNA quantity was determined in serum samples by use of polymerase chain reaction nested assay. HCV genotype 1 was detected in 13 patients and other genotypes in 9. Histological recurrence rates were 69% in patients with genotype 1 and 66% in patients with other genotypes. All cases of severe histological injury (chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis) were observed in patients with genotype 1. HCV RNA quantity was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 (mean, 2.023 x 10³ copies/mL) than in patients with other genotypes (mean, 27,403 copies/mL). In conclusion, the severity of histological recurrence after liver transplantation for HCV disease was higher in patients infected by HCV genotype 1 than in those infected with other genotypes. The levels of viral replication were higher in patients with HCV genotype 1 than in those with other genotypes. (Liver Transpl Surg 1997 Sep;3(5):501-5)     

Orthotopic liver transplantation at Groote Schuur Hospital.

We present data on 10 patients (5 men and 5 women, aged 21-56 yrs) with end-stage liver disease or tumour who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation at Groote Schuur Hospital between October 1988 and June 1991. Standard surgical techniques were used for procuring the donor liver, the recipient hepatectomy and the implantation of the liver. The venovenous bypass method was used in all but 2 patients. Postoperative immunosuppression was usually achieved with cyclosporin, azathioprine and low-dose steroids. Six patients were treated with prophylactic OKT3. Rejection episodes were treated with bolus doses of intravenous steroids. The indications for liver transplantation included chronic active hepatitis progressing to cirrhosis (5), biliary cirrhosis in association with inflammatory bowel disease (1), sclerosing cholangitis (2), alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (1), and tumour (1). All patients with chronic liver disease had experienced at least one complication, examples of which included encephalopathy, bacterial peritonitis, ascites, variceal bleeding and septicaemia. Serious postoperative complications included acute rejection of the transplanted liver, renal and liver failure that responded to intensive care support and medical management. One patient died on the 11th postoperative day with complications of bleeding oesophageal ulcer, shock and fungaemia. The remaining patients are alive and well 1-31 months after transplantation.     

Is hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis needed for liver transplantation in the era of new antivirals?

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most common causes of cirrhosis of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, frequently requiring liver transplantation. Other nonliver organ transplants get infected de novo or through reactivation from previous active or inactive infections. With significant improvements in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens over the last 20 years, organ transplantation has become the most effective and lifesaving therapy for patients with chronic renal failure, cirrhosis, hepatocarcinoma, and heart failure. Until recently chronic HBV infection was considered a formal contraindication for liver transplantation, since recurrence of infection without prophylaxis occurs in 75% to 90% of the patients, with significant morbidity and mortality and few therapeutic alternatives. However, the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) a decade ago to reduce the risk of reinfection of liver grafts, and more recently the availability of nucleoside analogues with few side effects and easy administration, have led to a dramatic improvement in patient outcomes with a risk of long-term HBV reinfection of less than 10% with combined HBIG and lamivudine prophylaxis. Chronic HBV infection in kidney, heart, and other organs has become a serious long-term problem and one of the most frequent and important comorbidities affecting graft and patient survival. Fortunately the introduction of nucleoside analogues allows significant control of viral replication and prevents progression of liver disease and other organ damage. In the present article we discuss the current indications for HBV prophylaxis and treatment prior to and after organ transplantation, as well as the most cost-effective way to apply different regimens to reduce side effects and improve survival and quality of life after transplantation.     

Clinical course of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients

Patients with end-stage renal disease are at high risk for exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although both viral replication and liver disease progression are accelerated after renal transplantation, the long-term impact of chronic HCV infection is unclear. Our aim was to analyze the course of HCV infection in renal transplant recipients and the effects of HCV reactivation on patient and graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the 21-year (1985-2006) data of 1274 renal transplant recipients, 43 of whom were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The mean posttransplant follow-up of 43 patients was 62.0 +/- 7.3 months. At the time of transplantation, HCV RNA was positive in 11 (25.6%) patients and negative in 32 (74.4%) patients. HCV reactivation was seen in 19 (45.2%) patients at a mean time of 20.8 +/- 5.7 months. In 31 (72%) patients, acute rejection occurred, whereas graft loss occurred in 10 (23%) patients. Three (7%) patients died. Among 43 patients, 22 (51.2%) were treated with interferon before transplantation. There was a statistically significant association between pretransplant interferon therapy and pretransplant HCVRNA level (P=.024), but no significant association of HCV reactivation and graft rejection, mortality, or kidney survival. CONCLUSION: HCV reactivation occurred in nearly half of the renal transplant recipients, mostly in the second year. Patient survival and graft survival were not affected by HCV reactivation. Anti-HCV positivity should not preclude chronic renal failure patients from renal transplantation.     

Methadone maintenance therapy in liver transplantation

Cirrhosis due to chronic infection with hepatitis C virus remains by far the most common reason for liver transplantation in North America. Currently, parenteral use of street drugs is the most common means of acquiring hepatitis C. Methadone maintenance therapy is an accepted form of treatment for chronic opiate (eg, heroin) addiction and, not surprisingly, a significant proportion of methadone-treated patients have chronic hepatitis C. The feasibility of liver transplant candidacy in hepatitis patients who require methadone maintenance therapy is controversial, and some transplant centers require patients to withdraw from such therapy in order for the transplant process to move forward. Thus stable patients with end-stage cirrhosis who are receiving methadone maintenance are left in a most difficult situation: discontinue methadone and accept the side effects of withdrawal with the risk of recidivism to use of street opiates, an absolute contraindication for transplantation, or continue methadone therapy and risk exclusion from the transplant process. The issue of methadone replacement therapy in end-stage cirrhosis and the posttransplant literature on the subject are explored in this paper.     

Liver Transplantation from an Identical Twin without Immunosuppression, with Early Recurrence of Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus reinfection after liver transplantation is universal and more severe than in nontransplant patients. Rejection episodes and immunosuppressive agents are considered risk factors for deterioration of recurrent hepatitis C. We report 2 cases of living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis who received right-lobe grafts from an identical twin. Thanks to genetic identity, no immunosuppressive drugs were administered during or after transplantation without rejection. Hepatitis C virus RNA kinetics showed a rapid increase following transplantation and liver biopsies 1 month after transplantation showed acute lobular hepatitis in both cases. Antiviral therapy using interferon alpha and ribavirin was started immediately, and both cases showed virological and histological response. In conclusion, avoidance of immunosuppression did not delay hepatitis C recurrence following transplantation, while early antiviral therapy without risk of rejection or immunosuppression led to successful viral eradication.