The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer

During laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), misidentification of the cystic duct, which causes major bile duct injuries, can result from wrong or incomplete dissection of Calot’s triangle. Therefore, the critical view of safety has been accepted as a safe method for gaining a sufficient view of Calot’s triangle before transecting the cystic duct. However, even in cases without aberrant anatomy of the bile duct, bile duct injury can occur by a wrong approach to a critical view of safety. Additionally, in cases of badly inflamed gallbladders, it is often hard to achieve a critical view of safety, because Calot’s triangle is often solid and cannot be expanded. In our standardized procedure, which is based on exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer (the ss-i layer), the critical view of safety can be safely achieved. We have safely performed LC, using our standardized procedure, for many cases with cholecystitis with highly inflamed gallbladders. In this article, focusing especially on prevention of bile duct injuries, we present our standardized procedure to achieve the critical view of safety along with histological findings.     

Mirizzi综合征的微创外科治疗

目的 总结应用腹腔镜和内镜联合治疗Mirizzi综合征的初步经验，探讨微创外科对Mirizzi综合征的治疗效果。方法 对21例CsendesⅡ型，Ⅲ型Mirizzi综合征患者，采用内镜鼻胆管引流术（ENBD）配合实施腹腔镜胆囊切除，胆总管探查，胆囊胆管瘘I期缝合修补术（内衬ENBD导管）。结果 19例手术成功，2例中转开腹。术中结石清除率100％，无胆漏，胆道出血等术后并发症。手术时间平均93.6min，术后平均住院9．4d。术后随访18－41个月，未有结石复发。结论 应用腹腔镜和内镜手段，综合治疗Mirizzi综合征在技术上是切实可行的。但腹腔镜下缝合修复胆管壁缺损较困难，适宜在腹腔镜技术较成熟的单位开展。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发胆管损伤26例临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术中并发胆管损伤的类型。原因及其预防。方法 回顾分析26例胆管损伤的原因。修复方法与结果。结果 本组术中胆管解剖关系不清所致胆管损伤15例。其中经胆囊管造影显示胆管识别错误电动致胆管切开10例，钛夹夹闭胆管3例；胆管电凝热传导伤4例。胆管撕裂，4例。结论 胆管解剖不清所致的胆管损伤是LC胆管损伤最常见类型。占58%，准确掌握术中造影能及时发现胆管识别错误所致的胆管损伤，仔细分清肝总管远端，胆总管近端，胆囊管近端及其汇合处，胆囊三角区内正确分离与安全止血是预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤的关键。     

Handling of biliary complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the setting of Tripoli Central Hospital

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has an increased incidence of bile duct injury and bile leak when compared with open cholecystectomy. This study reviews management of these complications in a general hospital setting. Data collected from patients diagnosed and treated in one surgical unit for biliary complications after LC between 1992 and 1996 were analysed.MethodA total of 14 patients were examined. Diagnosis was defined mainly by Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and undetected choledocholitiasis was discovered in association with two of these complications. 43% of patients presented after LC with early postoperative bile leak or jaundice due to partial or complete bile duct excision or slippage of clips from the cystic duct. 57% presented with late biliary strictures. Thirteen patients were treated surgically, with biliary reconstruction (11 patients), direct repair (one) and cystic duct ligation in combination with clearance of bile duct from large multiple stones (one). One patient,who had clip displacement from cystic duct in combination with misplaced clip on right hepatic duct, was treated elsewhere. Postoperatively, one patient developed anastomotic leak and another died from sequellaie of bile duct transection requiring staged operations.ConclusionsIt is concluded that, in an environment similar to that where the authors had to work, LC should be performed in hospitals with facility to perform ERCP or when access for this technique is available in a nearby institution. Early recognition and immediate management of biliary injuries is dependent on individual resources and circumstances but, if required, consultation with colleagues or referral of patients with suspected or established biliary complications should not be delayed.     

术中胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用

目的探讨术中胆道造影（IOC）在腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）中的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析2003年7月至2008年7月行LC病例442例,其中经ICO患者82例,占手术的18.4%。结果成功完成IOC 81例（97.5%）。发现胆总管结石13例（46.0%）,胆囊管结石4例（4.9%）,胆囊管汇入右肝管4例（4.8%）,胆总管远段狭窄3例（3.7%）,术中胆总管损伤1例（1.2%）。结论 LC中IOC对发现胆管结石的残留、及时发现胆管损伤、明确胆管解剖及变异均有帮助,值得在基层医院推广。     

Difficult bile duct stones

Opinion statement Bile duct stones are routinely removed at time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after biliary sphincterotomy with standard balloon or basket extraction techniques. However, in approximately 10% to 15% of patients, bile duct stones may be difficult to remove due to challenging access to the bile duct (periampullary diverticulum, Billroth II anatomy, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy), large (> 15 mm in diameter) bile duct stones, intrahepatic stones, or impacted stones in the bile duct or cystic duct. The initial approach to the removal of the difficult bile duct stone is to ensure adequate biliary sphincter orifice diameter with extension of biliary sphincterotomy or balloon dilation of the orifice. Mechanical lithotripsy is a readily available adjunct to standard stone extraction techniques and should be available in all ERCP units. If stone extraction fails with these maneuvers, two or more bile duct stents should be inserted, and ursodiol added to aid in duct decompression, stone fragmentation, and stone dissolution. Follow-up ERCP attempts to remove the difficult bile duct stones may be performed locally if expertise is available or alternatively referred to a tertiary center for advanced extracorporeal or intracorporeal fragmentation (mother-baby laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy) techniques. Nearly all patients with bile duct stones can be treated endoscopically if advanced techniques are utilized. For the rare patient who fails despite these efforts, surgical bile duct exploration, percutaneous approach to the bile duct, or long-term bile duct stenting should be discussed with the patient and family to identify the most appropriate therapeutic option. A thoughtful approach to each patient with difficult bile duct stones and a healthy awareness of the operator/endoscopy unit limitations is necessary to ensure the best patient outcomes. Consultation with a dedicated tertiary ERCP specialty center may be necessary.     

Primary cholesterol hepatolithiasis

Stones extracted from patients with hepatolithiasis were analysed by infrared spectrophotometry. Cholesterol stones containing 70% or more cholesterol were found in 12 out of 55 cases. Judging from the lodging site of the stones, the degree of dilatation of the cystic duct, and the presence of cholecystitis, five of the cases were considered to be cholesterol stones produced in the liver. Two out of the five cases were a 44-year-old female and a 46-year-old female, respectively, with normal bifurcation of intrahepatic ducts, and stones were found in the lateral branches of dilated cystic bile ducts. The other three were 2 males and 1 female with an average age of 33. In these cases, the posterior descending branch bifurcated from the left hepatic duct, and stones were lodged in the dilated bile ducts distal to the junction of the left hepatic duct and the posterior descending branch. It is our conclusion that at least the former two were cases of “primary cholesterol hepatolithiasis” in view of the shape of the stones conforming to the hepatic duct, their easy morcellation, and the high cholesterol contents.     

Primary cholesterol hepatolithiasis

Stones extracted from patients with hepatolithiasis were analysed by infrared spectrophotometry. Cholesterol stones containing 70% or more cholesterol were found in 12 out of 55 cases. Judging from the lodging site of the stones, the degree of dilatation of the cystic duct, and the presence of cholecystitis, five of the cases were considered to be cholesterol stones produced in the liver. Two out of the five cases were a 44-year-old female and a 46-year-old female, respectively, with normal bifurcation of intrahepatic ducts, and stones were found in the lateral branches of dilated cystic bile ducts. The other three were 2 males and 1 female with an average age of 33. In these cases, the posterior descending branch bifurcated from the left hepatic duct, and stones were lodged in the dilated bile ducts distal to the junction of the left hepatic duct and the posterior descending branch. It is our conclusion that at least the former two were cases of "primary cholesterol hepatolithiasis" in view of the shape of the stones conforming to the hepatic duct, their easy morcellation, and the high cholesterol contents.     

A Rare Case of Biliobiliary Fistula

Abstract: Biliobiliary fistula is a rare clinical entity. The case of a 72 year old female, who presented with epigastric pain and jaundice, is detailed herein. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) revealed two stones, one each in the common bile duct and the gallbladder. Continuous endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) was performed to relieve obstructive jaundice. Further study with contrast medium administered via the ENBD tube revealed a fistula between the neck of the gallbladder and the common bile duct. The cystic duct was intact. A stone was considered to have migrated into the common bile duct through the fistula. A diagnosis of biliobiliary fistula, Corlette type I was made. However, in this particular case, a biliobiliary fistula was noted at a site below the junction of the cystic duct and common bile duct. Removal of the gallbladder stones was followed by cholecystectomy. The common bile duct was then repaired by utilizing a T-tube. No evidence of malignancy was recognized in the resected gallbladder specimen. In the one year to date since surgery, the patient has been asymptomatic and without signs of biliary disease.     

Cystic Duct Stones Detected During Intraoperative Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

During intraoperative cholangiography, cystic duct stones were diagnosed in 79 of 898 consecutive patients (8.8%) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 45-month period. The stones were successfully removed laparoscopically. In addition, it should be mentioned that the stones were identified and retrieved before the cholangiography was started in all but 8 of the 79 cases. Of these 79, only 27 cases (34.2%) had been diagnosed as having cystic duct stones preoperatively by intravenous cholangiography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that intraoperative cholangiography is mandatory to detect unsuspected retained stones not only in the common duct but also in the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and also provides vital information as to biliary anatomic variations, the proximity of the cystic duct to the common duct, and the confirmation of inadvertent bile duct injury.     

Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos)

In some cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) may be difficult to perform in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) with severe inflammation and fibrosis. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) expand the indications for LC under difficult conditions for each level of severity of AC. As a result of expanding the indications for LC to treat AC, it is absolutely necessary to avoid any increase in bile duct injury (BDI), particularly vasculo‐biliary injury (VBI), which is known to occur at a certain rate in LC. Since the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13), an attempt has been made to assess intraoperative findings as objective indicators of surgical difficulty; based on expert consensus on these difficulty indicators, bail‐out procedures (including conversion to open cholecystectomy) have been indicated for cases in which LC for AC is difficult to perform. A bail‐out procedure should be chosen if, when the Calot's triangle is appropriately retracted and used as a landmark, a critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved because of the presence of nondissectable scarring or severe fibrosis. We propose standardized safe steps for LC to treat AC. To achieve a CVS, it is vital to dissect at a location above (on the ventral side of) the imaginary line connecting the base of the left medial section (Segment 4) and the roof of Rouvière's sulcus and to fulfill the three criteria of CVS before dividing any structures. Achieving a CVS prevents the misidentification of the cystic duct and the common bile duct, which are most commonly confused. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47 . Related clinical questions and references are also included.     

A case of well differentiated mucinous carcinoma of the gallbladder

We report a case of well differentiated mucinous carcinoma of the gallbladder. An 80-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of fever and CT showed a mass in the fundus of the gallbladder and choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic removal of the common bile duct stones was done. Abdominal ultrasonography and CT showed a 4 cm mass in the fundus of the gallbladder. Based on a diagnosis of adenomyomatosis or mucinous carcinoma of the gallbladder, a laparotomy revealed a white mass in the fundus of gallbladder. Intra-operative pathological diagnosis of lymph node of cystic duct was mucinous carcinoma. Therefore, we conducted partial resection of the liver with D1 lymph node dissection. Pathological diagnosis confirmed well differentiated mucinous carcinoma of the gallbladder. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he is doing well without recurrence.     

Instrumental detection of cystic duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Residual cystic duct stones (CDSs) after cholecystectomy have been recognized as a cause of postcholecystectomy pain. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of CDSs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A cohort of 330 consecutive patients (80 males and 250 females) undergoing LC between November 2006 and May 2010 was studied. Their age ranged between 16 and 88 years (median 50, IQR: 36.62). The data were prospectively collected of preoperative liver function tests, imaging, the presence of intraoperative CDSs, and common bile duct stones at on-table cholangiogram. CDSs were detected intraoperatively in 64 of the 330 patients (19%). Ultrasound failed to detect CDSs in any of these cases. Deranged liver function tests were noted in 73% of the patients with CDSs and in 57% without CDSs. Common bile duct stones were detected in 9% (29) of the 330 patients. CDSs occur commonly at routine cholecystectomy, and preoperative investigations are not helpful in their diagnosis. As CDSs may lead to postoperative morbidity, they should be actively sought out during surgery if present.     

Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillotomy is successful in more than 95% of the cases of choledocholithiasis. For patients with difficult bile duct stones not responding to mechanical lithotripsy, different methods for stone fragmentation have been developed. AIM: To compare the results of laser lithotripsy with a stone-tissue recognizing system, when guided by fluoroscopy only or by cholangioscopy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002 we have treated 89 patients with difficult bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laser lithotripsy. Unsuccessful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic were also performed before laser in 35% and 26% of the cases, respectively. RESULTS: Laser was effective in 79.2% of 72 patients guided by cholangioscopy and in 82.4% of 17 cases steered by fluoroscopy. The median number of impulses in the latter was 4,335 and 1,800 with the former technique. Two parameters influenced the manner of laser guidance. In cases of stones situated above a stricture, cholangioscopic control was more effective (64.7% vs. 31.9%). When the stones were in the distal bile duct, fluoroscopic control was more successful. CONCLUSION: In cases of difficult stones in the distal bile duct, laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic control is very effective and easily performed. Cholangioscopic guidance should be recommended just in cases of intrahepatic stones or in patients with stones situated proximal to a bile duct stenosis. In these cases, cholangioscopy should be performed either endoscopically or percutaneously.     

Trypsin level in gallbladder bile and ductitis and width of the cystic duct

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The change from laparotomy to laparoscopy for cholecystectomy has raised the question of how to manage concomitant bile duct stones. The present-day interest--and controversy--has focused on a transcystic approach reported to be feasible in 66-96% of cases, but without explaining the necessary prerequisite: the widening of the cystic duct. The cystic duct, wide mainly in patients with bile duct stones, has been reported to be highly variable: from strictured to very wide. The present study aims at comparing the trypsin level in the gallbladder bile and the cystic duct morphology and width in patients with and without bile duct stones. METHODOLOGY: A prospective series of 63 gallstone patients, 30 with and 33 without bile duct stones (controls), underwent cholecystectomy and bile duct clearance. The study includes the trypsin level in the gallbladder bile, the width and morphology of the cystic duct, and the size of the gallstones. RESULTS: The patients with bile duct stones had, in contrast to the controls, higher trypsin levels in the gallbladder bile (P < 0.001) and wider cystic ducts (P < 0.001) with more pronounced signs of chronic ductitis. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results strongly suggest that the increased trypsin level, a sign of reflux of pancreatic juice, caused changes in the cystic duct that facilitate gallstone migration, which also ought to render a transcystic stone extraction feasible.     

Anomalous connection of the right hepatic duct into the cystic duct: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

A 41-year-old female was admitted to our hospital for treatment of uterus carcinoma. Abdominal ultrasound showed gallbladder stones. Although magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed the right intrahepatic bile ducts, left hepatic duct and the common bile duct, the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts was not visualized. At surgery, intra-operative cholangiography showed a biliary anomaly of the right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct. Subsequently cholecystectomy was accomplished without any injury to the bile duct. Our case may be the eighth such case of this rare biliary anomaly. When magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography does not show the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts, biliary anomaly of the right hepatic duct should be suspected and careful dissection should be performed from the Hartman's pouch, followed by intraoperative cholangiography, in order to avoid unnecessary injury to the bile duct.     

腹腔镜下胆道造影术

为探讨腹腔镜下胆道造影的方法和价值，对６００例胆囊结石并慢性或急性胆囊炎（其中４例伴阻塞性黄疸，６例为胆源性胰腺炎）病人行无选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除和常规术中经胆囊管插管胆道造影术。５６８例（９４．７％）完成了术中胆道造影。术中造影发现胆总管病变４２例，其中３２例为术前未曾检查出的胆管异常。全组共发生胆管损伤３例（０．５％）。表明腹腔镜下经胆囊管插管胆道造影成功率高，术中胆道造影具提高手术质量和防止或减少胆管损伤的作用。     

Is intra-operative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy？ A multicentre rural experience from a developing world country

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in nonteaching rural hospitals of a developing country without intra-operative cholangiography (IOC). To evaluate the possibility of reduction of costs and hospital stay for patients undergoing LC.METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients with symptomatic benign diseases of gall bladder undergoing LC in three non-teaching rural hospitals of Kashmir Valley from Jan 2001 to Jan 2007. The cohort represented a sample of patients requiring LC, aged 13 to 78 (mean 47.2) years. Main outcome parameters included mortality, complications, re-operation, conversion to open procedure without resorting to IOC, reduction in costs borne by the hospital, and the duration of hospital stay.RESULTS: Twelve hundred and sixty-seven patients (976 females/291 males) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twenty-three cases were converted to open procedures; 12 patients developed port site infection, nobody died because of the procedure. One patient had common bile duct (CBD) injury, 4 patients had biliary leak, and 4 patients had subcutaneous emphysema. One cholecystohepatic duct was detected and managed intraoperatively, 1 patient had retained CBD stones, while 1 patient had retained cystic duct stones. Incidental gallbladder malignancy was detected in 2 cases. No long-term complications were detected up to now.CONCLUSION: LC can be performed safely even in non-teaching rural hospitals of a developing country provided proper equipment is available and the surgeons and other team members are well trained in the procedure. It is stressed that IOC is not essential to prevent biliary tract injuries and missed CBD stones. The costs to the patient and the hospital can be minimized by using reusable instruments, intracorporeal sutures, and condoms instead of titanium clips and endobags.     

Technical aspects in the laparoscopic management of complicated common bile duct stones

The management of common bile duct (CBD) stones traditionally required open laparotomy and bile duct exploration. With the advent of endoscopic and laparoscopic technology in the latter half of last century, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the mainstream treatment for CBD stones and gallstones in most medical centers around the world. However, in certain situations, ERCP cannot be feasible because of difficult cannulation and extraction. ERCP can also be associated with potential serious complications, in particular for complicated stones requiring repeated sessions and additional maneuvers. Since our first laparoscopic exploration of the CBD (LECBD) in 1995, we now adopt the routine practice of the laparoscopic approach in dealing with endoscopically irretrievable CBD stones. The aim of this article is to describe the technical details of this approach and to review the results from our series.     

Combination of Preoperative EST,Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Choledochotomy,and Postoperative Cholangioscopy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

A case of common duct stones, successfully managed with a combination of preoperative EST, laparoscopic choledochotomy and postoperative choledochoscopic stone extraction, is reported. A 32-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of jaundice and right hypochon-dralgia of several-days' duration. CT, US and ERCP revealed stones in the gallbladder and common bile duct. EST was performed to remove the stones in the common bile duct prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the patient developed pancreatitis as a complication of EST, which was successfully managed by conservative therapy. Though some stones remained in the common duct following the first trial of EST, the patient rejected a second round of EST. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochotomy were performed to remove the gallbladder and the stones remaining in the common bile duct. A T tube was placed in the incised common bile duct for management of possible retained stones. Twenty days after the surgery, successful postoperative cholangioscopy was performed, and the stones remaining in the common duct were removed. Hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis are relatively common complications of EST occurring in about 7% of cases, but only 3% of these patients experience severe pancreatitis, requiring hospitalization. Conservative therapy is always the treatment of choice. In our particular patient, pancreatitis caused by EST was successfully managed by decompression with ENBD and administration of ulinastatin. Residual stones in the CBD were completely removed by laparoscopic common bile duct exploration following EST and postoperative cholangioscopy through the T tube fistula.