Comparison of electric and magnetic coil stimulation in the supraclavicular region.

We compared the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) evoked in the biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles by conventional electrical stimulation at Erb's point (EP), and by magnetic coil stimulation of the supraclavicular region in 11 normal subjects. We found that magnetic coil stimulation was less effective than conventional stimulation in activating motor fibers in the brachial plexus in 45% of the recordings analyzed. CMAP amplitudes greater than those obtained with EP electrical stimulation were seen in 16% of recordings with supraclavicular magnetic stimulation, and in 33% of recordings with cervical magnetic stimulation, indicating that EP electrical stimulation is submaximal in a large proportion of cases.     

Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans.

The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-alpha and A-delta fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-delta fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-delta fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-alpha fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.     

Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of human cervical vertebral column: site of stimulation and clinical application.

In order to understand which neural elements are excited after percutaneous magnetic coil (MC) stimulation over the cervical vertebral column we have performed such study in 8 normal subjects and 4 patients. On moving the coil rostrocaudally up to 3 cm and horizontally up to 2 cm from the midline we found no change in the latencies of the compound muscle action potentials to biceps, deltoid, abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi muscles indicating a fixed site of excitation of the spinal roots within the intervertebral foramina. F latencies to APB after stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist were always longer than the direct latencies obtained after cervical vertebral stimulation. The mean difference between indirect latency based on F technique and direct latency to APB was 0.45 msec which represented a distance of 2.7 cm distal to the anterior horn cells assuming a conduction velocity of 60 m/sec. MC stimulation in 2 patients suggested a diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy which was confirmed by imaging studies or operative findings. Both MC and needle root stimulation in one patient with diabetic brachial plexopathy and in another with diabetic polyneuropathy suggested that the needle stimulation occurred about 1.2-1.8 cm proximal to MC stimulation.     

Transcranial electrical and magnetic motor cortex stimulation: studies in intact man

The new method of transcranial electrical and magnetic brain stimulation was tested in 41 normal subjects. Stimulation on the scalp excites corticospinal neurones in the motor cortex while stimulation over the spine excites spinal nerve roots. The difference between EMG response latencies after both stimulations represents conduction in the central motor pathways and is called central motor latency (CML). The aim of out experiments was to investigate certain methodological aspects of the technique in order to standardize the procedure. Recordings were done from slightly contracted abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior muscles after electrical stimulation on the scalp and from the relaxed and contracted abductor digiti minimi and biceps brachii muscles after magnetic brain stimulation. Stimulation over the spine (C7/T1 interspace in case of upper limb muscles stimulation and T12/L1 interspace in case of tibialis anterior stimulation) was always electrical. Using a rather weak non-commercial magnetic stimulator we were not able to activate lower limb muscles, neither we succeeded to evoke responses from the relaxed arm muscles in all subjects. Electrical scalp stimulation proved successful in all cases. Muscle response after cortical stimulation in contracting muscles and shorter latencies and provided more accurate estimate of conduction time in the central motor pathways than responses in the relaxed muscles. Latencies should be measured from several superimposed responses and not from averaged ones. The intensity of stimulation over the neck did not affect CML. We nevertheless suggest that the strongest stimulus intensities should not be used in order to avoid CML overestimation.     

Cervical nerve root stimulation. Part I: technical aspects and normal data.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical nerve root stimulation (CRS) is a technique of assessing the proximal segments of motor axons destined to upper extremity muscles. Few studies report normal values. The objective was to determine CMAP onset-latencies and CMAP amplitude, area, and duration changes in healthy controls for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), biceps, and riceps muscles. In addition, to determine the tolerability of CRS, as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). METHODS: We studied 21 healthy volunteers prospectively with CRS using four target muscles (APB, ADM, biceps, and triceps) bilaterally. Collision studies were used in all APB recordings. VAS was obtained in all subjects. RESULTS: Mean CMAP onset-latencies were: APB 14 +/- 1.5 ms; ADM 14.2 +/- 1.5 ms; biceps 5.4 +/- 0.6 ms; triceps 5.4 +/- 1.0 ms. Onset-latency significantly correlated with height for all nerves. The mean change in CMAP amplitude and area (%) between most distal stimulation and CRS was: APB reduction of 15.1 +/- 11.6 and 4.9 +/- 3.6%; ADM reduction of 21.1 +/- 10.7 and 17.2 +/- 8.8; biceps reduction of 10 +/- 11.5 and reduction of 8.7 +/- 6.8; triceps increase of 3.3 +/- 5.2 and 11.0 +/- 9.9% respectively. Mean CMAP duration change between most distal stimulation and CRS was: APB, increase of 20.4 +/- 7.4%; ADM, increase of 14.4 +/- 8.5%; biceps, increase of 13.9 +/- 10.8%; triceps, increase of 7.7 +/- 6.7%. The mean VAS score was 3.8 +/- 1.2, and all subjects completed the study. CONCLUSIONS: The present study establishes normative data and indicates that CRS is a well-tolerated technique. SIGNIFICANCE: The normal values may be used as reference data for the needle CRS technique in the assessment of proximal conduction abnormalities.     

Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to map the cortical representations of 4 upper extremity muscles (abductor pollicis brevis, flexor carpi radialis, biceps, and deltoid) of 10 normal subjects. Three stimuli were delivered to scalp positions 1 cm apart, and the amplitude and latency of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were averaged for each position. Maps were described in terms of number of excitable scalp positions, amplitude of MEPs, scalp positions for evoking largest amplitude MEPs, and threshold for producing MEPs. We compared different muscles across subjects and the same muscles on the left and right sides in individual subjects. Distal muscles had larger representations with higher amplitude MEPs and lower thresholds. Biceps and deltoid on the left had larger representations and higher MEP amplitudes than on the right. Maps showed a somatotopic progression on the scalp of proximal to distal muscles along a posteromedial to anterolateral axis.     

Optimal transcranial magnetic stimulation sites for the assessment of motor function.

The optimal placement sites for eliciting motor evoked potentials from the abductor digiti minimi and abductor hallucis muscles by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation were determined using a commercially available circular coli. Fifty volunteers were used for the study. The ability to elicit responses was found to be strongly dependent upon the scalp placement of the stimulator coil. The effects of altering the direction of current flow in the coil were tested on two different sets of volunteers: clockwise in one and counterclockwise in the other. It influenced only the locations of the sites which were optimal for eliciting responses from the abductor hallucis muscles and not those which were optimal for eliciting responses from the abductor digiti minimi muscles. Response latencies were found to be significantly dependent only upon volunteers' heights and not on their sex, age, or weight or the stimulus intensities used to elicit responses. No previous studies have defined the optimal scalp placements for eliciting responses from the lower extremities. This information may have clinical importance for making reliable assessments of patients with significantly impaired motor function.     

术中神经电生理监测和刺激尺神经治疗肘管综合征

目的 评估尺神经松解前置术结合术中超强电刺激治疗肘管综合征的治疗效果.方法 30例中重度肘管综合征患者首先进行尺神经松解前置术,测定并记录松解后小指展肌复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)的潜伏期及波幅;然后给予尺神经超强电刺激治疗(80 mA,2Hz,10 min),按照同样的方法再次记录小指展肌CMAP的潜伏期及波幅,并将刺激前后的数据进行统计学分析.结果 患者尺神经外膜松解后与超强电刺激后小指展肌CMAP的波幅分别为(2.5±0.4) mV和(6.2±0.8)mV,潜伏期分别为(12.0±0.6)ms和(10.3±0.3)ms,经比较有统计学意义(P＜0.05).超强电刺激后小指展肌CMAP的潜伏期较前平均缩短15.7％,波幅平均增大约2倍.结论 术中超强电刺激对肘管综合征患者的尺神经功能恢复具有辅助治疗作用.     

Pathophysiology of congenital mirror movements

A case of congenital mirror movements occurring in association with mild hemiparesis and unilateral schizencephaly was investigated using focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. The cortical motor representations for first dorsal interosseous, abductor digiti minimi and biceps brachii were mapped for both cerebral hemispheres: bilateral short latency EMG responses were elicited with stimulation over the nonschizencephalic hemisphere while no short latency responses were obtained with stimulation over the schizencephalic hemisphere. The cortical representations for all three homologous muscle pairs studied were colocalized, and the responses occurred at identical latencies bilaterally. Our findings, plus previous observations suggesting a single functional motor cortex in schizencephaly, are consistent with the suggestion that mirror movements are the result of branched corticospinal projections to distal muscle groups.     

Cutaneous silent periods in intramedullary spinal cord lesions

OBJECTIVE: The neurophysiological assessment of intramedullary spinal cord lesions has been unsatisfactory. Previous studies in patients with syringomyelia suggest that testing of cutaneous silent periods (CSPs) may be useful to assess centromedullary lesions. METHODS: The authors studied nine patients with intramedullary spinal cord lesions of different etiologies. Eight patients with cervical lesions presented with hypalgesia, hypothermesthesia, or pain in at least one upper extremity; five of them had also upper limb weakness or sensory impairment. One patient with a thoracic lesion had normal upper limb function. The authors recorded CSPs in abductor pollicis brevis muscle following digit II and digit V stimulation. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were obtained following median and tibial nerve stimulation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained in biceps brachii, abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior muscles following transcranial magnetic or electrical stimulation. RESULTS: CSP abnormalities were found in all patients with cervical lesions, but not in the patient with a thoracic lesion. Cortical median nerve SEPs had normal latencies in all patients, while tibial nerve SEPs, upper limb MEPs, and lower limb MEPs were delayed in five patients each. In one patient, abnormal CSP were the only neurophysiological finding. CSP abnormalities were associated with hypalgesia and hypothermesthesia in 95% of the studies. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity CSP testing is a sensitive neurophysiological technique for the assessment of cervical intramedullary lesions. In particular, abnormal CSPs are highly associated with spinothalamic dysfunction.     

Cortical control of voluntary blinking: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cortical regions related to voluntary blinking. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the facial motor cortex (M1) and the midline frontal region (Fz) in 10 healthy subjects with eyes opened and closed. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the orbicularis oculi (OOC), orbicularis oris (OOR), abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior using surface and needle electromyography electrodes. Facial M waves and blink reflex were measured using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the facial and supraorbital nerves. RESULTS: TMS at Fz elicited 3 waves in OOC with no response in other tested muscles except for the early wave in OOR. Facial M1 stimulation produced only early and late waves. Because of their latencies, shapes, and relationship to coil position and stimulation intensity, early and late waves appeared to be analogous to the facial M wave and R1 component of the blink reflex. The intermediate wave at 6-8 ms latency was elicited in OOC by Fz stimulation with eyes closed. CONCLUSIONS: Since its latency matches the central conduction time of other cranial muscles and it has characteristic of muscle activation-related facilitation, the intermediate wave is presumably related to cortical stimulation. This result provides evidence that the cortical center for the upper facial movements, including blinking, is not principally located in the facial M1, but rather in the mesial frontal region.     

Analysis of recovery processes after stroke by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

The objective of this study was to use motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to analyze the integrity of fast corticospinal functions as the neurophysiologic basis for motor recovery in stroke patients. This was a cohort study including 44 acute stroke patients with paralysis of the upper or the lower extremity. Motor evoked potentials of the abductor digiti minimi, the biceps brachii, the vastus medialis, and the tibialis anterior were performed within 10 days (mean, 6.9 days; range, 3 to 10 days) and 40 days (mean, 27.8 days; range, 14 to 40 days) after stroke onset. A separate score was defined for proximal and distal motor functions of the upper and lower extremity within the original Fugl-Meyer motor assessment. Motor performance was evaluated simultaneously with the MEP assessments and 26 weeks after stroke. For all the muscles in which a response was present during the first investigation, obvious recovery of the fast corticospinal functions occurred. For the abductor digiti minimi amplitude ratio and the vastus medialis MEP amplitude the differences between the two investigations were significant. An MEP response could be elicited in more cases at the second than on the first MEP assessment. A present MEP response during the first registration indicated nearly always subsequent motor recovery, both for proximal and distal motor functions of the upper and lower extremity. However, motor recovery was also observed in some patients for whom no MEP response could be elicited. Regression analysis showed significant relationships between the abductor digiti minimi (P = 0.020/0.004 [t1/t2])and biceps brachii (P = 0.020/0.004 [t1/t2]) MEP amplitude parameters and the 26-week hand and arm motor scores. No relationship existed between the tibialis anterior and the vastus medialis MEP parameters and the leg motor scores. Motor recovery manifests neurophysiologically often as the recovery of fast corticospinal functions. In many cases, assessment by MEPs is more sensitive than clinical examination to detect residual corticospinal functions, which forms the pathophysiologic basis for the predictive value of MEPs for motor recovery after stroke.     

Cervical magnetic stimulation: the role of the neural foramen

Magnetic stimulation of cervical nerve roots is a promising new technique, limited in part by uncertainty about the site of nerve depolarization. We used a modified "butterfly" stimulus coil with an easily defined excitation field to activate the C-8/T-1 nerve roots, recording over abductor digiti minimi. Locating both the lowest threshold for stimulation and the points of maximum stimulation, we determined the optimum rostral-caudal position and orientation for the stimulus coil over the posterior neck and upper trunk. The most favorable positions corresponded to the C-8/T-1 neural foramina, and the most favorable orientations to the roots within them. Additional measurements of depth and electric field suggested that the stimuli used should have been insufficient to activate nervous tissue in a homogeneous medium. A simple model indicates that the induced current is intensified where it passes through a bony foramen and explains preferential excitation of the nerve root at this site.     

Topographic differences in task-dependent facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE: To look for differences in task-dependent facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in proximal and distal upper extremity muscles. BACKGROUND: Postexercise facilitation of MEPs has been demonstrated repeatedly in forearm muscles. Proximal muscles are prominently involved in limb stabilization, a largely isometric activity. In contrast, distal hand muscles specialize in precision movements. Based on these functional differences between proximal and distal muscles, we postulated that there might be topographic differences in task-dependent facilitation of MEPs. METHODS: We studied the effects of isometric exercise and a precision grip task on MEPs in proximal and distal upper extremity muscles. RESULTS: Isometric exercise of the target muscle was associated with significant facilitation of MEPs in biceps and extensor carpi radialis muscles, but not in first dorsal interosseous or abductor digiti minimi muscles. In contrast, a precision grip task was associated with significant post-task facilitation of MEPs in first dorsal interosseous, but not in extensor carpi radialis. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in the facilitation of MEPs depending on the motor task and whether the muscle is proximal or distal may reflect the relative importance of proximal muscles in maintaining posture.     

Cervical root stimulation in the diagnosis of radiculopathy

Cervical root stimulation (CRS) was compared with conventional EMG, nerve conduction, and late response studies in 34 patients with possible cervical radiculopathy. Cervical roots were stimulated by monopolar needles inserted into paraspinal muscles, recording compound muscle action potentials in biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi muscles. In 18 patients with clinical evidence of radiculopathy, EMG was abnormal in 11 (61%), but CRS was abnormal in all 18. Of 16 patients with symptoms but no signs of radiculopathy, EMG was abnormal in 5 (31%) and CRS was abnormal in 9 (56%).     

脊髓型颈椎病病人经颅磁电刺激运动诱发电位的对比研究

目的探讨磁电刺激运动诱发电位（ＭＥＰ）在脊髓型颈椎病（ＣＳＭ）的应用价值，并对其临床相关性进行分析。方法采用经颅磁、电刺激对３０例脊髓型颈椎病病人以及年龄性别等相配匹的３０名健康成人分别于外展小指肌、肱二头肌及下肢展短肌表面进行ＭＥＰ的检测。结果全部病人的ＭＥＰ都出现异常，表现为潜伏期、中枢传导时间（ＣＭＣＴ）延长，时限增宽，波辐降低或不能引出。磁刺激ＭＥＰ的ＣＭＣＴ和皮层刺激潜伏期与脊髓型颈椎病临床日本整形外科协会（ＪＯＡ）评分间有密切相关性，能较好地反映ＣＳＭ病人的病情。结论ＭＥＰ在检测ＣＳＭ病人运动功能方面具有定量评价作用。与电刺激相比，磁刺激ＭＥＰ能更好地反映ＣＳＭ病人的病情。     

Motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation: correlations with height

The relationship between height and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) was studied in 52 healthy young subjects. Evoked responses from the abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior muscles were obtained following magnetic stimulation over the vertex and the cervical and lumbar regions. The latencies of MEPs were highly correlated with height. The conduction time from the motor cortex to the lumbar region was also correlated with height, but that from the motor cortex to the cervical region was not. It is concluded that height is an important variable in defining the MEP normality.     

Functional organization of exteroceptive inhibition following nociceptive electrical fingertip stimulation in humans.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the functional organization of inhibitory spinal reflexes mediated by cutaneous afferents (=cutaneous silent periods, CSPs) in order to assess differential strategies used by the human spinal cord to inhibit movement in upper limb muscles within the same myotome. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects underwent assessment of the effect of electrical finger-tip stimulation with different intensities on voluntarily contracting hand muscles. The rectified and averaged electromyogram (EMG) was recorded with surface electrodes placed over abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles following recurrent digit II and digit V stimulation. RESULTS: Finger-tip stimulation resulted in a series of inhibitory and excitatory EMG responses in all 3 hand muscles. Stimulus intensity exerted a significant influence on various CSP parameters (probability, onset and end latency, duration, index of suppression). CSPs were most pronounced in APB following digit II and, somewhat less, following digit V stimulation. FDI and ADM differed in CSP onset latency following digit II stimulation, and in the overall amount of suppression following digit V stimulation, despite being supplied by the same nerve and the same myotome. Excitatory long-loop reflexes seemed to be suppressed by increasing stimulus intensities, yet they interfered with CSPs, even when using noxious stimulation, in FDI following digit II stimulation, and in both ADM and FDI following digit V stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with the presence of an inhibitory neural circuitry within the human spinal cord which can rapidly restrain distinct muscle synergies. Neurophysiology indicates a more functional - task-related - organization of protective reflexes in the human upper extremity, rather than a merely metameric - anatomically based - order of activation of this neuronal circuitry.     

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Clinical and radiological correlations

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were studied in 28 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. MEPs after cortical stimulation were abnormal in 27 patients, the responses in the leg muscles being affected the most often. Clinically asymptomatic motor lesions were detected in 7 patients (25%). The central motor conduction time (CMCT) for the abductor digiti minimi muscles correlated significantly with the clinical disability, whereas the radiological findings did not correlate with the clinical and neurophysiological parameters. In 9 patients MEPs were also recorded in the biceps muscles. The 7 patients with an abnormal CMCT for the biceps muscles had the most severe stenosis at the C-4–C-5 level or higher. The 2 patients with normal MEPs of the biceps muscles both had a stenosis at the C-5–C-6 level. The results of this study suggest that MEPs are useful for detecting spinal cord dysfunction and for localizing the level of the lesion. Some recommendations regarding the possible use of MEPs in the clinical evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy are given. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Latency of motor evoked potentials to focal transcranial stimulation varies as a function of scalp positions stimulated.

We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), biceps brachii and deltoid muscles at rest and during slight voluntary activation. An 8-shaped coil connected to a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator was positioned over different scalp positions 1 cm apart. At least 24 stimuli were delivered at each location. Latencies of MEPs were compared with those obtained by electrical and magnetic stimulation during muscle activation. Progressively longer MEP latencies were obtained in 5 groups depending on the type and position of stimulation. The shortest latencies were obtained with (1) electrical stimulation during muscle contraction and (2) non-focal magnetic stimulation during muscle contraction; magnetic stimulation at rest produced longer latencies with stimulation of (3) an optimal position, (4) a suboptimal position, and (5) a non-optimal position. Mean latency differences between successive groups were 1.9, 2.0, 1.6, and 2.6 msec for APB. Similar latency differences were found for the other arm muscles. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the different latencies evoked by stimulation at different scalp locations are determined by the summation at spinal motoneurons of excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated by successive numbers of I waves.