不同类型尺骨鹰嘴骨折的内固定选择

Objective To discuss options of internal fixation devices for different types of olecranon fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was done for 62 patients with olecranon fractures who had been treated in our department from February 2007 to November 2009. Of them, 36 cases were treated with tension band wiring (TBW) and 26 cases with plating. The differences between the 2 groups were compared according to Broberg and Morrey scales. Results The patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months (average, 11 months) . There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of scores of Broberg and Morrey scales (χ2 = 1. 484, P =0. 361 ) . There were 5 losses of reduction in the TBW group while there were 2 cases of myositis ossificans in the plating group. Conclusions Internal fixation by TBW is preferred in the majority of patients with simple olecranon fractures. Dorsal plating is particularly indicated in the comminuted fracture and fracture dislocations.     

股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折手术方法的选择及疗效分析

Objective To investigate clinical features,operative treatments and outcomes of ipsilateral fractures of femoral shaft and neck. Methods Forty-two cases of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft were treated from November,2004 to November,2009 in our institution.They were 37 males and 5 females.Their ages ranged from 21 to 84 years,with an average of 59.2 years.The fracture involved 18upper shafts,17 middle shafts and 7 lower shafts.By Garden classification,there were 5 cases of type Ⅰ,10cases of type Ⅱ,21 cases of type Ⅲ,and 6 cases of type Ⅳ neck fractures.All cases were diagnosed in 3days after admission;there were no misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.Twenty patients were treated by artificialjoint replacement(replacement group),while 22 patients by fixation with cannulated nails,intramedullary nails,or plate(fixation group).Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results All cases were followed up for 1 to 3 years,with an average of 2 years.Femoral neck fractures united between 12 to 20weeks,with an average of 16 weeks;femoral shaft fractures united between 14 to 24 weeks,with an average of 18 weeks.There were significant differences between the 2 groups in average length of hospital stay,ambulation time,blood loss,postoperative activities and good to excellent rate of postoperative joint function(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Merchan scores 1,2,and 3 years after operation for complication-free patients(P>0.05). Conclusion Surgical treatment of ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and shaft depends on position of the shaft fracture,displacement of the neck fracture,physical constitution and age of the patient to be treated.     

克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折不同进针方式的比较

Objective To compare the treatment outcomes of techniques of K-wire fixation for treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children and provide guidelines for selection of internal fixation methods for humeral supracondylar fractures in children.Methods Sixty-four cases d humeral supracondlylar fractures in children were treated by K-wire internal fixation from January 2004 to January 2009.They were divided into 2 groups, with similar fracure types distributed to each group.Group one (crisscross K-wire fixation) contained 38 cases among which 21 were Gartlad Ⅱ fractures and 17 were Gartland Ⅲ fractures.Group two (lateral parallel K-wire fixation) cases contained 26 cases among which 18 cases were Gartland Ⅱ fractures and 8 cases were Garland Ⅲ fractures.Postoperative elbow functions were evaluated and compared between the two groups.Statistical analysis of the excellent-good rate was carried out.Results Postoperatively all 64 patients were follow-up for 6 to 54 moths (average 26 months).The excellent-good rate of elbow fiuctions in group one and two was 92.1% and 84.6%, respectively.There was no significant difference in functional recovery between the two fixation methods (P＞ 0.05).However ulnar nerve injury occurred in 4 cases of the crisscross K-wire insertion group, while none occurred in the lateral parallel K-wire insertion group.Conclusion Crisscross and lateral parallel K-wire fixation have similar clinical outcomes in treating humeral supracondylar fiactures in children.Lateral parallel K-wire fixation technique is simpler and can avoid the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.It therefore is an effective method to treat Gartland Ⅱ and Ⅲ supracondylar humerus fractures.     

克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折不同进针方式的比较

Objective To compare the treatment outcomes of techniques of K-wire fixation for treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children and provide guidelines for selection of internal fixation methods for humeral supracondylar fractures in children.Methods Sixty-four cases d humeral supracondlylar fractures in children were treated by K-wire internal fixation from January 2004 to January 2009.They were divided into 2 groups, with similar fracure types distributed to each group.Group one (crisscross K-wire fixation) contained 38 cases among which 21 were Gartlad Ⅱ fractures and 17 were Gartland Ⅲ fractures.Group two (lateral parallel K-wire fixation) cases contained 26 cases among which 18 cases were Gartland Ⅱ fractures and 8 cases were Garland Ⅲ fractures.Postoperative elbow functions were evaluated and compared between the two groups.Statistical analysis of the excellent-good rate was carried out.Results Postoperatively all 64 patients were follow-up for 6 to 54 moths (average 26 months).The excellent-good rate of elbow fiuctions in group one and two was 92.1% and 84.6%, respectively.There was no significant difference in functional recovery between the two fixation methods (P＞ 0.05).However ulnar nerve injury occurred in 4 cases of the crisscross K-wire insertion group, while none occurred in the lateral parallel K-wire insertion group.Conclusion Crisscross and lateral parallel K-wire fixation have similar clinical outcomes in treating humeral supracondylar fiactures in children.Lateral parallel K-wire fixation technique is simpler and can avoid the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.It therefore is an effective method to treat Gartland Ⅱ and Ⅲ supracondylar humerus fractures.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.     

导航下与传统方法应用动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery.