钬激光前列腺切除术应用体会

目的 探讨钬激光前列腺切除术HoLRP)的治疗体会。方法 2000年10月至2002年1月行HoLRP术10例，观察其手术并发症、术后留置导尿时间及治疗效果；如IPSS评分、最大尿流率。结果 无围手术期死亡或电切综合征发生，无需输血，术后平均置管2d，平均最大尿流率从术前的6．7mL/s增加至18．3mL/s，平均IPSS评分由23分降至7分。结论 HoLRP是一种安全有效的BPH新疗法，术中和术后并发症少，术后恢复快。     

Visual Laser Ablation of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

For the past 50 years, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the most common treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The authors have conducted visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) for BPH as a minimum invasive surgery. The results were compared with those of VLAP, VLAP+transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP), and TURP as other treatments for BPH. In the VLAP group, 50 of 52 (96.2%), 36 of 40 (90.0%) and 31 of 36 (86.1%) were categorized as having more than a Fair Response (FR) at 3, 6 and 12 months, postoperatively. In the VLAP+TUIP group, 24 of 29 (82.8%), 19 of 22 (86.4%) and 9 of 11 (81.8%) were classed as having more than a FR at 3, 6 and 1 2 months, postoperatively. Forty–one of 42 (97.6%), 1 7 of 1 7 (100.0%) and 6 of 6 (100.0%) patients reaction to TURP was more than FR in overall response at 3, 6 and 12 months, postoperatively. The need for a blood transfusion, perforation of the prostate capsule and transit incontinence persisting for more than 1 month occurred in 1 of 45 (2.2%), 1 (2.2%) and 4 (8.9%) patients in the TURP group. Bladder neck contracture was seen in 4 of 52 (7.7%) in the VLAP group. Average postoperative catheter duration was shorter in the VLAP+TUIP (5.7 ± 8.4 days) than in the VLAP group (10.3 ± 10.4 days). Although TURP remains the standard treatment for BPH, VLAP results in less morbidity compared to TURP. VLAP with TUIP appears to lessen the risk of postoperative urinary retention and provide better results in longer follow–up studies.     

Results of holmium laser resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: To assess the results of holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since October 1996, 259 patients have undergone elective HoLRP. Peak urinary flow rates (Qax), IPSS scores, and duration of catheterization and hospital stay from admission to discharge catheter free were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths nor cases of transurethral resection syndrome. Two patients required blood transfusion. The mean duration of catheterization was 1.6 days and the mean hospital stay 2.9 days. The mean IPSS decreased from 21.0 preoperatively to 7.0 at 1 year, whilst the Qmax increased from 10.5 mL/sec to 20.5 mL/sec. CONCLUSION: The HoLRP technique is a safe and effective treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, allowing resection of the prostate at the level of the capsule with minimal bleeding or fluid absorption and with results equivalent to those of standard transurethral resection.     

Holmium laser enucleation for large (greater than 100 mL) prostate glands

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using the transurethral soft tissue morcellator (TUSTM), as a primary surgical treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with prostate glands > 100 mL. METHODS: Eighteen patients with preoperative prostate volumes > 100 mL underwent the HoLEP procedure. The criteria for surgery were determined by a preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a prior failure of medical therapy, and urinary retention. RESULTS: The mean preoperative IPSS and prostate gland size were 13.8 and 142.3 mL, respectively. The total energy used by the laser was 288.4 kJ. The mean catheter time was 23.8 h and, perioperatively, no patients had electrolyte abnormalities or required blood transfusions. The 3-week postoperative IPSS was 2.8, with minimum long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with TUSTM is a safe and effective alternative to open prostatic surgery for glands > 100 mL.     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生

目的:评价经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗大体积良性前列腺增生(BPH)的价值。方法:BPH患者60例,前列腺重量均>100g,分为HoLEP组(n=32)和耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术组(n=28),比较两组手术时间、术中出血量和术后膀胱冲洗时间、导尿管留置时间、住院时间;术后3个月随访,比较两组患者IPSS、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、剩余尿量(PVR)等指标的变化。结果:HoLEP组与耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术组比较手术时间有所延长(P<0.01),但术中出血量减少(P<0.01),膀胱冲洗时间、导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间明显缩短(P<0.01)。术后3个月,两组IPSS、QOL、Qmax、PVR较自身术前显著改善(P<0.01),组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:HoLEP治疗大体积BPH具有与开放性前列腺切除术相似的疗效,同时手术安全性高、患者痛苦小、术后恢复快,是一种更适合于大体积BPH治疗的手术方式。     

Transurethral Visual Laser Ablation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using a KTP/YAG Laser

Background :
Transurethral visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) has been established as an alternative method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, most VLAP procedures utilize only a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-gamet (Nd:YAC) laser. Since a potassiumtitenyl-phosphate (KTP) laser offers limited tissue penetration, KTP can be safely utilized to excise part of the obstructing prostatic tissue. This study assessed the interaction between KTP vaporization and YAG coagulative ablation to determine the safety and efficacy of VLAP utilizing a combined KTP/YAG treatment.
Methods :
Forty patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH were treated with VLAP using a KTP/YAG laser. The laser light was delivered by an angle delivery device.
Results :
Most cases demonstrated a significant improvement in routine subjective and objective parameters (AUA symptom score, peak flow rate, average flow rate, and amount of residual urine). No significant complications relating to this procedure were reported, however, 4 patients experienced postoperative acute urinary retention.
Conclusion :
KTP/YAG laser ablation of the prostate is safe and effective for the treatment of BPH.     

钬激光和铥激光在经尿道前列腺剜除术中应用的对比性研究

目的:研究、比较钬激光和铥激光在经尿道前列腺剜除术中的有效性和安全性。方法:将98例BPH患者分为两组,分别采用钬激光(Ho组)或铥激光(Th组)经尿道前列腺剜除术,比较两组患者手术前后IPSS评分、残余尿量、最大尿流率、手术失血量及电解质等指标变化。结果:两组患者年龄、前列腺体积、术前IPSS评分、残余尿量及最大尿流率等指标均无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。Th组手术时间67～145min,平均(84.6±10.2)min,出血量50～240ml,平均(126.5±14.6)ml。术后平均留置尿管时间2.4d。Ho组手术时间46～122min,平均(70.5±7.5)min,术中失血量80～400ml,平均(176.5±14.1)ml,无输血事件。术后平均尿管留置时间2.5d。Ho组手术时间较Th组短(P=0.032),而失血量似大于Th组,但并无统计学差异(P=0.071)。两组患者手术前后血红蛋白、血Na+、渗透压等均无明显差异,无电切综合征者。两组术前IPSS、残余尿、最大尿流率与术后第3个月指标相比,均存在统计学差异(P均<0.05)。各指标同期对比均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:钬激光或铥激光经尿道前列腺剜除术均可有效缓解下尿路梗阻症状(LUTS),其短期效果相当。术中铥激光止血效果确切,但解剖清晰度逊于钬激光。     

A Non-Randomized Comparative Study of Visual laser Ablation and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Background: Transurethral resection of the prustate (TURP) haz been the -preferred surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for the past 50 years. Alternative methods for treating BPH such as visual laser ablation (VLAP) have been established during the past decade. In order to assess the safety and efficacy of VLAP, this alternative method was performed using a Urolase fiber and neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and compared to results obtained in patients treated with TURP for BPH Methods: In this non-randomized comparative study, 100 BPH patients were equally split between treatment with VLAP or TURP, and their cases compared. The efficacy was assessed using an International Prostate Symptom Score, urinary flow rates, post-void residual urinary volume and an estimated prostate volume.
Results: There was a clinically significant improvement in all parameters in both groups. In the VIAP and TGRP groups. 92.0%, and 81.6% 90.2% and 862 and 931% and 100.0% were categorized as effectively-treated cases at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively, respectively. So severe side effect was seen in VLAP group. The total and post-operative lengths of hospitalization in the VLAP group were shorter, but the duration of post-operative bladder irrigation was longer in these patients.
Conclusions: Although TURP remains the standard surgical treatment for BPH, VLAP is associated with less morbidity and the clinical outcome is similar compared to patients treated with TURP. VLAP in conjunction with TURP may result in less risk of postoperative urinary retention and vesicle irritability.     

钬激光碎石术和经尿道等离子体电切加剜除术治疗BPH并膀胱结石的探讨

目的：探讨BPH并膀胱结石的有效治疗方法,为临床治疗BPH并膀胱结石的一期腔内治疗提供参考。方法：回顾性分析钬激光碎石术和经尿道等离子体电切加剜除术治疗BPH并膀胱结石患者36例的临床资料。结果：36例均一次手术成功,碎石时间15～45min,平均26min前列腺电切时间45～150min,平均65min。术中术后均无输血,无电切综合征、膀胱穿孔、结石残留等并发症。术后3～5天拔除尿管,无排尿困难、尿失禁等。病理检查结果均为BPH。术后3个月,国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）由（22．6±4．8）分降至（7．8±1．5）分（P〈0．05）,最大尿流率（Qmax）由（6．3±2．5）ml／s升至（16．8±3．8）ml／s（P〈0．05）。结论：同期进行钬激光碎石术和经尿道等离子体电切加剜除术是一种治疗BPH并膀胱结石的高效、安全的方法。     

A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: We undertook a systematic review to assess the safety and efficacy of holmium laser prostatectomy compared to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched literature databases through August 2002. Holmium laser studies, including holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), of any design, and the transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) arms of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with sample sizes greater than 50 patients, date restricted to 1995 onward, were included for comparison. RESULTS: Three RCTs comparing HoLRP and TURP, and 2 RCTs comparing HoLEP and TURP were identified. For each of the holmium procedures there was also 1 nonrandomized comparative study and a number of case series (HoLRP 13, HoLEP 10). With the exception of 1 randomized trial the quality of the available evidence was poor, with the other RCTs lacking information regarding methods of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding. The majority of studies were characterized by relatively short followup periods and significant losses to followup. In terms of safety the data suggest that the holmium laser procedures are superior to TURP with regard to a number of key indicators of blood loss (transfusion rates, postoperative bladder irrigation, duration of catheterization and length of hospital stay), although amount of blood loss was rarely reported. In terms of efficacy the holmium laser procedures appear to be similarly effective to TURP in relieving the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser prostatectomy is at least as effective as TURP for managing the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, at the present time the long-term durability of the holmium procedures with respect to TURP cannot be determined due to a lack of published studies with sufficient followup.     

经尿道前列腺切除术对性功能影响的Meta分析

目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)、前列腺电汽化术(TUEVP)和钬激光前列腺剜除术(Ho-LEP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)对男性性功能的影响。方法:搜集比较TURP、TUEVP及HoLEP对性功能影响的随机对照研究(RCT),以Meta分析法系统比较不同术式治疗BPH对性功能的影响。结果:9个RCT研究1 050例患者纳入分析,研究基线具有可比性。TURP与TUEVP相比,对勃起功能影响较小(P=0.04),对射精功能的影响无显著差异。HoLEP和TURP在术后12个月和24个月对勃起和射精功能的影响均无显著差异。结论:TUEVP比TURP更易引起勃起功能障碍,但对射精功能的影响无明显差别;HoLEP与TURP对勃起和射精功能的影响无明显差别。     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生

目的评价经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除和前列腺组织粉碎术治疗良性前列腺增生（BPH）的临床效果,探讨手术操作技巧及并发症的预防。方法应用100 W钬激光器和组织粉碎器对45例BPH患者实施经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除（HoLEP）和组织粉碎术。术前国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）为15-32分,平均24.0分,最大尿流率（Qmax）为4-15 mL/s,平均8.4 mL/s,膀胱残余尿为60-246 mL,平均115 mL。结果41例行HoLEP手术成功。手术时间50-200 min,平均105 min,获得前列腺组织30-85 g,平均48.6 g,其中输血5例,膀胱黏膜或膀胱壁损伤5例,尿失禁1例,尿道狭窄3例。保留导尿时间3-7 d,平均4.3 d。术后35例获随访3个月,IPSS降至3-10分,平均5.2分（P〈0.01）,Qmax升至18-25 mL/s,平均22.4 mL/s（P〈0.01）,膀胱残余尿为0-68 mL,平均26 mL（P〈0.01）。结论经尿道钬激光剜除前列腺组织损伤小,术中出血少,并发症少,疗效可靠。HoLEP学习曲线较长,应注意手术技巧的掌握,减少并发症的发生。     

A 4-year follow-up of a randomized prospective study comparing transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate with neodymium: YAG laser therapy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy and durability of neodymium (Nd):YAG laser prostatectomy with transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TUVP) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1995 to March 1997, 180 patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH were randomized equally either to Nd:YAG laser therapy or TUVP. Laser therapy combined two different techniques, side-fire coagulation of the lateral lobes and contact vaporization of the median lobe. Before treatment the two groups had a comparable International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life score (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and prostate and adenoma volume. In all, 62 and 78 patients completed the 1, 2, 3 and 4-year follow-up from the laser and TUVP groups, respectively. RESULTS: At each follow-up, the IPSS, QoL, Qmax and PVR were significantly better and more durable in the TUVP than in the laser group. In the TUVP and laser groups respectively, at the 4-year follow-up the mean value of the IPSS was 3.7 vs 11.9, the QoL 1.3 vs 3.1, the Qmax 21.4 vs 13.6 mL/s and the PVR 25.1 vs 64.6 mL (all P < 0.001). The mean prostate and adenoma volume were significantly lower after TUVP than after laser therapy (P < 0.001) at the 1- and 4-year follow-up, with final values of 27.9 vs 35.9 and 11.7 vs 20 mL (both P < 0.001) for the TUVP and laser groups, respectively. Retrograde ejaculation was significantly more common after TUVP (63%) than after laser therapy (18%; P < 0.001). Impotence was reported in 8% of men after TUVP and in none after laser therapy (P = 0.040). The re-operation rate was 12% after TUVP and 38% after laser treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These 4-year follow-up results confirm that TUVP is significantly more effective and durable than the Nd:YAG laser for treating BPH. Residual obstructing adenoma was the main cause of failure in the laser group, which reflects the inadequacy of laser therapy for removing the adenoma.     

Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup

PURPOSE: It has previously been shown that holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) is superior to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with regard to perioperative morbidity and is equivalent to TURP in the short term. We present the long-term results of a randomized, prospective trial comparing HoLRP to TURP since information regarding the durability of holmium prostatectomy is lacking in the literature to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with urodynamic obstruction were randomized (April 1996 to August 1997) into 2 comparable groups and assigned to HoLRP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed prospectively at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively with an American Urological Association symptom score, quality of life score, peak urinary flow rate, and questionnaires concerning sexual function and continence. Preoperative pressure flow studies, ultrasound prostatic volume assessment and post-void residual volume measurement were repeated at the 6-month visit. All adverse events were noted. RESULTS: Of 120 patients 73 completed the 48-month assessment. HoLRP and TURP resulted in significant improvements in all parameters. There was no difference between the 2 techniques in terms of urodynamic parameters, potency, continence and symptom scores at the 48-month assessment. HoLRP took significantly longer to perform but perioperative morbidity, catheter time, nursing contact time and hospital stay were significantly less for HoLRP compared to TURP. CONCLUSIONS: HoLRP and TURP give equivalent and satisfactory long-term results, with no differences noted in major morbidity. This confirms the durability of these 2 treatments. Peri-operative morbidity is less with HoLRP.     

四种经尿道前列腺剜除术的疗效和安全性比较

目的比较不同手术治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年7月入住空军军医大学唐都医院的277例手术治疗的BPH患者的临床资料。其中第二代半导体红激光前列腺剜除(DiLEP)手术组88例,钬激光前列腺剜除(HoLEP)手术组50例,经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切剜除术(PKEP)手术组85例,铥激光前列腺剜除(THuVEP)手术组54例,比较4组手术病例手术时间、术后血红蛋白下降值、术后最大尿流率(Qmax)改善值、术后并发症、手术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)改善等参数,分析4种手术方法的疗效与安全性。结果手术均获成功,HoLEP、DiLEP、PKEP、THuVEP4组患者年龄分别为(68.84±6.28)、(70.94±6.14)、(70.31±7.33)、(70.37±5.87)岁,前列腺体积分别为(61.85±16.51)、(61.23±17.37)、(58.40±17.04)、(63.82±19.68)mL,差异均无显著性统计学意义(P>0.05);而手术时间[(94.24±39.13)、(93.67±50.31)、(117.25±62.99)、(97.46±40.62)min]、血红蛋白下降值[(8.40±5.18)、(9.80±5.22)、(11.89±8.18)、(10.48±4.39)g/L]、IPSS评分改善值[(13.14±5.43)、(13.42±3.93)、(11.38±4.55)、(12.20±4.56)分]以及最大尿流率(Qmax)改善值[(17.42±4.87)、(14.89±2.69)、(14.58±4.76)、(15.17±3.08)mL/s],4项指标差异均有显著性统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与PKEP相比,HoLEP与DiLEP手术时间短、术中止血效果好、术后前列腺症状改善明显;THuVEP手术时间短;DiLEP尿失禁发生率较低,具有良好的安全性。     

等离子电切镜联合输尿管镜下钬激光碎石与前列腺等离子切除术治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石33例

目的探讨等离子电切镜联合输尿管镜下钬激光碎石与前列腺等离子切除术（transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate,PKRP）治疗良性前列腺增生症（benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH）合并膀胱结石的疗效。方法连续硬膜外麻醉后,通过电切镜外鞘置人Wolf F8.0/9.8硬性输尿管镜,由输尿管镜镜鞘的进水孔进水,电切镜外鞘出水。活动离子电切镜外鞘寻找膀胱结石,找到膀胱结石后,通过输尿管镜操作通道置入钬激光碎石逐渐将结石碎成小块,Ellik冲洗器将已破碎的结石冲出膀胱外。然后置入等离子电切镜操作件,行前列腺等离子切除术（plasmakinetic resection of prostate,PKRP）。术毕,Elick冲洗器冲洗清除组织碎块,留置F22三腔气囊尿管接冲洗。结果33例均一次治疗成功,无严重并发症发生。术后复查KUB,均无结石残留,清石率达100％。国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）（9±3）分,显著低于术前（29±4）分（t=4．595,P=0．000）;生活质量评分（QOL）（2．5±1．0）分,显著低于术前（4．5±2．1）分（t=4．954,P=0．000）;最大尿流率（Qmax）（18．0±6．0）ml／s,显著高于术前（5．7±3．1）ml／s（t=8．913,P=0．000）。33例术后随访1—24个月,平均12个月,未出现尿道狭窄等远期并发症,均无结石复发。结论等离子电切镜外鞘输尿管镜下钬激光碎石联合经尿道PKRP治疗BPH合并膀胱结石,具有创伤小、恢复快、安全高效、并发症少的优点。     

1470nm半导体激光经尿道前列腺汽化术治疗BPH的疗效观察

目的:探讨1 470nm半导体激光经尿道前列腺汽化术治疗BPH的疗效和安全性。方法:应用1470nm半导体激光对46例BPH患者进行激光汽化切除术。患者年龄62~86岁,平均前列腺体积为(56.2±12.1)ml。同时观察记录手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症及手术前后IPSS、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)及剩余尿量(PVR)等指标,评估其差异有无统计学意义。结果:本组手术全部成功,手术时间平均(75.6±14.8)min,术中无明显出血,无输血病例。术后导尿管留置时间2~4d,平均留置尿管时间(2.5±0.4)d;IPSS术后1个月为(8.8±2.2)分,3个月为(7.6±1.2)分,明显低于术前[(18.5±3.6)分,P0.01],Qmax及PVR明显好于术前(P0.01)。所有患者均未出现尿失禁及明显的膀胱刺激症状。结论:1 470nm半导体激光汽化术治疗BPH效果肯定,值得临床推广。     

Transurethral holmium laser resection of the prostate

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of the holmium:YAG laser for transurethral endoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 103 patients with BPH with holmium:YAG laser resection of the prostate. A high power holmium laser generating a maximum of 60 or 81 W. was used in a pulsed mode, applying energy directly to prostatic tissue via a forward firing 550 micron. fiber transurethrally under direct vision. Treatment outcome was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine volume. We also compared holmium laser surgery and transurethral resection of the prostate for operative factors, such as surgical duration, bleeding volume and catheterization time. RESULTS: Average symptom score, quality of life score, peak flow rate and post-void residual significantly improved at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, with improvement maintained up to 36 months postoperatively in the holmium:YAG group. Intraoperative bleeding volume was significantly lower and catheterization time was significantly shorter for holmium:YAG than for transurethral prostatic resection. Use of the holmium laser caused no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its effectiveness and safety holmium:YAG resection is a viable potential surgical alternative for symptomatic BPH. The holmium:YAG laser has been verified to be useful for many purposes in urology.     

经尿道钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床观察

目的 对比经尿道钬激光剜除术与经尿道等离子切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床效果.方法 选择2013年1月至2014年12月在本院住院治疗的良性前列腺增生患者83例为研究对象,将患者随机分为钬激光组(42例)和等离子组(41例),分别给予钬激光剜除术或等离子切除术治疗.比较两组患者治疗前后IPSS、术中出血量、手术时间、术后置管时间、住院时间、残余尿及并发症发生情况等.结果 钬激光组术中出血量、手术时间均少于等离子组;术后尿管留置时间及术后住院时间均短于等离子组(P＜0.05).两组患者IPSS和残余尿量均显著下降(P＜0.05).术前两组IPSS、残余尿量比较,差异无统计学意义;术后两组IPSS、残余尿量比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P＞0.05).两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 钬激光或等离子切除术治疗良性前列腺增生均获具有良好的疗效和安全性,对于有前列腺电切术禁忌证的患者,可以考虑采用钬激光剜除术,因其出血风险小,能明显缩短导尿管留置时间和住院时间.     

经尿道前列腺汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症

目的 :探讨良性前列腺增生症 (BPH)的手术新方法。　方法 :采用经尿道前列腺汽化术 (TVP)治疗BPH3 60例。　结果 :TVP平均手术时间 4 0min ,平均出血量 80ml。术后留置导尿管平均 4 .5d ,拔除导尿管后均自行排尿。术后第 3个月和第 6个月随访 ,国际前列腺症状评分 (IPSS)从术前 2 3分分别降至 11分和 7.2分 ,最大尿流率从 7.2ml/s分别上升为 13 .6、15 .8ml/s ,残余尿从 80ml分别降至 2 8.0、12 .0ml。　结论 :TVP是一种安全性高、并发症少、疗效确切的新手术方法