Relationship Between Individual Components of the Extended-Criteria Donor Definition and the First Post-transplant Kidney Graft Resistance Index,Measured by Doppler Sonography

Background

Despite an increasing utilization of kidneys procured from expanded-criteria donors, little is known about the effects of particular expanded-criteria donors definition components, that is, hypertension, increased creatinine prior to procurement, and cerebrovascular cause of death on the kidney graft Doppler parameters measured shortly after transplantation, whose increased values are associated with unfavorable outcomes. Hence, we analyzed the relationship between expanded-criteria donors components and resistance index values measured within 2 to 3 days post-transplant.

The advanced age deceased kidney donor: current outcomes and future opportunities

BaCKGROUND: Due to the aging general population, deceased donors > or =55 years will form an increasingly larger proportion of the deceased kidney donor pool. METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we determined the change in graft survival between 1996 and 2000 among 32,557 recipients of donors aged <55 years and > or =55 years in univariate and multivariate survival analyses. We identified donor risk factors for graft loss that might influence the decision to accept or reject donors <55 and > or =55 years. The initial glomerular filtration rate established 6 months after transplantation (initial GFR), and the stability of GFR in the first post-transplant year (GFR at 12 months post-transplantation-GFR at six months post-transplantation) were compared between recipients of donors <55 and > or =55 years and the association of these factors with graft survival was determined. RESULTS: In 2000, one-year graft survival in donors > or =55 years was 86.7%. Between 1996 and 1999 the projected graft half life improved from 11.4 to 14.5 years for recipients of donors <55 years (P < 0.01); however, there was no improvement for recipients of donors > or =55 years (8.2 to 9.2 year, P= 0.46). Among donor factors studied, only cold ischemic time >24 hours identified recipients of donors > or =55 years at risk for graft loss. Compared to recipients of donors <55 years, recipients of donors > or =55 years established a lower initial GFR (42 vs. 56 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.0001), and had less stable GFR in the first post-transplant year (-1.5 vs. -0.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P <.0001). Recipients from donors > or =55 years with initial GFR > or =50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and no drop GFR during the first post-transplant year had graft survival that was superior to that of donors <55 years with either initial GFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or a drop in GFR during the first post-transplant year. CONCLUSION: Donors > or =55 years are a valuable resource. Despite improvements in immunosuppression, rejection, and delayed graft function, the projected increase in long-term graft survival among recipients of donors <55 years was not shared among recipients of donors > or =55 years. Recipients of donors > or =55 years had lower initial GFR, and less stable GFR during the first post-transplant year. Limiting cold ischemic time to <24 hours may improve outcomes among recipients of donors > or =55 years. Future studies to maximize initial GFR and minimize early loss of GFR in recipients of donors > or =55 years may lead to improved outcomes from deceased donors > or =55 years.     

Crucial Role of Extended Criteria Donors in Deceased Donor Single Kidney Transplantation to Face Chronic Shortage in the Heart of the Mediterranean Basin: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundThe gap between organ availability and patients on the waiting list for deceased donor kidney transplants has resulted in the wide use of extended criteria donors (ECDs).We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of single kidney transplantation (KT) performed at our institute with standard criteria donor (SCD) or ECD grafts, according to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network definition. Patients and methods. Our retrospective analysis studied 115 adult recipients of KT from January 2016 to July 2018, with kidney grafts procured from adult donors after brain or circulatory death, performed at our institute. Among the 2 recipients’ groups, we compared the incidence of early graft loss, delayed graft function, hospitalization, and surgical complications. We compared the evaluation of time to early graft loss with Kaplan-Meier estimators and curves; the hypothesis of no difference in time to graft loss between the 2 groups was tested using the log-rank statistics.ResultsOf the 103 deceased donor kidney transplants during the study period, 129 grafts were used after the regional network sharing allocation. More frequently, ECDs had a greater body mass index than SCDs (25.2 ± 3.9 vs 27.7 ± 5.0, P = .005) and type II diabetes mellitus (0% vs 18%, P = .002). KT recipients who received an ECD graft (73, 63.5%) were older (59.8 ± 9.8 vs 45.2 ± 15.4, P < .001) and presented a higher rate of delayed graft function (56% vs 24%, P = .001). Post-transplant graft loss did not differ among the 2 groups.ConclusionBased on clinical experience in a single transplant center, ECD use for KTs is crucial in facing the organ shortage, without impairing post-deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes.     

Hyperthermia-induced HSP expression correlates with improved rat renal isograft viability and survival in kidneys harvested from non-heart-beating donors

Transient sublethal hyperthermia followed by recovery from heat stress, referred to as heat shock preconditioning, exerts a protective effect on ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury in many systems. This effect is considered to be correlated to heat shock proteins (HSPs) and might be a critical factor in kidney graft function and survival. This study was designed to examine the impact of heat shock preconditioning on kidney isograft function and survival in a model utilizing non-heart-beating (NHB) donors. Four groups of male Lewis rats (n = 10/group) subjected either to whole body hyperthermia (groups A and C) or to sham anesthesia (groups B and D) were allowed 24 h recovery. Thereafter, 20 min of warm ischemia (A/B), and in a separate set of experiments 40 min of warm ischemia (C/D), were induced by suprarenal aortic cross clamping before renal procurement. After 24-h preservation with University of Wisconsin solution at 4 °C, orthotopic kidney transplantations were performed to syngeneic bilaterally nephrectomized recipients. Tissue specimens were taken to determine HO-1/HSP32, 72, and 90 induction by Western blot analysis. Renal function was measured by means of serum creatinine and creatinine clearance on days 0, 3, and 7 as well as urine volume, protein content, and creatinine levels daily. HO-1/HSP32 and HSP72 were found to be expressed constitutively. Moreover, heat shock strongly induced renal HSP72 and HSP32/HO-1, and to a lesser extent HSP90, expression. For recipients of group A grafts, the graft survival rate was 10/10, whereas it was 7/10 (70 %) in recipients of group B grafts (log rank p < 0.05). Following 40 min of warm ischemia, 6/10 (60 %) recipients survived, whereas all sham treated animals died with anuria within 6 days (log rank p = 0.01). Heat shock preconditioning strongly improved graft viability and reduced functional impairment. Creatinine clearance (CRC) on day 3 post Tx was 0.43 ± 0.24 ml/min in preconditioned animals (group A) and 0.07 ± 0.09 ml/min (p < 0.001) in sham preconditioned (group B), whereas it was 0.91 ± 0.33 ml/min and 0.03 ± 0.02 ml/min (p < 0.00 001) on day 7 post Tx. Following 40 min NHB time, CRC in survivors of preconditioned graft recipients (group C) was 0.32 ± 0.2 ml/min (day 3 post Tx) and 0.23 ± 0.08 ml/min (day 7 post Tx) and was significantly better than CRC of group B (p < 0.01 and p < 0.00001, respectively). CRCs prior to NHB procedures were comparable in all animals ranging between 1.31 and 1.72 ml/min. Serum creatinine as well as proteinuria were significantly increased after transplantation in both groups but recovered within 5 days in recipients of preconditioned grafts, whereas kidneys from donors without HP did not recover function. Histological alterations were also diminished following HP. Hyperthermic preconditioning induces strong and long lasting HO-1/HSP32, HSP72, and HSP90 expression in rat kidneys. HP increases survival following transplantation and improves renal graft function including proteinuria, volume output, and creatinine clearance. HSP induction might be used to develop novel approaches in clinical transplantation. Received: 3 November 2000 Revised: 27 February 2001 Accepted: 29 May 2001     

Outcomes of Paired-Exchange Live-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionPaired-exchange kidney transplantation (PEKT) enables recipients with willing but incompatible donors to find potential matches from a larger pool of donors. It involves transportation of donor kidneys to the intended recipient with a consequent increase in the cold ischemia time (CIT).Patients and MethodsOur single-center study compared the outcomes of PEKT versus traditional in-center live-donor kidney transplants (ICKT). Retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent PEKT and ICKT from January 2009 to February 2012 at our institution was performed. Delayed graft function, acute rejection rates, incidence of proteinuria, trends in serum creatinine, and graft and patient survival rates were compared between groups.ResultsBaseline demographic data were similar between the PEKT group (n = 15) and the ICKT group (n = 30) except that CIT (13.1 vs 3.8 hours; P < .001) and panel reactive antibody titers (12.6% ± 22.9% vs 0.9% ± 4.9%; P = .01) were significantly higher in the PEKT group. No patient developed delayed graft function. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range: 2–27.5 months), graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups. Serial creatinine levels were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences between groups in acute rejection rates (3 of 15 vs 3 of 30) and development of proteinuria posttransplantation (8 of 15 vs 22 of 30).ConclusionsOur study found similar outcomes between the PEKT and ICKT groups despite longer CIT and higher panel reactive antibody titers in the PEKT group. These findings support the current practice of PEKT with transporting of donor kidneys, with the resultant increase in the chances of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

Effect of donor age and parent-to-child transplant on living-related donor kidney transplantation: a single center's experience of 236 cases

Abstract

To study the impact of parent-to-child transplant and older donor age on recipients' post-transplant creatinine levels, a total of 236 patients who received living donor kidney transplantation were evaluated for kidney viability based on creatinine (Cr) level. Of the 236 pairings, 113 (48%) were parent-to-child followed by sibling transplants (66, 30%). Recipient Cr levels were significantly higher at 6 months and 3 years post-transplant in the parent-to-child transplants compared to other donor–recipient relationships. In addition, donor age (average age: 44.1?±?11.5; range: 19–66) contributed to higher recipient post-transplant Cr levels (p?<?0.01). Pre-transplant donor and recipient Cr levels tended to result in higher post-transplant Cr levels in recipients (p?<?0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of both parent-to-child transplant and older donor significantly increased the risk of elevated post-transplant Cr levels in recipients with an estimated odds ratios ranging from 3.46 (95% CI: 1.71–6.98) at 6 months to 8.04 (3.14–20.56) at 3 years post-transplant. Donor age significantly affected transplant survival as measured by higher recipient post-transplant Cr levels. In addition, parent-to-child transplant pairings, along with older donor age, significantly increased the risk of elevated post-transplant Cr levels in recipients.     

Results of Transplantation of Kidneys Procured From Donors After Brain Death Aged 60 Years and Older

Objective

To analyze results of transplantation of kidneys procured from donors after brain death aged 60 years and older (hereafter denoted by “≥60”) compared to kidneys procured from donors after brain death aged 40–59 years (hereafter denoted by “40–59”) in medium-term follow-up period, and to assess factors that affect recipient and kidney graft survival.

供肾穿刺活检在亲属活体肾移植中的应用及边缘供肾对受者预后的影响

目的 分析供肾穿刺活榆在亲属活体肾移植中对供肾质量的诊断价值及边缘供肾对亲属活体肾移植受者早期预后的影响.方法 2004年2月至2008年7月142例亲属活体肾移植患者,按照供体年龄和供肾情况分为边缘供者组(51例)和非边缘供者组(91例).并对49例亲属活体供肾行细针穿刺活检术.分析2组受者的术后血肌酐(Scr)变...     

Kidney transplant monitoring by anti donor specific antibodies

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies were studied by cytotoxicity crossmatching (CTXM) and flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) in 117 kidney transplant candidates; the same study was carried out in 33 cadaver-donor kidney recipients, during the first 3 post-transplant months, for which donor cells were available. Pre-transport evaluation showed that 82.9 % of subjects were CTXM negative/FCXM negative, 6.8 % of patients were positive in both tests, and 10.3 % were CTXM negative/FCCM positive. Post-transplant monitoring for donor-specific antibodies (Abs-DS) showed that nine recipients (27.3 %) were FCXM positive; six of them were IgG + and three IgM +. In comparing these results with the clinical course, a significant association between FCXM IgG + and rejection episodes was observed (P < 0.01).     

Pre-transplant and post-transplant soluble CD30 for prediction and diagnosis of acute kidney allograft rejection

Background  Serum levels of soluble CD30 (sCD30) have been considered as a predictor of acute kidney allograft rejection. We have evaluated the pre-transplant and post-transplant levels of sCD30 with the aim of determining its value in predicting and diagnosing kidney rejection. Methods  We measured sCD30 serum levels before kidney transplantation, 5 days post-operatively, and at creatinine elevation episodes. The predictive value of sCD30 for diagnosing acute rejection (AR) within the first 6 post-operative months was assessed in 203 kidney recipients from living donors. Results  Pre-transplant and post-operative levels of serum sCD30 were 58.10 ± 52.55 and 51.55 ± 49.65 U/ml, respectively (P = 0.12). Twenty-three patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection, and 28 had acute allograft dysfunction due to non-immunologic diseases. The pre-transplant sCD30 level was not different between patients with and without AR. However, post-transplant sCD30 was higher in the AR group. The median serum level of post-transplant sCD30 was 52 U/ml in the AR group and 26.3 U/ml in a control group (P < 0.001). The relative changes of sCD30 on day 5 were higher in patients with AR (P = 0.003). Based on post-transplant sCD30 levels, we were able to differentiate between kidney recipients who experienced an AR within 6 months post-surgery and those without an AR (cutoff value 41 U/ml; sensitivity 70%; specificity 71.7%). The level of sCD30 during periods of elevated serum creatinine was not independently associated with the diagnosis of AR. Conclusion  Post-transplant sCD30 levels and their relative changes are higher in patients experiencing AR. We propose further studies on the post-transplant trend of this marker for the prediction of AR.     

Is Erythrocytosis More Common After Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation? A Single-Center Experience

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is reported in 8% to 22% of kidney transplant recipients. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of PTE in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplantation (SPKT). This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of PTE in a cohort of SPKT and same-donor single kidney transplant patients and find predictive factors for erythrocytosis development. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed with 65 SPKT recipients and 65 same-donor single kidney transplant patients. Post-transplant erythrocytosis was defined as a hematocrit persistently >51% without a known cause of erythrocytosis. The PTE prevalence was 23.1% and was more frequent in SPKT patients than in single donor patients (38.5% vs 7.7%; P < .001). The mean time for PTE development was 11.2 ± 13.3 months. In the multivariate model, SPKT was the only predictor for PTE development. De novo hypertension was more frequent in the PTE group (P = .002), but there was no difference in stroke and pancreatic or kidney thrombosis occurrence. Post-transplant erythrocytosis is more common after SPKT than after single kidney transplantation. De novo hypertension was more frequent in the erythrocytosis group, but allograft thrombosis rates.     

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.     

Long‐term outcome of renal transplantation from octogenarian donors: A multicenter controlled study

To assess whether biopsy‐guided selection of kidneys from very old brain‐dead donors enables more successful transplantations, the authors of this multicenter, observational study compared graft survival between 37 recipients of 1 or 2 histologically evaluated kidneys from donors older than 80 years and 198 reference‐recipients of non–histologically evaluated single grafts from donors aged 60 years and younger (transplantation period: 2006‐2013 at 3 Italian centers). During a median (interquartile range) of 25 (13‐42) months, 2 recipients (5.4%) and 10 reference‐recipients (5.1%) required dialysis (crude and donor age‐ and sex‐adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.55 [0.34‐7.12], P = .576 and 1.41 [0.10‐19.54], P = .798, respectively). Shared frailty analyses confirmed similar outcomes in a 1:2 propensity score study comparing recipients with 74 reference‐recipients matched by center, year, donor, and recipient sex and age. Serum creatinine was similar across groups during 84‐month follow‐up. Recipients had remarkably shorter waiting times than did reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (7.5 [4.0‐19.5] vs 36 [19‐56] and 40 [24‐56] months, respectively, P < .0001 for both comparisons). Mean (± SD) kidney donor risk index was 2.57 ± 0.32 in recipients vs 1.09 ± 0.24 and 1.14 ± 0.24 in reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Adverse events were similar across groups. Biopsy‐guided allocation of kidneys from octogenarian donors permits further expansion of the donor organ pool and faster access to a kidney transplant, without increasing the risk of premature graft failure.     

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation With Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience

AimThe aim of this study is to present the outcome of kidney transplantation after laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) compared with conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in a single-center experience.MethodsThis retrospective study compares data from the initial experience with 110 consecutive LESS DN donors and their recipients (group A) with 205 consecutive conventional LDN donors and their recipients (group B).ResultsThis study compared 110 LESS DNs completed in an 18-month period with 205 LDNs completed in the immediately preceding 42-month period. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. In groups A and B, respectively, the incidence of immediate graft function was 90% vs 91.2%, slow graft function was 9% vs 5.3%, delayed graft function was 0.9% vs 2.9%, graft loss was 0.9% vs 2.9%, and death with a functioning graft was 0.9% vs 1.5%. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.3 ± 0.93 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL (P = .447), 1.1 ± 0.33 mg/dL vs 1.2 ± 0.75 mg/dL (P = .184), and 1.05 ± 0.25 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.39 mg/dL (P = .224) at 7, 30, and 365 days after transplantation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 88 ± 18.2 vs 83 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .004). The mean donor operative times in groups A and B were 175.9 ± 24.9 minutes vs 199.88 ± 37.06 minutes (P = .0001), respectively, and the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 minutes vs 3.64 ± 1.38 minutes, respectively (P = .0001). The mean body mass index, the incidence of complex vascular anatomy, and the rate of complications were the same in the 2 donor groups.ConclusionsThe outcome of kidney transplantation after LESS DN is comparable to conventional LDN. LESS DN can be employed as the primary approach for kidney donation with low donor risk and without compromising recipient outcomes.     

Analysis of Risk Factors for Allograft Outcome Comparing 2 Kidneys From the Same Donor in Separate Recipients

Background

An analysis of 2 kidney transplants from the same donor at the same center enables us to analyze the influence of risk factors on the outcome of the grafts in different recipients.

Hyperparathyroidism at 1 year after kidney transplantation is associated with graft loss

BackgroundHyperparathyroidism persists in many patients after kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between post-transplant hyperparathyroidism and kidney transplantation outcomes.MethodsWe identified 824 participants from a prospective longitudinal cohort of adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation at a single institution between December 2008 and February 2020. Parathyroid hormone levels before and after kidney transplantation were abstracted from medical records. Post-transplant hyperparathyroidism was defined as parathyroid hormone level ≥70 pg/mL 1 year after kidney transplantation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of mortality and death-censored graft loss by post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, college education, parathyroid hormone level before kidney transplantation, cause of kidney failure, and years on dialysis before kidney transplantation. A Wald test for interactions was used to evaluate the risk of death-censored graft loss by age, sex, and race.ResultsOf 824 recipients, 60.9% had post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. Compared with non-hyperparathyroidism patients, those with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism were more likely to be Black (47.2% vs 32.6%), undergo dialysis before kidney transplantation (86.9% vs 76.6%), and have a parathyroid hormone level ≥300 pg/mL before kidney transplantation (26.8% vs 9.5%) (all P < .001). Patients with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism had a 1.6-fold higher risk of death-censored graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–2.49) compared with those without post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. This risk more than doubled in those with parathyroid hormone ≥300 pg/mL 1 year after kidney transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.95–9.03). The risk of death-censored graft loss did not differ by age, sex, or race (all P_interaction > .05). There was no association between post-transplant hyperparathyroidism and mortality.ConclusionThe risk of graft loss was significantly higher among patients with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism when compared with patients without post-transplant hyperparathyroidism.     

Outcome in emotionally related living kidney donor transplantation

Background. The growing shortage of cadaver kidneys, the limited possibilities to expand the living related donor pool and the good results obtained in our centre with poorly matched cadaver kidneys, led us in 1991 to begin accepting highly motivated, unrelated, living kidney donors who had a strong emotional bond with the recipients. Methods. Between 1 January 1991 and 1 January 1996, 46 potential living kidney donors and their emotionally related recipients were evaluated. Twenty-three cases were accepted for renal transplantation after thorough somatic and psychological evaluation. The mean post-transplant follow-up until 1 April 1996 was of 28±3 months. Compatible blood groups and a negative cross-match were mandatory, but no minimal HLA matching was required. Results. There was a 50% drop-out rate following the initial screening. The main reasons for not performing transplantation were immunological contraindications in 39% of the cases, somatic in 30.5%, psychological in 26% and socioeconomic in 4.5%. In the accepted group of recipients, 48% (11/23) received transplants without chronic dialysis. Donor survival was 91%; two deaths unrelated to nephrectomy occurred 1 year after donation. The 2-year actuarial recipient and graft survivals were 100% and 91% respectively, compared to 99% (recipients) and 93% (grafts) in the non-HLA-identical living related kidney transplant group, and to 93% (recipients) and 83% (grafts) in the cadaver kidney transplant group. Recipient rehabilitation was completed after 4±1 months. Emotionally related donors returned to work 5±2 weeks after nephrectomy, and no donor regretted his decision, even in the case of failure. Conclusions. Kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option, allowing more patients with end-stage renal disease to avoid chronic dialysis. Recipient and graft outcome were superior to cadaver kidney transplantation. Motivated and emotionally related donors should be allowed to donate one of their kidneys provided that they are carefully selected and thoroughly informed.     

Surgical Stress Hyperglycemia Associated With New-Onset Diabetes in Living Kidney Donors

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and risk factors of new-onset diabetes after donation in kidney donors without diabetes.MethodsLiving donors of kidney transplants between 1998 and 2016 were evaluated. To detect the blood glucose profile of the donors, preoperative fasting glucose (pro-G), nephrectomy evening glucose (nG), and postoperative day 1 fasting glucose (post-G) values were measured.ResultsA total of 195 cases were included in the study. The mean follow-up time in months ± SD (range) was 56 ± 45 (12–215). Of these, 28 (14.3%) donors developed diabetes. The pro-G (103 ± 7.6 vs 93 ± 9.0), nG (208 ± 122 vs 163 ± 67) and post-G (121 ± 25 vs 111 ± 21) values of the donors with new-onset diabetes were higher. Nineteen donors (9.7%) had normal pro-G, nG, and post-G values (group A). However, there were 153 (78.5%) cases with at least 1 abnormal value (group B) and 25 (12.8%) cases that had abnormal values in all (pro-G, nG, and post-G) measurements (group C). The incidence of new-onset diabetes was 0 (0%) in group A, 11% in group B, and 48% in group C (P < .001). In multiple regression analysis, pro-G (Exp[B], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04–1.13; P < .001) and basal glomerular filtration rate (Exp[B], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P < .01) independently associated with new-onset diabetes.ConclusionsIn kidney donors without a history of diabetes, the development of diabetes after donor nephrectomy is an important problem. Pre- and postoperative blood glucose levels provide important information to predict these cases.     

Serum levels of antibodies against oxidised LDL in kidney graft recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lipid abnormalities present in the post-transplant period may contribute to the development and progression of complications leading to graft and patient loss. In the present study serum levels of antibodies against oxidised LDL (Ab-oxLDL) in kidney graft recipients were investigated along with their possible relation to the development of complications in the post-transplant period, and to the outcome of kidney transplantation. METHODS: Serum levels of Ab-oxLDL and lipid pattern were evaluated in 92 kidney graft recipients before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after kidney transplantation, as well as in 90 healthy blood donors (control group). RESULTS: Kidney graft recipients had higher frequency of low levels of Ab-oxLDL as compared with the control group. A decrease in Ab-oxLDL levels was observed at 6 months post-transplant. Patients with early graft loss due to acute rejection had lower pre-transplant Ab-oxLDL levels (p < 0.05) as compared to patients with graft survival >3 months. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that decreased Ab-oxLDL levels found in kidney graft recipients may reflect impaired response to the products of lipid oxidation or increased consumption of Ab-oxLDL, and are associated with graft loss due to acute rejection.     

Lymphoma after living donor kidney transplantation: an Iranian multicenter experience

Introduction  Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are well-recognized complications in solid organ recipients. Limited data exist about the development of PTLDs in living kidney recipients. This study deals with a multicenter nationwide experience with kidney recipients from living donors. Methods  We reviewed data of PTLD patients from a total population of 6,500 patients transplanted at three different transplant centers in Iran from 1984 to 2006. We also compared their data with 2,250 normal kidney recipients of Baqiyatallah Transplant Center. Data were analyzed to determine potential correlates with the occurrence of PTLD and patient outcome. Results  Overall, 31 patients were diagnosed as having post-transplant lymphomas. The incidence of PTLD in our kidney transplant population comprised 0.47%. Sixteen (53%) PTLD patients were females, whereas 15 (47%) were males. The mean ages at transplantation and diagnosis were 37.1 and 41.9, respectively. Twelve (63%) patients died, and seven are alive. All deaths occurred within the 1st year after PTLD diagnosis. The mean time period from transplantation to diagnosis of PTLD was 64 (0.7–173) months. Localization of PTLD in the brain associated the worst outcome. Compared to non-PTLD patients, PTLD patients were significantly female predominated (51.6% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.03) and had lower age at transplantation (36.9 years vs. 42.9 years, respectively; P = 0.01). Patients under immunosuppressive regimens containing azathioprine were at higher risk for acquiring PTLDs compared to those with a MMF-containing regimen. Conclusion  PTLD is a major threat to kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive agents have a significant role in developing the disease. Early detection of the disease and using more safe immunosuppresants may have beneficial effects on patient outcomes and incidence of the disease.