小切口、持续负压引流与传统切开引流治疗聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶隆乳术后乳腺脓肿的比较

目的探讨小切口、持续负压引流治疗聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶隆乳术后乳腺脓肿的效果。方法 20例患者采用小切口、持续负压引流和20例患者采用传统切开油纱填塞引流治疗聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶隆乳术后乳腺脓肿,观察治疗效果。结果小切口、持续负压引流组在愈合时间、换药次数、疼痛程度、瘢痕大小等方面均明显优于传统切开引流组。结论持续负压引流组可以明显缩短愈合时间,减少换药次数,减轻换药痛苦,减少瘢痕形成。是治疗聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶隆乳术后乳腺脓肿最理想方法。

The comparison betweenthe outcomes of using small cuts and continuous negative pressure drainage and the traditional incision and drainage to treat mammary abscess caused by HPG breast implants

Objective To discuss the outcomes of using small cuts and continuous negative pressure drainage to treat mammary abscess caused by HPG breast implants.Methods Small cuts and continuous negative pressure drainage were performeded in 20 cases of mammary abscess caused by HPG breast implants and the traditional incision and drainage was performeded in another 20 cases to evaluate the outcomes.Results Using small cuts and continuous negative pressure drainage to treat mammary abscess caused by HPG breast implants has obvious advantages over the group of using incision and drainage in healing time,the frequency of changing dressings,the degree of pain and the bigrosmall of scar.Conclusion Using small cuts and continuous negative pressure drainage can obviously shorten the healing time,reduce the the frequency of changing dressings,reduce patients pain and reduce scar formation.It is the idealest way to treat mammary abscess caused by HPG breast implants.