Accuracy of the Master's exercise test in detecting significant coronary artery disease

To assess the significance and accuracy of noninvasive tests in detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD; greater than 50% stenosis), the Master's exercise test, treadmill exercise test and dipyridamole-loading myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were performed and their results were compared with coronary angiographic findings in 60 patients with angina but without myocardial infarction. Among these, 27 patients had significant CAD. The Master's test performed in outpatient clinics had an 85% sensitivity and a 76% specificity in detecting significant CAD, when the degree of ST depression was equal to or exceeded 1 mm. The sensitivity further improved to 96% by adding chest pain to the criteria; then all patients with multivessel disease or critical ischemia were identified by the Master's test. Treadmill tests performed after admission had a 78% sensitivity and a 67% specificity. When the severity of ischemia was judged either by exercise capacity or the degree of ST depression or the coronary T wave, the treadmill test was superior to the Master's test. Although patients without significant CAD had longer exercise capacity and the higher maximum heart rate in the treadmill test than did those in the Master's test, these trends were similar but less marked in patients with significant CAD. Dipyridamole-loading myocardial perfusion scintigraphy showed an excellent sensitivity and specificity; 96% and 94%, respectively, in detecting significant CAD. It was particularly useful in distinguishing false positive exercise results due to left ventricular hypertrophy and coronary spasm and that in women, from true positive results. In conclusion, the Master's test is a simple and useful method for screening CAD in community hospitals and in outpatient clinics.