In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the failure and fracture resistance of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures (FPDs) under the influence of different surface treatments and adjustment procedures.MethodsSeven groups (n = 8/group) of three-unit zirconia-based FPDs were fabricated in anatomic design (AD) or anatomically reduced design (ARD) and surfaces were prepared according to clinical relevance: #1: AD – sintered; #2: AD – sintered – glazed; #3: AD – sintered – sandblasted – glazed; #4: AD – sintered – polished – grinded (contact points adjusted); #5: AD – sintered – polished – grinded – repolished; #6: ARD – sintered – veneered; #7: control: analogous to #3 but without thermal cycling (TC) and mechanical loading (ML). FPDs were adhesively bonded to polymethylmethacrylate abutment teeth. TCML (TC: 6000 × 5°/55°; ML: 1.2 × 10⁶ × 50 N, 1.6 Hz) was conducted in a chewing simulator with steatite spheres as antagonists. Failures were monitored and fracture resistance was determined after ageing. Data were analysed statistically with Mann–Whitney U-test (Kolmogorov–Smirnov-test; α = 0.05). FPDs were subjected to scanning electron microscopy for fractographic failure analysis.ResultsNone of the FPDs failed during TCML, but showed wear at contact points. Median fracture force ranged between 1173.5 N (#4) and 1316.0 N (#3) without significant (p = 0.910) differences between the groups or in comparison to the control (p > 0.462).ConclusionsZirconia restorations showed high resistance to failures and fracture under different surface treatment variations. Full-contour polished or glazed zirconia FPDs might be an alternative to common veneered restorations.