| Abstract: | During 1977-80 the annual number of surgical procedures on the spinal canal and discs has remained in the vicinity of 1800–1900 and fusions have ranged from 682 to 810. Neurosurgical participation in spinal surgery amounted to 18–20% of all spinal procedures. Disc lesion, canal stenosis, spondylosis, congenital and developmental malformations constituted 70% of the total spinal work carried out in a major neurosurgical unit in New South Wales. The above conditions form an ‘overlapping’ field of surgery, the orthopaedic surgeons treating an estimated 80% of these patients. Surgical management by neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeons of the same clinical category of spinal patient is different. An estimated one-third of orthopaedic patients are submitted to lumbar fusion. Neurosurgeons avoid fusion in the lumbar region. The need for integrated and sound neurosurgical and orthopaedic methods of management in the overlapping fields of spinal surgery has become imperative. To the neurosurgeon, the outcome of spinal surgery in terms of relevance to the extent of chronic spinal disability in the community has probably become more important than the outcome of craniocerebral surgery in the community. More attention should be given to standards of work in spinal surgery in matters of training, research and quality assurance. A research project by members of the Department of Neurosurgery, The Prince Henry and Prince of Wales Hospitals is outlined. the project is aimed at: (1) summarizing the experience of six neurosurgeons in spinal surgery in terms of results of treatment, indications, timing and surgical techniques; (2) evaluation of the effectiveness of neurological surgery in reduction of permanent disability of spinal causes; (3) definition of the role of neurosurgical techniques and management in overlapping fields of surgery. Participation of neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeons in the project is invited. |
