| 股动脉穿刺术后三种止血方法的效果比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石娟,余琴.股动脉穿刺术后三种止血方法的效果比较[J].泸州医学院学报,2010,33(1):77-78. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石娟 余琴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 泸州医学院附属医院心内科,四川泸州,646000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：对股动脉穿刺术后三种止血的方法进行效果比较，探讨怎样减少外周血管出血并发症的发生。方法：收集156例股动脉穿刺术后病例的资料，其中，48例采用Angiolink^TM血管缝合器止血，50例采用普通绷带止血，58例采用Coban^TM自粘式绷带止血。对三种方法的效果进行比较。结果：Angiolink^TM血管缝合器止血组，外周血管出血并发症的发生率为2．1％，低于采用Coban^TM自粘式绷带止血组（2．1％vs9．0％，P〈0．05）和普通绷带止血组（2．1％vs24％，P〈0．01）。Coban^TM自粘式绷带止血组比普通绷带止血组明显降低，外周围血管出血并发症率（9．0％vs24％，P〈0．05）。结：Angiolink^TM血管缝合器用于股动脉穿刺术后止血，能明显的减少外周血管并发症的发生，但对那些无力支付昂贵血管缝合器的患者，选用Coban^TM自粘式绷带止血，也是一个好的替代方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 股动脉穿刺术 止血方法 比较 |
THE COMPARISON OF THREE KINDS OF HEMOSTASIS FOR FEMORAL ARTERY PUNCTURE PROCEDURE |
| |
| Shi Juan,et al.THE COMPARISON OF THREE KINDS OF HEMOSTASIS FOR FEMORAL ARTERY PUNCTURE PROCEDURE[J].Journal of Luzhou Medical College,2010,33(1):77-78. |
| |
| Authors: | Shi Juan |
| |
| Institution: | Shi Juan,et al Department of Cardiology,the Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective:To explore the hemostasis method for decreasing peripheral vascular bleeding compli-cations after femoral artery puncture procedure. Methods:156 patients accepted cornary artary invasive procedure via femord artery punture were enrolled,including AngiolinkTM vascular closure device hemostasis group 48 cases,CobonTM cohesive and elastic restraining bandage hemostasis group 58 cases and common bandage hemostasis group 50 cases. The difference of peripheral vascular bleeding complications was observe... |
| |
| Keywords: | Femoral artery puncture Hemostasis method Comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
