| Google Scholar、Scirus及PubMed检索功能对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 侯跃芳,赵玉虹,龚黛琛.Google Scholar、Scirus及PubMed检索功能对比研究[J].医学信息学杂志,2009,30(7):12-16. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 侯跃芳 赵玉虹 龚黛琛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国医科大学信息管理与信息系统(医学)系,沈阳,110001
2. 厦门市解放军第174医院信息科,厦门,361003 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对比权威数据库PubMed及权威学术搜索工具Google Scholar、Scirus的检索功能,主要比较检索方法、检索结果、结果输出格式等方面的功能,利用10个题目的检索试验比较检索效果,并分析3种工具的各自特点.Google Scholar的收录范围最广;PubMed检索功能优于其它两种工具;在输出结果的格式方面,3种检索工具各具特色.
|
| 关 键 词： | 检索功能 比较研究 |
Comparative Research on Retrieval Function of Google Scholar, Scirus and PubMed |
| |
| Hou Yue-fang,Zhao Yu-hong,Gong Dai-chen.Comparative Research on Retrieval Function of Google Scholar, Scirus and PubMed[J].Journal of Medical Informatics,2009,30(7):12-16. |
| |
| Authors: | Hou Yue-fang Zhao Yu-hong Gong Dai-chen |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper gives a comparative analysis of retrieval function among PubMed, Google Scholar and Scims mainly form the following aspects: retrieval methods, retrieval results and output formats. Effects of retrieval are compared through 10 retrieval tests, and respective characteristics of three retrieval tools are analyzed. Google Scholar has the largest scope;PubMed has better retrieval function than the other two;in the aspect of result output, three retrieval tools have their own characteristics. |
| |
| Keywords: | Coogle Scholar Scirus PubMed Google Scholar Scims PubMed Search Function Comparative Study |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《医学信息学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《医学信息学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
