Correction of myopic astigmatism by combined treatment with PRK and T-incision and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

Background: In contrast to the correction of simple myopia there is no widely accepted technique for the correction of myopic astigmatism. Currently two techniques are available: the photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) and the combination of arcuate keratotomies with standard PRK (PRK-T). Methods: In two groups, 67 patients underwent a correction of myopic astigmatism in a total of 87 eyes (19 by PRK-T and 68 by PARK), and were followed for 1 year. The spherical equivalent was − 6.7 D in both groups and the refractive astigmatism ranged from − 1.0 to − 6.5 D. The PARK procedure was performed by means of an elliptic ablation (Kertom I, Schwind) with a 5.8 × 8.1 mm zone. The PRK-T technique consisted of two arcuate keratotomies with a free optical zone of 7 mm and a standard myopic PRK at least 6 weeks later. Results: The 1 year follow-up was completed in 57 out of 87 eyes included in the study. At 1 year post-operation, 83 % of the PRK-T group and 80 % of the PARK group had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The refractive astigmatism was reduced by 76 % in the PRK-T group and by 67 % in the PARK group. The spherical equivalent was − 0.59 ± 1.1 D at 1 year after PRK-T and − 0.28 ± 1.04 D after PARK. In three eyes of the PARK group (6.7 %) a visual loss of more than one Snellen line occured. Two of these eyes had a preoperative myopia of more than − 6 diopters. Conclusion: Both techniques have the potential to reduce myopic astigmatism, however, the success rate is not as high compared to spherical PRK. Also, the complication rate of 2.5 % in corrections to − 6 D is significantly higher than that with spherical myopic PRK.