首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Impact and effectiveness of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease among children under 5 years of age in the Netherlands
Authors:L Peckeu  A van der Ende  HE de Melker  EAM Sanders  MJ Knol
Institution:1. European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden;2. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands;3. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention and the Netherlands Reference Laboratory of Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Abstract:BackgroundIn 2011, the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was replaced by the 10-valent vaccine (PCV10) in the Netherlands. We report on impact and effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children aged under 5 years by switching from PCV7 to PCV10.MethodWe included IPD cases between 2004 and 2019 in children aged < 5 years reported via the national surveillance system. To assess the impact of the PCV10 vaccination program we compared IPD incidence 6-8 years after PCV10 introduction (2017–2019) to the two years just before the switch to PCV10 (2009–2011). We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) using the indirect cohort method, comparing vaccination status (at least two vaccine doses) in IPD-cases caused by PCV10 serotypes (cases) to non-PCV10 IPD cases (controls), in children eligible for PCV10.ResultsThe overall incidence decreased from 8.7 (n = 162) in 2009–2011 to 7.3 per 100.000 (n = 127) in 2017–2019 (Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.83, 95%CI: 0.66; 1.05). IPD caused by the additional serotypes included in PCV10 declined by 93% (IRR 0.07, 95%CI: 0.02; 0.23). Incidence of non-PCV10 IPD showed a non-significant increase (IRR 1.25, 95%CI: 0.96; 1.63). Among 231 IPD-cases eligible for PCV10, the overall VE was 91% (95%CI: 67; 97) and did not differ by sex or age at diagnosis. Effectiveness against non-PCV10 serotype 19A IPD was non-significant with an estimate of 28% (95%CI:-179; 81).ConclusionPCV10 is highly effective in protecting against IPD in Dutch children under 5 years with limited serotype replacement after switching from PCV7 to PCV10. We found no evidence for significant cross-protection of PCV10 against 19A serotype IPD.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号