微创腔镜辅助下甲状腺切除术

目的 探讨微创腔镜辅助下甲状腺切除术与传统开放甲状腺切除术在治疗效果方面的差异.方法 搜集自2008年8月至2010年8月年我院开展的腔镜辅助下甲状腺切除术与同期传统开放甲状腺切除术共计210例,其中腔镜辅助组98例,传统手术组112例.结果 腔镜辅助组切口长度(2.2±0.4) cm、术中出血量(13±7) ml、术后第1天引流量(19±10) ml、手术时间(105±43) min.传统手术组切口长度(5.60±1.0) cm、术中出血量(39±13) ml、术后第1天引流量(51±9) ml、手术时间(60±10) min.两组喉返神经麻痹各1例,无术后出血.结论 对于特定的甲状腺结节患者,腔镜辅助下甲状腺切除术是安全有效的.由于美容效果好、患者术后康复快,是甲状腺外科手术的发展方向.Abstract：Objective To compare the outcome of two groups between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy(MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy. Methods Two hundred and ten patients were enrolled in the study dated from August 2008 to August 2010, 98 patients treated with MIVAT and 112 patients treated with conventional thyroidectomy. Results Patients underwent MIVAT had a mean incision length of (2.2±0.4) cm, compared with (5.6±1.0) cm for conventional thyroidectomy. The mean surgical time for MIVAT was (105±43) minutes, and for conventional thyroidectomy was (60±10) minutes. The mean drainage of the first day after surgery was (19±10) ml in MIVAT group, and the other group was (51±9) ml. The mean intraoperative blood loss was lower in MIVAT group [(13±7) ml] than that in the conventional thyroidectomy group[(39±13) ml]. There was no difference in vocal cord paralysis or postoperative hematoma. Conclusions MIVAT is safe in selected thyroid nodule patients, and has been a new trend for thyroidectomy because of its cosmetic result and quickly recovering.

Minimally invasive and video-assisted thyroidectomy