缺血及二氮嗪预适应对大鼠缺血再灌注心肌的保护作用

目的 探讨缺血及二氮嗪预适应对大鼠缺血再灌注心肌的保护作用及机制.方法 Wistar大鼠30只,建立离体心脏灌注模型,分成3组,每组10只:(1)缺血再灌注组(I/R组):心脏平衡灌流30 min后,缺血30 min,再灌注1 h.(2)缺血预适应组(IPC组):心脏平衡灌流10 min,经2次缺血再灌注.(3)二氮嗪预适应组(DPC组):心脏平衡灌流10 min,给予2次含二氮嗪(100μmol/l)的K-H液灌注5 min再复灌不含二氮嗪的K-H液,缺血30 min,再灌注1 h.各组取心尖肌做冰冻切片行过氧化物酶体增生激活受体γ协同刺激因子1α(PGC-1α)免疫组织化学染色,电镜标本对心肌线粒体行Flameng评分.结果 IPC组、DPC组PGC-lα表达明显增高,与I/R组比较差异有统计学意义,但IPC及DPC两组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).Flameng评分:IPC组(0.44±0.13)、DPC组(0.47±0.10)、I/R组(1.78±0.14);IPC及DPC两组与I/R组比较差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.01).结论 缺血及二氮嗪预适应对心肌线粒体有保护作用,这一作用可能与PGC-1α激活及高表达有关.

Protective effect of ischemia and diazoxide preconditioning on postischemic reperfused myocardium and possible mechanism thereof

OBJECTIVE: To study the protective mechanism of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and diazoxide preconditioning (DPC) against myocardium ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. METHODS: The hearts were taken out from 30 male Wistar rats and were divided randomly into 3 equal groups: I/R group undergoing 30-min equilibration perfusion and 30-min ischemia and then 60-min reperfusion, IPC group undergoing 10-min equilibration perfusion and then two cycles of 5 min ischemia interspersed with 5 min reperfusion prior to 30 min ischemia and a 60-min reperfusion, and DPC group undergoing 10-min equilibration perfusion and 2 cycles of 5 min of 100 microM diazoxide perfusion followed by 5-min drug-free period before the 30 min ischemia and 60-min reperfusion. Frozen sections of myocardium at the cardiac apex were made and immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha). Ultrathin sections 70 nm thick were made and transmission electron microscopy was used to detect the structure of the mitochondria with the Flameng scoring system. RESULTS: The PGC-1alpha expression of the IPC and DPC groups were significantly higher than that of the I/R group (P<0.01 and P<0.05), however, there was no significant difference in PGC-1alpha is expression between the IPC and DPC groups (P >0.05). The Flameng scores of the IPC and DPC groups were 0.44 +/- 0.13 and 0.47 +/- 0.10 respectively, both significantly higher than that of the I/R group (1.78 +/- 0.14, both P <0.01), however, there was no significant difference between IPC and DPC groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: IPC and DPC can protect myocyte mitochondria from the injury of ischemia/ reperfusion. The cardioprotective effects of IPC and DPC may be concerned with the activation and high expression of PGC-1alpha.