首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

2019年度安徽省三级中医院和其他三级综合医院超声质量控制调查比较
引用本文:王佳佳,王金萍,姜凡,李保启. 2019年度安徽省三级中医院和其他三级综合医院超声质量控制调查比较[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(7): 643-646. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.07.005
作者姓名:王佳佳  王金萍  姜凡  李保启
作者单位:1. 230031 合肥,安徽中医药大学第一附属医院超声科2. 230031 合肥,安徽中医药大学第一附属医院超声科;230601 合肥,安徽省超声医学质量控制中心3. 230601 合肥,安徽省超声医学质量控制中心;230601 合肥,安徽医科大学第二附属医院超声科
摘    要:目的调查分析安徽省三级中医院超声质量控制工作的现状和可能存在的问题。 方法安徽省超声医学质量控制中心下发2019年超声质量控制调查表,调查对象为安徽省10家公立三级中医院和38家三级综合医院,调查内容包括《超声医学专业质量管理控制指标专家共识(2018年版)》提出的7个超声质量控制指标以及各调查医院超声亚专业学组开设情况。 结果安徽省三级中医院超声科平均每日超声检查人次、年度危急值通报例数明显少于同级别综合医院(210.9人次/d vs 482.5人次/d;12例 vs 44例)。超声科亚专业学组开展方面,中医院与综合医院之间在超声介入学组、肌肉骨骼学组的开展方面相比(30.0% vs 89.4%;10.0% vs 63.2%),存在一定不足。 结论安徽省三级中医院在超声亚专业开展以及超声新技术开展方面与同级别综合性医院间存在较大差距。充分开展超声新技术,加强中医院校的超声医学教育,在缩小中医院、综合医院超声质量控制差距中有一定作用。

关 键 词:超声医学  质量控制  医学教育  超声医师  
收稿时间:2020-05-01

Comparison of ultrasound quality control between tertiary hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine and other tertiary general hospitals in Anhui Province,China in 2019
Jiajia Wang,Jinping Wang,Fan Jiang,Baoqi Li. Comparison of ultrasound quality control between tertiary hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine and other tertiary general hospitals in Anhui Province,China in 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound, 2021, 18(7): 643-646. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.07.005
Authors:Jiajia Wang  Jinping Wang  Fan Jiang  Baoqi Li
Affiliation:1. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China2. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China; Anhui Ultrasound Medical Quality Control Center, Hefei 230601, China3. Anhui Ultrasound Medical Quality Control Center, Hefei 230601, China; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medicine University, Hefei 230601, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate and analyze the present situation and possible problems of ultrasonic quality control in tertiary hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in Anhui Province, China. MethodsAnhui Ultrasonic Medical Quality Control Center issued the 2019 quality questionnaire to 48 public tertiary hospitals in Anhui Province, China, including 10 TCM hospitals and 38 general hospitals. Seven ultrasonic quality control indicators from the 2018 Ultrasonic Medical Professional Quality Management Control Target Expert Consensus, and the development of ultrasonic subgroups in the hospital were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe average numbers of daily ultrasound examinations and annual critical value report cases in TCM hospitals were less than those in the same level general hospitals (210.9 person-time/day vs 482.5 person-time/day; 12 cases vs 44 cases). In terms of the development of ultrasonic subgroups including interventional ultrasound subgroup and musculoskeletal subgroup, there was also a significant difference between TCM hospitals and general hospitals (30.0% vs 89.4%; 10.0% vs 63.2%). ConclusionThere is a difference in the development of ultrasonic subgroups groups and ultrasound new technology between TCM hospitals and general hospitals in Anhui Province, China. Developing suitable new ultrasound technology and improving the ultrasound medical education in TCM universities may promote the improvement of ultrasound quality control in TCM hospitals.
Keywords:Ultrasonic medicine  Quality control  Medical education  Ultrasound doctor  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号