首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

心脏黏液瘤多模态成像特点及诊断模式
引用本文:林静茹,孙洋,李晓宁,陶瑾,王海苹,刘梦怡,王建德,权欣,李晓妮,朱振辉,王浩,吴伟春.心脏黏液瘤多模态成像特点及诊断模式[J].中华医学超声杂志,2021,18(5):472-481.
作者姓名:林静茹  孙洋  李晓宁  陶瑾  王海苹  刘梦怡  王建德  权欣  李晓妮  朱振辉  王浩  吴伟春
作者单位:1. 100037 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外医院超声影像中心2. 100037 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外医院实验诊断中心病理科3. 100037 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外医院放射影像科4. 253000 山东德州,德州市人民医院超声科
基金项目:中国医学科学院心血管重点实验室建设项目(2019PT310025); 北京市科学技术委员会首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广(Z171100001017213)
摘    要:目的 探究心脏黏液瘤(CM)多模态成像特点及其多模态诊断模式.方法 回顾性研究2016年7月至2019年8月在阜外医院行二维经胸超声心动图检查初诊为CM的178例患者,以病理结果为金标准,将研究对象分为CM组和非CM组,根据超声心动图特点将CM组划分为典型CM组和非典型CM组.分析归纳各组患者的临床特征,二维经胸超声心...

关 键 词:心脏黏液瘤  超声心动图  多层螺旋计算机断层摄影术  心脏磁共振成像  多模态成像
收稿时间:2020-02-25

Multimodality imaging for diagnosis of cardiac myxoma
Jingru Lin,Yang Sun,Xiaoning Li,Jin Tao,Haiping Wang,Mengyi Liu,Jiande Wang,Xin Quan,Xiaoni Li,Zhenhui Zhu,Hao Wang,Weichun Wu.Multimodality imaging for diagnosis of cardiac myxoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound,2021,18(5):472-481.
Authors:Jingru Lin  Yang Sun  Xiaoning Li  Jin Tao  Haiping Wang  Mengyi Liu  Jiande Wang  Xin Quan  Xiaoni Li  Zhenhui Zhu  Hao Wang  Weichun Wu
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the multimodality imaging features of cardiac myxoma (CM) and explore the multimodality diagnosis model of CM. MethodsOne hundred and seventy-eight patients who were initially screened for CM by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at Fuwai Hospital from July 2016 to August 2019 were retrospectively included in our study. Using pathological results as the gold standard, the subjects were divided into either a CM group or a non-CM group.The CM group was further divided into a typical CM subgroup and an atypical CM subgroup according to the characteristics of echocardiography. The clinical characteristics and the imaging features of echocardiography, multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) were compared between groups by t-test, chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test. ResultsOf the 178 patients with an initial diagnosis of CM, 160 (89.9%) underwent surgical treatment and pathological examination (89.9%); 150 patients were diagnosed with CM, 1 with low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, 1 with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, 1 with angiosarcoma, 2 with hemangioma, 2 with lipoma, and 3 with thrombosis. The diagnostic accuracies of echocardiography, MSCT, and CMR were 93.8 %, 96.3%, and 100%, respectively. The proportions of patients with hypertension and atrial fibrillation in the typical CM subgroup were significantly lower than those of the atypical CM subgroup (25.4% vs 53.1%, χ2=8.978, P=0.003; 2.5% vs 18.8%; χ2=9.027, P=0.003); the left atrial anteroposterior diameter and the early diastolic peak flow velocity of the mitral valve were significantly higher in the typical CM subgroup than in the atypical CM subgroup (39.21±6.34) mm vs (35.92±5.72) mm, t=2.357, P=0.020; (1.59±1.67) m/s vs (0.90±0.25) m/s; t=2.040; P=0.043]. The average long diameter of atypical CM was significantly smaller than that of typical CM (34.81±17.43) mm vs (45.99±16.73) mm; t=3.324, P=0.001], and the width of tumor pedicle or base was significantly larger than that of typical CM (13.02±7.28) mm vs (9.97±4.73) mm; t=-2.506, P=0.014]. The distribution, attachment site, morphology, mobility, presence of tumor pedicle, and presence of atrioventricular valve orifice obstruction in atypical CM were significantly different from those in typical CM (P<0.05 for all). Low-attenuation was the main MSCT feature of atypical CM, and the proportion of patients with medium or mixed attenuation and enhancement was higher than that of typical CM, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The signal intensity of atypical CM on T1 and T2 weighted images was similar to that of typical CM (both P>0.05). The average long diameter of the non-CM masses was smaller than that of typical CM, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The average short diameter was similar to the typical CM, and the width of the tumor pedicle or base was significantly larger than that of the typical CM (13.35±6.80) mm vs (9.97±4.73) mm; t=-2.026, P=0.046]. The distribution, attachment site, morphology, presence of tumor pedicle, and mobility of non-CM masses were significantly different from those of typical CM (P<0.05 for all). Based on the above analysis, the echocardiographic characteristics of non-CM masses were similar to those of atypical CM. The main MSCT feature of non-CM masses was mixed attenuation, which was different from that of typical CM (P<0.05). The non-CM masses were iso-hyperintense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and showed enhancement at about one-half of cases on first-pass perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement imaging, which did not show significant difference from those of typical CM (P>0.05 for all). ConclusionBased on the multimodality imaging features of CM, echocardiography should be used to discriminate typical CM from atypical CM and further cardiac CT and CMR are used to distinguish between malignant and benign tumors and to assess histological types of cardiac masses considered as atypical CM, which can improve the diagnostic efficiency of CM, reduce the misdiagnosis rate, and contribute to preoperative planning.
Keywords:Cardiac myxoma  Echocardiography  Multi-slice computed tomography  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging  Multimodality imaging  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号