首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基底节区高血压脑出血二种微创术式对比分析
引用本文:周连发,徐荣林,何镔,李加松,李明生.基底节区高血压脑出血二种微创术式对比分析[J].浙江临床医学,2011,13(6):627-629.
作者姓名:周连发  徐荣林  何镔  李加松  李明生
作者单位:安徽省天长市中医院神经外科,239300
摘    要:目的 比较锁孔血肿清除术与锥颅碎吸术二种微创术式治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效.方法 回顾性分析本科收治的49例基底节区高血压脑出血患者的现病史、手术时间、术后并发症、术后拔管时间及预后.结果 与锥颅碎吸术相比,锁孔血肿清除术能够提前拔管时间,降低术后并发症,改善预后.结论 对于基底节区高血压脑出血,锁孔血肿清除术是一种有效术式.

关 键 词:高血压脑出血  锁孔血肿清除术  锥颅碎吸术

Comparison study on the operations of hematoma puncture and key-hole craniotomy evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage
Institution:Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
Abstract:Objective To compare hematoma puncture and key - hole craniotomy evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted for comparing the impact of two surgical methods mentioned above on postoperative complications, extubation time and outcome. Result Compared with hematoma puncture, key - hole craniotomy evacuation can induce little postoperative complications and shorter extubation time with better outcome. Conclusion Key - hole eraniotomy evacuation is a better surgical method for hypertensive basal gattglia hemorrhage.
Keywords:Hypertensive basal  ganglia hemorrhage  Key -hole craniotomy evacuation  Hematoma puncture
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号