| 三种梅毒检测方法的应用评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周秀萍,杨长顺,刘志杰,李争鸣.三种梅毒检测方法的应用评价[J].检验医学与临床,2010,7(17):1851-1851,1877. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周秀萍 杨长顺 刘志杰 李争鸣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 湖南省怀化医学高等专科学校,418000
2. 湖南省怀化市第一人民医院,418000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)、酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)三种方法对梅毒的诊断价值。方法分别采用RPR、TP-ELISA、TPPA三种方法对228例梅毒患者血清进行检测。结果 RPR法的灵敏度为73.0%,ELISA法为97.4%、TPPA为99.7%。RPR法与TP-ELISA法检测结果相比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),RPR法与TPPA法检测结果相比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),而ELISA与TPPA法检测结果相比较差异无统计学意义。结论梅毒检测方法各有优缺点,临床应根据检验目的的不同合理选用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 梅毒 酶联免疫吸附试验 快速血浆反应素试验 梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验 |
Evaluation of three methods for the detection of syphilis |
| |
| ZHOU Xiu-ping,YANG Chang-shun,LIU Zhi-jie,LI Zhen-min.Evaluation of three methods for the detection of syphilis[J].Laboratory Medicine and Clinic,2010,7(17):1851-1851,1877. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Xiu-ping YANG Chang-shun LIU Zhi-jie LI Zhen-min |
| |
| Institution: | ZHOU Xiu-ping,YANG Chang-shun,LIU Zhi-jie,LI Zhen-min(1.Huaihua Medical College,Hunan 418000,China;2.First People′s Hospital of Huaihua,Hunan 418000,China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To explore the value of rapid plasma reagin test （RPR）,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA） and treponema pallidum particle assay（TPPA）in the diagnosis of syphilis.Methods The serums of 228 syphilitic cases were detected by RPR,ELISA and TPPA.Results The sensitivity was 73.0 % for RPR,97.4% for ELISA,and 99.7 % for TPPA.The detection result of RPR had a significant difference compared with the detection results of ELISA and TPPA,while there was no significant difference between ELISA and TPPA.Conclusion Because each method of syphilic detection has merits and demerits,the selection of methed should be on the basis of check purpose. |
| |
| Keywords: | syphilis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay rapid plasma reagin test treponema pallidum particle assay |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
