2006—2011年《中华预防医学杂志》论文作者分析

目的探讨《中华预防医学杂志》载文作者、机构、地区分布情况，旨在进一步了解和认识我国预防医学研究领域的现状及问题。方法利用中国生物医学期刊引文数据库，用文献计量学方法，对该刊2006—2011年论文作者发文量、合作情况、地区分布、系统分布、核心作者、高产单位等进行统计分析。结果《中华预防医学杂志））2006—2011年发表论文1544篇，其中作者合作论文1400篇，合作率90．670／0，合作度5．11；发表1篇论文的作者1140人（87．29％）；核心作者166人（12．71％），发表论文404篇（26．17％）。高产单位15个，发文608篇（39．38％）；位居前3位的是中国疾病预防控制中心、北京大学医学部和复旦大学医学部，疾病预防控制中心发文630篇（40．80％），高等院校发文495（32．06％），高等院校附属医院发文188篇（12．18％）。北京、浙江和上海地区的作者发表论文分别为510篇（33．03％）、142篇（9．20％）和138篇（8．94％），位居前3位。结论《中华预防医学杂志》影响力有了较大增长，合作率高，新一代实力雄厚对刊物影响较大的核心作者群已经形成，但核心作者数量及所发表的论文数还有待提高。

Authors of Articles Published in Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006 - 2011

Objective To investigate the distributions of authors, institutions and regions of Chinese Joumal of Preventive Medicine （ CJPM）, and to understand the current situation in the research field of preventive medi- cine. Methods The authors, the co - authors and the core authors of papers published in CJPM during 2006 to 2011 were quantitatively analyzed with literature searched from Chinese Medical Citation Index. The distribu- tion of institutions, regions and highly quantitative organizations were further analyzed. Results Totally 1544 papers were published on CJPM within the 6 years and 1400 papers of one or more co -authors, with the coop- erative rate and degree of cooperation respectively 90. 67% and 5. 11. Totally 1140 authors （87.29% of the total first authors） published only one paper on the journal. There were 404 （26. 17% ） papers published by 166 （ 12. 71% ） core authors and 608 （39.38%） papers by 15 high - productivity institutes. The top three /4 high - productivity institutes were successively Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing Uni- versity Medical School and Fudan University Medical School. The number of papers from CDCs, universities and affiliated hospitals were 630 （40. 80% ）, 495 （32. 06% ） and 188 （ 12. 18% ）, respectively. As for the distribution of provinces, Beijing was the first of rank with 510 （33.03%） papers, Zhejiang with 142 （9.20%） papers as the second and the third, Shang- hai with 138 （8.94%） papers. Conclusions The in-fluence of the CJPM has been greatly increased and it presents a high author cooperative rate. A group of active and talented core authors are emerging; nevertheless, the number of core authors and the papers published by core authors is to be increased.