闭合复位与外固定支架治疗桡骨骨折的疗效对比

目的对比分析闭合复位石膏外固定与外固定支架治疗桡骨骨折的临床疗效。方法选取2009年6月～2011年3月来本院就诊治疗的80例桡骨骨折患者,随机分为两组,对照组40例患者采用闭合复位石膏外固定治疗,治疗组40例患者采用外固定支架治疗。根据Lidstrom评判标准及骨折复位评判标准比较两组患者治疗后的功能恢复情况及复位情况。结果对照组患者复位评判优良率为45.0%,功能评判优良率为47.5%;治疗组患者复位评判优良率为95.0%,功能评判优良率为92.5%,P〈0.05。结论外固定支架治疗桡骨骨折较闭合复位石膏外固定疗效显著,而且外固定支架操作简便,创伤较小,是一种较为理想的治疗桡骨骨折方案。

Curative effect contrast of closed reduction and external fixator in the treatment of radial fractures

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of closed reduction treatment and external fixator in the treatment of radial fractures.Methods Eighty radial fractures cases were chosen in our hospital from June 2009 to March 2011,they randomly divided into two groups,40 patients of control group treated with closed reduction and plaster external fixation treatment,40 cases of treatment group were treated with external fixation stents.According to Lidstrom score and fractures score standards,functional recovery and reset were compared between the two groups after treatment.Results Excellent rate of reset score of control group was 45.0%,good function score rate was 47.5%;excellent rate of reset score of treat ment group was 95.0%,excellent function score rate was 92.5%,P < 0.05.Conclusion The external fixation of radial fractures compared with closed reduction and plaster external fixation effect is significant,and the external fixator is easy to operate,less invasive,it is an ideal treatment of radial fractures.